User talk:Aidillia

This is Aidillia's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Kind Miss Seon-joo has been accepted

The Kind Miss Seon-joo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 05:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Aidillia!

Happy New Year!

Aidillia,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 10:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 10:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Aidillia,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! — 🎉🎆 Paper9oll 🎆🎉 (🔔 • 📝) 11:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year!

Aidillia,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! SnowKang (talk) 07:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

SnowKang (talk) 07:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nouera

Hello, Aidillia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nouera, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:03, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bbb23 (talk) 01:11, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accidentally archive, i'm so sorry. I don't realize it. I already uninstall the script. Aidillia^(talk) 01:13, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

To enforce editing restrictions placed by the community, as described at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1177#User:Adillia,

you have been temporarily blocked from editing. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Hammersoft (talk) 03:21, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: Edit restrictions placed by the community are enacted by community consensus. In order to overturn this block, you must either receive the approval of the blocking administrator or consensus at a community noticeboard (you may need to copy and paste their statement to a community noticeboard).

You were properly notified of your WP:IBAN with User:D.18th [1]. WP:IBAN is clear; "make reference to or comment on Foo anywhere on Wikipedia, directly or indirectly". In this case, "Foo" is User:D.18th. Yet, you chose to violate the IBAN anyway. Since you seem incapable of abiding by your IBAN, I have blocked you for 1 week. You are on an extremely slippery slope. This is a very, very lenient block. There are admins who would block you indefinitely for the iban violations you have been committing. This ends. Now. If you want to be part of this community, you will strictly adhere to your IBAN. If you're not clear about what that means, then ASK QUESTION. Continuing as you have is completely unacceptable. --Hammersoft (talk) 03:21, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aidillia,

I hope you fully understand that this is a lenient block. If, after this block is over, you return to making "accidental" edits and asking questions about the other editor, you will be indefinitely blocked from ever editing Wikipedia. This is your second chance. You must learn to move on, write about other subjects and have some self-control. The community has run out of patience and you won't be given you another limited time block should you break the Interaction Ban again. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:53, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aidillia. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 03:12, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Just wow. Aidillia, you had a window of opportunity in which to redeem yourself and you absolutely blew it. I said you were on an extremely slippery slope. Not only did you manage to slip further, you slipped as far as one can possibly fall by your own actions. What an absolutely silly move. Moving forward, you can try...as so many have done before you...to keep making sockpuppets while thinking we're too stupid to notice. Or, you could take a break for six months and attempt to come back as a productive member of this community. The former means wasting your time and ours. The latter means you might have a chance at redeeming yourself. I hope, for your sake, you are interested in the latter. If so, Wikipedia:Standard offer applies. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:49, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I never know if editing on a second device is forbidden too. I thought this device I'm using was the only one. But I only just have 1 edit (which is installing one script); there's no more than that. It's my mistake to not know about this early. I'm so stupid and silly. I will try to read Wikipedia rules about it. I never knew that creating many accounts, although there's no such problem, is forbidden. I will stop this behavior; I'm really sorry again and again for causing a problem again. I wish I knew these rules earlier. Aidillia^(talk) 02:27, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked from editing. You, by your own admission, made an edit anyway. I can't imagine how one could not know there were rules against that. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 06:10, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because I never read the rules about it? I came here to Wikipedia just only for editing my interest topic. I don't read all the time for the rules. I'm too late to know about it. So while I've been blocked, I'm trying to read it. Aidillia^(talk) 07:46, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I should force myself to read it to avoid something bad happening again in the future. Aidillia^(talk) 08:10, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. That is one of the goals of the Standard Offer @Aidillia

Re: this and the discussion above, please slow down and show a positive history editing on another project and you might be considered for an unblock in six months. You have been disruptive and feigning ignorance is more of the same pattern. You as a person are blocked. Not the account, not the device. Star Mississippi 13:38, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Aidillia^(talk) 22:29, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aidillia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been blocked for so long. I often used the Aidillia account for editing. I usually wake up early to edit on English Wikipedia because it's my routine. I admit that I have many mistakes that need to be fixed. I've been waiting for 1 week to be unblocked, but then I was blocked as a sockpuppet by Izno, which makes me in shock. I don't know if using another device is a violation. It's my mistake for editing on another device, and, as I found out recently about it, I only just installed one script (1 edit). But isn't it too harsh to block it straight? I swear to never repeat the same mistake. I will try to read all of Wikipedia's policies and change myself to a better one. I know many people are not satisfied with my behavior. I was trying to change when I would be unblocked in 1 week, but suddenly I was blocked again, which disappointed me. Please consider it; my day without editing is just nothing. It's a fool of me to keep repeating the same mistake; I promise that I'll change. Much of my work on the draft is still ongoing there: Please consider unblocking me or at least changing the setting to block just for 1 week. I'm really begging.

