User talk:Svartner
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Miguel Márquez
[edit]Hello. I noticed that you had three interventions on the discussion of Miguel Márquez, but in the end, you left no vote. Not sure whether you did it on purpose or simply forgot, so I thought it best to warn you about it (Delete or Redirect).
Kind regards. Barr Theo (talk) 23:25, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hello. I honestly have no idea what to do in this case, so I preferred not to vote. Svartner (talk) 23:30, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Svartner: Listen, I can neither help you make that choice nor influence it because of WP:CANVASS, but your vote might be the difference between a definitive sentence and no consensus, so please just follow your guts and cast your vote. Don't let those doubts beat you. Kind regards. Barr Theo (talk) 00:02, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, voted. Svartner (talk) 00:07, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- My disappointment is immeasurable, and my day is ruined... Barr Theo (talk) 00:17, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Why? That article really got confusing. If you're interested in keeping the Uruguayan player article, the ideal would be to restart it as a draft, where you can gather the sources more calmly. Svartner (talk) 00:20, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Listen, I'm not interested in keeping the Uruguayan player...
- The only reason I want to turn him into a redirect is because it is the only way to preserve my 0% deletion ratio. I currently have 1,001 articles with ZERO deletions). But yeah... I suppose there is nothing I can do to save that streak now. Kind regards. Barr Theo (talk) 00:29, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Now I understand better, I changed the vote to redirect. I thought you would like to work on the Uruguayan player's article, in case there is no one willing, maybe it won't cause confusion. Svartner (talk) 00:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Great, I have just accidentally pulled off an WP:CANVASS... This Miguel Márquez situation is proving to be a great headache... Barr Theo (talk) 00:47, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Now I understand better, I changed the vote to redirect. I thought you would like to work on the Uruguayan player's article, in case there is no one willing, maybe it won't cause confusion. Svartner (talk) 00:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Why? That article really got confusing. If you're interested in keeping the Uruguayan player article, the ideal would be to restart it as a draft, where you can gather the sources more calmly. Svartner (talk) 00:20, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- My disappointment is immeasurable, and my day is ruined... Barr Theo (talk) 00:17, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, voted. Svartner (talk) 00:07, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Svartner: Listen, I can neither help you make that choice nor influence it because of WP:CANVASS, but your vote might be the difference between a definitive sentence and no consensus, so please just follow your guts and cast your vote. Don't let those doubts beat you. Kind regards. Barr Theo (talk) 00:02, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Was the text of the new article substantially identical to that deleted in the last AfD? Jclemens (talk) 03:15, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- After the article is deleted via AfD, its recreation within a short period of time is prohibited. If you want to work on it, I recommend starting a draft. Svartner (talk) 14:09, 10 May 2025 (UTC)