User talk:DragonflySixtyseven

IMPORTANT NOTE: ADD YOUR MESSAGES AT THE BOTTOM, NOT THE TOP. OTHERWISE I MIGHT NOT SEE THEM.

Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.

Previous discussions:

Happy New Year, DragonflySixtyseven!

Happy New Year!

DragonflySixtyseven,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Myrrha

Hello! I see you cited my review of **Myrrha** in your article on the story. How did you find Galactic Journey? :) --Neopeius (talk) 04:27, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Originally... probably via File770, or possibly while doing the reading for the Hugo Award for Best Fanzine. While writing the article on Myrrha... probably just Google.

Interestingly, a post on GJ is directly responsible for me writing the article about Antoni Przybylski. DS (talk) 04:39, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've mentioned you

Hi, in case the ping didn't work, I mentioned you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#New user repeatedly citing Wikipedia, does not communicate. DuncanHill (talk) 14:46, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Holiday/Tim Hunter Wiki bio

I’ve lived with this ridiculous entry for years and I can continue to live with it, but it’s utter nonsense. The Trumbos never wanted or asked for the physical Oscar statue back; my dad, who fronted for Trumbo, and Trumbo were fast friends for life, and the idea that I would have anything to do with it is nuts. The Oscar sat in the bottom of Ian’s filing cabinet for decades. In ‘93 the Academy “restored” Trumbo’s story credit and had a ceremony giving the family a new Oscar, and I was at that ceremony with the Trumbo family; Mitzi Trumbo was my roommate. The graf in the McFadden book about tv producer Dan Curtis doesn’t even say what the Wiki bio says, though I don’t have the citation with me now. I’ve never given a damn about this stuff, but some outraged friends have indeed tried to delete or correct it. Anyway, the idea that the Trumbos asked Ian to give back the physical statue is completely false; and the idea that I, his son who had nothing to do with any of it, was ever involved or asked for anything is even more nuts. In fact, I was mostly responsible in helping Trumbo’s son, Chris, to get the Writers Guild to restore Trumbo’s name on the actual screenplay credit (the Oscar in ‘53 was in fact for best original story). Listen, I’ve had a long career myself and have managed to live with this nonsense and survive quite nicely; but if you’re the guy who keeps putting in that the Hunters, me specifically, refused to give their close friends The Trumbos back the actual ‘53 Oscar statue, I have to tell you it’s a completely spurious entry. I leave it to you, Dragonfly. Salut/Tim H 179.50.232.64 (talk) 04:07, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Floating islands as cultural touchstones

Hi! I read your essay on the philosophy of the Cultural References section before hitting "restore" on that section for the Floating Island page. Yes, it's people eating food, but this is not a common dish--I went to look it up on Wikipedia after I watched the Hepburn/Tracy movie and thought this old cinematic reference would be interesting to Wikipedia users. Then a few other users listed a handful of other references, which I found interesting and cool. This is my first "talk" entry, so sorry if I miss some formatting thing.Winnifred Goldring (talk) 14:59, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What happens if it happens?

Source: https://www.facebook.com/JohnConroe/posts/pfbid02UgNaDV3sYgG9oeX4gSkewwgZ5BysMeYP59uh79GDczjh8F2HrbqE3fmfKRNm8tpEl?__cft__[0]=AZVLVO5X8evwH8vmQ1JKfhiB9AeawDJiBvaLr6H9I0SNr2sE7GWFF5tiUWqNmk3zJqmxvTvU2UZaLn_ndDR1_CQ-gsCOJzAH0-19dTO7Cq3D07ytIIOe9fSqH91p-M6lAv2AjpVnFIfNO6iUtfLHfHwZSCyTQd_fDK3Nj5EEc5qZVg&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R

If this happens how long would it take to get a page for it on Wikipedia and would that mean the author could get his page created on Wikipedia? CarverSindile (talk) 00:19, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects for

Hi Dragonfly. I've been submitting possible redirects for the User:DragonflySixtyseven/Marquis necrology list via WP:AFC. I've found a few that appear to be typos in the original book:

"Winfleld Smith" = Winfield Smith
"Anton S. Hesing" = Anton C. Hesing
Elizabeth Eleanor Greatorex = Eleanor Greatorex (may be confusing Eleanor Greatorex (1854-1917) with Eliza Pratt Greatorex (1819-1897)?)

74.94.190.241 (talk) 16:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but if you find any more that are such obvious errors, just correct them in the source.

