User talk:Josedimaria

WP:PLACEDAB and Nigeria

Hi, I notice that you've been active in making pagemoves and requested moves over the last while. As you know, I've started a discussion concerning WP:PLACEDAB and expect that the current policy will be updated soon. This would mean that all ambiguous Nigerian cities would follow the format Placename, Nigeria, and not Placename, State as the policy currently specifies. I'd ask that you consider pausing your activity for a few days; once the policy is in place, then these moves will be uncontroversial and the articles can be moved per the new standard. 162 etc. (talk)

162 etc. Okay, but what about the ones that have been moved? Josedimaria237 (talk) 18:34, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnster for you

		The Football Barnstar
		So Super 6 ended yesterday, and I was thinking about creating time to work on the article. It was nice to see you already beat me to it. I use to be only one committed to updating these articles, but I feel really glad to know that there is someone else that is dedicated to creating detailed articles on our elite football. For this reason, I am issuing you this barnster. HandsomeBoy (talk) 14:15, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am a member of a closed WhatsApp group that contains most of the key administrators in the NWFL, I am wondering if you are also there? HandsomeBoy (talk) 14:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I am even surprised that there are other Wikipedians concerned about NWFL and Nigerian women's football.

I am not on that WhatsApp group. Josedimaria237 (talk) 15:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What's even more surprising is that we are both male, where are the Nigerian women editors????. I actually started contributing in this area because of the obvious content gap, but along the line I started to really follow and enjoy women's football. I streamed the entire UWCL game on YouTube live, and I really enjoyed that game. For Nigeria, I mostly only watch highlights, but will be glad to visit a stadium one of this days, at least it will be an avenue to get pictures into some of these wiki articles. Hope you have joined WikiProject Nigeria? HandsomeBoy (talk) 15:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Me too I would like to watch an NWFL game and I follow women's football a lot.

I will like to join WikiProject Nigeria because a lot of Nigerian articles need heavy updates and I need users who can contribute to Nigerian football updates with pictures, I am finding it difficult to upload pictures on Wikipedia and I have stopped as it may lead to me getting blocked if I remain persistent. Josedimaria237 (talk) 15:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can join WP:WikiProject Nigeria by following this wikilink Wikipedia:WikiProject_Nigeria#Active_members, and adding your username to the members section. Concerning images, I have added more than 100 images to Wikipedia/Commons, so I think I am in a good position to assist in that regard. There are also many experienced editors that monitor the WikiProject Nigeria talkpage, and they will be quick to respond to any of your query. We are always glad to help because we were once assisted too. I am very sure you will be assisting others on the talkpage in the nearest future.HandsomeBoy (talk) 16:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HandsomeBoy: Thank you, I have joined WikiProject Nigeria, I will like you to add me to the mailing list. Josedimaria237 (talk) 21:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Demas Akpore

Hello, Josedimaria237,

Please review WP:DRAFTIFY for policy on when it is proper for editors to move articles from main space to Draft space, especially the "Reasons not to move an article to draftspace" section. Unless an article is moved to Draft space as a result of an AFD closure, articles that have been created more than 90 days ago should not be draftified. This article was 14 years old so it was not eligible to be moved to Draft space. Again, please review the guidelines so you are better informed about draftification. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This…

…could be a clear oversight but your contributions at Mark Nwagwu lacks citations. You should take a look at it and confirm what I said. Best, Reading Beans 20:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reading Beans: There is a reference, unless you're saying the reference is not valid.Jõsé^hola 14:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am talking about this part; He attended Christ the King School, Aba between 1942 to 1949 then proceeded to St. Patrick’s College, Calabar to study between 1950 to 1956.

He received his B.Sc degree in Zoology from the University of London in 1961 and his M.Sc degree in 1965, he also received a Ph.D degree in Zoology from the University of Stockholm in 1965.

Nwagwu went to the University of Connecticut in 1966, where he completed spectacular researches on myosinmessenger RNA and muscle-protein synthesis on his post-doctoral fellowship. Or, is it from the Business Day article? I’d suggested adding the reference in each paragraph. Best, Reading Beans 20:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking a look and fixing it. You rock! Best, Reading Beans 04:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reading Beans: Is that okay? Jõsé^hola 14:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It is, 100%. Thank you. Best, Reading Beans 11:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from zh:胡介国 to Hu Jieguo. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 22:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Josedimaria! Your additions to Hu Jieguo have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 22:24, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ibrahim Mustapha (Nigerian footballer) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Giant Snowman 12:22, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is the fullname not constructive? @GiantSnowman: Jõsé^hola 17:07, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a fullname, and the stats were wrong. Giant Snowman 09:13, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking it's a fullname as I noticed in a source.@GiantSnowman: Jõsé^hola 09:55, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One, you did not cite any source. Secondly, NFT clearly has it as a nickname. Giant Snowman 10:17, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Josedimaria! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Shortened forms list, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 15:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rejection of Assassination of Muhammed of Ghor draft

Hello, you recently rejected my draft for the assassination of muhammed of ghor and would like it be re-considered for approval.

