User talk:DaniloDaysOfOurLives

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

A fox for you!

[edit]

For you work in the birthday committee!!!

CactusđŸŒ” spiky ouch 02:37, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thank you so much! This really means so muchđŸ˜ŠđŸ„° I love being on the birthday committee!! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 06:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Johnlock

[edit]

Threw my hat in the ring for GAN after all, if you're still interested in reviewing. Rusalkii (talk) 00:07, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing! I am so glad to hear that. I am more than happy to review it :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:53, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wisconsin GA review

[edit]

Hi there, I have finished all my edits to the article Closures of the University of Wisconsin branch campuses. I just wanted to give you a reminder because I realize I forgot to ping you on the talk page. No worries though if you can't get to it soon. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 15:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Pilot" GA review

[edit]

DaniloDaysOfOurLives Hey! How are you doing? I was just wondering if you were going to get around to continuing the review for Pilot (Arrested Development)? I’m sorry for asking, I know you’re busy, but I am going to be away for a few days and so I was wondering if you would be able to do it soon. Again, no rush, just wondering! Thanks again, I’m sorry if I come off as rude ;) Crystal Drawers (talk | contribs) 15:53, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DaniloDaysOfOurLives Hey :))
Just letting you know I recently fixed everything you’ve asked for, the article should be good now! Crystal Drawers (talk) 01:00, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Reviewer Barnstar
Thank you for taking the time to review two of my GA noms! Your perspective as a reader unfamiliar with the subject was very helpful, and the articles were improved with your comments :) IAWW (talk) 21:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you so much! This really means a lot :) I will happily review some more of your GA nominations :D DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:35, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Emmerdale characters introduced in 1992

[edit]

Hello there, I remember from a while back you said you had a list of 1992 Emmerdale characters. How's that going? I'm also interested to know what other characters you have drafts for from Coronation Street, Emmerdale, EastEnders and Hollyoaks. All the best! EmmerdaleFan2001 (talk) 09:45, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I gave you a barnstar after you reviewed two of my GA nominations... and then you reviewed six more! Thank you so much. Your comments are very much appreciated. IAWW (talk) 08:35, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so so much!! I love reviewing your articles and I am glad I have been able to help :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:24, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive

[edit]
May 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:YEARRANGE

[edit]

This manual of style does state For consistency, avoid abbreviated year ranges when they would be used alongside non-abbreviated ranges within an article (or related pages, if in titles), and on related pages⏀both to EastEnders (including list of EastEnders characters) and other soaps)⏀full date ranges is used. Therefore, using 2012–14 over 2012–2014 would contradict this practice. It also states non-abbreviated years are generally preferred, so shortened years is not what is preferred overall. Not to mention, it also states it should be used within a one-calendar year time, which would be 2013, not 2014⏀as exampled: 1881–1882;  1881–1886 (not 1881–86);  1881–1892 (not 1881–92). livelikemusic (TALK!) 17:30, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | May 2025, Vol 11, Issue 5, Nos. 326, 327, 337, 338


Online events:

Announcements (events facilitated by others):

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,269 articles during this period!
  • 21 Apr 2025: 20.090% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,061,363; 414,126 women)
  • 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% (2,057,083 bios; 412,857 women)

Tip of the month:

  • Those of you who experience harassment while trying to create or improve articles about women
    are welcome to bring your problems to our attention on the Women in Red talk page.

Other ways to participate:

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:19, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

New article for DYK

[edit]

Thanks again for your offer to help. This is the article I am trying to get up to a DYK for the person's birthday on June 27. How best should I proceed? Remember (talk) 20:41, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So should I just post the article up now and you will help me get it through DYK by June 27, 1912? Remember (talk) 11:14, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, so sorry for the lateness, I did not see this! The thing is that articles cannot be requested for a date longer than six weeks, so I would recommend waiting a few weeks before publishing it so that it can then be set for 27 June. I look forward to reviewing it :D DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 18:17, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Understood. I will wait until May 16 to make it live! Remember (talk) 19:18, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Amazing! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:37, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I made the article here - Irve Tunick. Should I submit this for a DYK? Remember (talk) 19:54, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Dingle

[edit]

Hey Danilo, would you be able to move my draft User:JuneGloom07/Tina D to Tina Dingle, please? - JuneGloom07 Talk 00:43, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes of course! Just moved! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 03:23, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! - JuneGloom07 Talk 04:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Charlie Suff

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Charlie Suff you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 12:24, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GAN television section

[edit]

We are obliterating this section! Nice work. IAWW (talk) 18:13, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I love reviewing articles there and I like working with you - we make a great team :D DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 18:17, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree! IAWW (talk) 20:57, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moved userpages

[edit]

Hello. I notice that you have been tagging pages in your userspace under U1 when they were created outside of your userspace. Can you please use {{db-moved}} instead of {{U1}}? As Writ Keeper noted at User:DaniloDaysOfOurLives/Move1, pages that have previously been moved are only eligible if all previous titles were in the user's userspace, so U1 is inappropriate. Thanks, Sdrqaz (talk) 01:19, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will do that from now on. Thank you for letting me know. I was unaware of this as I had used U1 hundreds of times over the past 9 or so months and there was never an issue until recently, and the pages were always deleted. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To give a bit more context, the prohibition on U1 for pages that were created outside of the requestor's userspace is a safeguard against someone moving a random page that they didn't like into their userspace so that it could be deleted without discussion. Anyways, thanks for the reply! Sdrqaz (talk) 01:49, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Syrian Revolution

[edit]

Hi, you moved Syrian revolution to Syrian Revolution - the closer disruptively closed that with their third ever edit and was a clear BADNAC so I've re-opened it. Can you please un-do that move? Thank you. SportingFlyer T·C 06:23, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I have just moved it back. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 06:37, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Charlie Suff

[edit]

The article Charlie Suff you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Charlie Suff for comments about the article, and Talk:Charlie Suff/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 07:43, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Andrew Still (actor)

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Andrew Still (actor) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 10:44, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Andrew Still (actor)

[edit]

The article Andrew Still (actor) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Andrew Still (actor) for comments about the article, and Talk:Andrew Still (actor)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 23:23, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Robot Revolution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Humanoids.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Metro discussion

[edit]

Hi @DaniloDaysOfOurLives, you mentioned earlier that there was an ongoing discussion on the reliability of the metro for soap opera information, but I can't find it anywhere! Where is it? Also, I'm just checking you got my email? IAWW (talk) 15:16, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @It is a wonderful world! The discussion is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Soap Operas#The use of Metro as source in articles related to soap operas. Also, I am so so sorry, I did not see your email! I just noticed it now - it had gone in my spam! I am about to go to sleep so I will reply to it later today - I was worried you had not replied! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 05:16, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Aha good job I checked about the email, and thanks for the link to the discussion. I noticed you are still doing so many GA reviews! How do you feel about both of us hard focusing the Television section to try and clear the whole section? IAWW (talk) 07:22, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]