As for Greatorex: you're probably right that Marquis conflated the two, but given that it was a list of people who died between 1895 and 1901, they most likely meant Eliza Pratt, not Eleanor Elizabeth. DS (talk) 16:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling of "Licensed"

In [this diff], I don't understand what you mean by "Not mentioned in MOS:S". It's very clearly mentioned. The noun spelling is "licence" in all varieties of English except AmE, in which it is "license". The verb spelling is "license" is used in every variety. "Licence" (and hence "licenced" etc) is always an incorrect verb spelling, except in archaic texts (and that's why it appears in Wiktionary). It's really not contemporary BrE usage. Bazonka (talk) 20:04, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's implied, but it's not present. DS (talk) 20:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are splitting hairs. What's there is clear enough. Bazonka (talk) 20:12, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up on our IRC chat

Hi! We were chatting on IRC about c:File:Centre of New Industries and Technologies, 2006.JPG/File:Cnit.JPG because the image is not acceptable for Commons (no Freedom of Panorama in France). Could you please undelete File:Cnit.JPG so I can take care of the Commons file? Best, — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Restored. DS (talk) 14:59, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Caroline

Glad to see that you created a page on Miss Caroline. It may be worth noting that the panels which ran in newspapers were mostly -- but not solely -- reprints of panels from the book, and also that in 2020, About Comics reissued the book, expanded to include the additional panels. Both facts are referenced in this press release -- which as a press release doesn't add notability, but does give information. I won't be adding this information myself, because I'm the publisher of About Comics, so COI-city!, but noting collections is pretty common in strip articles. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 00:44, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping me in my first article!

Hi you met me in Wikichat, I was OrangeOcelot32 and I asked advice from you for making my first article about an Iloilo City Government official. Thank You for entertaining my questions, I might pester you again to improve my article! Regards! :D Charles Jayson Zaldivar (talk) 05:05, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Windup Girl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pulp fiction.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion related to an article created by me

There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding reason for discussion. The thread is Request for Resolution of Undisclosed Paid Tag on Article "The Chenab Times". The discussion is about the topic The Chenab Times. Thank you. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 08:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Please ignore! Sausage fingers when scrolling my watchlist. So sorry. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:06, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Assitance

Hello, i hope you're doing great. I saw your message to Jamiebuba seeking clarification to why he rejected the article I created, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ola_Oresanya

I am doing everything to improve the article, have followed all the instructions and advice of other editors who have even helped to correct the article.

respectfully, I have seen many articles with less references, citations and less quality in the content approved here. I feel the articled meets notability deserves an approval, or better still given more chances for corrections.

Please i need your honest opinion and review of the modified article i created after making some adjustments and adding more references. Here is a link to the new article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Oladimeji_Oresanya

Thanks for your time Semilore90 (talk) 18:05, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The allegory of the fox

It's good! I want to run it in the Signpost. This is good, yes? May I? jp×g 18:25, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly. Make sure to include the context (i.e., the quote from Collect).

Can I ask how it came to your attention in the first place? DS (talk) 22:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Review request

Dear DS Hello I restored a previously deleted draft (Draft:Hossein_Mohammadi_Vahid_2i) and added new material and sources to it, and included a televised interview of his event. Please check if these resources can turn a draft into an article.I checked and saw that the text were not copied from another site. Jackpet11 (talk) 16:34, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mehrdad Nikoonahad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mehrdad Nikoonahad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehrdad Nikoonahad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

E Eng 12:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Gall Bladder"

For Melancholia you said the etymology was indeed "Gall Bladder" and provided a source. Someone has since said it is actually "Black Bile" using that same source. Where did you get the idea that it was "Gall Bladder"? Player02110 (talk) 23:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No idea, sorry - it was five years ago. DS (talk) 01:03, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raat.jpg

The least you can do is vote for this redirect to be deleted. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

thank you Elijahwordpress (talk) 20:47, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Resolving COI with Kenneth Zaret

Hello DS - thanks for responding to my help request. I've added affiliation on my userpage and placed the COI header on Kenneth Zaret's talk page. Would it be best to revert to the old version (15:18, 1 May 2023‎) and then I can follow the Edit COI template to start the process to update to Zaret's page? Birch1896 (talk) 15:36, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

		Anti-Wikibullying Barnstar
		Thank you for your impactful anti-bullying contribution Imperial ^[AFCND] 10:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dikkatra Parvathi Poster .jpg