The topic not being considered notable doesnt make sense in my opinion. Mohammed Ghori was the founder and the first emperor of the Ghorid Empire of central asia. Based off of the wiki notability guidelines a topic is considered notable if the topic receives coverage in reliable sources, which it has been. The topic has been notably discussed in many reliable medieval historical texts by independant third party historical authors such as by Minhaj-i-Siraj Juzjani, Firishta, Ibn al-athir, the Tarikh-i-alfi which was commissioned by the Mughal emperor Akbar and the Jami al-Tawarikh produced in the Mongol Ilkhanate with signiifcant mention, which leads me to believe it was wrongly rejected twice. Modern day authors such as VD Mahajan, sir henry Miers Elliot among many others refer to his death also, so this rejection should kindly be reconsidered.

Kind regards Zenithxxx (talk) 19:48, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zenithxxx: The assassination is not notable on its own, should be merged into the main topic of discussion. Even the sources used on the draft do not speak exclusively on the assassination alone. Jõsé^hola 08:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please expand more on why it is not notable because so far you haven't been clear as to what makes it not notable. I have provided you with the reasons why it is including providing the wiki GNG which as per the guidelines on there it is notable to desire its own stand alone article. Even further as per the GNG, 'Signficant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but does not need to be the main topic of the source material' hence your last point of it not speaking exclusively on the assassination is not acceptabe according to the guidelines (which the sources do anyway and state the background, details of the assassination and the aftermath). Zenithxxx (talk) 17:13, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Plots

Hi, most plots for films, television, plays and books do not need references as they are primary sourced from the work itself as per WP:MOSFILM, and should be written in the editor's own words, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 23:49, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And this information is as a result of what? @Atlantic306: Jõsé^hola 07:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your AfC comment here regards Atlantic306 (talk) 09:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Essex Coroner Kidnapping Plot

Hi, Josedimaria. I was hoping you might expand on your reasons for rejecting Draft:Essex Coroner Kidnapping Plot. The draft includes a number of sources from reliable publications. This would normally indicate some degree of notability. Is there any other aspect that I have missed or misunderstood. Thanks for taking the time to review this draft. Salimfadhley (talk) 13:09, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I saw your comment at User:Ayyoobsharifi/sandbox. Users are free to submit their articles initially as a sandbox, and it is up to the reviewer to either move to draftspace or review it as it is. You should have also noticed a box that allows you to move the submission to the draftspace. Nevertheless, I've declined the submission since the subject is non notable, but in the future, it is best to refrain from making comments like Submit as a draft not sandbox. Thanks! ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 07:41, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @ToadetteEdit: I never realized. João^hola 07:45, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, and happy reviewing! ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 07:47, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your Articles for Creation review on Salamabad Dachhna

Hello Josedimaria. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation review on Salamabad Dachhna is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Salamabad Dachhna will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:39, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on my draft

The comment you left on my draft is kind of pointless, key words being kind of, as two MCR songs that weren’t singles and didn’t chart or get a certification by the RIAA or other music recording industry associations have articles, Skylines and Turnstiles and Demolition Lovers, both of which are classified as good articles on their talk page. Newtatoryd222 (talk) 13:24, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Newtatoryd222 was meant to be a question, sorry. João^hola 09:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on Draft:Rev. Royal_Gould_Wilder

@Josedimaria Thank you so so much. I really appreciate your help and guidance. I have added wikilinks for a few terms and removed for a few. Thanks a lot again. Padmarag (talk) 17:06, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Padmarag: Please help in adding more relevant categories and de-orphaning the article. João^hola 08:24, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Josedimaria Yes. I'll work on it this week and will also link to other relevant topics/articles. Padmarag (talk) 07:38, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Right to Read inquiry report

Thank you for your suggestions on this draft. I have added many more references and made changes so it is more encyclopedic. Do you have any more suggestions, or is it now ready to be published?

