User talk:Agent VII

This user is new to Wikipedia. Please assume good faith, remain civil, and be calm, patient, helpful, and polite while they become accustomed to Wikipedia and its intricacies.

This is Agent VII's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome Agent VII!

Hello Agent VII. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Cabayi, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:   Introduction to Wikipedia   The five pillars of Wikipedia   Editing tutorial   How to edit a page   Simplified Manual of Style   The basics of Wikicode   How to develop an article   How to create an article   Help pages   What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:   Do be bold   Do assume good faith   Do be civil   Do keep cool!   Do maintain a neutral point of view   Don't spam   Don't infringe copyright   Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest   Don't commit vandalism   Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:   Ask a question

or you can:   Get help at the Teahouse

or even:   Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{Help me}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:   Fight vandalism   Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome   Help contribute to articles   Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you   Help design new templates   Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost   Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your userpage.

Please remember to:

• Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
• Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
  

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

• Español
• Deutsch
• Français
• Italiano
• עברית
• Русский
• 日本語
• Polski
• فارسی

Sincerely, Cabayi (talk) (Leave me a message) 16:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

VRT verified can add self information?

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Recently you reverted my edit on Kerry Sulkowicz where an editor (now confirmed to be Kerry Sulkowicz himself) added about his personal information without adding a reliable source. I don't think being verified makes them any exception to add information without a reliable source (even if it about themselves). You restored their version and stated "allowed to add as per VRT verified". Can you tell which particular policy or guideline you are referring to here? If no, then kindly revert your edit (reverted) because as I know being VRT verified doesn't give you any special say in what is in your article. Thanks, ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 18:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also see WP:COISELF. ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 18:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for information and revert. @Nthep: I wanted to know whether they are allowed to edit own article even after successfully VRT verified. It will let me avoid such reverts in future. Thank you. Agent 007 (talk) 06:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are no restrictions on subjects editing the article about them other than those which apply to any editor about COI and BLP. I wouldn't get too worried about edits like the one in question. If the subject is adding that type of detail themselves, I think a) they're OK with the information being out there and b) it's accurate, so I'd possibly tag it with {{cn}} and maybe remind the subject they are not a reliable source about themselves. Nthep (talk) 09:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

Thanks for your anti-vandalism work!

GoldRomean (talk) 18:59, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding more information to The Little Black Boy of the Pasture!

I would like to thank you for adding more information to my newly created article (The Little Black Boy of the Pasture). Sometimes, I forget to include important details. Thank you! Dr. Valmontier (talk) 14:57, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Agent VII. Thank you for your work on Alejandro C. Frery. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I would think being elected a IEEE Fellow is more notable than lecturer (in the infobox).

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 12:04, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciation

Thanks for assisting in reviewing my pages you are doing wonderfully well. Royalesignature (talk). 11:25, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: DineshKalaiselvan

Hello Agent VII. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of DineshKalaiselvan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Salvio ^giuliano 07:52, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Salvio giuliano Thanks once again, but I think Dinesh Kalaiselvan fails WP:ANYBIO. So, listed it to WP:AFD Agent 007 (talk) 17:17, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Totally reasonable, I agree with you. I wanted to draftify the article, but the page creator had already created the page as a draft and then moved it to mainspace, so I thought that moving it back would be move warring. In the end, declining an A7 in no way means I think that the subject is notable. —  Salvio ^giuliano 17:21, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Thank you for reviewing Dreamland (Sparks novel), an article I created. It's now online! ~Rafael! (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 19:30, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How the notability of John Iredale be established

Hello, I've seen your notice on John Iredale (academic) saying that sources exist that would establish notability. I think that some of these sources would be news articles from appropriate outlets, but what are the others? Could you give me some pointers? Thanks. Jw93d59 (talk) 20:46, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jw93d59 google.scholar.com as a refs (5, 6, 7) may be replaced with a notable publication/reliable news reference. Agent 007 (talk) 20:54, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

Jw93d59 (talk) 21:07, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK could you have a look at the araticle now, and see if notability has been established?

