User talk:Shubhsamant09

Prayagraj name change

Hi. Some editors are trying to change the name of Prayagraj to Allahabad. Can you go to the article talk page and share your opinion.2401:BA80:A39A:E771:C49:290F:F8AB:DE31 (talk) 12:12, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Of course Shubhsamant09 (talk) 00:19, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is unacceptable WP:CANVASSING, for what it's worth. Remsense ‥ 论 01:46, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Really isn't. He was simply asking him to give his opinion. Never stated whether they should support the name change or not. Flux0909 (talk) 00:24, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, specifically asking someone you already think agrees with you is center-cut canvassing, and it would take particular effort to ignore that being the dynamic here. Remsense ‥ 论 00:42, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Idk man, how do you think the guy already knows @Shubhsamant09's stance? I'm not as experienced as you, so I'm genuinely asking you how do you conclude that this Canvassing? Flux0909 (talk) 00:44, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to indulge in an in-depth analysis on someone else's talk page for their own sake, but the phrasing "some editors are trying to change X" is already expressly partisan. I'm going to be frank: the IP messaged only editors with usernames that would, given a clearly low but plausible standard of evidence on their part, indicate a perspective aligned with theirs regarding the move. That's enough for me, as this isn't a court of law and mistakes that happen are low-stakes and can be remedied in good faith. Remsense ‥ 论 00:53, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see, thank you for explaining. Flux0909 (talk) 00:59, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tibetans in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asylum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article translation

Hi, I was hoping you could assist me in translating Tibetans in India, an article you yourself created, into the languages you are fluent in. I've been trying myself, and feel it could be quicker if we do it together. Flux0909 (talk) 00:23, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
547	Annoying Orange (talk)	Add sources
3,285	Languages of India (talk)	Add sources
78	Kanadikavu Shree Vishnumaya Kuttichathan Swamy temple (talk)	Add sources
1,420	Indo-Aryan languages (talk)	Add sources
106	Silivri (talk)	Add sources
16	Rampura Dabri (talk)	Add sources
228	Half-mast (talk)	Cleanup
755	Pythagoreanism (talk)	Cleanup
556	Śramaṇa (talk)	Cleanup
2,159	Super Sentai (talk)	Expand
165	Dhyana in Hinduism (talk)	Expand
1,685	T-90 (talk)	Expand
204	Buddhism and Jainism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
3,804	Senegal (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,030	Statelessness (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
62	Mainland Southeast Asia linguistic area (talk)	Merge
10	Sinosphere (linguistics) (talk)	Merge
10	Anti-miRNA oligonucleotides (talk)	Merge
9	General debate of the seventieth session of the United Nations General Assembly (talk)	Wikify
845	Moksha (talk)	Wikify
19	Narrow-gauge railways in Denmark (talk)	Wikify
8	Swami Bodhayan Mandir (talk)	Orphan
24	Currency interventions under Erdoğan administration (talk)	Orphan
5	Baba Shah Esfahani (talk)	Orphan
174	Old Hindi (talk)	Stub
6	Jorebungalow (talk)	Stub
236	Indian 1-rupee note (talk)	Stub
38	Ramjal Setu link project (talk)	Stub
4	Iraq Solidarity Campaign (talk)	Stub
22	Punarjanman (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

T20 World Cup GAs

Thanks for your reviews of T20 World Cup GAs; I just wanted to let you know that there are some more if you're interested.

Vestrian24Bio 02:36, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vestrian24Bio Hi, thank you for letting me know. I'll go over all of these and review them. If interested, could you please review - Hindustani-speaking world? Shubhsamant09 (talk) 02:40, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hindustani-speaking world

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hindustani-speaking world you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 02:44, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Tibetans into Tibetans in India. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of National Front assistants affair

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article National Front assistants affair you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Flux0909 -- Flux0909 (talk) 22:45, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of National Front assistants affair

The article National Front assistants affair you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:National Front assistants affair for comments about the article, and Talk:National Front assistants affair/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Flux0909 -- Flux0909 (talk) 00:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shubhsamant09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, Thank you for your time. I understand the reason behind the block and take full responsibility for the violation. I’ve submitted a detailed unblock appeal through the ticket system (UTRS), where I’ve acknowledged the sockpuppetry and explained the context and intent behind my actions. I want to reassure you that I’m committed to editing constructively and transparently going forward, and I’m no longer using any alternate accounts. I respectfully ask that my appeal be considered based on the good faith intention to move forward the right way. Thank you again for your attention to the matter.Shubhsamant09 (talk) 02:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)}}[reply]

Decline reason:

Your sock account held conversations with this account. Under the circumstances, I think your best chance of being unblocked is to take the standard offer and re-apply in 6 months time with no more abuse of multiple accounts. PhilKnight

Hi, I'll keep note of this. Shubhsamant09 (talk) 22:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC) (talk) 11:22, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #102228 -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see no private information in your UTRS request; all of it should be here. 331dot (talk) 09:16, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did see a lot of LLM use at the UTRS request, though. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:36, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Writing in a formal tone does not equalize to the use of an LLM model. For the record, I acknowledge my mistake in violating Wikipedia’s sockpuppetry policy, and I fully accept the procedures that have been set in place as a result. I appreciate the time and consideration given to this matter. Shubhsamant09 (talk) 22:38, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to make it clear that the user reviewed and passed his own GA nomination at National Front assistants affair. This has since been undone. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:59, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]