User:Mojoworker
|
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
At some point I may actually add some narrative to my userpage.
Awards
[edit]| wise cleanup Thank you for quality articles on military history such as Battle of Pocotaligo, gnomish work on articles and fighting subtle vandalism, for illustrating "wise old thing" (with a ring to it), for working on cleanup in the tavern, - you are an awesome Wikipedian! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
The Guidance Barnstar | |
| Dear Mojoworker, thanks for your kind words on my talk page, including your good faith and advice to make me a better Wikipedia editor. I wish the best to you and yours, AnupamTalk 16:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
The Civility Barnstar |
| yes Bondboy9756 (talk) 23:56, 15 June 2018 (UTC) |
|
The Original Barnstar |
| thank you for turning the citations into same numbers, but how did you do that? Bondboy9756 (talk) 02:10, 16 June 2018 (UTC) |
|
The Citation Barnstar |
| Thanks for actually showing me how to cite my sources! NumbnessOfDestruction (talk) 10:51, 18 June 2018 (UTC) |
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
| Absolutely inspired :D ——SerialNumber54129 11:57, 18 April 2019 (UTC) |
Subpages
[edit]
No RfXs since 17:28, 3 November 2025 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online |
|
1.67 RPM according to DeadbeefBot 09:52, 24 November 2025 (UTC) change |
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- ~2025-35755-97 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Rosalinda (Mexican TV series) was changed by ~2025-35755-97 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877378 on 2025-11-24T05:37:07+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 05:37, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-35616-04 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 189 five times in the last 5 minutes (BLP vandalism or libel, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:53, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-35991-14 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:53, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- ~2025-35991-54 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Moscovium (diff): account is being used only for promotional purposes. Account keeps adding info only to cite themself, it seems. RFZYNSPY talk 05:12, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- NBCFourNewsTeamFan2025 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On WUVP-DT (diff): Persistent addition of unsourced content; possible sockpuppet? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 06:40, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- Harshtrivedi0001 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – User has been unconstructively editing Ekdil. When I tried to advise them on how to edit better, they instead chose to vandalize my userpage. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 07:03, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. @Zackmann08: This is better suited for ANI. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:02, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Daniel Quinlan: I will happily file an ANI but I feel that the edit I linked to above shows CLEAR vandalism of my userpage... --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 08:04, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-35941-51 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Weird talk page spam. Sugar Tax (talk) 08:46, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-32118-99 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after recent release of block; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Not here. Meters (talk) 09:22, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-35972-27 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Not a forum after final warning (given to same IP as another TA, ~2025-34297-75 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)). Meters (talk) 09:57, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- Ballu Lohar Official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- ExternalRevengeRoad (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Yourdigitaldost Food & lifestyle Bloger (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Quick throwaway account (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Crcbot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- AlvinJoelTech (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See the draft they created. Chess enjoyer (talk) 05:17, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- Saqafa Golden Thread Mediation (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See the edit summary of the creation of their userpage. Chess enjoyer (talk) 09:35, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- Inese Official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Implies a shared account. Chess enjoyer (talk) 09:38, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- SotaTek JSC (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See their sandbox, which probably needs to be G11ed. Chess enjoyer (talk) 09:53, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- Manderly Group (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See their sandbox, which probably needs to be G11ed. Chess enjoyer (talk) 09:56, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- Chinapcba (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See their sandbox, which probably needs to be G11ed. Chess enjoyer (talk) 09:59, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- Sharjah Entrepreneurship Center (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. UpTheOctave! • 8va? 10:11, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Extended confirmed protection: Persistent addition of unsourced cast after extended-confirmed protection expired. Media Mender (talk) 13:17, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Socks and logged-out editors repeatedly re-adding the same unsourced original research about how TikTok is "Neo-Libertarian Falangism" despite multiple requests for a citation. • a frantic turtle 🐢 14:23, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent block evasion. C F A 15:38, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Frequent vandalism from anonymous/non-participating editors due to past association with extremist entities & his informant role within said organization. Additionally, the subject is controversial within the MMA world, attracting negative attention from UFC fans. 30Four (talk) 17:46, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Theknoledgeableperson (|have a chat) 19:43, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