Jw93d59 (talk) 21:09, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive

September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:30, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review needed please

Hi, can you take a look at this article? - Madhupur Municipality. It's almost 3 months now. Thanks! Flashthomsom (talk) 18:43, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions

You recently added the short description "List of invasive plant species in Massachusetts" to List of invasive plant species in Massachusetts, and "2025 Puerto Rican protests" to 2025 Puerto Rican protests. In cases like those, where any reasonable short description is a direct or nearly-direct copy of the title, then the short description should be "none" instead. For further details, see WP:SDCONTENT and WP:SDNONE. — LucasBrown 02:16, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This goat has reviewed you...

...and approves \o/

Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 14:42, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review Request for Draft:Congregation of Teresian Carmelites

Hi Agent VII, thank you for previously moving the draft Draft:Congregation of Teresian Carmelites to mainspace on 7 August 2025. I’ve since added more reliable references to strengthen the article and address feedback about sourcing. Could you please review the updated draft and let me know if it’s ready to be moved back to mainspace? I’d greatly appreciate your feedback or assistance. Thanks! Desertstorm1000 (talk) 16:19, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Desertstorm1000 Sorry, I am not confident this time and leave it to any another reviewer. Agent 007 (talk) 17:42, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!!

Thank you very much for reviewing the article I made about Bunny Summers!! Well, could you please now do the same with the article of Daisy Bufford, which is on my Watchlist? Because the User who previously reviewed the article was blocked and it’s review was reverted. CheAjlt (talk) 15:59, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CheAjlt Its already reviewed last month. Check this. Agent 007 (talk) 16:50, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

		The Special Barnstar
		Thanks for reviewing the articles. BhikhariInformer (talk) 18:31, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern about review speed

Hi Agent VII! Thanks for all your reviews during the NPP backlog drive, I just wanted to reach out because I was a little concerned about the speed of your reviews. It seems you're reviewing 5-6 articles per minute at times, and I was wondering if you could help me understand how you were able to check sources and copyvio while moving that fast, because on the surface it doesn't seem possible to me. Thank you again for your contributions! 🌸⁠wasianpower⁠🌸 (talk • contribs) 18:50, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Agent VII, slow the f down, I don’t want this, this or this to happen to you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:03, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I happened upon Ex-Christians (former Christians), which you reviewed, via an RM/TR request. The first and third sources don't seem to mention the subject at all. I strongly suspect this was written by an LLM. Please be more careful and make sure to actually look at the sources before hitting the "review" button. Toadspike [Talk] 12:08, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Agent VII, it's really concerning that you've continued editing without answering this question. -- asilvering (talk) 15:43, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@AsilveringI have taken a note of it. I am doing reviewing of articles based on quality from proven editors at first only. I am also verifying refs and msging creators when as/ required. I am already using Earwig's copyvio tools, gptzero for LLM content detections. Thank you. Agent 007 (talk) 15:48, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was a miss from my side and thanks @Toadspike for the advice to avoid such scenarios. Agent 007 (talk) 15:50, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It does not look like so, Agent. You literally just marked this article Irena Segalovičienė as reviewed; an article about a living person that lacks citations in an entire section, and is also uncategorised. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:51, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have marked un-reviewed. Agent 007 (talk) 15:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Christian Ings isn't clearly notable; there are in fact unsourced paragraphs, and again, this is a BLP. Personal life is unsourced. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am slowing down. @Vanderwaalforces@Asilvering@Toadspike . I will avoid where there is doubt now onwards. I have a question if you can clarify. Why logs not showing the latest. Are they using some special tools that is hiding the patrolling. Agent 007 (talk) 15:59, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do, please. I will go through your already marked articles and see what I can find.

No, he's not "hiding" his logs, you can find them here, looks like he uses the "mark as patrolled" more often than the Page Curation tool bar's "mark as review". Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:33, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proven editor articles need thorough reviews, too, for the record. People can make mistakes, and if someone is proven enough that their articles don't need thorough reviews, that’s what WP:Autopatrolled is for. 🌸⁠wasianpower⁠🌸 (talk • contribs) 16:00, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A reminder that footballers (or any athlete for that matter) are not automatically "notable" for appearing in one professional game. This has not been the case since 2022. Please ensure that they meet notability guidelines before marking as reviewed. Thank you, JTtheOG (talk) 21:32, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Thanks. Agent 007 (talk) 07:54, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Agent VII, I'm glad to see you've slowed down a bit, but I just came across Bholaganj, which you marked as reviewed earlier today. Not only is it clearly promotional, but it also contained translated copyvio from when it was translated from the Bengali Wikipedia. I've tagged it with G11 and G12, please make sure you're taking your time and thoroughly checking copyright when reviewing, it only took me a couple minutes to find this. You're still doing 1-2 reviews per minute, please consider taking a little more time per review to be a bit more thorough. 🌸⁠wasianpower⁠🌸 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Page swap

