User talk:SilverLocust

Welcome to my talk page!

Alternatively, you can ping me on a discussion page by including {{Replyto|SilverLocust}} in a comment or contact me by email or on Discord.


Tech News: 2025-27

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:38, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2025).

Administrator changes

removed NuclearWarfare

Interface administrator changes

added L235

Guideline and policy news

Miscellaneous

  • The 2025 Developing Countries WikiContest will run from 1 July to 30 September. Sign up now!
  • Administrator elections will take place this month. Administrator elections are an alternative to RFA that is a gentler process for candidates due to secret voting and multiple people running together. The call for candidates is July 9–15, the discussion phase is July 18–22, and the voting phase is July 23–29. Get ready to submit your candidacy, or (with their consent) to nominate a talented candidate!

Tech News: 2025-28

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:02, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • July 9–15 - Call for candidates
  • July 18–22 - Discussion phase
  • July 23–29 - SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
  • The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-29

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:06, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Collins

[edit]

Thanks for that, though I think someone is trying to change the incoming links to the article. 331dot (talk) 10:44, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: You can hold off on updating those until there's a requested move. I've reverted the bold move to Susan Collins (politician)Susan Collins (politician). ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 10:47, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing. Onel5969 TT me 10:50, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Let me know if you need me to go back and revert those changes.Onel5969 TT me 10:51, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No need to revert them per WP:NOTBROKEN. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 10:55, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

The discussion phase of the July 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • July 18–22 - Discussion phase (we are here)
  • July 23–29 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • July 30–c. Aug 3 - Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Discussion phase.

On July 23, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last approximately four days, or perhaps a little longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request

[edit]

Could you change the Hip Hop template to look more like this?

2601:C7:C280:14C0:604B:6A11:AF10:4EE (talk) 17:38, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not going to remove all of the hyphens from "hip-hop". See the discussions Requested move 23 November 2024 and Requested move 2 December 2024 where there was consensus to use the hyphen. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 18:00, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Leave all the hyphens in, but other than that, change the template to what I've shown. 2601:C7:C280:14C0:604B:6A11:AF10:4EE (talk) 19:01, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The other changes consist, so far as I have found, of things like using former names of articles (like changing LGBTQ representation in hip-hop to LGBT representations in hip hop music or changing Romani hip-hop to Romany hip hop) or section names that are not the current section names. Each one that I have checked has not been a helpful change. If there's any particular changes in there that you want to identify, please say what the changes are and why they would be helpful. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 00:46, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like you to put in the rap rock genres that are not there.2601:C7:C280:14C0:38E3:7302:6F55:75EA (talk) 14:30, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-30

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:39, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections | Voting phase

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Voting phase

The voting phase of the July 2025 administrator elections has started and continues until July 29 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • July 23–29 – Voting phase
  • July 30–c. Aug 3 – Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for approximately four days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-31

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:23, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 27

[edit]

1RR violation

[edit]

Hi there. I believe this is a 1RR violation:

First revert: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamas&diff=prev&oldid=1303840029

Second partial revert, still counts as revert to my understanding: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamas&diff=prev&oldid=1303878921

Could you check and if so, take the appropriate action? Raskolnikov.Rev (talk) 01:58, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the violation and imposed a 10-day WP:0RR user restriction. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 06:36, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the prompt resolution. Raskolnikov.Rev (talk) 10:52, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-32

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 03:37, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2025).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, a new speedy deletion criterion, G15, has been enacted. It applies to pages generated by a large language model (LLM) without human review.
  • Following a request for comment, there is a new policy outlining the granting of permissions to view the IP addresses of temporary accounts. Temporary account deployment on the English Wikipedia is currently scheduled for September 2025, and editors can request access to the permission ahead of time. Admins are encouraged to keep an eye on the request page; there will likely be a flood of editors requesting the permission when they realize they can no longer see IP addresses.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Wikimania 2025 is happening in Nairobi, Kenya, and online from August 6 to August 9. This year marks 20 years of Wikimania. Interested users can join the online event. Registration for the virtual event is free and will remain open throughout Wikimania. You can register here now.