I feel this file must be deleted as the image is not a poster (the first version of the file wasn't one either but a video cover), is miscapitalised and has an unwanted space. May I get this to RfD, or can you easily just delete it? Kailash29792 (talk) 07:04, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For whatever reason, I'm not comfortable with doing that unilaterally. Go to RfD. DS (talk) 03:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gone to RfD. Please feel free to vote. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:17, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of redirect File:Raat.jpg

Hi DragonflySixtyseven,

I noticed your deletion of this file redirect. Although the logs are slightly confusing, it appears to have been an {{R from move}} from File:Raat (movie poster).jpg, which was at that title from 2009 until recently.

WP:FILEREDIRECT states that [i]n most cases the file redirect should remain, except if the original name falls under one of the revision deletion criteria...or shadows a file on Commons - neither of which appear to apply in this case. Therefore, unless there is something I’m missing (in which case I apologise), please could I ask that the redirect is undeleted?

All the best, ^user:A smart kitten_meow 13:23, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What you're missing is that someone took it to RfD, and I decided to shortcut the process by just deleting it. That was procedural; however, it's clearly very important to you that this redirect continue to exist, so I've restored it. DS (talk) 00:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Always precious

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:49, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, DragonflySixtyseven!

Happy New Year!

DragonflySixtyseven,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 14:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 14:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nardwuar

Hi DS, I saw your edit to that page. What part of Canadian Jew was unsourced to you? That he was born in Vancouver and is Jewish are the first 2 sentences in the early life section and sources currently in the article mention both. Nobody (talk) 06:15, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No idea how I didn't see that. Thank you for pointing that out. DS (talk) 14:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:REFUND

You may find User:SD0001/RFUD-helper this helpful when doing REFUND requests. It provides some handy options, and will reply to the request with "done" or "not done", etc... which is a common courtesy. I'll mark your recent refund as done... - UtherSRG (talk) 17:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2005

Heh, 19 years ago? Sorry, I don't recall. --El on ka 05:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Joseph S. Bartley

Hello! Your submission of Joseph S. Bartley at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Joseph S. Bartley

On 6 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joseph S. Bartley, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after Joseph S. Bartley was sentenced to twenty years in prison for embezzlement, he tried to have himself declared legally dead? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph S. Bartley. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Joseph S. Bartley), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I meant the article ELF(film) not SCP Foundation

I understand dnw Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 22:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the SCP trouble

Heh..[(●¥●)] Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 04:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble with Spanish protest page

Hello. Spanish protests against the amnesty (2023-2024) - Wikipedia This page has been subject to numerous edits without any evidence given. Spanish protests against the amnesty (2023-2024): Difference between revisions - Wikipedia Spanish protests against the amnesty (2023-2024): Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

User contributions for Unidosporasensio - Wikipedia In addition to this user not providing any sources or evidence that the protests are still ongoing, I have reason to believe that it is a sock account of this user, User contributions for Dreimouse in an nutshell - Wikipedia, who has been making identical edits and arguments without evidence, despite repeated warnings. Spanish protests against the amnesty (2023-2024): Difference between revisions - Wikipedia Talk:Spanish protests against the amnesty (2023-2024) - Wikipedia User talk:Dreimouse in an nutshell - Wikipedia

Given that this has been ongoing for weeks and no one has given any evidence that these particular protests are ongoing, I ask that the page be restored to 2023 Spanish protests against Catalan amnesty, that the page be put on full protection, that both of these users be banned for constantly making edits without giving any sources, and for using sock accounts, since the edits and the lack of sources strongly implies its the same person, and that the protests be declared definetifly over. Thank you. (2607:FEA8:7221:F600:6D6D:96B4:58C3:9331 (talk) 23:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Saltly sea dog

You left a note asking that I be more formal, having taking issue with the details of an article I wrote. I have issue with details that corroborate what I have tried to convey about people; are deleted by editors whom appear to have no use for those details. I did not say that in reading the cite it came across that the commodore was in his later years prone to injecting into his converse language not suitable for delicate ears, and that while he kept a talking bird the curse words it repeated has been described thusly. He cursed, the bird cursed and if you have a better way of stating this, please, have at it. Deleting the entry does no service to this decorated seaman and hero of WWI & WWII. Plain spoken has always meant to allow for the language used below decks.