Thanks for closing Talk:Who_Are_You_(song)#Requested_move_28_August_2025 and performing the requested move. However, it appears after executing the page swap, you left Who Are You (The Who song) redirecting to Who Are You (disambiguation) when it needed to be retargeted to Who Are You (song) as {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}}. Please be careful using the automated pageswap script, especially when the redirect being swapped targets a different page- in those cases I usually perform moves one at a time, suppressing the redirect as necessary, so I am clear on what exactly I am doing (see Wikipedia:Page_mover#Moves_involving_primary_topics). Cheers, Mdewman6 (talk) 00:41, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdewman6 Will keep in mind the order. Thanks. Agent 007 (talk) 05:01, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Text-based teasing

Hello Agent VII. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Text-based teasing, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: As far as I can tell, the references aren't nonsensical, they're just malformed. A spot check showed the actual sources exist. Thank you. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 12:54, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ThadeusOfNazereth, GPTZero is showing 100% AI generated. Thank you. Agent 007 (talk) 12:56, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Agent - AI detectors are notoriously unreliable and are not a valid way of applying G15 because of that. The only valid applications are the presence of communication intended for the user, entirely non-existent references, and nonsensical citations. None of those are present. For what it's worth, I agree that it's probably AI-generated, but it'll get weeded out by the standard process. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 12:59, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review request

Dear Agent VII,

Thanks for checking the page on Tetsurō Degawa which I had posted (admittedly a little too soon, as I was only halfway creating it). The page is in better shape now. Could you have a look and, if appropriate, remove the tag at the top? Thanks for your help.

ElenaHorikawa (talk) 22:59, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done. Thanks Agent 007 (talk) 14:03, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A word of thanks

Hi, I just wanted to say thank you for reviewing the articles that I created. I hope you're having a good day :) Lazarbeem (talk) 14:06, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Agent 007 (talk) 14:04, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Page for Abha Bhaiya

Hi, I just noticed that you have marked a main space page I just created for Abha Bhaiya as AI generated. I can assure you that everything on the page has been painstakingly put together by me. You can take a look at my Sandbox as evidence where I've slowly been working on this in the last few weeks. I've also created several other pages and AI generation has never been flagged as an issue. Not that it matters, but AI generation is an anti-thesis to everything I do on and off Wikipedia.

If there's anything else I can do to help you reconsider the tag, I'm happy to! Let me know. Thanks! Baberoothless (talk) 11:59, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will re-review once. Thank you for notifiying. Agent 007 (talk) 12:00, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the prompt response on this. Appreciate it! :) Baberoothless (talk) 12:04, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Thanks for adding a short description to an article I created called Two by Two (novel)! ~Rafael (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 15:56, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Agent VII oh my! I sent this less than a day ago and you already have 4 discussions below. You are famous! ~Rafael (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 13:42, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hi Agent VII. Thank you for your work on Ricardo Chavez Ortiz. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I can't see why you marked this as reviewed; it seems clearly a case of WP:1E and WP:NCRIMINAL.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 16:58, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Klbrain: This person reviews up to 10 articles per minute, that’s why. JTtheOG (talk) 18:32, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JTtheOG yeah. I made this article and right after I moved it to mainspoace, Agent reviewed it as notable... they are professional! ~Rafael (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 13:44, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/September 2025 regarding an issue you are involved in. Thank you. 🌸⁠wasianpower⁠🌸 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review needed

Can you please review this draft page Draft:Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms & Rajbhasha (Jharkhand)

Thanks! Flashthomsom (talk) 08:54, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Flashthomsom I am leaving it for others to take up. Agent 007 (talk) 11:32, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright no issue :) Flashthomsom (talk) 13:00, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft submission for The Dream of the Red Chamber (1977) declined

