User talk:ImaginesTigers
| Year | Location |
|---|---|
| 2020–2021 | View history |
| 2022 | Archival page |
| 2025 | Archival page |
Your recent Game of Thrones edit
[edit]Guess what. There are now Harv error/warnings that you put back in the article with this edit but my edits had fixed them. Care to explain? - Shearonink (talk) 16:46, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- I've been working (quite a lot) on the article over the past few days. The warnings are helpful to me because they represent where I know there is something useful that I haven't managed to put in yet, and save me time later with referencing. Harvard errors do not break the article and exist only in the biblio. — ImaginesTigers (talk) 16:48, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Did I REMOVE the unused refs? No I did not. They still exist within the biblio for future use. The article is littered with Harv errors & Harv warnings. I am working on clearing articles from Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors and this one popped up and I thought I would fix it. You object to that? - Shearonink (talk) 16:52, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not one to be the tone police but the aggressive tone over harv refs errors feels a bit surreal.
- Since this is causing you pain, I can add citations using those unused references to fix those errors for you. I've just done Westfahl so we don't need the ref=none. — ImaginesTigers (talk) 16:56, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- No pain, just a lot of ref work down the drain. Have at it, enjoy. - Shearonink (talk) 17:01, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Did I REMOVE the unused refs? No I did not. They still exist within the biblio for future use. The article is littered with Harv errors & Harv warnings. I am working on clearing articles from Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors and this one popped up and I thought I would fix it. You object to that? - Shearonink (talk) 16:52, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of A Game of Thrones
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Game of Thrones you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:45, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thank you for your lovely review to Episode 4778. I think it is the loveliest GA review I have ever gotten. Please keep being your kind and amazing self! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 00:19, 16 July 2025 (UTC) |
- That's very kind Danilo — thank you :) — ImaginesTigers (talk) 01:19, 16 July 2025 (UTC) — ImaginesTigers (talk) 01:19, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Million Award for Baldur's Gate 3
[edit]
|
The Million Award |
| For your contributions to bring Baldur's Gate 3 (estimated annual readership: 1,200,000) to good article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 16:22, 17 July 2025 (UTC) |
- Thanks Reidgreg! — ImaginesTigers (talk) 17:18, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
In appreciation
[edit]
|
The Reviewers Award | |
| By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this award in recognition of the thorough, detailed and actionable reviews you have carried out at FAC. This work is very much appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:19, 18 July 2025 (UTC) |
- @Gog the Mild: Had a look through Punic Wars. Looks brutal. The article, though – refs in particular – look gorgeous. Great work, something of which to be very proud. — ImaginesTigers (talk) 23:49, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
_John_Martin_-_NGA_2004.64.1.jpg) |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Joshua Commanding the Sun to Stand Still upon Gibeon (1816) John Martin - NGA 2004.64.1.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 01:56, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
|
DYK for Baldur's Gate 3
[edit]
On 28 July 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Baldur's Gate 3, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the video game Baldur's Gate 3 won so many awards that its creators collected them in rotating teams to avoid impacting development? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Baldur's Gate 3. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Baldur's Gate 3), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:05, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Hey
[edit]Hey, I hope you do not mind me writing a little note on here. First of all, thank you so much for your kind review of Episode 5408 - I really appreciate it! I am autistic so I often misinterpret these things, but I got the feeling that you were annoyed at me in the review as your tone was different from the last review - I probably misunderstood and am being paranoid, but I wanted to apologise if I have accidentally annoyed you in any way - it is not my intention, especially after your extremely kind review of my Episode 4778. I hope you are doing well (actually, I hope you are doing amazingly!) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:58, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
- @DaniloDaysOfOurLives: Hello, Danilo! Don't fret – I am very familiar with what you're going through because of ADHD/RSD. I am not annoyed even a little bit. I had a lot going on this weekend, and wanted to get through the review relatively quick, so I just wasn't spending a lot of time policing my tone as I wrote. In the last review, I was often rather critical so I re-wrote sentences over and over again to be as friendly as possible. Sadly I just didn't have the time on this occasion. If something was really wrong, I wouldn't have finished the review – so please don't worry, and I hope you accept my apologies for being a bit grumbly. The article is a fine piece of work, with some minor corrections, and I'd say better than the last one! — ImaginesTigers 10:21, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for being so kind and understanding - I have extremely bad RSD and it often gets me extremely upset on Wikipedia. I am so sorry that you have been not too well and busy - I hope you are okay? Please do not stress about how friendly you sound with me, as I know that you are a friendly person and I appreciate your kindness! And thank you so much for the kind words - it means a lot! I will review one of your GAs one of these days... DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:30, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Jeffrey Epstein client list talk page archive?
[edit]Hey there, I was wondering what the rationale was behind this edit: [1] What's archived is simply an unconstructive, notaforum couple of comments that qualify for simple deletion, rather than archiving - in my opinion. Thoughts? cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 21:28, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Anastrophe: It's a very fair point, and you're very right. I've deleted it from the archive and requested the page get deleted as a non-controversial clean-up request. — ImaginesTigers 21:32, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
- Excellent - thank you kindly! cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 21:52, 30 July 2025 (UTC)