- Moved from WP:RPPD. Zinnober9 (talk) 21:24, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Theknoledgeableperson: Are you asking for removal of semi-protection? I don't see any vandalism. @Zinnober9: This page is semi-protected, so pending would be a reduction, no? Sdrqaz (talk) 04:54, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Sdrqaz I regularly see "Persistent vandalism" as the comment for waylaid increase requests in RPPD, usually from Twinkle placed requests, so with that history at RPPD (by anyone, not specifically Theknoledgeableperson), I automatically thought this was an increase request in the wrong place. The lack of a padlock icon was also supportive of this viewpoint. I admit I failed to look at the page history, and see now where it is quiet (filter log as well). But if it is a very quiet recent history, why the typical RPPI comment of "persistent vandalism" and not something more conducive to lowering language that doesn't automatically lead the reader to think the page needs an increase of a protection and got misplaced? I fully own the error of moving if it is indeed a decrease request, but the language of "Persistent vandalism" is at face-value, contradictory to a RPPD request in my way of thinking. Regardless, apologies for any error I caused in this potential misread. Zinnober9 (talk) 06:02, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Theknoledgeableperson: Are you asking for removal of semi-protection? I don't see any vandalism. @Zinnober9: This page is semi-protected, so pending would be a reduction, no? Sdrqaz (talk) 04:54, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Declined I'll chime in here...if it is a request to up protection: there's no disruption which would warrant it. If it is a request to downgrade it: the repeated request for edits on article talk makes me think this isn't a good idea. Lectonar (talk) 07:50, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 00:30, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 02:19, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 03:04, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing by an IP: 1, 2, 3. Anbarasan1523 (talk) 03:58, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of editing using only WP:ABOUTSELF sources form possible sock puppet accounts. Andwats (talk) 04:06, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- Just like to add this a BLP and political candidate. Andwats (talk) 05:00, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This would need to be fully protected, as almost all involved are ec-users; we aren't there yet. Fwiw, I see more or less normal editing, and disagreements about content. If you really think there are sockpuppet accounts at work, please file a SPI. Lectonar (talk) 09:28, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content, continued after protection expired. Waxworker (talk) 05:19, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism war. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 07:09, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Two temp accounts, but likely the same person. Wikishovel (talk) 07:35, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Reason: It’s getting vandalized because the article is about the Kurdish people ~2025-35960-99 (talk) 07:40, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:29, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting a request for unprotection, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.
To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the "View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words "protected", "changed protection level", or "configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.
DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...
- ...you are being prevented from editing the page. A desire to change content is not a valid reason for unprotection. Instead:
- If you can edit the article's talk page, use the WP:Edit Request Wizard to propose a change on the article's talk page. Include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterward.
- If the article's talk page is protected, you may propose a change at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is that the article has not been vandalized. That simply means the protection is working as intended.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details.
- ...you haven't contacted the protecting administrator.
You may request a protection reduction below if...
- ...you want to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection. You may add the request to this page without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
- ...you need to remove creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
- ...you are proposing a trial reduction in protection for a page that has been protected for several years, provided the proposal is supported by evidence such as talk page activity, page views, page traffic, number of watchers, frequency of edit requests, and prior history of vandalism.
- ...the protecting administrator is inactive or has not responded to you in several days.
If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Theknoledgeableperson (|have a chat) 19:43, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
- I made the right call this username is trying to lower the protection. ~2025-36016-43 (talk) 04:58, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- (Discussion present at Requests_for_page_protection/Increase#Sulaiman_Al-Fahim for which board this request goes, RPPI/D).
