User talk:KeyolTranslater

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Trinidadian French-Creole moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Trinidadian French-Creole. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:36, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What will I need to establish notability, it is decently well known in Trinidad (If you want I can link multiple channels that cover the language and the culture of French-Creole-Trinidad), multiple singers also used the language and some words still remain. On the Antillean Creole wikipedia page it mentions Trinidadian french creole, which is the only creole (except the obscure San-Miguel Creole) that doesn't have a proper page on wikipedia and I thought that it would be right to give this dying language some recognition. Thank you for your help. KeyolTranslater (talk) 19:20, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trinidadian French-Creole (August 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anerdw was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Really good start. Claims currently attributed to YouTube channels and blogs need to be given reliable sources or removed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Anerdw (talk) 06:10, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So video archives are not allowed? I can probably find some videos on different websites, would that be allowed? KeyolTranslater (talk) 08:15, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also I am not trying to go against the rules but I do believe these YouTube sources to be genuine, KatVixenchick is run by a professor and Myrote is run by an author who wrote a book of the same name. I do understand that checks need to made to YouTube sources and blogs however I do believe that the sources I have found are genuine KeyolTranslater (talk) 08:27, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Anerdw

[edit]
Hello, KeyolTranslater. You have new messages at Anerdw's talk page.
Message added 13:09, 9 September 2025 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Anerdw (talk) 13:09, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trinidadian French-Creole (September 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:43, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samuel Mitchell (governor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Topsham. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gros Jean

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gros Jean requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 0xReflektor (talk) 08:34, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He created Calypso/Kaiso music, it is on the front page “Legendary founding of Kaiso” KeyolTranslater (talk) 17:18, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph de Bouloc

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joseph de Bouloc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 0xReflektor (talk) 08:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He was governor of Grenada, it says on the page. KeyolTranslater (talk) 17:19, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pierre-Claude Bonvoust d'Aulnay de Prulay

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pierre-Claude Bonvoust d'Aulnay de Prulay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 0xReflektor (talk) 08:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joseph de Bouloc

[edit]
Notice

The article Joseph de Bouloc has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 0xReflektor (talk) 09:41, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joseph de Bouloc for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph de Bouloc is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph de Bouloc until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

0xReflektor (talk) 10:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heullari moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Heullari. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. grapesurgeon (talk) 03:00, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aww Man, no worries, it’s hard to establish notability because it’s from N. Korea, a region which doesn’t really share their information as much. Like if you go onto YouTube you can seen various versions of the song by the various bands, and if you were to ask a North Korean they’d probably know what you are talking about. (I don’t condone North Korea I just found this topic interesting). Also I did find quite a few sources but they were all either in Korean or broken. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 11:22, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heullari (November 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Largely referenced to unreliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 10:05, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, KeyolTranslater! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 10:05, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Juchewave moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Juchewave. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. grapesurgeon (talk) 14:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I don’t think it should be moved to draftspace, it seems notable enough when you search on sound cloud or YouTube for Juchewave, it is a small (but not too small) movement of music, it’s very hard to find sources that mention it because article writers wouldn’t write about a somewhat niche music genre online. There are many videos which have thousands of views which I suppose show notability, but I couldn’t use those as evidence as YouTube is considered an unreliable source. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 18:48, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's precisely the issue; we rely on WP:RS for notability. The burden of proof is on you to find notability when you create new articles. If it's hard to find RS, then maybe it's not notable. We don't judge notability based on views on social media btw. grapesurgeon (talk) 18:51, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah ok I understand, but does that mean famous social media personalities and musicians aren’t notable due to being on social media, or do they get to a stage of relevance? Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 18:54, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Social media follows/views/likes/subscribers etc are all irrelevant to Wikipedia notability. How we judge notability depends on the topic (see WP:N; has different sections by topic) but in general we rely on coverage in major, reliable academic or journalistic sources. grapesurgeon (talk) 18:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I understand 👍 Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 18:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Provenance

[edit]

Where did you get this image? Clearly you did not get in a time machine and photograph someone who died in 1808. DS (talk) 14:49, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It’s a photograph of a miniature painting. It is Louis Cazot Sr (the uniform has military tassels on the arm, showing it was someone of military standing, which would’ve been Louis Cazot Sr. as opposed to his son who was in the militia but of a lesser rank). Is it that hard to tell it’s a painting/sketch. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 16:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Very simplified: for copyright purposes, an accurate two-dimensional representation of a two-dimensional artwork is considered equivalent to the original. You are not considered the creator, the original portraitist is. Similarly, the date of creation is not "when you uploaded it to Commons" (or, for that matter, when you took the photo). It's when the original image was created. DS (talk) 00:38, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well it would be prior to 1808, I assume 1796 after he was elevated in status in the Grenada Militia. He is wearing a military uniform (and he was head of the militia- I have documentary evidence if you require on him being the head of the militia), he retired soon after from the militia therefore it was made between 1796-1808 (probably on the earlier side). The original portrait artist is unknown but it isn’t the highest quality therefore I assume it was a local Grenadian painter who created this sketch. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 10:15, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And also I saw that photos and depictions of now deceased persons are in the public domain (not that would mater as the artist and Louis Cazot have both been deceased for 200 years) Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 11:05, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine. Make sure to add that information to the file on Commons. Original artist unknown; date between 1796 and 1808. DS (talk) 14:13, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes sure will do. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 14:33, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It comes from an acquaintance of mine, but it was not made by them, it was made around the 1790s, and I believe this original version is in Grenada still, an heirloom of the LaGrenade family (which still exists and is headed by Cecile LaGrenade). Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 16:18, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello KeyolTranslater! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Iron Cross second class recipients, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Dent (politician) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Samuel Dent (politician). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Equine-man (talk) 14:24, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Problems with grammar, like I knew it would be drafted and I’m not surprised, but language grammar problems? Really? I’m fluent in English and the grammar seems fine. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 14:54, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trinidadian French-Creole (November 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrysGalley was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
A number of the sources don't work and the end External Links needs tidying up. Hopefully not a lot of work to do here.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ChrysGalley (talk) 20:00, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Really? Perhaps you live in a foreign country because as far as I’m aware all the sources work. Let me quickly check Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 09:31, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello KeyolTranslater! The thread you created at the Teahouse, A page which has been on the waiting list for quite a while., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:08, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Blakie moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Lord Blakie. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Theroadislong (talk) 18:51, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Belvedere estate moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Belvedere estate. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Theroadislong (talk) 18:53, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lord Blakie has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lord Blakie. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:55, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello KeyolTranslater! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Wikipedia Clone, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:12, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello KeyolTranslater! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Need assistance on a draft article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:11, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trinidadian French-Creole (November 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrysGalley was:
Just a technical decline to prevent another review editor picking this up before it is quite ready. The submitting editor is free to resubmit whenever they are ready.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ChrysGalley (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, I’ll complete the page soon. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there @KeyolTranslater, this is just a technical decline - if it is resubmitted it goes into a big list and a review editor may spend quite a while on it before seeing all the notices and Talk pages. So this is just to get the pressure off everyone until the article is ready. Just seen your message back, so we are just crossing over here. Take your time. ChrysGalley (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]