User talk:Superboilles

Please leave me a message

Draft:Schmid & Partner Engineering AG Submission declined on 16 August 2025 by Superboilles

Dear Superboilles, Thanks very much for your quick review of the draft article about the Schmid & Partner Engineering AG. I had not expected that it would be reviewed so soon and thought that I would have time to edit and add more references. I would like to add images, but for that I need to acquire the images and the permission to use them. GoneDutch (talk) 15:25, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I believe that once a submission is declined the draft remains in place for another 6 month or so. Images might be helpful to other entries, but from what I've seen there's very little third-party substance to build an entry on. Good luck though! Superboilles (talk) 18:47, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts

Hello, I just want to update you about Akusada and Cruz VS Cruz, both have been speedy deleted (per your request) and their draft pages could now be moved to mainspace. Thank you! Hotwiki (talk) 13:28, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your Articles for Creation review on Akusada

Hello Superboilles. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation review on Akusada is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Akusada will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:48, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your Articles for Creation review on Cruz VS Cruz

Hello Superboilles. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation review on Cruz VS Cruz is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Cruz VS Cruz will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:48, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Filippo Maria Rijli

Hi Superboilles! Thank you for reviewing the draft and your feedback.

Please find below additional references I found about the topic:

https://www.unibas.ch/en/News-Events/Awards-Honors/Article/Filippo-M.-Rijli-elected-to-Accademia-Nazionale-dei-Lincei.html https://www.unibas.ch/en/News-Events/News/Uni-Research/Basel-research-project-receives-5.3-million-euros.html https://www.whatisepigenetics.com/epigenetics-behind-unique-human-faces/ https://www.myscience.ch/de/news/2023/building_face_structures_by_remote_control-2023-fmi https://universe.unibas.ch/projects-collaborations/7645 file:///Users/filrijli/Downloads/2017-02-transcriptional-discrimination.pdf https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/783348 file:///Users/filrijli/Downloads/2013-01-epigenetic-orchestrate-neuronal-migration.pdf https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-06-corticocerebellar-neural-circuits.html https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080610092756.htm https://www.gravita-zero.org/2010/07/esof-2010-torino-what-makes-us-humans.html

Could you please let me know whether, in your experience, (at least some of) these additional references could qualify the piece for a wikipedia article.

I appreciate your input. Thank you. Vz19 (talk) 06:28, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly none of these will cut it - you need independent sources (e.g. not Uni Basel where you work, but rather a newspaper) to make a profile of you ("Filippo was born this year, he did this and that". But generally speaking it is poor form to write one's own entry and not declare the obvious conflict of interest... Superboilles (talk) 19:51, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Superboilles, thank you for your reply and feedback. I would like to clarify that I have no personal or professional connection to the subject of the article. I do not work with or for him, and have no business interests involved. I have simply followed his work over the years. While preparing the article, I reached out to him for information and references to ensure accuracy. After your review, I forwarded some of the references I had received in the hope they might be useful for the revision. Unfortunately, as you pointed out, there are few suitable secondary sources available on this topic. On the other hand, according to WP:PROF: "Many scientists, researchers, philosophers, and other scholars (collectively referred to as "academics" for convenience) are notably influential in the world of ideas without their biographies being the subject of secondary sources." Thank you again for your time and assessment. Vz19 (talk) 09:53, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Georges Dumitresco article cleanup

Dear Superboilles,

Once again, I do appreciate and thank you for taking the time reviewing and accepting the Georges Dumitresco article. I would be grateful if you could you please clarify the following:

1) The text that follows cited a number of references. I believe that you have removed all its references. Please explain. "A medical doctor and a versatile artist, Georges Dumitresco contributed articles on health topics to the daily newspaper Le Nouvelliste and also illustrated the paper and its articles."

2) The following phrase with its references mentioning the journals that published his works was entirely removed. Please explain. "His works have been published in Romanian publications such as Memoria, revista gândirii arestate (https://www.revistamemoria.ro/) [34][35], Luceafarul[36], Literatorul[37] and Romania Libera[38]."

Thank you. Tedysh (talk) 07:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Superboilles for improving the Reinhard Höhn article up to scratch.It reads much better now. Thank you for your time and attention. Meanwhile I need to improve and I'll keep working on that. Cheers

thanks - not even sure this in the correct place Scarp-bolt (talk) 16:30, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]