User talk:DreamRimmer bot II

This is DreamRimmer bot II's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Database reports

The reports by this bot, such as User:GalaxyBot/Reports/Files credited to Getty Images should have the date in <onlyinclude>...</onlyinclude> tags (see Wikipedia:Database reports/File description pages shadowing a Commons file or redirect as an example) as it messes up Wikipedia:Database reports. Gonnym (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I have fixed it. – DreamRimmer (talk) 17:26, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Office Australia

Draft:The Office Australia was listed at User:GalaxyBot/Reports/G13 eligible drafts in this revision, despite last being edited by a human (Kobott) less than four months ago. It carelessly deleted as a result. Why did this occur? ✗plicit 00:31, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Explicit, this is a false positive because Kobott has the word "bot" in its name. I'll update the script to ensure Kobott isn't flagged as a bot in the future. I don't think many users have "bot" in their usernames, but if there are, I’ll include only regular bots in the report and remove this type of filtering to prevent similar false positives. – DreamRimmer (talk) 00:41, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to note that I have updated the script to include non-AfC abandoned drafts in the report. Please check the content of the drafts before deleting them, instead of only reviewing the edit history, as this report may include some drafts with the {{promising draft}} template. If you don't want drafts with this template to be included, please let me know, and I will remove them. – DreamRimmer (talk) 00:51, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe just look for the suffix "-bot", which does not match "-bott". ~Anachronist (talk) 02:40, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are many bots with different suffixes, such as User:JJMC89 bot III and User:Qwerfjkl (bot). So, I needed to add more filters, but for now, I have chosen to set the filter to the bot usergroup. – DreamRimmer (talk) 10:55, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:GalaxyBot

Hello, DreamRimmer,

It looks like GalaxyBot hasn't issued a report in a few hours. Could you check and make sure it hasn't gotten caught up in any system-wide snafus? Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:10, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. I am aware of this. Many bots, including mine, are unable to edit due to maxlag. The relevant Phabricator ticket is T382625. Once this is resolved, it will automatically start working again. – DreamRimmer (talk) 08:18, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the update, DreamRimmer. It looks like the bot is updating about twice a day. I look forward when it is back to hourly. Thanks again for the information. This might explain SDZeroBot's lack of updates yesterday, too. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:16, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Liz, I have started a web service at https://galaxybots.toolforge.org/g13reports, which will be updated every hour. Sometimes, the bot is unable to edit the wiki due to maxlag or other server-related issues. In such cases, you can use this web app. The only time it will not be updated is if the script or the database query fails. I hope this would be helpful. – DreamRimmer (talk) 17:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

G13 eligible drafts a day early

Hi, GalaxyBot just updated User:GalaxyBot/Reports/G13 eligible drafts, but these drafts are not eligible for deletion until tomorrow. Since there is no June 31st, the bot listed drafts eligible for deletion on January 1 instead. ✗plicit 01:10, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Explicit: Fixed. – DreamRimmer (talk) 11:01, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:DreamRimmer bot II/Reports/G13 eligible drafts

Hello, DreamRimmer,

This page hasn't updated in a few hours. Is there any way you can look into it? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed I changed my bots' usernames to make credential management easier, but renaming them caused their execution to fail in the Toolforge environment, which is why they went down. – DreamRimmer (talk) 10:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Serpent and Lily

Hello DreamRimmer bot II. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Serpent and Lily, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: @Mathglot, Ictinos4, DreamRimmer, and Justlettersandnumbers: Given that this is an early work by Nikos Kazantzakis and that el:Όφις και Κρίνο exists, I think outright WP:G13 deletion is possibly not the optimal outcome here. As always, please do feel free to disagree. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:55, 28 March 2025 (UTC). Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:55, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:SDZeroBot/Draftify Watch

What happened here? ✗plicit 00:41, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Explicit: This is a false positive. The bot was working as intended. This page has an AfC submission template and hasn't been edited by a human in the past six months, which is why it was nominated for deletion. I will exclude this page from future reports once I have some free time. – DreamRimmer (talk) 02:39, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:DreamRimmer bot II/Reports/G13 eligible drafts

Hello, DreamRimmer,

The report hasn't updated in a few hours so I thought I'd post a note about it. Hope you are having a good weekend. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:09, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like things are back to normal. This seems to happen about once a week, it just lasts a few hours and then everything is okay. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bot down?

Hi DreamRimmer, the bot has not made any edits over the past 8-ish hours. Seems to be down, so I'm letting you know in case you weren't aware of it. ✗plicit 11:55, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I will take a look at it tomorrow. – DreamRimmer ■ 16:08, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

help us out in wikipedia

I would like to propose the creation of a Wikipedia article dedicated to **Neeru Yadav**, popularly known as the *Hockeywali Sarpanch* from **Lambi Ahir village, Jhunjhunu district, Rajasthan**. Her leadership-driven initiatives such as the **“Bartan Bank”**, **Girls Hockey team**, **FPO (Sachhi Saheli Mahila Agro Producer Company)**, **“Pakshi Ghar” (Bird House)**, and **Mera Ped Mera Dost** have gained substantial media attention and brought transformative impact to her community. 59.99.179.133 (talk) 10:13, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The bot deleted my draft without warning

Why did it delete my draft without warning me i was going to submit it Is la🏳️‍⚧ 11:26, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Hello, Isla,

Actually, DreamRimmer bot II didn't delete your draft, it just posted a notification that the draft was eligible for CSD G13 on your User talk page. So, that was your warning. The bot isn't an admin and doesn't have the ability to delete pages, admin Explicit actually deleted this page. Draft:Yukinobu Tatsu had not been edited for 6 months so was eligible for CSD G13 speedy deletion. You hadn't edited the page since May 2, 2024 so I'm not sure how anyone--whether a bot, editor or admin--would have guessed you wanted to resubmit it right now. Firefly Bot posts a 5 month notification and it did so here but it only does this once not every time a draft is eligible for speedy deletion.

Any way, you can always get a draft deleted as a G13 easily restored, either ask the admin who deleted the page or make a request at WP:REFUND. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:00, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]