In Bahia he picked up a talking parrot he named Barnacle Bill, which became a salty sea dog itself, the captain always had a ready smile and was very plain-spoken, the Transatlantic Commodore was the epitome of an old sea salt.

The edit to this trashed hours spent trying to find a cite for this bird, in real life, the 1909 cartoon for the talking bird wasn't good for publication, but the commonalities between the cartoon, Randall's bird and Popeye's (salty sea dog) bird had me looking for that connection (WWI hero had talking bird = Popeye's talking bird) but I could not find any published connection. It's not just the talking bird, but the connection to a popular cartoon fiction of the bird making fresh comments to the Bluto character. I intended that the link for Bahia Bill not go to the popular sea shanty or to the genus Parrot, but to a TALKING BIRD. Please restore any edit to the original. Thanks CaptJayRuffins (talk) 16:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your helpfulness on the SCP Foundation page and it's talk page! Babysharkboss2 was here!! ^{King Crimson} 17:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good job, on everything

		The Editor's Barnstar
		for being one of the best darn editors

Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 22:25, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Invitation to join the Twenty Year Society

Dear DragonflySixtyseven,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more.

Best regards, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

— The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question about Marquis

Hello. Awhile ago I stumbled up the User:DragonflySixtyseven/Marquis page by happenstance and I've been trying to help maintain it every once in a while. I have noticed something that may be an accidental omission, but I wanted to check and make sure it wasn't intentional. I was checking the blue links in the Summerbell section when I noticed John Preston Sutherland (in between George Sutherland and Roderick Dhu Sutherland in the book) is missing on the page's list. It isn't a red link, its just not present in the list at all. Should the name be added? RoundSquare (talk) 23:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I simply hadn't gotten around to cleaning that section yet, because this is all just a hobby and there are lots of other things to do on Wikipedia and its sibling projects. If I'd been doing the sections in order instead of just whichever ones I feel like, that might have been more obvious.

I wouldn't be surprised if there are other entries in that section that are missing or display OCR errors (e.g., "Williain" instead of "William"). Thank you for asking. DS (talk) 00:46, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Faber and Faber books

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven,

I hope your week is starting off well. Just a reminder that category redirects are formed differently from article redirects. Please look at the code/template on this page so that creating them will be easier in the future. Many thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request to View Deleted Revision of Metalachi

Hi DragonflySixtyseven,

I noticed that the page Metalachi was deleted for not asserting notability back in 2013. I am interested in viewing the content of the last deleted revision for research purposes as I consider reviving this page. Could you please help me with this?

Thank you, NatBaca (talk) 18:47, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The deleted page "Faux News"

Is this still not worth putting at Satiric misspelling, even after 15 years? Chuterix (talk) 22:10, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Editor experience invitation

Hi Dragonfly :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 16:15, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

AFDs

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven,

I've noticed that you have been closing some AFD discussions. A couple of points. Please let discussions run for a full 7 days before closing them instead of closing them a day early. There is really no reason to close a discussion before 7 days have passed unless it is a SNOW situation which would mean an overwhelming number of Keep or Delete arguments and very little opposition. Secondly, according to WP:NOQUORUM, if an AFD discussion has only 1 Delete argument, we typically close these discussions as "Soft Delete" due to low participation. Soft Deletions are possible if the article has not been to AFD or been PROD'd before and there are no arguments to Keep the article. This allows the article to be restored via WP:REFUND should an editor wish to work on the article and improve. If you are using XFDcloser, which I recommend, you'll see the option to tag a Delete closure as a Soft Delete.

Thanks for helping out, we can always use more conscientious discussion closers! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Miles Rock

Hi, I saw that one of your sandbox pages of a "who's who" had a link to the not yet created Miles Rock. Well, I just created it if you wanted to take a look and probably improve. Fascinating individual. Regards dm (talk) 10:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Message

I don't know if you have pings turned on, but I left you a message at User talk:Teatreez#Copyright violations and autopatrolled. If you don't want to get involved, that's fine, but I think this is the least-drama and stress filled way to go about it. Sorry to bother you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 08:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Director-general of justice and home affairs" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Director-general of justice and home affairs has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 1 § Director-general of justice and home affairs until a consensus is reached. MimirIsSmart (talk) 13:43, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking assist in WP:ANI

Hey there Just wondering if you could help take a look at this case. Said IP address has persisted with disruptive behaviour and I feel it best to request urgent intervention on this. Thank you! hundenvonPG (talk) 04:30, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

QD info ('red link')

Hi,

Kelly Xu (financier/investor), article has been QD, "06:35, 2 December 2024".

