User talk:JeBonSer

Halo

Europe
User:JeBonSer User talk:JeBonSer Special:EmailUser/JeBonSer Special:Contributions/JeBonSer https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/JeBonSer https://xtools.wmflabs.org/pages/en.wikipedia.org/JeBonSer User:JeBonSer/Awards
Home
Talk
(Archives · Newsletter)
E-mail
Contributions
Edit count
Articles
Awards



Welcome!

Hello, JeBonSer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! mgiganteus1 (talk) 18:32, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi JeBonSer! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:47, Monday, May 25, 2015 (UTC)

About article Soda Forest

[edit]

Hi , i just added supported references at article Soda Forest , that you have tagged. Thank you Lanceloth345 (talk) 11:39, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Added +1 new source that support all article. Lanceloth345 (talk) 11:48, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

This isn’t a question I just wanted to thank you for accepting my page “The battle of Brecon”. Also all the topics you are interested in are highly interesting and diverse (it is excellent to see another history lover especially an Ancient history lover.) KeyolTranslater (talk) 08:18, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate draftification: 63rd Airborne Brigade

[edit]

Hi there, and thank you for your help with NPP! I wanted to reach out because I noticed you recently draftified 63rd Airborne Brigade. Because this article was created more than 90 days ago, it is not eligible for draftification (see WP:DRAFTNO). The script you're using, MoveToDraft, should have a bright red notice stating when an article is not eligible for draftification, either due to age or active editing. Make sure you page attention to this! Additionally, you did not provide a rationale for deletion nor notify the article creator, both of which can be automated through the MoveToDraftScript. If you think I've missed something or made an error, please let me know. I'm open to feedback. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:55, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrillization of Polish under the Russian Empire was also draftified without explanation, despite being over 90 days old. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:31, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Significa liberdade: Sorry for the inconvenience, but I would like you to know that the MoveToDraftScript that I am using doesn't have a bright red notice every time I encounter an article that has been created for more than 90 days. That's why I didn't know that it was not right to draftify an article that was created for more than 90 days. Maybe the script that I have used was an old script. JeBonSer (talk) 02:39, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply! I just noticed that you're using a different MoveToDraft script than I thought, so I apologize if my comment came across as harsh! I use User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js, whereas it looks like you're using User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js. Because the latter has not been updated since 2020, I would suggest switching over to the former. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:43, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

[edit]
Precious
Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:23, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quick draftification

[edit]

Hello there, and thank you for your help with NPP! I wanted to reach out because I noticed your recent draftication of Draft:Vila Praia de Âncora, which occurred three minutes after the article was created. Per NPPHOUR, articles shouldn't be draftified if they are actively being edited. In practice, this means articles shouldn't be draftified if they have been meaningfully edited in the past hour. Draftifying articles too quickly can come across as bitey -- especially considering that articles in mainspace do not need to be complete, and editors are allowed to develop articles in the mainspace.

Additionally, I noticed that you did not inform the editor that their article was draftified or provide rationale for the draftification. To help with some of these processes, I recommend switching your draftification script to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js. The Evad37 script hasn't been updated since 2020, and the MPGuy2824 does more automatically, including notifying editors and providing rationale for draftification. It also alerts you to articles that may not be eligible for draftification.

I hope this makes sense. Thank you again for all your help with NPP. It's definitely appreciated! Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:50, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Diocletian boundary stones

[edit]

Hi JeBonSer, thank you for reviewing the above-mentioned article. Q: why did you tag it as uncategorized when it is included in two relevant categories? Cheers רמרום (talk) 14:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@רמרום: Error tagging because of the late refresh of the page during the time I tagged it with the "uncategorised" tag using the Page Curation Toolbar. JeBonSer (talk) 15:00, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing unsourced articles

[edit]

Hello, and thanks again for your help with NPP! I wanted to reach out because I noticed you marked a couple unreferenced articles as reviewed this month (see List of mountains in Afghanistan and Draft:Bazirite). Looking at the logs, you marked the articles as reviewed, then tagged as unreferenced. Per the flowchart, unreferenced articles should not be marked as reviewed. If you have any questions about this, please let me know. Thanks again for all your work this past month! Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:08, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025 NPP backlog drive – Points award

[edit]
The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia   
This award is given in recognition to JeBonSer for accumulating at least 500 points the September 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Utopes (talk / cont) 03:07, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025 NPP backlog drive – Streak award

[edit]

Geneva mechanism Award

This award is given in recognition to JeBonSer for accumulating at least 25 points during each week of the September 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Utopes (talk / cont) 04:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025 NPP backlog drive – Re-re-view re-ward

[edit]
The Teamwork Barnstar
This award is given in recognition to JeBonSer for performing at least 25 re-reviews in the September 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Utopes (talk / cont) 08:20, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

[edit]

Welcome, welcome, welcome JeBonSer! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2025 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk) 06:35, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]