User talk:Significa liberdade

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping|Significa liberdade}}), so that I will be notified.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, linking to your username, so that you will be notified.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

This is Significa liberdade's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8: 30 days

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Nomination of Soviet invasion of Albania for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soviet invasion of Albania, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soviet invasion of Albania until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited One Gallant Rush, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Standard-Times.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fred "Disco" Brown

I received a message from Significa liberdade that my article submission has not been accepted, reason being the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. States I can find it and improve it at Fred Brown (basketball) instead. I would like to respectfully clarify that the existing Wikipedia page for Fred Brown (Downtown Freddie Brown, born 1948, Seattle Supersonics) refers to a completely different individual. The draft I submitted is for Fred "Disco" Brown, born in 1962, whose career, achievements, references, honors, and biographical background are entirely separate and independently verifiable. The two individuals share a similar name but are not the same person, and the sources provided in the draft-including verified newspaper articles, organizational references, honors, awards, and external links-demonstrate clear and notable distinctions between them. I kindly request a reconsideration of the draft with this clarification in mind, as the existing article does not cover Fred "Disco" Brown in any form. Please let me know if any additional information or citations are needed to assist in the review. Monjaz (talk) 16:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this clarification, Monjaz! Sorry for the mistake. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:05, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification, and I appreciate your help with resolving the earlier confusion regarding the two different individuals named Fred Brown. If there are two drafts currently associated my account, I would like to keep only one active draft for Fred "Disco" Brown. I was not aware two drafts existed under review. Please if possible let me know which draft is currently in the review process so I can confirm which one should remain and which draft should be withdrawn or deleted. Thanks again for your assistance. Monjaz (talk) 22:35, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Neither draft article is submitted for review at the moment. Here are the two drafts: Draft:Fred Brown (Former American Basketball Player) and Draft:Fred Brown (basketball, born 1962). I would suggest merging them. As you do so, your edit summaries should say something like, "Content copied from ARTICLE" to ensure it aligns with copyright requirements (see WP:COPYWITHIN). Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:39, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it looks like you also started the draft at Draft:Fred Brown (basketball, born 1962). I recommend working on one draft for the same subject, rather than creating multiple drafts. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:07, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

UNKLFNKL

Hello, the page was created for the third time after the AfD/Speedy delete. Thank you for your attention. Svartner (talk) 00:16, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know, Svartner! I've now re-deleted the page and added some salt. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:20, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UNKLFNKL (2nd nomination)

Thank you for the useful trick of looking at the sourcing. I'd never thought of that. Appreciate your time in pointing that out to me. Equine-man (talk) 00:19, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:20, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

request

Hello, thank you for informing me about this issue, regarding this article, there is actually a problem with both the article name and the structure of the article IR IBBI; in fact, the original article is available in a correct and high-quality form with reliable sources called IRIB UHD. Can you delete the article IR IBBI or merge it into this new article IRIB UHD?Mihanyar (talk) 10:43, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I recommend starting a merge discussion (see WP:MERGE). Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:14, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Thank you for the welcome message. EagleHands (talk) 17:29, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aw, thank you! What a nice treat. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:15, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

fuck you

my article on the globe fusion skate shoe was declined by YOU I hope you burn in hell I bet you wear skinny jeans and vans this kinda pisses me off I really wanted to get that posted and I'm sorry if I did many things wrong but still fuck you goodbye. ~2025-34965-78 (talk) 07:29, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear that you're frustrated! Writing a new article is definitely challenging. When writing an article, you want to find at least three reliable, independent sources with significant coverage of the subject. For example, it wouldn't be enough to find three ads for these shoes (not independent), three store listings (not significant coverage), or three TikToks (not reliable). At a quick glance, I can't find any good sources that discuss these shoes, though that doesn't mean they don't exist! This source is a decent example of what you might be looking for, though it's specifically discussing Nike Air Force Ones. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:47, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Block notices

Just had a thought - would it be possible to suggest that the block notice itself have a bolded sentence explaining not to use AI/LLM and direct users to Wikipedia:NICETRY? I know it's on GAB, but having it front-and-centre might help (slightly) lower the vast number that we're getting.