Many people, doing a lot of good work. Have a nice day! 2001:2020:301:A1FD:11E:D11E:1E34:E036 (talk) 05:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC) /2001:2020:301:A1FD:11E:D11E:1E34:E036 (talk) 05:16, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not clear on what (if anything) you're asking for, sorry. DS (talk) 15:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bold deletions

These appear to be out-of-process deletions. What criterion for speedy deletion does each of them fall into, if any?

File:FHM1.jpg ("bad license", but the license info {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}} isn't anything violating WP:F3)
File:LakeWade.JPG ("image used only by a deleted page", but tagged as public domain, so not eligible for WP:F5)
File:Muralb.jpg ("photo of a mural in Illinois, where freedom of panorama does not apply to murals. Image is not really needed in the article, therefore no proper Fair Use Rationale could be constructed.")
Kelly Xu ("sources 1&2 are by a Forbes Contributor: not useful. 3&6 are press releases (PR Newswire): not useful. 4 is a podcast transcript of Xu talking about her own project: Not useful. 5 is a translation of the Forbes piece. With all those removed, there's nothing left.")
File:Dh logod.jpg ("I doubt the validity of that license")
File:Esham1.jpg ("dubious licensing")

SilverLocust 💬 13:01, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your response on my talk page did not answer my question, which was "What criterion for speedy deletion does each of them fall into, if any?" The rationales you provided are not bases for speedy deletion but rather for deletion-discussion nominations (or in some instances PROD-style seven-day tagging under F4–F7).

The one exception is that you've now asserted that Kelly Xu had no indication of importance. However, that standard "is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources", so noting that the sources are Forbes.com contributors and press releases doesn't mean that the assertions are not credible.

More broadly, my concern is that you are habitually deleting pages that aren't eligible for speedy deletion. These files should be nominated for deletion, not boldly deleted. Since yesterday, there's also File:Buttweld.jpg ("unused and extremely low quality (it's 6kb, made in MS-Paint)"), again despite F5's limitation to non-free images.

I'm looking for you to stop doing that. The easiest way would be for you to agree to stop, but if you are of the view that you don't need to follow deletion policy, there are more tedious ways to seek to resolve that. SilverLocust 💬 13:47, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello DragonflySixtyseven, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025.
Happy editing,
Abishe (talk) 22:26, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 22:26, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question about Citations

Hi DS, I was wondering if you could help me with something. I’m trying to check if any of the original sources cited in the four biography articles I published contain personal identifiers, like usernames in the URL—especially in PDFs. Since some PDFs can display either the uploader’s name or the name of the person who opens them, do you have any suggestions on how to spot this easily? I just want to make sure that no identifying information was accidentally included in the citations. Logger67 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 02:23, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Tale of the Three Beautiful Raptor Sisters, and the Prince Who Was Made of Meat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Tale of the Three Beautiful Raptor Sisters, and the Prince Who Was Made of Meat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tale of the Three Beautiful Raptor Sisters, and the Prince Who Was Made of Meat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Orange sticker (talk) 15:48, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Glory Lane (Alan Dean Foster novel - cover art).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Glory Lane (Alan Dean Foster novel - cover art).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:12, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Combination Pizza Hut and Taco Bell

On 22 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Combination Pizza Hut and Taco Bell, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one analysis of the song "Combination Pizza Hut and Taco Bell" cites the ancient Roman orator Quintilian? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Combination Pizza Hut and Taco Bell. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Combination Pizza Hut and Taco Bell), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:02, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day, DragonflySixtyseven, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! RPE ✍️ 📚 04:57, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Arthur Harrison Motley

On 8 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Arthur Harrison Motley, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that instead of drinking liquor with prospective clients, Arthur Harrison Motley sent them notes written in red pencil crayon, 10,000 times a year? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Arthur Harrison Motley. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Arthur Harrison Motley), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jacques Drollet

On 10 June 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jacques Drollet, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jacques Drollet said that he would have Marlon Brando arrested if Brando ever returned to Tahiti? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jacques Drollet. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jacques Drollet), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 15,615 views (650.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mark Lasky, cartoonist.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mark Lasky, cartoonist.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dontsign

Template:Dontsign has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:5AF:9096:9EC1:275E (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting autopatrol permission to upload a new version of a photo