Hello Agent VII, thank you for reviewing my draft on the 1977 film. Pertaining to your comment on adding reliable sources for the plot section: I watched the film and summarised the plot myself, then cross-checked the names of the characters and their relation to each other with the source novel. I'm also a native Mandarin language speaker, and have adequate understanding of the cultural context of the film, to help prevent misinterpretation/mistranslation. I am unsure how else to provide a source for the plot other than the film itself. Do let me know how else to proceed with this issue. Thanks! Redding13 (talk) 13:22, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please add reference if you can for the plot. I have also added a review section with some reference. I will try. Agent 007 (talk) 13:28, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Redding13 If you have a mandarin source, you add it also. Agent 007 (talk) 13:30, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright @Agent VII I have added a few Mandarin sources in the plot section. Redding13 (talk) 14:09, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Translation note on The New Force (TV series)

Hi, I saw you added a translation attribution to the article I created, The New Force (TV series). However I did not translate the article; I wrote it independently with the available sources. Comparing to the Swedish page, they do not seem that similar, aside from basic information like who is directing it and when the series premieres. Is there a reason you flagged it as an unattributed translation? Thanks, Zzz plant (talk) 16:10, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because of [sv] individual attribution(s). Thanks for notifying, will remove the tag. Agent 007 (talk) 16:13, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zzz plant: They did the same on an article I created: Juan de Dios Bojórquez. Deleting the tag on the talk page is easy, but how about the incorrect permanent record in the article's edit history? Can that be expunged? (Tag Alsoriano97: same story on Josefa Tolrà, right?) Moscow Mule (talk) 13:48, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Moscow Mule It is not an issue as the originality of creation is with you even after removal of wrongly added notice. Thanks for notifying. Agent 007 (talk) 13:57, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not so sure that it's not an issue. The AT link in the edit summary says it's a script that automatically adds attribution ... to articles with non-attributed translations. That sounds – at the very least – like an admonishment for misconduct: in this case, violating the CC-BY-SA rights of the foreign-language editors, which is something I try to be very careful about. Moscow Mule (talk) 14:13, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you've removed the notices but I still don't quite understand how you evaluated these articles to be unattributed translations to begin with. The text is quite different, and there are even different/additional references. It would be good if you could be more cautious with this practice in the future. As I’m sure you can understand it’s not a great feeling to be wrongly dinged for violating copyright. Along those lines, I would appreciate if you could update your re-review log to remove the note about sv-wiki attribution. Zzz plant (talk) 14:21, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done and agree with your words. Thank you. Agent 007 (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review Article

Hello @Agent VII, could you please take a look at the article Nupur Joshi. This page is about a Hindi actress. I have attempted to write it based on information from several important sources. Does it still need some improvements? Because I have noticed that it has remained unreviewed even after several months Thanks. Neuroswasthya (talk) 09:12, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Neuroswasthya the aricle's is supported by reference that are sponsered/interview type making it a weak case of WP:NACTOR. Please review WP:BASIC requirements and make improvements. If you require further help please post your query at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. Thank you. Agent 007 (talk) 14:59, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Agent VII I've added some sources to the article and tried to improve it. Thanks for the suggestions. Neuroswasthya (talk) 10:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed related to rejected draft

Hi, my draft Draft:Deoghar Municipal Corporation (DMC) was rejected as a duplicate. However, no separate page exists for the municipal corporation. Currently, the Deoghar city page covers it. In reality, the city and its municipal corporation are complete distinct entities. I hope this clarifies my point. Please kindly look into it.

