User talk:Matthew John Drummond

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Matthew John Drummond (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Peter Sallis Wikipedia page reason me and no one else can add history to his page no longer

Decline reason:

This account is not directly blocked. If you are unable to edit, please follow the instructions that appear when you attempt it. 331dot (talk) 17:07, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Adventures of Alice (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Adventures of Alice and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Matthew John Drummond! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What can I do to improve it Matthew John Drummond (talk) 17:17, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). You currently only have a single source that shows it exists but not that it is notable. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 17:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had a quick look in the papers but didn't find much just this: https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-guardian-television-by-mary-crosie/150237442/ KylieTastic (talk) 17:26, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That newspaper article is correct that what this page I'm creating is ment to be based on. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 17:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Adventures of Alice (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Adventures of Alice and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waqar💬 17:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Receptiob section for Draft:The Adventures of Alice

The article Draft:The Adventures of Alice needs a reception section explaining what critics and other people thought about the program. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 20:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added more stuff to the reception Matthew John Drummond (talk) 20:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crying Down the Lane (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crying Down the Lane and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:00, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I need assistance Matthew John Drummond (talk) 13:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me find any information about the episodes Matthew John Drummond (talk) 12:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve added in more references to the website Crying Down the Lane. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 14:15, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've added more references to the Wikipedia draft page I've creating titled Crying Down the Lane Matthew John Drummond (talk) 14:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Musical Playhouse (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Musical Playhouse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waqar💬 20:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Adventures of Alice (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Adventures of Alice and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:48, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Reprieve (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Reprieve and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there is information about this movie can you find. Can you also find out if the film has survived. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 16:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doing a google there is very little about the film, not really surprising as a "10 minute experiment film" KylieTastic (talk) 17:17, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Has the film survived in the National Film and Television School archive since they’ve kept my of there old programs. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 17:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to know if there are ways to find sources for more obscure films maybe try asking at Wikipedia:WikiProject Film - they even have a resources page that may help Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Resources. KylieTastic (talk) 17:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Reprieve (1972 film)

Hello Matthew John Drummond,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Reprieve (1972 film) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-1ctinus📝🗨 17:14, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete that page and change my draft page to The Reprieve (1972 short film). Matthew John Drummond (talk) 17:20, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do I do that. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 18:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crying Down the Lane (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crying Down the Lane and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Sallis / Junglies

Greetings. Please provide the exact page on this source – ^[1] – for the show Junglies. It's a lot of pages to scroll through, and we need to be sure it's actually there. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 10:25, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

1. "Collections Search – Peter Sallis". BFI. Retrieved 7 December 2023.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Adventures of Alice has been accepted

The Adventures of Alice, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 20:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strange Experiences (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Strange Experiences and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:47, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gawby.com

A lot of your recent draft submissions seem to be using the site Gawby.com as a source. The thing is, the site appears to be user-submitted in the same way IMDb is, so I'm not sure if it can be cited as a reliable source. Harryhenry1 (talk) 07:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I,ve added another reference to the page. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 15:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a reliable source to the page. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 18:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Musical Playhouse (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Musical Playhouse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bristol Entertainment (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Guessitsavis was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Bristol Entertainment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 22:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Snowdropper (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Snowdropper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murder Most English: A Flaxborough Chronicle (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Murder Most English: A Flaxborough Chronicle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Your edit to Draft:Murder Most English: A Flaxborough Chronicle has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. win8x (talking | spying) 22:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Matthew John Drummond, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia) The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Matthew John Drummond, good luck, and have fun. User:Significa liberdade (talk) 17:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Your edit to Peter Sallis has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Draft:Murder Most English: A Flaxborough Chronicle has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. -- Diannaa (talk) 15:33, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murder Most English: A Flaxborough Chronicle (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Murder Most English: A Flaxborough Chronicle may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bristol Entertainment (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:The Bristol Entertainment may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Candida (1961 TV play) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Candida (1961 TV play). Thanks! Toadspike [Talk] 23:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've corrected the link and I've also added another link as well to that section on the page. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 14:52, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leave it to Charlie (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tavantius was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leave it to Charlie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tavantius (talk) 18:52, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Poet (1960 TV play) (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tavantius was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Poet (1960 TV play) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tavantius (talk) 18:46, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I got the first reference from the Wikipedia page The Poet's Mystery. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 20:51, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Belonging (TV Play) (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Idoghor Melody were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Belonging (TV Play) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 14:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Musical Playhouse (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Musical Playhouse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:18, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crying Down the Lane (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tavantius was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crying Down the Lane and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tavantius (talk) 18:42, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strange Experiences (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowman304 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Strange Experiences and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowman304|talk 03:13, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murder Most English: A Flaxborough Chronicle (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pokelego999 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Murder Most English: A Flaxborough Chronicle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 15:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Candida (1961 TV play) (November 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Candida (1961 TV play) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AntientNestor (talk) 11:25, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Snowdropper has been accepted

