User talk:Gonnym

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

"The Needs of the Many" listed at Redirects for discussion (again)

The redirect The Needs of the Many has been (for the third time now) listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 28 § The Needs of the Many until a consensus is reached.

Missing you already...

... you are valued :) House Blaster (talk • he/they) 02:28, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

+1. – SD0001 (talk) 11:36, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

+1. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:54, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a Retired template on your User pages so I'm just considering this absence to be a break, not a retirement. Come back when you find yourself wanting to edit! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:24, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Episode 16 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Episode 16 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Episode disambiguation pages until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:54, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar

I noticed you haven't been active in the past month and wanted to send my deepest personal regards to you. I know we have not always seen eye-to-eye on everything, but I still respect and appreciate you as an editor. I don't want any bad blood between us, and I wanted to echo that you are greatly missed and especially valued. I apologize for how I have handled disputes in the past. I am learning from them and will make great effort to do better at seeing things from someone else's perspective. I hope all is well with you. Cheers, — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥^{(discuss · contribs)} 03:48, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Runaways season 1

Hello, Gonnym. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Runaways season 1".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:19, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A rebranded but same production company

You do realised that TCF Television Productions, 20th Century Fox Television and 20th Television are the same company ever since it was founded in 1949 and was renamed three times over the years (like 20th Century Fox Television was renamed to 20th Television in 2020 ever since Disney brought 20th Century Fox back in 2019) despite being the same company, right? Not to mention Universal Cable Productions and Universal Content Productions are infact the same company when it was rebranded to Universal Content Productions back in 2019. Look, I don't wanna upset you but this is all true. 148.252.149.167 (talk) 19:14, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid episode table markup

Working on the Category:Pages using episode table with unknown parameters, I was able to process around 850 or so fixes. What's left in this category now appears all be articles that use the similar {{Book table}} & {{Book list}}. I tried to look those over, but I'm not familiar enough with that template to figure out what's at issue with them. ButlerBlog (talk) 21:22, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ask User:Alex 21 as he created those so should know how to fix any issues there. Gonnym (talk) 11:02, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Butlerblog

Fixed at the module. Thanks Gonnym for the ping! -- Alex_21_TALK 00:56, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Alex 21: Awesome - thank you! (And thanks Gonnym for the proper ping). ButlerBlog (talk) 12:40, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Godsy

You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Explicit § Wikivoyage redirect. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 12:26, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fsis

Hi. Template:Fsis (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) contains similar code to the four you listed at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 July 11#Template:Lre. I'm not sure what any of these do or supposed to do, nor do I know anything about language templates. Just letting you know in case you missed this one and wanted to nominate it for deletion as well. --DB1729^talk 00:54, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that editor created a group of related and unused templates. Once the first group is done at TfD, I'll take a look at the others. That will also give them more time to show actual usage for these. Gonnym (talk) 07:13, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

T5

Hi! I can't pretend to be very familiar with WP:T5, but I'm reading "It excludes /testcases and /sandbox subpages" to mean that a page such as Template:Infobox aircraft occurrence/sandbox 2 is not eligible for deletion under it. Please let me know if I'm wrong. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:24, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Which is why I didn't tag it with T5. If you really think this isn't a WP:G6 and requires a full TfD, then I'll send it. But that seems extremely pointless. Gonnym (talk) 11:55, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see how it could fall under WP:G6, which is why I didn't delete it; I wanted to explain why I hadn't deleted under a criterion that might have been applicable. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:49, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can't see how a 12 year old sandbox2 that isn't used anywhere, isn't "uncontroversial maintenance"? Then I really don't have anything else to say here. Gonnym (talk) 08:00, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]