Hi DS,

I would like autopatrol permission to upload a new version of the photo of Roger Ailes that I've lightened using the Photoshop Curves adjustment. Please help me with this. The present photo on Wikipedia is at:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Roger_Ailes,_June_2013.jpg

Thanks. Doug4 (talk) 18:03, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not involved with that side of Commons, sorry. I recommend asking a Commons admin, on Commons. DS (talk) 23:16, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Query about review of Cecilia Rikap

Hi (DragonflySixtyseven), Could I ask for an explanation on your review of the page Cecilia Rikap? You reviewed the page a week ago or so and if I search the name on Google the page does not come up. I thought that pages are indexed for google search within about a day from the review. Is there something specific to this review or a change of practice? This is purely for my understanding and thank you for reviewing the page!

Cites

If you have sources to support comparisons to Thornton Wilder, great! Incorporate them into the text!

Make sure to attribute the opinion, because "<cultural thing X> is similar to <cultural thing Y>" is always an opinion that needs to be attributed.

If you don't want to incorporate your sources into the text, then remove the sentence entirely. DS (talk) 00:45, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notr.

I mentioned in the edit summary to look at the talk page.

Please take a look, I'm curious as to what you think. - jc37 04:12, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Youderian

Hello there. A couple years ago you commented twice that 'Youderian' sounded like an Armenian name, and indeed, it does. However, I edited the page to say he was of Prussian descent because I am a relative and that whole side of the family is originally from Prussia. The name was Guderian (like the WWII general of, I hope, no relation) prior to arrival in this country in the mid-19th century. Hope that clears it up! 147.251.22.4 (talk) 14:43, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to trust that you're telling the truth here, but the problem is that accepting "I know this, it's part of my family history, I have no reason to lie!" as a source is a terrible precedent. What if someone else said "I'm a relative of Youderian and we are 100% Armenian"? How would I know which of you to believe?

It's not likely to happen in this particular case, but "I don't have any published sources but I promise that the deceased person was of my ethnic group" is something that has caused a lot of squabbles. (Sometimes even when they're still alive: what ethnicity do you assign someone who was born in a nation that no longer exists, to parents who were from two other nations?)

That said, I suppose "I'm not Armenian, but that sounds Armenian to me" isn't really valid either. Solution: the article doesn't really need to say that he was Armenian or Prussian. So I'll remove that detail. DS (talk) 14:56, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Hey there DragonflySixtyseven, I'd like to wish you a happy adminship anniversary! Congratulations on your special day, and thank you for all the contributions you've made.

CREditzWiki (Talk to me!!) 02:18, 9 October 2025 (UTC) On behalf of the Birthday Committee[reply]

Happy adminship day

May The Swartz - Be With You (talk) (talk) 15:57, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Happy Adminship

from the Birthday Committee

Wishing DragonflySixtyseven a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!

-- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 03:52, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up from Live Help Chat – Draft:Imtiaz Rafi Butt

Hi, I was chatting with you earlier on the #wikipedia-en-help IRC channel about the article Draft:Imtiaz Rafi Butt. Unfortunately, we got disconnected before the conversation could be completed. As discussed, I have now corrected the factual detail regarding his father's death to match the source exactly: “Imtiaz Rafi Butt was just two months old when his father, Rafi Butt, died in a plane crash in 1948.” The rest of the draft is built only around The Nation’s independent coverage and one supporting source from Dawn. I’d greatly appreciate it if you’re able to revisit the draft when time allows — or let me know if there’s anything else I should improve on my side. Thank you again for your time and guidance. Best regards Hassnain Raza786 (talk) 14:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As I was trying to convey to you earlier, if you only have those two sources, I don't think Mr. Butt meets notability criteria. "Notability" is, by and large, "the extent to which someone has been noted". DS (talk) 23:53, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your honest reply — I truly appreciate your time and clarity.

If I may ask just once more, is there any version of this draft (e.g., shorter, strictly limited to the verified content) that could still be published in Wikipedia’s mainspace based only on these two sources? Or is it better to wait until more in-depth, independent coverage becomes available?

Thank you again for all your guidance. Hassnain Raza786 (talk) 08:10, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wait until there are more sources, yes. DS (talk) 12:25, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify further. If I’m able to provide one more solid, independent, secondary source (in addition to The Nation and Dawn), would that likely meet the notability threshold for an article on Imtiaz Rafi Butt? Or is a broader media trail typically expected?

