User talk:Luizadnts

This is Luizadnts's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hindelbank Prison has been accepted

Hindelbank Prison, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Epsilon.Prota ^talk 21:30, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Women's Strike of 14 June 1991 has been accepted

Women's Strike of 14 June 1991, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Epsilon.Prota ^talk 21:43, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orbe penitentiary complex has been accepted

Orbe penitentiary complex, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Epsilon.Prota ^talk 22:04, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred Siegfried (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Epsilon.Prota was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm sorry, but right now there aren't quite enough reliable sources for this to be a Wikipedia article. Also, as a heads-up unrelated to notability, the final quotation in Criticism and crime against humanity appears to be interrupted. I notice you've created a great number of articles - thank you very much for your work here!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alfred Siegfried and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Epsilon.Prota ^talk 22:12, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: House Burlamacchi (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Weirdly casual in tone?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:House Burlamacchi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 18:59, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Causes of the Third Crusade moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Causes of the Third Crusade. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it duplicates several articles already in existence. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:55, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carnot family (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MediaKyle was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

A large portion of "Notable figures", "Legacy", and "Burials" does not contain citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carnot family and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MediaKyle (talk) 12:46, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parvis des Droits-de-l'Homme has been accepted

Parvis des Droits-de-l'Homme, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 05:44, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hans Wilsdorf Foundation (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources cited do not establish notability per WP:ORG. Also, some of the sources do not work.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hans Wilsdorf Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:08, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Translating

Hi,

You're probably aware of this already, but I'll say it anyway: when translating articles from other language versions of Wikipedia, you need to check that the sources are enough to satisfy the requirements of the English Wikipedia, which are stricter than in the other language versions (at least the ones that I'm familiar with).

You also need to check that the sources actually work. It happens often that an article was created, perhaps many years ago, citing sources which were fine at the time, but which have now expired. Sometimes it's just a case of finding the new location and updating the URL, but sometimes the content is no longer available, which obviously creates a problem in what comes to translating the section of the article that relies on that particular source. In the Draft:Hans Wilsdorf Foundation which I just declined, sources 1, 2, 4 and 5 didn't work.

Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:16, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tricastin Nuclear Site has been accepted

Tricastin Nuclear Site, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 16:02, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luigi Villoresi (botanist) has been accepted

Luigi Villoresi (botanist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 21:57, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:History of the Cité Scolaire Robert-Badinter

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:History of the Cité Scolaire Robert-Badinter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emma Ott has been accepted

Emma Ott, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Superboilles (talk) 07:09, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scroll on the Comparative Merits of Sake and Rice has been accepted

Scroll on the Comparative Merits of Sake and Rice, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:02, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Établissement public de coopération intercommunale has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Établissement public de coopération intercommunale. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:58, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Upper Tanaro Valley has been accepted

Upper Tanaro Valley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GoldRomean (talk) 18:34, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reminders for your other unsubmitted draft pages

Hey, Luizadnts, I'm here to remind you about your other unsubmitted draft pages. I just want to remind you that you can resubmit your other draft pages that have failed from the past checking or your other unsubmitted draft pages that have not yet been submitted for checking, and I just want to remind you that I'm ready to check it if it is ready for mainspace. JeBonSer (talk) 13:34, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pietro Lauro has been accepted

Pietro Lauro, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 23:58, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pietro Lauro

Hi! I'm the creator of the italian version of Pietro Lauro: thank you for your translation! PapaYoung89 (talk) 08:06, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Politics of Corsica has been accepted

Politics of Corsica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Wikishovel (talk) 10:15, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great work

Just sent you a thanks for your great work translating the Scroll on the Comparative Merits of Sake and Rice page. It was really nicely done, and great to see Japanese articles translated which are not the normal pop culture topics, so thanks. If you would like to do more of them, or edit already existing pages, feel free to join WikiProject Japan - we always need more writers - especially since your prose was so clear.

BTW, you do know that as a reasonably experienced editor, you don’t need to go through the Articles For Creation process right? You can just create them directly, especially since the quality of your articles seems high.