The Snowdropper, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strange Experiences (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OlifanofmrTennant was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Strange Experiences and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 00:24, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should I remove the word some. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Belonging (TV Play) has been accepted

Belonging (TV Play), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Reprieve (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Reprieve and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:01, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Everyday Readers (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Everyday Readers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:22, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kitty Clive (TV play) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kitty Clive (TV play). Thanks! RangersRus (talk) 23:46, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Across a Crowded Room (TV play) (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tesleemah was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Across a Crowded Room (TV play) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tesleemah (talk) 12:57, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strange Experiences (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Strange Experiences and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:56, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Candida (1961 TV play) (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AntientNestor was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Candida (1961 TV play) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AntientNestor (talk) 08:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about the 1961 TV movie by the BBC. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 12:01, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've linked to the existing article, above: "The BBC adaptation Candida […] a 90 Minute TV play in 1961 for BBC Television".--AntientNestor (talk) 14:51, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bristol Entertainment (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Bristol Entertainment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 14:57, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strange Experiences (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Strange Experiences and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:08, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Don't Ever Talk to Clocks (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kovcszaln6 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Don't Ever Talk to Clocks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kovcszaln6 (talk) 17:36, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you try and find some sources that have information about the film. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 13:18, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why should they? It's your drafts for possible articles they're talking about here. While this site is a collaborative project, it (to me at least) seems weird to ask an editor who's there to just tell you your article was rejected, to do the research you're supposed to be doing. Harryhenry1 (talk) 13:23, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WRT most of the editors' comments above: more on providing sources can be found here.--AntientNestor (talk) 11:29, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:She Loves Me (1979 TV play) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:She Loves Me (1979 TV play). Thanks! Jõsé^hola 11:48, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a link to the plot. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 12:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Dangerous Kind of Love (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OlifanofmrTennant was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A Dangerous Kind of Love and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:14, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Candida (1961 TV play) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Candida (1961 TV play). Thanks! AntientNestor (talk) 18:18, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Candida (play). Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:45, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Secret Agent (1975 TV play) has been accepted

The Secret Agent (1975 TV play), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RachelTensions (talk) 18:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Ten Commandments (1971 TV series) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Ten Commandments (1971 TV series). Thanks! RangersRus (talk) 20:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marie Stopes: Sexual Revolutionary (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pokelego999 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marie Stopes: Sexual Revolutionary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 04:02, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: She Loves Me (1979 TV play) (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:She Loves Me (1979 TV play) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 19:19, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've added two critic reviews. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 20:05, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This here is not a review and Michael Simpson is the director of the play. This here is also not a review but a BLOG. One and only the best source you have on the page is this one by NY Times. But this alone is not enough for a standalone article on the play. My suggestion to you is to merge the best source and some content to page She_Loves_Me#Other_productions. RangersRus (talk) 12:46, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I found these two newspaper articles about what the critics thought about the film. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 01:18, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: She Loves Me (1979 TV play) has been accepted

She Loves Me (1979 TV play), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 00:01, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, Matthew John Drummond. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Matthew Drummond, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Harryhenry1 (talk) 08:11, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Poet (1960 TV play) (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Poet (1960 TV play) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:24, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leave it to Charlie has been accepted

Leave it to Charlie, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:25, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Any relation?