Best regards,

```` John NH (talk) 17:28, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting for Review the article Draft:Ramgarh, Siwan

Dear Sir,

I hereby requesting you for review my draft article Draft:Ramgarh, Siwan.

Thank you,

~ Bihari Editor ^(Talk) 16:37, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baruun-Urt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MIAT.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for feedback on declined AfC Draft:Legal_Impact_for_Chickens

Thanks @Josedimaria for reviewing the draft I submitted. Any chance you can provide more detail on what needs to improve?

The template message on LLM generation isn't pointing to any specific direction or issue, so it doesn't give much guidance on why. Hence the question. If notability is the issue, please check the talk page and respond there.

This is for: Draft:Legal_Impact_for_Chickens

FYI, I wrote most of the page myself, I hope the edits reflect that.

Best, Sklabb (talk) 09:38, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sklabb: The Notable litigation section for example looks like something from an LLM response. João^hola 06:14, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Josedimaria I'd love to work with you and fix what's needed. Could you be more specific on the issue(s) at hand? I understand that an LLM response is bad generally because of many possible issues:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing
Something else

That's a lot of potential angles to rewrite on in general. Any specific feedback on the specific draft would be great, so I can fix it and get the page ready for approval. Sklabb (talk) 09:41, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sklabb: Check the draft now, and fix where noted. João^hola 12:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the specific comments! I'll follow your suggestions later this or next week and get back once I've done that. Sklabb (talk) 16:32, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Josedimaria thanks again for your help. I have updated the article's specific litigations with some extra information, and followed the notes where I could. It would be great if you can have a look and review. I think these edits based on your feedback have made for a good improvement to the article! Sklabb (talk) 15:26, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sklabb: Remove the tags I added and resubmit for review. João^hola 15:37, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Josedimaria: Thank you, done! Sklabb (talk) 17:12, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:44:07, 21 October 2025 for assistance on AfC submission by Spencergmd

Spencergmd (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Fred A. Moss (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I would like to know if I have the reference issye resolved in the most recent submission. Thanks

Spencergmd (talk) 13:44, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You declined Margaret Miner

I wonder if you woudl elaborate on what your reason was. You expressed the thought that it was not written neutrally, but I can't spot that. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 09:31, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025–26 Ghana Premier League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hearts of Oak.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2024_IPSC_Rifle_World_Shoot

Comment: If this is an article about an event/competition's edition, please notify by Wikilinking. Joãohola 06:06, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi @João, this article is about the 2024 Edition of the IPSC Rifle World Shoot - I'm new to editing so can you please explain what you meant with your comment?

N.Marsmensch (talk) 21:33, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@N.Marsmensch: I mean there should be a link to IPSC Rifle World Shoot page on the article if it exists - for example 2024–25 UEFA Champions League – UEFA Champions League. If not, it should be created before creating an edition of such competition, except if the single edition was the only time the competition was held e.g. 2023 African Football League. João^hola 00:20, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:04:17, 17 November 2025 for assistance on AfC submission by Spencergmd

Spencergmd (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Fred A. Moss (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Regarding the submitted draft of the article Fred A. Moss, I believe that the text is now fully supported by references. I have removed any material that is not encyclopedic as far as I can determine. Please review the article and help me understand what further I could do to make the article acceptable. Thank you

Spencergmd (talk) 22:04, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Spencergmd: None of your references is a secondary source that gives a detailed coverage on the man (who is he, what he does). Secondly, the sources used are primary sources on journals he published and random mentions of him. João^hola 07:24, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note regarding Draft:Alexander Arkadyevich Kaufman

@Josedimaria: Hello, and thank you for the previous review of my draft. I wanted to let you know that I have thoroughly revised and rewritten the article, addressing all the concerns you raised. The draft now includes independent, secondary sources such as the SPWLA obituary, the Colorado School of Mines “Faculty Spotlight,” and the SEG honors listing. I have resubmitted the draft through AfC. Thanks again for your feedback. GITSK (talk) 21:41, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @GITSK: I cannot find the draft, could you send me the link? João^hola 05:56, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alexander Arkadyevich Kaufman (geophysicist) - Wikipedia GITSK (talk) 06:26, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Josedimaria: Thank you for your helpful comments on my draft.

1. Regarding your first point about non-trivial secondary coverage beyond tributes:

the draft already cites several independent sources that provide in-depth coverage of Kaufman’s career and scientific work. For convenience, here are direct links:

**Colorado School of Mines “Geophysics Newsletter” – SEG Honorary Membership (Spring 2005)** – independent coverage of his contributions and career.

https://www.mines.edu/geophysics/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2017/08/geophysics-newsletter-spring-2005.pdf

**Colorado School of Mines “Professor Kaufman: A Perfect 10” (Spring 2002)** –independent coverage of his teaching, reputation among students, publications.

https://www.mines.edu/geophysics/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2017/08/geophysics-newsletter-spring-2002.pdf

**Geophysical Journal International (1996 review by M. N. Berdichevsky)** – a peer-reviewed academic review discussing the theoretical contributions of Kaufman’s monograph (read the first paragraph of the review).

https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/127/2/559/592834?login=false

2. Regarding the title: there is another notable historical figure with the same full name, Alexander Arkadyevich Kaufman (1864–1919), who was a Russian economist. To avoid confusion between the two, I kept the “(geophysicist)” disambiguator. If you prefer a different disambiguation format, I am happy to adjust it. Кауфман, Александр Аркадьевич — Википедия

Thank you again for your time and consideration.

GITSK (talk) 00:59, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GITSK: You can raise the notability issues at related portals like Portal talk: Geophysics or at the Teahouse then mention me there. João^hola 08:29, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diocese of Gurúè, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Latin Rite.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello Josedimaria:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in December!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than half a month of outstanding reviews from the current 2+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 December 2025 through 31 December 2025.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help!

// hekatlys [talk] 17:02, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Josedimaria! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Parameter not displaying, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:10, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Frederick J. Beutler

Hi. Thank you for reviewing my draft. He meets criteria 3 of WP:NACADEMIC because he is a life fellow of IEEE. I have used this source as a reference because in specific criteria notes it says "For documenting that a person has been elected member or fellow, publications of the electing institution are considered a reliable source." HRShami (talk) HRShami (talk) 08:12, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]