Thanks again Absurdum4242 (talk) 08:56, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Compagnie départementale du Haut-Rhin pour la recherche de houille (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AirshipJungleman29 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Compagnie départementale du Haut-Rhin pour la recherche de houille and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:59, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FS Class 830 I has been accepted

FS Class 830 I, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:05, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monte Oserot has been accepted

Monte Oserot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monte Nebin has been accepted

Monte Nebin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Environmental competencies of French local authorities (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Absurdum4242 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is an excellent and amazingly written article… however… there is a problem because pretty much all of the sources given are primary rather than secondary sources. That would be perfect for a researched academic article, but unfortunately Wikipedia articles require citations to independent secondary sources. News articles, or academic papers discussing the system would be perfect, if it’s possible to find some? Keep up the great work, and good luck 👍

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Environmental competencies of French local authorities and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Absurdum4242 (talk) 13:03, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Félix-Fournier square has been accepted

Félix-Fournier square, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Absurdum4242 (talk) 13:04, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chairman of the Council of Ministers (France) has been accepted

Chairman of the Council of Ministers (France), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Absurdum4242 (talk) 13:08, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tabun (horse breeding) has been accepted

Tabun (horse breeding), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Absurdum4242 (talk) 13:09, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Locarno-Ponte Brolla-Bignasco railway has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Locarno-Ponte Brolla-Bignasco railway. Thanks! João^hola 07:35, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Federal Prosecutor's Office of Switzerland has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Federal Prosecutor's Office of Switzerland. Thanks! Toadspike [Talk] 23:09, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alfred Siegfried has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alfred Siegfried. Thanks! Ca ^{talk to me!} 00:35, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Canonical quarter has been accepted

Canonical quarter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Absurdum4242 (talk) 08:04, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Locarno-Ponte Brolla-Bignasco railway has been accepted

Locarno-Ponte Brolla-Bignasco railway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Absurdum4242 (talk) 08:13, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Urban development in Lille (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Lijil were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I see this is translated from French wikipedia (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Développement_urbain_de_Lille). It doesn't really work well in the English Wikipedia because 1) It is very poorly sourced 2) It is not connected to existing English language articles 3) It is written more like an essay than a wikipedia article - for instance, English wikipedia requires that the first words in the article be the title of the article, so this article should start "Urban development in Lille is....". I can see there is a lot of material here though that might be useful. Can you add some of this to the article about Lille first? Then potentially agree with other editors of that article how to separate it into its own article if this makes the Lille article too long?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Urban development in Lille and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lijil (talk) 15:46, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lycée Molière (Paris) has been accepted

Lycée Molière (Paris), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Wikishovel (talk) 10:20, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ciné-Journal suisse has been accepted

Ciné-Journal suisse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Agent 007 (talk) 18:23, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mon R2 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mon R2. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:44, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mon R2 (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ozzie10aaaa was:

needs references

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mon R2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:45, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gemini OB1 Molecular Cloud has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gemini OB1 Molecular Cloud. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:57, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Marie Tourte-Cherbuliez has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marie Tourte-Cherbuliez. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:11, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marie Tourte-Cherbuliez has been accepted

Marie Tourte-Cherbuliez, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:11, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avoyer has been accepted

Avoyer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bonadea contributions talk 19:32, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pourtalès family has been accepted

Pourtalès family, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:16, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henriette Bitzius-Zeender has been accepted

Henriette Bitzius-Zeender, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:19, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lake Pontechianale

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lake Pontechianale, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lake Varna (Italy)

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lake Varna (Italy), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cherré (archaeological site)

Please address the many issues at Cherré (archaeological site) - there are a dozen ref errors, and punctuation needs to go before citations, not after... there are about 300 much punctuation errors there now. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 04:08, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cherré (archaeological site)

added links pointing to Chenu, Tegula, Vaas and Augustan

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:12, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lake Sant'Anna

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lake Sant'Anna, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:08, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:History of the Cité Scolaire Robert-Badinter

Hello, Luizadnts. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "History of the Cité Scolaire Robert-Badinter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monoceros R2 has been accepted