- Thank you temp editor. It is possible I've erred in moving this to RPPI, but the request's language is more common of a misplaced RPPI than an RPPD, and Twinkle placed requests do get mis-sent every so often. OP has been pinged for clarification at the moved request linked above. And apologies to all if I did err. Zinnober9 (talk) 06:12, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please add an edit request to the talk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here
Requests for specific edits should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page is also protected, preventing you from adding a request there.
- You may add the appropriate template (
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}) to the article's talk page if you would like to request an edit be made. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - For edit requests being made due to the editor having a conflict of interest with the article subject (see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used instead of the others listed above. - Requests to move pages that are currently move-protected should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not on this page.
- This page is not for holding discussions regarding content. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit that you wish to be performed.
Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 2 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:11, 24 November 2025 (UTC) |
| 64 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 06:23, 24 November 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| There are no outstanding requests for account creator. |
|---|
Account creator[edit] |
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Hello! I formally request the Autopatrolled user right. I'm a regular user of Wikipedia, both in Turkish and English. I have contributed to the Turkish Wikipedia, particularly on the Tao-Klarjeti region. I have also started to transfer these contributions to the English Wikipedia. I think it would be good to reduce the workload involved in reviewing the items I have written. Thank you. --ႧႤႧႰႨ ႾႠႰႨ (talk) 15:32, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
I have been editing Wikipedia since 2006, have created numerous new articles, edited countless others, and am very familiar with its policies. Λeternus (talk) 12:46, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
I've periodically patrolled Michelangelo1992's articles, and consistently found them to be in good shape. Focused on books as a topic area and very clear familiarity with WP:NBOOK. He's created 135 articles. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 22:56, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Hello, I request AutoWikiBrowser rights to generally help apply consistent templates and make efficient edits across many pages. I saw it on WP:JWB. Thank you. Bagwe Neza (talk) 09:27, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
I want to use this tool to correct grammar, fix Bare URLs, adding and improving references and apply consistent templates. I have been doing this using the standard web-based editor, which is more tedious, so this will bring productive efficiency to my work. ddas|edEn (talk) 14:49, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I would like to request access to AutoWikiBrowser (AWB) for my account User:Will229. I have been making manual edits such as fixing typos, improving references, formatting citations, and adding wikilinks to underlinked articles. I would like to use AWB to streamline these maintenance tasks, always reviewing each edit before saving. I understand and will follow all Wikipedia policies regarding the use of AWB. Thanks! Will229 (talk) 22:08, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
I am a long-time content creator, and work frequently with references and lists, which can get quite tedious at times. I would like to obtain AWB to streamline the process. ❆ AKAZA ❆ 23:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
I recently discovered this tool and it will remove a lot of the tedious, repetitive work I often do. Things like Syntax fixes, template fixes, MOS fixes, etc. Equine-man (talk) 21:39, 15 November 2025 (UTC) Equine-man (talk) 21:39, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
I request autowikibrowser rights in order to carry out large-scale edits on dozens of local constituencies in Hong Kong (which were abolished in 2023). Thank you. ~~ J. Dann 02:27, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
I would like to have access to this tool in order to make quick find-and-replace changes across multiple articles. Erisie (talk) 17:33, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting access to use JWB so that I can optimize and fix Infobox and templates. I have been using JWB with my bot account GnoeeeBot at mlwiki.- ❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 17:25, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Hi !
