User talk:ToBeFree

To add this button to your own talk page, you can use {{User new message large}}. It can easily be modified: Colorful examples are provided on the "Template:User new message large" page.
Please note that you are currently not logged in.
This is not a general problem – you can leave a message anyway, but your IP address might change during the discussion, and I might end up talking to a wall. Creating an account does not require an e-mail address; all you need is a password and a name. You are not required to do this, but please consider creating an account before starting long-term interactions with other users. Thank you very much in advance.

Thanks for locking this article, but it seems you locked the vandalised version. This edit here is heavily disputed and has been reverted numerous times. could you please revert it. Even though the user says "You never got consensus", they are actually the one acting against consensus ~2025-33214-55 (talk) 23:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~2025-33214-55, I'll always protect the wrong version in some users' eyes. If you believe there is an uncontroversial change to be made for obvious reasons, you can click here to create an edit request and someone will help making it. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:48, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In this case it's really the wrong version, I've already explained this to another admin yesterday. This is a longterm case of IP disruption https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ser!#Black_Japanese ~2025-33214-55 (talk) 23:49, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The current version even uses the same photo twice, it's completely nonsensical ~2025-33214-55 (talk) 23:51, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sooner or later, someone will fix it then. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:56, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia questions relating to a particular matter

[edit]

Hi, ~ ToBeFree

   I have some trivia questions for you. This is relating to editing I promise. I am going to ask two separate questions. It might seem rhetorical, but it's really to have a better understanding. 

First question: Are you familiar with the congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez? If you not, no cheating. If you are are, then cool.

- What city was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez born in? 


Second question:

- Can you name a city that makes up five boroughs? 

How have you been. I mentioned the last time we communicated that I felt that I could come to you regarding any questions or concerns. I am back. 😃


To be honest, I did have a dispute with another user. But I think I handled okay. It has been resolved for now.Welcometothenewmillenium (talk) 02:25, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up on ANEW

[edit]

Not sure if this is worth reopening my ANEW post for, but BlackVulcanX (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) appeared & reverted after the article was protected & I restored the status quo; the TA also wanted this information at the bottom of the section. It is such a silly thing to edit war over especially since I didn't restore the things that were really the crux of the edit wars (section heading, new sentence opening section, etc). Instead of doing a mea culpa about missing that the information was already in the section, the TA doubled down that it wasn't a duplication before deciding actually the original sentence was the duplicate...

Behaviorally they look the same: besides the above, in August & October BlackVulcanX removed a subsection heading, with the October edit being nearly identical to the TA's edits on Nov 4-5 (ex). If they are a single person, reopening the ANEW post probably makes sense since the TA had hit 4RR but I thought checking with you first (WP:CONTACTCU) was a better first step. Sariel Xilo (talk) 06:42, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is, respectfully, nonsense. That line has been at the bottom of the section for a long time, so I partially reverted to keep it there. I've also never seen a "Sales" section that wasn't chronological. Sariel Xilo appears to be targeting his editing opponents in order to win some content agenda (?). Also, these two edits[1][2] by Sariel Xilo constitute edit warring (look at the bottom, removing the exact same line).
The talk discussion appears to be progressing nicely (and thank you for commenting there!), so if there is consensus to move that line it will be moved. I do not see the issue here. Lets use the talk page and work together. BlackVulcanX (talk) 07:49, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Sariel Xilo and BlackVulcanX, I have read these messages but don't think there's currently any advice for me to provide or any action for me to take. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]