Thanks! Flashthomsom (talk) 09:07, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Flashthomsom I agree completely with User:Dan arndt's decline. You have said Currently, the Deoghar city page covers it. . So if you want to create a its municipal corporation, then ensure its contents are not the same and pases WP:ORG as you are well aware. You may re-work on Draft:Deoghar Municipal Corporation (DMC) and re-submit again as the duplicate is already marked WP:G6. Thank you. Agent 007 (talk) 14:47, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain me what changes do I need to do ? Flashthomsom (talk) 15:44, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Flashthomsom at first its looking Okay to me. Still I would prefer a second opinion from @Dan arndt on this. Thank you. Agent 007 (talk) 15:51, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, but can u move this draft to that redirect? Flashthomsom (talk) 16:32, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am confused:( Flashthomsom (talk) 17:05, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My intention was for the redirect at Draft:Deoghar Municipal Corporation to be deleted so that the Draft:Deoghar Municipal Corporation (DMC) could be moved there and assessed as a AfC. The Deoghar article doesn't cover the administration of the City, so there is a potential need for a separate article on the Deoghar Municipal Corporation. The draft as it stands is highly dependent upon a number of primary sources and that information needs to be verified through independent sources. Dan arndt (talk) 02:39, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No there are multiple third party news citations already. Please look carefully Flashthomsom (talk) 08:09, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anything else I can do ? Flashthomsom (talk) 19:27, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone ahead and accepted the draft after improvements made since declined. Agent 007 (talk) 17:54, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting to review AI-generated tag removal

Hi, could you please take a look at both the articles - Department of Excise and Prohibition (Jharkhand) & JUIDCO and see if the {{AI-generated}} tag is still needed? The content has been updated and sourced with proper refs..Thanks! Flashthomsom (talk) 09:22, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Movie released

Hi, Can you check this Draft:Premalo, the movie released and has full-length reviews.

Thankyou 202.153.35.242 (talk) 10:45, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The draft is submitted, so someone will see. But thank you for you contributions (I sent a message at your talk page too!) ~Rafael (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 14:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good day, Chief!

I recently discovered something so I thought of bringing it to your attention without further delay. Perhaps you might have an answer for all my senses of curiosity. There’s an article you approved some months, ago, of which I rlly thanked you for the approval. But, this same article approved Babatunde Kolawole is not found on the google indexing pages; it’s not rating high. I’m here today asking that you give me the needed clarification that would soothe my thoughts. Best Regards, 9aija (talk) 15:39, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@9aija how google indexing an article thing seems to be beyond scope. Please post this query at WP:TEA if any other editor might answer. Thanks. Agent 007 (talk) 18:46, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Chief 9aija (talk) 05:06, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Agatha All Along (disambiguation)

The article Agatha All Along (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Now a WP:ONEOTHER disambiguation because the miniseries has become the primary topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk | contribs) 18:40, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi can you review the article Tarulata Kutum

i moved this article few days ago to mainspace. Did submit it for review in draft before but due to large backlog i got no response so myself moved it to mainpsace. Can you please review it?

Thanks. Dagoofybloke (🥀) 05:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It may take sometime. In the meantime please go through WP:SINGER guidelines and try to improve the article. Also, references like spotify and youtube should be avoided as per WP:RSPYT consensus. Agent 007 (talk) 13:57, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okay i will remove those references from discography. Frankly, seeing the notability guidelines i will say it is somewhat borderline. Proving notability for such artistes is hard because local news from this region (Assam, India) are mostly in local language and not well published online as news articles. Though found few which i guess qualifies as significant coverage. (i will try to search more) Dagoofybloke (🥀) 14:20, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Guide to temporary accounts

Hello, Agent VII. This message is being sent to remind you of significant upcoming changes regarding logged-out editing.

Starting 4 November, logged-out editors will no longer have their IP address publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account (TA) associated with their edits. Users with some extended rights like administrators and CheckUsers, as well as users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will still be able to reveal temporary users' IP addresses and all contributions made by temporary accounts from a specific IP address or range.

How do temporary accounts work?

Editing from a temporary account

• When a logged-out user completes an edit or a logged action for the first time, a cookie will be set in this user's browser and a temporary account tied with this cookie will be automatically created for them. This account's name will follow the pattern: ~2025-12345-67 (a tilde, year of creation, a number split into units of 5).
• All subsequent actions by the temporary account user will be attributed to this username. The cookie will expire 90 days after its creation. As long as it exists, all edits made from this device will be attributed to this temporary account. It will be the same account even if the IP address changes, unless the user clears their cookies or uses a different device or web browser.
• A record of the IP address used at the time of each edit will be stored for 90 days after the edit. Users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will be able to see the underlying IP addresses.
• As a measure against vandalism, there are two limitations on the creation of temporary accounts:
  • There has to be a minimum of 10 minutes between subsequent temporary account creations from the same IP (or /64 range in case of IPv6).
  • There can be a maximum of 6 temporary accounts created from an IP (or /64 range) within a period of 24 hours.