Greetings, Mr. Drummond; just curious if you claim any relation to Philip Drummond, or his biological daughter Kimberly? Fictional though they may be, the "true" may be stranger than fiction.

2600:8800:1E98:B000:5920:C568:E2A9:6FC0 (talk) 03:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, what? Like you said they're fictional characters, so why are you asking this? Harryhenry1 (talk) 04:48, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've never heard on him before. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 13:58, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kitty Clive (TV play) has been accepted

Kitty Clive (TV play), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:07, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Kids International Show has been accepted

The Kids International Show, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ToadetteEdit (talk) 13:32, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question about Draft:Matthew Drummond

Why make an article about yourself? Especially when creating new articles the draft notice strongly discourages such a practise. Harryhenry1 (talk) 01:43, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Candida (1961 TV play) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Candida (1961 TV play). Thanks! AntientNestor (talk) 09:08, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the link. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 11:28, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Matthew John Drummond. Thank you for your work on Kitty Clive (TV play). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:32, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Thank you. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 20:14, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Crying Down the Lane

Hello, Matthew John Drummond. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Crying Down the Lane, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Matthew John Drummond. Thank you for your work on The Kids International Show. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:12, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: 👍. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 14:58, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Matthew John Drummond. Thank you for your work on The Snowdropper. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:13, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: 👍. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 14:58, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Matthew John Drummond. Thank you for your work on Leave it to Charlie. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:13, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: 👍. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 14:59, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rocky Hollow has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rocky Hollow. Thanks! Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 20:25, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it has and I've added new information about the series. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 20:31, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have more sources beyond archive.org and a wiki? Harryhenry1 (talk) 02:29, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rocky Hollow (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Drmies were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rocky Hollow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 20:35, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Murder Most English: A Flaxborough Chronicle

Hello, Matthew John Drummond. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Murder Most English: A Flaxborough Chronicle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Ten Commandments (1971 TV series) has been accepted

The Ten Commandments (1971 TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 20:03, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ben Whitehead, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Opolito (talk) 22:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ben Whitehead, you may be blocked from editing. Opolito (talk) 03:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Candida (1961 TV play) (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Setergh was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Candida (1961 TV play) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Setergh (talk) 16:09, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marie Stopes: Sexual Revolutionary has been accepted

Marie Stopes: Sexual Revolutionary, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 03:30, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Matthew John Drummond. Thank you for your work on Marie Stopes: Sexual Revolutionary. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:20, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Thankyou. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 00:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Reprieve

Hello, Matthew John Drummond. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Reprieve, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matthew Drummond (May 6)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

CoconutOctopus talk 20:08, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 20:09, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Murder Most English: A Flaxborough Chronicle

Hello, Matthew John Drummond. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Murder Most English: A Flaxborough Chronicle".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rocky Hollow (May 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Drmies was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: A month and two dozen edits after the last rejection, editor has added one small newspaper article with TV announcements, and more plot summaries, plus a dead "Toonhound" link whose value cannot be determined and a few fandom links. One can only surmise that there is no significant coverage proving notability, and we're wasting our time in draft hell.

Drmies (talk) 14:50, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Questions about your drafts

Why are you still adding to drafts (like Rocky Hollow) that have been rejected so much that they can't be resubmitted? Harryhenry1 (talk) 14:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Precisely. And the information you are adding wasn't even encyclopedic or properly verified in the first place. Consider coping it over to Wikia, maybe. Drmies (talk) 17:34, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Dangerous Kind of Love (May 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Drmies was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Not every topic that exists is notable; there is still no proof of this meeting our standards, because there is no reliable, proper, secondary sourcing that discusses the topic in any depth.