Hello, SilverLocust,

Just letting you know that this draft is nearing CSD G13 time and it is old enough that you might not receive a notification when it is deleted. Hope all is well with you. Liz Read! Talk! 03:37, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I've dummy'd it. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:46, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alejandro Zamora Shiv Shambhu Blocked

[edit]

"It is not right to block Alejandro Zamora Shiv Shambhu from Wikipedia. He helps ensure that a Mexican figure is recognized as important in the field of Yoga. I kindly request that you unblock me." 189.180.215.241 (talk) 13:08, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are instructions on the user talk page for requesting an unblock. The block should be appealed from that page while logged in to that account. Logging out in order to edit other pages (like this one) is block evasion and may led to your IP address being blocked. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 22:10, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-33

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:26, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-34

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:34, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive

[edit]
September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:32, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-35

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:09, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Word count

[edit]

Hey,

Just wanted to say that I was at 800 words (-/+ 10%) which was my word limit (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=1300894058) when the thread was archived. I've added another 200 words (and asked for an extention for it) to deal with the unauthorised unarchiving of the thread and additional allegation about things that happened after the thread was archived. I've edited my bit a few times to bring the word count down and to make it more concise, as the statement that you've brought back from 18th July was full of responses to other people directly, I've since reworded it to reduce my word count and not directly respond to every comment. This was my first arbitration I've been involved with and it's hard to know the process, plus I'm often on mobile, and mobile editing for the arbitration page is extremely hard if you're trying to reply to someone. I will refrain from getting involved in the process anymore, just wanted to explain my actions, because the arbitration started six weeks ago (and was closed four weeks ago) and a lot has developed since then. Icecold (talk) 09:50, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal

[edit]

Hi, I'd like to request that the warning be downgraded to an informal reminder, as you originally suggested. I understand the problems with my edit and I've committed to being more careful with my future edits. You might say that in such case I'd have nothing to fear. However, as you can see from another editor's off-topic comment in the AE thread about an unrelated RUSUKR edit, editors like myself working in contentious areas get scrutinised a lot and sanctions can be weaponised in future. Alaexis¿question? 19:01, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamzin and Vanamonde93: Wish to respond? I won't reduce it to an unlogged warning unless you two are fine with that, given that a warning can be logged by a single administrator. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 19:13, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would be opposed both per my comments at AE about the edits we looked at, but also because I trust AE admins as a body will not give more than necessary weight to a logged warning. I appreciate the ask. Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:40, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The headcount in favor of a logged warning was 2 in favor, 1 not-opposed, 1 opposed, so per WP:CTOP your closure was correct under a rough-consensus standard, and can't be reversed outside of a formal appeal. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 06:53, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe the appeal procedures are a restriction on the closer's ordinary discretion around revising or reverting a close. Anyway, purely hypothetical since as I said I wouldn't reduce it unless you agreed. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 07:41, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-36

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:46, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2025).

Administrator changes

readded Euryalus
removed

Interface administrator changes

readded Ragesoss

CheckUser changes

readded AmandaNP
removed SQL

Oversight changes

readded AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open on whether use of emojis with no encyclopedic value in mainspace and draftspace (e.g., at the start of paragraphs or in place of bullet points) should be added as a criterion under G15.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case Article titles and capitalisation 2 has been closed.
  • An RfC is in progress to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

Tech News: 2025-37

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:11, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections | RFC phase

[edit]

The RFC phase of the July 2025 administrator elections has started. There are 10 RFCs for consideration. You can participate in the RFC phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/RFCs.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:43, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-38

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 17:03, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Can you help me with an account problem?

[edit]