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
I would like to request confirmed rights to contribute more effectively to Wikipedia. My goal is to help improve existing articles, create high-quality content, and participate more actively in maintenance tasks. Obtaining confirmed status will help me edit without frequent CAPTCHA interruptions and allow me to work more efficiently. Somjeedd (talk) 17:21, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights WikiEditor451 (talk) 15:00, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator[edit] |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover[edit] |
| There are no outstanding requests for the mass message sender flag. |
|---|
Mass message sender[edit] |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
Given the articles I have created/contributed to on Wikipedia, I would like to have access to review new articles, and believe I could contribute to expanding the new articles, finding citations, fixing tone, etc. KyleSirTalksAlot (talk) 04:44, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
I would like New Page Reviewer rights to help review pages and redirects and reduce the backlog. I am familiar with Wikipedia policies. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 04:57, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia for the past years, during which I have created and edited serval articles in line with Wikipedia’s content policies and guidelines. I've been an AfC reviewer since May and have enjoyed the work. I'd like to help with new page reviewing as well. In the last year or so, I've been more interested in reviewing and editing and have participated in many AfD discussions and done various cleanup tasks in addition to the AfC reviewing. I'm committed to using the tools responsibly, Thank you for considering my request. Destinyokhiria 💬 22:57, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
I’ve already created a few articles and I often check new pages for sourcing, notability, and overall quality. I also help out in AfD discussions when I can, mostly to look at whether topics meet notability and if the sources are solid. I enjoy helping new editors fix their pages and guiding them on what needs improvement. Since I’m already active in this area, I’d like to take a more direct role in keeping the new pages feed clean and helping page creators understand the basics. Becoming a reviewer would let me contribute more effectively. Thanks for considering my request! Acrom12 (talk) 11:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Hello to the reviewer! I've noticed the large backlog and would like to help make some progress with patrolling pages, mainly redirects. I have some previous experience in the article for creation space, creating my own articles, and creating my own redirects. I try to help new incoming editors, including mentoring my current partner and teaching them how to use the features of Wikipedia. I'm capable of catching content that probably shouldn't belong on Wikipedia, but also helping new users expand draft articles. I participate in AfD, though my suggestions are often rejected; I consider this a skill that I am still learning. It's worth noting that I have never misused speedy deletion or other non-discussion deletion methods; my usage of these has been successful when I have applied them. Even still, my knowledge of AfC and redirects provides me with a good basis to use this right. Thank you, and please ask any questions you may have. aaronneallucas (talk) 05:12, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Hey! I got my trial NPR rights a month ago and really enjoyed my time so far. I am still learning the ropes, and the start wasn't easy, but I hope that I'm slowly getting there. Unfortunately, I've been quite busy due to a few real-life matters that needed my full attention and have therefore not been able to do too extensive reviewing, but I'd like to help where I can, and I've really enjoyed it during the few times when I was able to look into some articles. Thank you for considering. Squawk7700 (talk) 00:32, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I retuned Wikipedia after a little wiki-break and found NPP with a "very large" backlog and so I want to help review new pages to keep it sorted out (at least what I could). Vestrian24Bio 13:00, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
Hello all. I’d like to be a pending changes reviewer to help keep articles accurate and reliable. I’m interested in taking on more responsibility and expanding my experience and role on Wikipedia. Thank you! Erin1973 (talk) 17:58, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
I would like to become a pending changes reviewer because I think I could help quite a lot in the process of reviewing pending revision changes. I am notably experienced (450+ edits in mainspace, 1200 edits total) and do not have any COI with any article. I also think I should become a pending changes reviewer because I would really like to contribute to the community in more ways, as I am very much involved in the fight against vandalism by my efforts as a recent changes patroller. I am familiar with the policies of Wikipedia and have not had any edit wars or the sort (excluding warnings) with anyone in a considerably long time. I also do not have any biases to any pages, only adding information by collecting references from other sources. Thank you! Theeverywhereperson (talk here) 09:04, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I have done some anti-vandalism work, but feel like I could take on some more responsibility. Would it be possible to get Pending Changes Reviewing permission? Thank you in advance, for your answer! Legendbird (talk) 13:05, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights Nikunj12387 (talk) 04:13, 21 November 2025 (UTC) Reasons: I am active in Wikipedia since 2019, with 3,600 edits in 1,300 pages, created 162 articles. My work focus on improving quality, formatting, adding references, and maintaining neutrality. I have controlled changes. I would like to support the pending changes system by reviewing good-faith edits and helping maintain accuracy on semi-protected pages. |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
