Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention

Usernames for administrator attention

Shortcut

• WP:UAAWP:UAA

This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report.

1. Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks.
2. Real names are permitted, except when the editor implies they are someone other than themselves, such as impersonating a notable living person.
3. Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional.
4. For libellous usernames or usernames that contain another editor's nonpublic personal information, please contact an oversighter and do not report it here.
5. Discuss less-serious violations with the user on their talk page so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith. Templates such as {{Uw-username}} or {{Uw-coi-username}} may be used. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
6. Do not leave a username warning on a user's talk page and also immediately report them here. Do one or the other, and not both simultaneously.
7. Patrollers are asked to remove reports that have been declined, are bot-reported false positives or are otherwise non-blatant or stale reports.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Note: Patrollers may wish to monitor usernames flagged by filters 54, 148 and 149; private filters 102, 354, 499, 579; and this recent changes filter tag.

This page was last updated at 16:13 on 14 December 2025 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.

Bot-reported

• GeraldSkibidinho (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "skibidi" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:30, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Randomthinksofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:00, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

   Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 19:00, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• NabiOfficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

   Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 07:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Bunderling (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "bund" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:50, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

   Note on file stands for ass -- DQB (owner / report) 13:50, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User-reported

• PalestineMustBeFree (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Disruptive username – LuniZunie_(talk) 00:20, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Not a blatant violation of the username policy. The name is a political statement. In itself, it does not violate the username rules. Let's wait and see when they edit. -- Alexf^(talk) 01:24, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Alexf I was on the edge for this one, however, doesn't it apply as a disruptive username since it is "referencing highly contentious events or controversies", or am I misunderstanding what "event" means in this context? – LuniZunie_(talk) 01:30, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @LuniZunie: Maybe you are right, but that's how I saw it. -- Alexf^(talk) 02:35, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm not sure this is so disruptive that it merits blocking with no edits, but as it falls under a CTOP with a 30/500 restriction every talk page post they make would technically violate the restriction. 331dot (talk) 09:37, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Doctorinfobd (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (doctorinfobd.com). See Draft:Doctorinfobd. Annh07 (talk) 16:10, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]