Hi, I want to ask for your help on a problem, for which I apologize here. I have been writing articles on Wikipedia for quite some time now, and I have many articles to my name, but I have never been involved in the deeper rules of the site; I was simply interested in spreading historical knowledge. That is why, at the same time, I think due to a system error, I made a mistake. When I tried to upload a picture to Wikimedia once, the system wouldn't let me, forcing me to create the address Sylvain5791 there to upload the image to Wikimedia. I didn't realise this address also worked on Wikipedia. And the Sylvain5791 address was created from the same email address I use for the Sylvain1975 account. A few days ago, I noticed a date error (the starting date of a period) on one of my maps uploaded to Wikimedia. Since that map was part of a series of maps concerning the Austro-Hungarian confrontations during 1848-1849, made by me on Wikimedia, I had to adjust the date on the map that followed this map, as well. To make these corrections, I used the account Sylvain5791, because Wikimedia did not allow me to do so with my original account Sylvain1975. Afterward, without paying attention to which account I was logged into, I made small changes to the descriptions of these maps on the Wikipedia pages where they were used. I thought I was still editing from my original account (Sylvain1975), but in fact, those two minor edits appeared under the Sylvain5791 account. I was not aware that having separate accounts on Wikipedia and Wikimedia was against the rules, nor that clicking back into Wikipedia would cause edits to be made with the Wikimedia account, because I thought that my Sylvain1975 address would not change into Sylvain5791 there by using it on Wikimedia. That is how the two edits appeared in the articles Spring Campaign and Winter Campaign (1848–1849). I sincerely apologize for this. I never used the account for a malicious purpose. If I had intended to do anything wrong, I would have created that account from a different email address. I did not mean to break any rules. As I mentioned, I only created the second account by mistake, because the system would not allow me to upload an image to Wikimedia with my original account. These edits were limited to articles I had written myself, and the Sylvain5791 account was not used for any malicious purpose (Creating an illusion of support, Internal discussions, Circumventing policies, Strawman, etc.). When I figured out that I made a mistake, I put the template retired on that account, and I also wrote an explanation on its talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sylvain5791

So, I want to ask you, what can I do? Can you help me? Maybe I can use: - Clean Start https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Clean_start, - Legitimate users option https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate_uses, - or to tag the Sylvain5791 account as: Maintenance: An editor might use an alternative account to carry out maintenance tasks, or to segregate functions to maintain a user talk page dedicated to the purpose. The second account should be clearly linked to the main account, as "This account is the alternate account of "Sylvain1975Original account", with the mention that it is used only for image uploading. Or any other option you propose.

Thank you for your advice, and I apologize for any inconvenience I caused you. Sylvain1975¿question? 19:46, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sylvain1975. There's no need to worry. You can just put {{User alternative account banner|Sylvain1975}} at the Sylvain5791 user page. (Wikipedia:Clean start doesn't apply here, because this you aren't starting over with a new account.) If you want to make it clearer at a glance that the two accounts are connected, you could make a quick request to rename it to "Sylvain1975 (alt)" (while logged in to Sylvain5791), but that isn't necessary. I don't think anyone looking at your alternative account's edits and similar name would think it is intended for deception (or other impermissible purposes stated at Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry). (Personally, I use the alt account name SilverLocust+.) ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 17:23, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! Sylvain1975 (talk) 09:25, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-39

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:52, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for creation of the redirects 'Siberian Wikipedia' and 'Siberian wikipedia'

[edit]

Can you please create the redirects 'Siberian Wikipedia' (with a capital 'W') and 'Siberian wikipedia' (with a lowercase 'w') with the templates {{Rcat shell}}, {{R from domain name|.org}}, {{R to section}} (for both redirects), {{R from other capitalisation}} and {{R avoided double redirect|Klingon Wikipedia}} (only for the second redirect) and redirect them to the article 'list of Wikipedias § Siberian', because I think those redirects would be useful to readers? PK2 (talk; contributions) 11:19, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I meant 'Wikipedia' in both instances (both with a capital 'W' and a lowercase 'w'), not 'Wikipeda'. I just fixed those spellings now. PK2 (talk; contributions) 22:41, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@PK2: I've undeleted Siberian WikipediaSiberian Wikipedia. This isn't a domain name (which would end in .org), and it's an anchor rather than a section. If the reader types "Siberian wikipedia" into a search, it already automatically fixes the capitalization. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 17:07, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-40

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:49, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AE question

[edit]

Hi, I'd like to ask a question regarding the latest AE proceedings I was the subject of. I'm asking you since you've commented on them and have been involved in other incidents, so you likely have the necessary context.

I don't want to appeal my BER - some of my edits were inappropriate and I'm still reflecting on the arguments made by admins and other users, in the meantime I've taken a break from the more contentious topics related to the Arab-Israeli conflict.