Drmies (talk) 17:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kitty Clive (TV play)

The article Kitty Clive (TV play) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. After cleaning up the references we are left with an obscure TV play that fails WP:GNG. The two sources are trivial mentions, eg the Daily Mirror entry in its entirety is "Kitty Clive" in a TV listing guide. It doesn't even merit a specific time. It isn't even clear this is the same TV play,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Opolito (talk) 21:50, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prometheus: The Life of Balzac (May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prometheus: The Life of Balzac and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 04:09, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Heir of Skipton

Hello, Matthew John Drummond. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Heir of Skipton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:08, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: World Theatre (TV series) (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:World Theatre (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 16:02, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Kids International Show draft

User:Drmies what else should I add to this draft since I've been editing it more. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 00:50, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies since the tag on the original post doesn't work. Harryhenry1 (talk) 02:19, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, not moving it into main space is one thing. The other is, if all you got is a few newspaper articles, then maybe it wasn't notable. Finally, copy editing for grammar and meaning is always a good idea--but if a subject is not notable, that's perhaps a waste of time. Drmies (talk) 12:51, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strange Experiences has been accepted

Strange Experiences, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 06:21, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• ToadetteEdit, I don't get it. Did you see the four newspaper articles that are supposed to add notability? Drmies (talk) 12:54, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • I rechecked the sources in the article. As far as I know, newspaper sources are in a paywall. So, in the assumption that it discusses the subject in detail, I have accepted it because the topic could plausibly pass AfD. I am OK with an AfD if someone has a chance to analyze the sources to check the significance of the subject. ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 13:07, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • So, User:ToadetteEdit. you assumed that what could have been simple TV listings, and one article in a local newspaper, would provide sufficient coverage for notability. I also note you did nothing with the comments made by User:OlifanofmrTennant and User:Ktkvtsh, who made serious complaints about content, writing, and sourcing--neither of them thought it was well sourced. And in your cleanup after accepting it, you seem to have skipped over the many serious deficiencies I edited out here, including basic capitalization. Drmies (talk) 15:17, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

      Hmm, it appears that I have not found the subtle issues on the page; thanks for noticing that. But since the notability is somewhat unclear, I might reconsider bringing it up to AfD if it fits. ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 15:24, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On Draft:Rocky Hollow (TV series) and Draft:Rocky Hollow

I'm not sure if you can just put a draft for a rejected article into a new one under a slightly different name with none of the issues asked about having been answered? Tagging @Drmies for further input here. Harryhenry1 (talk) 14:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh, Harryhenry1, it's a veritable display of incompetence (look at this), and I just deleted a copy of a draft they put up in mainspace. But my day is already bad enough so, if you don't mind, I'm going to walk the dog first. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:18, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On Matthew Drummond and Draft:Matthew Drummond

Excuse me, but you cannot create an article based on a draft that was rejected (Tagging @CoconutOctopus, who rejected the article's draft, for their input in this). Harryhenry1 (talk) 16:05, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft

@CoconutOctopus what else could I add to Matthew Drummond Draft. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 16:16, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can't. It's been rejected. I do not believe you meet Wikipedia's strict notability criteria; it is strongly advised you do not try to create an autobiographical page - if you become notable in future, someone else will create it. CoconutOctopus talk 16:41, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matthew Drummond

The article Matthew Drummond has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, article is a copy of a previously rejected draft.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CoconutOctopus talk 16:41, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Autobiography

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:56, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Matthew John Drummond,

Please do not write articles about yourself, your projects and any subjects where you have a conflict-of-interest. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:59, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Who can I ask for advice about the draft of the page. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 21:19, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Like they just said, you can't write an article about yourself. Harryhenry1 (talk) 00:45, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not about me it's about someone else named Matthew Drummond who is a friend of Mine. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 00:48, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else? Your username and all your editing activities indicate you and Matthew Drummond are the same person. Harryhenry1 (talk) 00:50, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Besides Matthew Drummond is an actual actor in real life. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 16:49, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's nice, but just being an actor isn't enough to get a Wikipedia page. Harryhenry1 (talk) 01:02, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Musical Playhouse

Hello, Matthew John Drummond. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Musical Playhouse, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Reprieve

Hello, Matthew John Drummond. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Reprieve".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:13, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Don't Ever Talk to Clocks

Hello, Matthew John Drummond. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Don't Ever Talk to Clocks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:08, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bristol Entertainment (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Bristol Entertainment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:04, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hotel! (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hotel! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 16:22, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Secret Diaries of the Film Censors (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Secret Diaries of the Film Censors and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 00:03, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Across a Crowded Room (TV play) has been accepted