Reason for requesting rollback rights I have been recent-changes patroller for a long time on and off, also am a proud twinkle user. I kind of did not realise I didn't have this right, gaining the sacred right would make my counter-vandalism work much easier. Thanks for reading this :) Kajjul (talk) 16:19, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
I’ve been patrolling recent changes consistently and have handled a substantial amount of vandalism. I also pending changes reviewing rights. Gaining rollback rights would allow me to respond more quickly and effectively, especially during spikes in vandalism, and would support the work I’m already doing. Shubhsamant09 (talk) 00:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
I've been handling vandalism for quite a while now, I have a chunk more than 1000 edit's the majority of which are dealing in vandalisum(the rest of witch are other simmalar activitys). I mainly use Ultraviolet and ocasionally twinkle but would like to try to use the tools that require rollback. Pyrrhic victor (talk) 15:14, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting rollback after willingly giving up Twinkle, and more recently being suggested I request rollback. I believe Rollback would be beneficial to my patrolling of recent edits. Babysharkb☩ss2 I am Thou, Thou art I 14:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
I have been patrolling recent changes for a while. I currently use Ultraviolet when patrolling recent changes, but would like to try AntiVandal to expand my toolbox, which requires rollback. I use the standard warning templates with Ultraviolet, although I do have a set of "uw-0" style messages that I use occasionally. mdm.bla 03:21, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
I have been RC patrolling for over two months now. Clicking individual diff links to revert edits is very inefficient and unnecessary, and I believe having rollback could fix this. I've made over 200 edits to mainspace and have no history of edit warring. Seanwk :) (Talk | Contribs) 02:42, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
I often use the twinkle or redwarn rollback tool to revert vandalism or sock edits, however sometimes it does not load for me. I'm requesting access to the rollback tool as it would make things much easier. I'm familiar with when to use rollback and would be confident with this tool. Thank you. Golem08 (talk) 01:19, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor[edit]
I have been stepping up my template editing in recent months, and believe that I meet the requirements. I likely haven't made 5 significant edits to template-protected modules, but I think it's more than 0. I'll leave that up to the reviewer, though. I have contributed a number of simple templates that have become relatively standard-use in a short period of time, including {{Game-won}} and related templates, as well as {{Hockey season stats entry}} and related templates. MikeVitale 18:20, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for temporary account IP viewer |
|---|
Temporary account IP viewer[edit]
I'm active in counter-vandalism and anti-spam, and I am increasingly coming across more complex cases involving temporary accounts. This permission will help me better resolve situations like these. I have 6 months tenure and over 300 edits, and understand the importance of protecting privacy per the WMF policy. Thanks, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 11:18, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
As a Balkans-focused editor, I have a long record of reporting socking (both at SPI and by directly contacting relevant admins). The ability to compare IP ranges and geolocations has been central to my work on that front. I fully understand the relevant privacy policies and practices. Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:49, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
I can't say I'd use the privilege frequently, but at times I have found IP information helpful when investigating vandalism and puppetry. I promise to use this power only for good, never for evil. EEng 02:17, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
I have participated in many SPIs over the years, and have a history of working to prevent long-term abuse on controversial articles. While I expect I will only use this right occasionally, I would appreciate being permitted to have it in my toolbox for such occasions. I have read, understand, and agree to all terms and conditions attached to this right. Yours, &c. RGloucester — ☎ 00:32, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
I am returning to counter vandalism and believe that being able to view IP addresses of temporary accounts will be valuable to identify patterns of vandalism. I understand the importance of privacy and have familiarized myself with the foundation guidelines on its use. Lucas7yoshi (talk) 08:45, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
I've returned to being active with counter-vandalism since I earned rollback rights a few months ago. I think it'd be useful to have TAIV rights as I have already encountered a few TAs who I suspect are the same person. I have read and understood the criteria of use. Tarlby (t) (c) 00:57, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
|