I honestly think I'm developing an eye twitch from the phrase "Thank you for considering my request"... Blue Sonnet (talk) 16:25, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) @Blue Sonnet: I like the idea. I too am getting an eye twitch. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:58, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"According to our twitchy eyeballs, this is LLM-generated." Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:51, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We need a support group 😁 Blue Sonnet (talk) 18:26, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't be against it. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:51, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a look around when I've got time to find out how to suggest it formally - thanks! Blue Sonnet (talk) 18:27, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References: removed "general" reference

Dear Significa: you removed my reference on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ukrainian_desertion_crisis&action=history per:

06:53, 15 November 2025 Significa liberdade talk contribs  12,250 bytes −262  →References: removed "general" reference undothank Tags: Manual revert Visual edit

without explaining yourself. In most situations, adding a reference improves the article. It may be a good policy to explain your reasons for such a move. Please reply with your rational here. Thank you in advance, ApoieRacional (talk) ApoieRacional (talk) 21:07, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, and thanks for reaching out! Citations are helpful for verifying information. If the citation is not directly linked to information in the article, it should not be listed in a "general references" section. Instead, you could place it in "further reading" or "external links" if you think the reading is considerably valuable for readers. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:44, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt reply. My next question is: what's supposed to into "general references"? ApoieRacional (talk) 21:49, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you share an article that has a "general references" section? This is uncommon. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:52, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I did a Google AI, and I've got this result:

General references are full bibliographic citations listed at the end of an article that support the content "in general", but are not explicitly linked to specific text within the article via inline citations (footnotes). This style is often found in shorter or less developed articles, though Wikipedia's guidelines encourage the use of specific inline citations as an article matures.

You are correct in that, it was not my intent to place my added citations into "General References". Could you please restore my added citations into External Links. I did not save that edit on my computer, and I do not have time-reversal powers on Wikipedia.

Thank you in advance, 22:18, 22 November 2025 (UTC) ApoieRacional (talk) 22:18, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend looking into the page history. You can look at your previous revision to copy the link, then go to the current edition and add it. Let me know if you need help. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your help. I was able to figure out how External Links work. ApoieRacional (talk) 02:07, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful! So glad that worked for you. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:55, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cambridge

If Cambridge, New Zealand had a section called #Cambridge East, I would accept it as the 'primary topic' (especially given that Cambridge East railway station is just a proposal so wp:CRYSTAL applies), but it does not (so there is nowhere sensible to put a {{redirects}} hat note.

Much the same challenge applies to Cambridge North, which I see redirects to Cambridge North railway station, even though there is a "Cambridge North" neighbourhood and statistical district of that name in Cambridge, New Zealand (but no section #Cambridge North). But significantly, this station is operational.

Turning both redirects into disambigs would provide "equality of misery" for both Cambridges, I suggest. Otherwise when the station gets built, the question of primacy will be moot (in the US sense) due to Wikipedia:Article titles#Consistency. It makes sense to get ahead of the game. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 23:11, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Go for it. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:12, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ping - Question on your ping on hard v soft block

@Significa liberdade: - I have a question of soft vs hard block for @TRCHRcomms. (Responding to your ping on User_talk:Lisangho.) Are you still online? — ERcheck (talk) 04:41, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:50, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade: This was my thinking on the blocks:

It appears that @TRCHRcomms established an apparent group account for TRCHR (Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research) with a "promotional user name" on 25 November 2025. A COI-username warning was posted on the user talk page; and, subsequently, the user began editing on the Draft:Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research. As the editor had declared a COI, the block warning was "softer", but IP addresses were blocked (as possibly a group account).
@Lisangho is also part of TRCH, with a new account established on 20 November 2025, and creating Draft:Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research.
I would recommend that TRCHR sort out their accounts, address the block for username (show that they understand username & individual account requirements), as well assuring that they understand Wikipedia's policy on promotional editing.
Should I change the block warning to uw-spamublock?
Do you see any flaws in my thought processes above?

BTW-Do you celebrate Canadian Thanksgiving or American?

