User talk:Theknoledgeableperson

This is Theknoledgeableperson's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: London underground emergency response unit (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JuniperChill were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Transport for London. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The first source (TfL) is primary which doesn't count towards the notability requirements. Londonist is also considered a primary source since they met (and interviewed) with TfL. As this page is quite short, you may consider adding this info to existing articles such as Transport for London and London Underground instead. Also see WP:REFB on how to properly format citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:London underground emergency response unit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JuniperChill (talk) 12:59, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Theknoledgeableperson! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JuniperChill (talk) 12:59, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your additions of Template:Unreferenced

Hi, I've reverted your addition of this template to several articles that had at least one reference. Please note that this template is not to be used on articles that already have references like Trudi Roth. If an article needs more references, Template:More citations needed should be used instead. Thanks. Epicgenius (talk) 11:18, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've also reverted your edit to Dulles International Airport Main Terminal where you (1) split out part of the lead and (2) tagged it as unsourced. Per WP:LEAD, three paragraphs is an appropriate lead length of articles of this length, so these paragraphs did not need to be split out. Additionally, per WP:CITELEAD, references are not needed for claims in lead sections that are already cited elsewhere. These claims are already cited in the Description and History sections of the article.

Given that you seem to be a newer user, I suggest reading up on the guidelines I just linked, and the documentation pages of the templates you're using. Thank you, and please feel free to ask if you need any clarifications. Epicgenius (talk) 11:51, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So if an article has at least one reference you use not

Thank you correcting me @Epicgenius Theknoledgeableperson (talk) 18:27, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Theknoledgeableperson, that is correct. – Epicgenius (talk) 18:27, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you reply fast!! Theknoledgeableperson (talk) 18:29, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Theknoledgeableperson! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Theknoledgeableperson (talk) 17:22, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

City London (disambiguation)

I saw you created this new disambiguation page - it seemed to more or less duplicate the one that already existed at London City, so I've redirected it there, in case you were wondering where it went! Andrew Gray (talk) 22:23, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually can you redirect it to city of London (disambiguation) as it makes more sense

Thanks, have a good day mate! Theknoledgeableperson (talk) 19:09, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Profound (company)

The page Profound (company) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:48, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i did not create the article i just moved to an article to a draft as it was not suitable for wikipedia Theknoledgeableperson (talk) 19:52, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i was about to do a speedy deletion but you beat me to it Theknoledgeableperson (talk) 19:53, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Theknoledgeableperson,

You didn't create the article but you created the main space Redirect page. You should have tagged that page as a CSD R2 for speedy deletion and that's what this notice was for. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:19, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ghatak (2006 film)

The page Ghatak (2006 film) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:41, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]