While reading what BER is I suddenly realised that I'd be banned from opening enforcement requests. I'm not a big fan of them, I don't think I've ever made AE or ANI requests. However I'm concerned that the problematic behaviour that has been happening in the PIA topic area (primarily a severe lack of AGF and removal of reliable sources supporting opposing viewpoints) would continue and I would have no way of bringing it to the admins' attention. Short of requesting an exception to this part of the ban, what would you recommend as the best way to address such issues if they arise?

To be transparent, I've asked u:Vanamonde93 a similar question here but I wasn't fully satisfied by the response I got. Alaexis¿question? 11:57, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Alaexis: Sorry, I missed the notification that you had sent this. If you think administrator intervention is necessary, personally I'm willing to be pinged from your user talk space or by email to take a look, provided that you keep the request brief (say, under 200 words for the initial message), that you don't ping others in the request, and that you only do so occasionally. However, I will try to resolve it without issuing sanctions, since I don't want to treat this as a broad workaround to the restriction. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 05:10, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! That definitely works for me. Alaexis¿question? 06:31, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Technical Barnstar
[73] 😮 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:18, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@ToBeFree: ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 04:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
😄 I also love the design of these. I looked at the table and thought "hell yes". And then I checked who added them and found noone, checked for template changes, checked for module changes and then lacked words. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:12, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-41

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 17:20, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2025).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed Vanamonde93

Arbitration

  • After a motion, arbitration enforcement page protections no longer need to be logged in the AELOG. A bot now automatically posts protections at WP:AELOG/P. To facilitate this bot, protection summaries must include a link to the relevant CT page (e.g. [[WP:CT/BLP]]), and you will receive talk page reminders if you forget to specify the contentious topic but otherwise indicate it is an AE action.

Tech News: 2025-42

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Possible 1RR violation

[edit]

I believe but am not entirely certain that this edit constitutes a 1RR violation. I informed the editor of it and they claim it is not, without addressing it and instead discussing the merits of the tag. Can you resolve this if this is indeed a violation?

I believe it may be as according to Wikipedia:Edit warring, "to revert is to undo the action of another editor." Uw-3rr states that "undoing another editor’s work — whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material — counts as a revert." Maintenance tags are not exempt from 1RR. Tags like

or

are substantive, contentious claims about an article's quality. Their removal and restoration are treated as any other content edit under 1RR. Furthermore, in the same series of edits the editor reverted other content alongside adding the tags, constituting one revert. Because re-adding a tag after it has been removed constitutes undoing the removal, that action qualifies as a revert under the policy definitions. Reinstating something they had been reverted constitutes a second revert, and thus is a violation of 1RR.

Furthermore, I believe the tagging itself violates WP:DRIVEBYTAG, but that is being discussed in the talk and can play out there. Raskolnikov.Rev (talk) 22:32, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I replied with an explanation and warning. I'd also revert the violation, but it has already been reverted. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 04:18, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-43

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:32, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-44

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help Desk weirdness

[edit]

Your name came up here. [92] Perhaps you have some sort of clue as to what the heck this is all about? I attempted to answer a somewhat confusing question about section heading formatting regarding an article on a long-dead illustrator, and through an increasingly convoluted discussion, am now apparently being accused of mistreating a 'Supreme Court rape victim', while 'obtain[ing] information about this article offering to assist me' - an odd accusation to make, since I was being asked to assist. There appears to be some sort of CoI involved too, which apparently TheArtandVintage, who started the thread, would rather didn't get discussed further, despite revealing it on their user page some time back. [93] AndyTheGrump (talk) 06:14, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't the foggiest idea what that's about, sorry. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 06:28, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Judging by this post on TheArtandVintage's talk page, [94] they may well have been editing with a previous account, and have been blocked. Maybe that will jog your memory? Probably not, but I'm thoroughly baffled - more so, since I'm now being told that suggesting that “it’s not an emergency to update an article about an illustrator that died in 1975”, as I did, was defamatory. Just bizarre... AndyTheGrump (talk) 06:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Due to ongoing CoI concerns etc, I have now taken this to ANI: [95]. AndyTheGrump (talk) 08:44, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This addition appears to indicate that the discusison of 3A vs 3B is still an on-going or unsettled topic, rather than closed with consensus. DMacks (talk) 11:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How so? "Per consensus at ___" doesn't mean ___ is still open. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 11:27, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also that change was per 4. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 11:29, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Here's something you added:
or users with few or no edits outside user space, excessively unrelated or grossly improper<ref group=meta>The words "or grossly improper" will be deleted if 3B passes over 3A.</ref>
but that "if" is not an open question. DMacks (talk) 11:45, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh sorry, I didn't check the footnote. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 11:47, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick fix! DMacks (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Guide to temporary accounts

[edit]

Hello, SilverLocust. This message is being sent to remind you of significant upcoming changes regarding logged-out editing.