— ERcheck (talk) 04:56, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand your reasoning. However, it is confusing to an outsider, including the person you blocked. The block notice states that the only problem with their editing is their username, and they can create a new account with a non-promotional username and continue editing. However, when someone tried to do that, they were blocked from editing. This comes across as mixed messaging, especially since TRCHRcomms hasn't received any other notices regarding their editing. I suggest responding to the block notice with your specific concerns. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:03, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade: -- Lisangho's account was created before the block. And, it seems that TRCHRcomm's account did not request a new username, nor make any response to the block message. They were not blocked from editing their userpage.

Does the IP block prevent Lisangho from editing? I've never done a partial IP block that would allow a different logged in account to edit.
Which page should I respond on? TRCHRcomm (blocked account) or Lisangho who asked the question?

— ERcheck (talk) 05:29, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TRCHRcomm is not required to request a new username nor respond to the block notice. Rather, the block notice states they can create a new account without any issues. However, the block settings make this impossible, and have blocked other editors using the same IP address (e.g., Lisangho). I would suggest leaving individualized messages for both TRCHRcomm and Lisangho. For TRCHRcomm, I would explain that they will need to request a new account and that you are concerned that multiple people are using the account. If you do not intend for other users on the same IP address (e.g., Lisangho) to be blocked, you should change the block settings. However, if you have specific concerns about Lisangho, I would suggest bringing up those concerns on their TP. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:44, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade: Looking in detail again at Draft:Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, the first edit by the blocked editor (TRCHRcomm) changed the paid disclosure notice's name from Lisangho to TRCHRcomm? Same person / WP:Multiple accounts. Note that Lisangho was the first account created and created the draft. — ERcheck (talk) 05:57, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can certainly ask about that. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:00, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade - I put notes on both editors' talk pages. Will leave the IP block in place until hearing back. — ERcheck (talk) 06:13, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:14, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being a great sounding board. Happy (American) Thanksgiving! — ERcheck (talk) 06:20, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! And happy American Thanksgiving wherever you are! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:21, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - December 2025

Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 12, Nos. 326, 327, 355, 356, 357

Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.

Online events:

New: Alphabet run X, Y, Z | Food and drink | Women who died in 2025
Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music

Announcements:

Global Translat-a-thon 2025 06 December 2025

Tip of the Month:

Lists of deaths by year is a good resource for the December / January meet-up Women who died in 2025

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help wanted! Want to apply your skills or learn new ones? Help us plan monthly events, design event logos,
come up with a tip-of-the-month, and/or provide any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:19, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Madeline Martin

Hello! I saw that you recently published an article on Madeline Martin, but you wrote that she has only published five books, when she’s published over thirty. Those five are definitely the better well known so completely I understand the article focusing on them, but the article states those are her only books. I think this might have been just a grammar mistake, as the other books all come up right away when searching her name online. Please double check that articles articles are accurate and not misleading before they’re published. Thank you, and thanks for writing the article! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 08:50, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Notcharizard! I thought I added all the books listed on her website, but looking at her website now, I see the other book series. Not sure what happened. I really appreciate you bringing this to my attention. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:44, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2025).

Administrator changes

Valereee

CheckUser changes

Spicy

Technical news

Starting on November 4, the IP addresses of logged-out editors are no longer being publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account associated with their edits.
Administrators will now find that Special:MergeHistory is now significantly more flexible about what it can merge. It can now merge sections taken from the middle of the history of the source (rather than only the start) and insert revisions anywhere in the history of the destination page (rather than only the start). T382958

Miscellaneous

The December 2025 administrator elections are scheduled from Nov 25 – Dec 15.
An Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in December 2025, with over 1,000 drafts awaiting review from the past two months. In addition to AfC participants, all administrators and new page patrollers can help review using the Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!

Sent byMediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to reach a consensus on Runit Debbarma

Hi, I am getting in touch with you as I see you have added categories to this article, and also you are an administrator. I have been adding maintenance tags to this article Runit Debbarma earlier, which were removed by the author of the article without any appropriate changes/addition. Despite of proposed deletion, these tags were once again removed by the author of the article without any explanation. Currently, the article is in AFD-related discussion, but these tags were removed too, despite several warnings to the author. If you can give it a quick look at it, we probably can come to a consensus. Thank you for your time.Khorang 08:35, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]