Decline reason:

Absolutely not. Please follow the Standard Offer advice @Hammersoft gave you above. Star Mississippi 03:47, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Aidillia^(talk) 03:34, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let's lay this out;

11 December 2024: You are blocked for 24 hours for edit warring and are duly notified.
7 January 2025: You are blocked from editing the File namespace for edit warring. You are duly notified.
23 January 2025: You are blocked for 1 week for edit warring and are duly notified
5 February 2025: You are blocked for 1 week for violating your interaction ban and are duly notified

In all that time you never once thought to look at the blocking policy (even though you were linked to it many times) and you want us to believe that? Not only that, but when you were blocked for edit warring on 23 January, you created a sockpuppet account [2]. Then, just four hours after your 5 February block you created another sockpuppet account [3]. So, according to you, in all this time that you had the opportunity to read our blocking policy you never thought to yourself "Gosh, I guess I'm blocked and shouldn't edit"? Instead, you want us to believe that you somehow thought that even though you've been blocked on this account four different times, it was somehow ok for you to use another account on another device? Wow. If you really think that, there is a serious competence issue and you shouldn't be editing Wikipedia ever. If, as seems more reasonable, you thought coming up with this excuse would fool us, there's still a serious competence issue, and you're essentially insulting the collective intelligence of the people here. In either case, I now would not recommend an unblock in six months without a complete 180 degree turn around with clear demonstration of understanding of what you have done. Not that it would have made a difference given your sockpuppeting abuses, but I wish I had blocked you indefinitely before instead of just 1 week. You're just not understanding what it means to be a part of this community at all. I strongly recommend you stop placing unblock requests until August 2025 at the very, very minimum. In the meantime, if you create any more sockpuppet accounts what slim hope you have of ever coming back to this community will be shattered. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:55, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Ok i understand. Aidillia^(talk) 22:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Daechi Scandal

Hello, Aidillia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Daechi Scandal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Good Man (TV series)

Hello, Aidillia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Good Man (TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:08, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Good Man (TV series) has been accepted

The Good Man (TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 15:17, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kissing for Nothing!

Hello, Aidillia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kissing for Nothing!, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Spring Fever (TV series)

Hello, Aidillia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Spring Fever (TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aidillia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think it's time for me to be active here back? For that long time, I've realized my biggest mistake. I'm really sorry... that's the biggest lesson for me. I'll never do it again in the future. Please consider unblocking me. I will try my best to follow the guidelines here and be more extra careful:) I will improve my behavior.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:06, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock (1)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aidillia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm really sorry for my behavior before.

It's my mistake to create another account, as I wasn't aware that creating one using another device was a violation until I read WP:Sockpuppetry.. I created 2 account with 1 edit during blocked for 1 week. That's the reason why ive been blocked right? I have 10 account that is abandoned and i don't misused it. I'm sorry if it's misunderstanding.

I'm also sorry for edit warring for uploading a file. All i do is just try to improve it. But I'm really sorry for warring; I will never do it again. I should just create a discussion on the talk page first if there's a problem. It's my mistake to not realize it earlier. If there's any problem, I should just ask for help instead of warring. I promise I will not continue to cause damage or disruption in this Wikipedia.

I promise to never repeat this mistake. I will make useful contributions instead in the future. Please consider unblocking me. I will try my best to follow the guidelines here and be more extra careful.