Starting 4 November, logged-out editors will no longer have their IP address publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account (TA) associated with their edits. Users with some extended rights like administrators and CheckUsers, as well as users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will still be able to reveal temporary users' IP addresses and all contributions made by temporary accounts from a specific IP address or range.

How do temporary accounts work?

Editing from a temporary account
  • When a logged-out user completes an edit or a logged action for the first time, a cookie will be set in this user's browser and a temporary account tied with this cookie will be automatically created for them. This account's name will follow the pattern: ~2025-12345-67 (a tilde, year of creation, a number split into units of 5).
  • All subsequent actions by the temporary account user will be attributed to this username. The cookie will expire 90 days after its creation. As long as it exists, all edits made from this device will be attributed to this temporary account. It will be the same account even if the IP address changes, unless the user clears their cookies or uses a different device or web browser.
  • A record of the IP address used at the time of each edit will be stored for 90 days after the edit. Users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will be able to see the underlying IP addresses.
  • As a measure against vandalism, there are two limitations on the creation of temporary accounts:
    • There has to be a minimum of 10 minutes between subsequent temporary account creations from the same IP (or /64 range in case of IPv6).
    • There can be a maximum of 6 temporary accounts created from an IP (or /64 range) within a period of 24 hours.

Temporary account IP viewer user right

How to enable IP Reveal

Impact for administrators

  • It will be possible to block many abusers by just blocking their temporary accounts. A blocked person won't be able to create new temporary accounts quickly if the admin selects the autoblock option.
  • It will still be possible to block an IP address or IP range.
  • Temporary accounts will not be retroactively applied to contributions made before the deployment. On Special:Contributions, you will be able to see existing IP user contributions, but not new contributions made by temporary accounts on that IP address. Instead, you should use Special:IPContributions for this (see a video about IPContributions in a gallery below).

Rules about IP information disclosure

  • Publicizing an IP address gained through TAIV access is generally not allowed (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 previously edited as 192.0.2.1 or ~2025-12345-67's IP address is 192.0.2.1).
  • Publicly linking a TA to another TA is allowed if "reasonably believed to be necessary". (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 and ~2025-12345-68 are likely the same person, so I am counting their reverts together toward 3RR, but not Hey ~2025-12345-68, you did some good editing as ~2025-12345-67)
  • See Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer § What can and can't be said for more detailed guidelines.

Useful tools for patrollers

  • It is possible to view if a user has opted-in to view temporary account IPs via the User Info card, available in Preferences → Appearance → Advanced options → Tick Enable the user info card
    • This feature also makes it possible for anyone to see the approximate count of temporary accounts active on the same IP address range.
  • Special:IPContributions allows viewing all edits and temporary accounts connected to a specific IP address or IP range.
  • Similarly, Special:GlobalContributions supports global search for a given temporary account's activity.
  • The auto-reveal feature (see video below) allows users with the right permissions to automatically reveal all IP addresses for a limited time window.

Videos

Further information and discussion

Most of this message was written by Mz7 (source). Thanks, 🎃 SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-45

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:31, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2025).

Administrator changes

added Toadspike
removed

CheckUser changes

added asilvering

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Tech News: 2025-46

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:36, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History Merge

[edit]

Hello SilverLocust, I hope you're doing well. Could you please merge the history of Draft:The Remarried Empress into the newly created mainspace article, The Remarried Empress? Thank you for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 13:49, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, done. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 17:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've just realized there's a draft for this article, and I thought it was a redirect for a novel. But I didn't copy-paste from the draft, so why does it need to be merged? Shouldn't we open a discussion first? 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 22:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They didn't have to be merged for attribution, but they are literally on the same exact subject so there's no need to discuss merging them. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 22:05, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]