Monoceros R2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Perryprog (talk) 02:37, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Really awesome work on this translation by the way—I'll read it over again probably tomorrow but there's a good chance this can be upgraded to a B-class article. Thanks for your many contributions! Perryprog (talk) 02:57, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Third Crusade, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Assassins and Hainaut.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:French Vexin

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:French Vexin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carnot family has been accepted

Carnot family, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 15:58, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Études (Debussy)

added links pointing to Conductor, Fifth, Fingering, Bryn Mawr, A-flat, G-sharp and Heinrich Strobel

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lake d'Avio

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lake d'Avio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:08, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Too Beautiful (film) has been accepted

Too Beautiful (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Absurdum4242 (talk) 15:58, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Archivistic law in Switzerland

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Archivistic law in Switzerland, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:08, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Quadruple Alliance

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Quadruple Alliance, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lake Quarto

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lake Quarto, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:08, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lago di Licola has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lago di Licola. Thanks! Carolina2k22 • (talk) 11:06, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lago di Licola has been accepted

Lago di Licola, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 10:57, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bric Mindino has been accepted

Bric Mindino, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Taking Out The Trash (talk) 17:38, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Le Démon de midi (novel) has been accepted

Le Démon de midi (novel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:56, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pallavicini Collection (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrysGalley was:

Wikipedia is not a directory, and here there is a huge list, taken from Italian Wikipedia. See WP:NOTDIRECTORY. The article is notable, but it needs to have an encyclopedic tone and style.

It may be best to either delete that section altogether, or alternatively highlight some selected exhibits, particularly if that leads on to a standalone article on that specific exhibit.

Some work is also needed on the sourcing, since one reference is repeated about 10 times.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pallavicini Collection and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ChrysGalley (talk) 13:11, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: House Burlamacchi (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Carolina2k22 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:House Burlamacchi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Carolina2k22 • (talk) 13:55, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lake Sant'Anna

Hello, Luizadnts. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lake Sant'Anna".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred Siegfried (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrysGalley was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Along with the previous reviewer, I have concern about the Criticism and crimes against humanity section. This is sourced and and is well worded, however it is a duplicate of material that exists already in the main article Kinder der Landstrasse. By putting a big section on this in the subject's biography there is now a linkage. It's not an unreasonable linkage but between the subject and "crimes against humanity" that specific linkage would need to be sourced - someone needs to directly accuse the subject of that crime. As far as I can tell this has not been done via a reliable source.

My suggestion is to leave the starting two paragraphs, where the linkage is modest / conservative; and for the last section reduce that to the first sentence and the last two sentences, with a "Further information" link to the main article on Landstrasse.

By all means let me know what you think about this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alfred Siegfried and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ChrysGalley (talk) 18:40, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lake Varna (Italy)

Hello, Luizadnts. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lake Varna".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Pye-dog

added links pointing to Hybrid and Kombai

Combleux

added a link pointing to Aquitanian

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Établissement public de coopération intercommunale (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrysGalley was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Realistically it's not encyclopedic in the current format. Apart from all the red links which are unlikely to be fulfilled in English wiki, it's also very detailed, almost a directory, which will be difficult to keep up to date. All but one source are primary, mostly quotes from the legislative code, though given coverage in the regional French press it would not be difficult to come up with more independent sources. There are some substantial paragraphs with no sources. There is an article to be had here, but it needs some more editing. Perhaps to something much shorter and using more independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Établissement public de coopération intercommunale and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ChrysGalley (talk) 16:01, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lake Pietranzoni

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lake Pietranzoni, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Economy of the Iroquois

added links pointing to White ash, Awl and World Trade Center

Foreign relations of Iraq

added a link pointing to Muslim conquests

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Camelopardalis dark region has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Camelopardalis dark region. Thanks! Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 05:46, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Peripheral nebular regions of the Orion Complex has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Peripheral nebular regions of the Orion Complex. Thanks! Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 05:59, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aubain has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aubain. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:03, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Maquis de l'Ain et du Haut-Jura when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:47, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Santissimo Nome di Maria e degli Angeli Custodi, Genoa when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:06, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Blazoning

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blazoning, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:French Vexin

Hello, Luizadnts. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "French Vexin".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]