Temporary account IP viewer user right

How to enable IP Reveal

• Administrators may grant the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right to non-administrators who meet the criteria for granting. Importantly, an editor must make an explicit request for the permission (e.g. at WP:PERM/TAIV)—administrators are not permitted to assign the right without a request.
• Administrators will automatically be able to see temporary account IP information once they have accepted the Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy via Special:Preferences or via the onboarding dialog which comes up after temporary accounts are deployed.

Impact for administrators

• It will be possible to block many abusers by just blocking their temporary accounts. A blocked person won't be able to create new temporary accounts quickly if the admin selects the autoblock option.
• It will still be possible to block an IP address or IP range.
• Temporary accounts will not be retroactively applied to contributions made before the deployment. On Special:Contributions, you will be able to see existing IP user contributions, but not new contributions made by temporary accounts on that IP address. Instead, you should use Special:IPContributions for this (see a video about IPContributions in a gallery below).

Rules about IP information disclosure

• Publicizing an IP address gained through TAIV access is generally not allowed (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 previously edited as 192.0.2.1 or ~2025-12345-67's IP address is 192.0.2.1).
• Publicly linking a TA to another TA is allowed if "reasonably believed to be necessary". (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 and ~2025-12345-68 are likely the same person, so I am counting their reverts together toward 3RR, but not Hey ~2025-12345-68, you did some good editing as ~2025-12345-67)
• See Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer § What can and can't be said for more detailed guidelines.

Useful tools for patrollers

• It is possible to view if a user has opted-in to view temporary account IPs via the User Info card, available in Preferences → Appearance → Advanced options → Enable the user info card
  • This feature also makes it possible for anyone to see the approximate count of temporary accounts active on the same IP address range.
• Special:IPContributions allows viewing all edits and temporary accounts connected to a specific IP address or IP range.
• Similarly, Special:GlobalContributions supports global search for a given temporary account's activity.
• The auto-reveal feature (see video below) allows users with the right permissions to automatically reveal all IP addresses for a limited time window.

Videos

• How to use Special:IPContributions
• How automatic IP reveal works
• How to use IP Info
• How to use User Info

Further information and discussion

• For more information and discussion regarding this change, please see the announcement from the Wikimedia Foundation at Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF) § Temporary accounts rollout.

Most of this message was written by Mz7 (source). Thanks, 🎃 SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing

@Agent VII I have created new article can you review RONB.due to large backlog I think no any other reviewer will see this article. so I moved it from draft to main space. Any Update ? (talk) 06:18, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dirty Pair (Anime))

The page Dirty Pair (Anime)) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. UtherSRG (talk) 16:40, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@UtherSRG My mistake, should have moved without redirect. Thanks. Agent 007 (talk) 16:42, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, there's already an article Dirty Pair, so no, it still needed a disambiguation. I've added a link from that article to the one you created. However, you and the other editors of that article may agree that there's some significant overlap and should discuss either a merge of the two, or a better split of information between the two. I'm just here to clean up the technical stuff. :D - UtherSRG (talk) 16:48, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PS. The article you wrote is now at Dirty Pair (anime). - UtherSRG (talk) 16:49, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Or wait... you just moved it. I need more coffee... - UtherSRG (talk) 16:50, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sahil Mehta (actor)

I declined your speedy on this article, but I would highly encourage you to start an AFD on this. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 22:42, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

About an page unreviewed

Hi i recently show an article i created before Top Channel Films reviewed by you, it shows recently unreviewed by an bot (pressuming runned by you) it's kind of mistake or? Thank you Lanceloth345 (talk) 15:06, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lanceloth345 It is not intentionally done. This is taken due to incorrect approach to patrolling last time from my side which I rectified later. Don't worry someone from the NPP will definitely mark it patrolled by next backlog drive. Thank you. Agent 007 (talk) 16:26, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok i have readed all disuccsion about this, just to be sure if smth not wrong as articles :)). Happy editing and thank you for response. Lanceloth345 (talk) 16:29, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]