Decline reason:

Continued deception and "I will try my best" doesn't inspire confidence A path to an unblock would have to include at minimum' a one-account restriction. Star Mississippi 13:24, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Aidillia^(talk) 10:50, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is not the case that you only created two accounts. See Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Aidillia. --Yamla (talk) 11:30, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's my old accounts, i want to find a better username. I abandoned some of it.. I don't know if that abandoned accounts will also be included. I just create it for fun. But dont worry i don't do any vandalism or warring on those account. Aidillia^(talk) 11:42, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So why did you attempt to mislead us regarding how many accounts you had created? --Yamla (talk) 11:59, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my mistake. I will only focus in 1 account in the future. Aidillia^(talk) 12:03, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't answered the question I asked. --Yamla (talk) 12:04, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't know that creating many account is violating. I read about WP:Sockpuppetry so late. I'm didn't about that rule at that time. Aidillia^(talk) 12:09, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This still doesn't answer the question. You created ten accounts. In your unblock request, you falsely claimed you only created two. --Yamla (talk) 12:14, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh.. that 2 account is the reason i've been blocked because i made an edit and created another account during the block for 1 week. Aidillia^(talk) 12:17, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As you are unwilling or unable to answer the question posed, I strongly oppose any unblock of this user. --Yamla (talk) 12:22, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry i'm trying to understand.. what r u trying to say.. Aidillia^(talk) 12:24, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it true that i created 2 account during the block for 1 week previously before this current block? they blocked me because i creating another acc and made an edit during the block using another device Aidillia^(talk) 12:28, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it's true i created 10 accounts before. Aidillia^(talk) 12:25, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone explain me clearly.. i really want to understand what's going on.. i've been waiting for many months to be unblocked. I'm sorry for not able to understanding Yamla's message.. Aidillia^(talk) 12:35, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No technical evidence of recent block evasion. --Yamla (talk) 11:59, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock (2)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aidillia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have ten account and some of it was abandoned. And i don't misused it as warring or vandalism. Two of them were created during the block for 1 week. As i read WP:Sockpuppetry, i can finally understand it. It's my biggest mistake to not know it before.

I will think deeply before doing something that can led to disruptive. If there's any problem, i will straightly go ask someone for help or open a discussion. I will read and follow some of guidelines here to avoid problems in the future.

I swear and promise to never repeat this. I will be more careful in the future and respect each other. I will get rid of my problematic past behaviour, and be more responsibility in the future. I will improve myself and the way i speak.

Please consider unblocking me .

Decline reason:

Sorry Aidillia, I don't think you're ready to come back to editing yet. Have you considered editing on the Wikipedia in your native language? Having a history of good edits on another project would look good on you for the purposes of any future unblock requests. asilvering (talk) 00:34, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To any administrator considering this unblock request; this is a checkuser block, and can not be removed or loosened without checkuser approval. See WP:CUBL. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:20, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not leaning toward accepting, but @Hammersoft would @Yamla's confirmation of no recent evading in response to yesterday's request speak to that or you'd want a more thorough check? Star Mississippi 16:46, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I used checkuser and found nothing concerning. I think we can take Yamla's and my checks as "consulting a checkuser". PhilKnight (talk) 17:11, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Star Mississippi; yes. (and thank you PhilKnight for your check as well) --Hammersoft (talk) 19:29, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Aidillia: - do you agree to use only one account from now on? PhilKnight (talk) 16:34, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree. Aidillia^(talk) 22:06, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see you edited it @Aidillia but to your first response. No, you may not. You as a human are blocked and currently ineligible for a cleanstart. Following your plan would be further block evasion.

Thanks @Hammersoft @PhilKnight for your further insight. Star Mississippi 01:09, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Aidillia^(talk) 01:35, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

reply

To user @Asilvering : You mean another language of Wikipedia? Aidillia^(talk) 01:07, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yes. -- asilvering (talk) 01:22, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock (3)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aidillia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As suggested by @asilvering, i started editing everyday on the Indonesian Wikipedia only since 12 days ago and also Wikidata of Wikipedia. I used sandbox for testing, do some fixing, improving, and spend my time expanding some articles. I think i'm fully prepared to be here. I hope u guys can see my good contributions.

I have ten account and some of it was abandoned. And i don't misused it as warring or vandalism. Two of them were created during the block for 1 week. My fault to not know it if it's violating.

I will think deeply before doing something that can led to disruptive. If there's any problem, i will just straightly go ask someone for help or open a discussion. I will read and follow some of guidelines here to avoid problems in the future. I promise to never repeat this. I will be more careful in the future. I will get rid of my problematic past behaviour, and be more responsibility in the future.