I want to be fully prepared before resubmitting, and your guidance has been really helpful. Hassnain Raza786 (talk) 12:29, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Three quality sources should be enough for an article, yes. DS (talk) 13:31, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks once again for your invaluable guidance. Hassnain Raza786 (talk) 14:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jeannette Ng's Campbell Award acceptance speech

On 23 October 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jeannette Ng's Campbell Award acceptance speech, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jeannette Ng accepted the 2019 John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer with a speech in which she called the award's namesake, John W. Campbell, a "fucking fascist"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jeannette Ng's Campbell Award acceptance speech. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jeannette Ng's Campbell Award acceptance speech), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 00:02, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Guide to temporary accounts

Hello, DragonflySixtyseven. This message is being sent to remind you of significant upcoming changes regarding logged-out editing.

Starting 4 November, logged-out editors will no longer have their IP address publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account (TA) associated with their edits. Users with some extended rights like administrators and CheckUsers, as well as users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will still be able to reveal temporary users' IP addresses and all contributions made by temporary accounts from a specific IP address or range.

How do temporary accounts work?

Editing from a temporary account

When a logged-out user completes an edit or a logged action for the first time, a cookie will be set in this user's browser and a temporary account tied with this cookie will be automatically created for them. This account's name will follow the pattern: ~2025-12345-67 (a tilde, year of creation, a number split into units of 5).
All subsequent actions by the temporary account user will be attributed to this username. The cookie will expire 90 days after its creation. As long as it exists, all edits made from this device will be attributed to this temporary account. It will be the same account even if the IP address changes, unless the user clears their cookies or uses a different device or web browser.
A record of the IP address used at the time of each edit will be stored for 90 days after the edit. Users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will be able to see the underlying IP addresses.
As a measure against vandalism, there are two limitations on the creation of temporary accounts:
- There has to be a minimum of 10 minutes between subsequent temporary account creations from the same IP (or /64 range in case of IPv6).
- There can be a maximum of 6 temporary accounts created from an IP (or /64 range) within a period of 24 hours.

Temporary account IP viewer user right

How to enable IP Reveal

Administrators may grant the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right to non-administrators who meet the criteria for granting. Importantly, an editor must make an explicit request for the permission (e.g. at WP:PERM/TAIV)—administrators are not permitted to assign the right without a request.
Administrators will automatically be able to see temporary account IP information once they have accepted the Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy via Special:Preferences or via the onboarding dialog which comes up after temporary accounts are deployed.

Impact for administrators

It will be possible to block many abusers by just blocking their temporary accounts. A blocked person won't be able to create new temporary accounts quickly if the admin selects the autoblock option.
It will still be possible to block an IP address or IP range.
Temporary accounts will not be retroactively applied to contributions made before the deployment. On Special:Contributions, you will be able to see existing IP user contributions, but not new contributions made by temporary accounts on that IP address. Instead, you should use Special:IPContributions for this (see a video about IPContributions in a gallery below).

Rules about IP information disclosure

Publicizing an IP address gained through TAIV access is generally not allowed (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 previously edited as 192.0.2.1 or ~2025-12345-67's IP address is 192.0.2.1).
Publicly linking a TA to another TA is allowed if "reasonably believed to be necessary". (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 and ~2025-12345-68 are likely the same person, so I am counting their reverts together toward 3RR, but not Hey ~2025-12345-68, you did some good editing as ~2025-12345-67)
See Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer § What can and can't be said for more detailed guidelines.

Useful tools for patrollers

It is possible to view if a user has opted-in to view temporary account IPs via the User Info card, available in Preferences → Appearance → Advanced options → Enable the user info card
- This feature also makes it possible for anyone to see the approximate count of temporary accounts active on the same IP address range.
Special:IPContributions allows viewing all edits and temporary accounts connected to a specific IP address or IP range.
Similarly, Special:GlobalContributions supports global search for a given temporary account's activity.
The auto-reveal feature (see video below) allows users with the right permissions to automatically reveal all IP addresses for a limited time window.

Videos

How to use Special:IPContributions
How automatic IP reveal works
How to use IP Info
How to use User Info

Further information and discussion

For more information and discussion regarding this change, please see the announcement from the Wikimedia Foundation at Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF) § Temporary accounts rollout.

Most of this message was written by Mz7 (source). Thanks, 🎃 SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 02:48, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]