Please consider unblocking me.. I will use this one account from now on.

Decline reason:

12 days is by far insufficient. Next reviewing admin might consider removing TPA. Star Mississippi 02:28, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Aidillia^(talk) 02:05, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-admin) Hi @Aidillia, Sorry everyone for intruding, I wasn't called, but it's quite important to point out that you started editing on the Indonesian Wikipedia only since 12 days ago.

I think you should edit there longer before requesting unlocking on en.wiki, thanks. PixelWhite (talk) 02:17, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done tq for telling! Aidillia^(talk) 02:23, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi, would it be enough if i request it in mid-september? Aidillia^(talk) 02:36, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

At a minimum. Please focus on quality edits there and understanding how you will make use of those skills if unblocked here. Do not view it solely as a tool toward getting unblocked here. Star Mississippi 02:42, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay i understand👌🏻 Aidillia^(talk) 02:48, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock (4)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Aidillia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As suggested by @asilvering, I started editing every day on the other language of Wikipedia since 33 days ago and also active on Wikidata. I'm fully prepared to be here. I hope you guys can see my good contributions there.

As I have created ten accounts before and some of them were abandoned, I don't misuse them for warring or vandalism. Two of them were created during the block for 1 week. My fault for not knowing if it's violating and doing 1 edit (installing a script).

I will think deeply before doing something that can lead to disruption. If there's any problem, I will just straightly go ask someone for help or open a discussion. I will read and follow some of the guidelines here to avoid problems in the future. I promise to never repeat this. I will be more careful in the future. I will get rid of my problematic past behavior and be more responsible in the future.

Please consider unblocking me..

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=As suggested by @asilvering, I started editing every day on the [[Indonesian Wikipedia|other language]] of Wikipedia since 33 days ago and also active on Wikidata. I'm fully prepared to be here. I hope you guys can see my good contributions there.

As I have created ten accounts before and some of them were abandoned, I don't misuse them for warring or vandalism. Two of them were created during the block for 1 week. My fault for not knowing if it's violating and doing 1 edit (installing a script).

I will think deeply before doing something that can lead to disruption. If there's any problem, I will just straightly go ask someone for help or open a discussion. I will read and follow some of the guidelines here to avoid problems in the future. I promise to never repeat this. I will be more careful in the future. I will get rid of my problematic past behavior and be more responsible in the future.

Please consider unblocking me.. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=As suggested by @asilvering, I started editing every day on the [[Indonesian Wikipedia|other language]] of Wikipedia since 33 days ago and also active on Wikidata. I'm fully prepared to be here. I hope you guys can see my good contributions there.

As I have created ten accounts before and some of them were abandoned, I don't misuse them for warring or vandalism. Two of them were created during the block for 1 week. My fault for not knowing if it's violating and doing 1 edit (installing a script).

I will think deeply before doing something that can lead to disruption. If there's any problem, I will just straightly go ask someone for help or open a discussion. I will read and follow some of the guidelines here to avoid problems in the future. I promise to never repeat this. I will be more careful in the future. I will get rid of my problematic past behavior and be more responsible in the future.

Please consider unblocking me.. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=As suggested by @asilvering, I started editing every day on the [[Indonesian Wikipedia|other language]] of Wikipedia since 33 days ago and also active on Wikidata. I'm fully prepared to be here. I hope you guys can see my good contributions there.

As I have created ten accounts before and some of them were abandoned, I don't misuse them for warring or vandalism. Two of them were created during the block for 1 week. My fault for not knowing if it's violating and doing 1 edit (installing a script).

I will think deeply before doing something that can lead to disruption. If there's any problem, I will just straightly go ask someone for help or open a discussion. I will read and follow some of the guidelines here to avoid problems in the future. I promise to never repeat this. I will be more careful in the future. I will get rid of my problematic past behavior and be more responsible in the future.

Please consider unblocking me.. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Aidillia^(talk) 00:12, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if non-administrators are allowed to do this (please delete my comment if I'm not) but I'd support this editor returning. ^EF⁵ 00:21, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree 👍 Muatsem90 (talk) 07:50, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilKnight: Care to check? --Hammersoft (talk) 12:15, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I used CheckUser and didn't find any evidence of recent abuse of multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 13:10, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]