Across a Crowded Room (TV play), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:00, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Poet (1960 TV play) (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LEvalyn was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Poet (1960 TV play) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ L 🌸 (talk) 06:44, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Musical Playhouse

Hello, Matthew John Drummond. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Musical Playhouse".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:26, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kitty Clive (TV Play) (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kitty Clive (TV Play) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:18, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Candida (1961 TV play) (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Candida (1961 TV play) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:25, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hotel! (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hotel! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'​'​'[​[User:CanonNi]​]'​'​' (💬 • ✍️) 11:29, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Prometheus: The Life of Balzac has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Prometheus: The Life of Balzac. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:27, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prometheus: The Life of Balzac has been accepted

Prometheus: The Life of Balzac, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:28, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bristol Entertainment (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bunnypranav was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Bristol Entertainment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:47, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Poet (1960 TV play) (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Poet (1960 TV play) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

[​[User:CanonNi]​] (💬 • ✍️) 14:41, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Chem. Lab. Mystery (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Chem. Lab. Mystery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 19:50, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Chem. Lab. Mystery (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiMentor01 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Chem. Lab. Mystery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiMentor01 (talk) 12:14, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Candida (1961 TV play) has been accepted

Candida (1961 TV play), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 12:03, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kitty Clive (TV Play) has been accepted

Kitty Clive (TV Play), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 12:15, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: World Theatre (TV series) has been accepted

World Theatre (TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 12:17, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Poet (1960 TV play) (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Poet (1960 TV play) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 12:22, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Rocky Hollow

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Matthew John Drummond (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I've improved the page Draft:Rocky Hollow and cleaned it up more.

Decline reason:

Don't waste admin's time this way. This template isn't for questions, it's for unblock requests. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:17, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Matthew John Drummond (talk) 20:49, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're not blocked, @Matthew John Drummond. I did not tell you to make an unblock request. I told you to go to the rejecting reviewer's user talk page and write them a message. qcne (talk) 20:55, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Where is his talk page. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 21:32, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Drmies qcne (talk) 21:36, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rocky Hollow has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rocky Hollow. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:18, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Draft:Rocky Hollow. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 22:42, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rocky Hollow (TV series) (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cactusisme was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rocky Hollow (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 10:25, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew John Drummond, if you again submit a draft that was previously declined under a new name, you are going to get blocked. You are sucking up volunteer time. Drmies (talk) 15:40, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He just tried moving Bumper Films into being a page just for Rocky Hollow, even though it's still just a draft currently. Harryhenry1 (talk) 14:15, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by this edit reason?

"The original Wikipedia page about this article was about a tv show something completely different from what the article has been turned into now." - but that page has always been just about Bumper Films since 2007, why change it to just be about Rocky Hollow? Harryhenry1 (talk) 14:18, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then why was it originally called Rocky Hollow. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 16:37, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still not following you here, this page was never solely about Rocky Hollow until this weird page move. Here is the earliest version of Bumper Films page from 2007. Harryhenry1 (talk) 16:39, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

When I click on Rocky Hollow it says it has been retracted to Bumper Films. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 16:40, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because you can't just turn an article into another, completely different article - I moved it back to how it was originally, and it created redirects in the process. Why did you do that to begin with? Harryhenry1 (talk) 16:43, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

When I clicked on Rocky Hollow from Peter Sallis Wikipedia it said (Redirected from Rocky Hollow) which then made me think it was originally about Rocky Hollow the tv series until it was then changed to Bumper Films or at least that's what I think it was originally about I can't find the original page of what it looked like. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 16:46, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Bumper Films page has always just been about Bumper Films, never just Rocky Hollow. Look at the page's edit history linked here to see what I mean. I already linked you to the earliest version of the page from 2007 a few replies. What you clicked was the page just called Rocky Hollow having been turned into a redirect to Bumper Films. Harryhenry1 (talk) 16:50, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the edit history for the Rocky Hollow page that became a redirect to Bumper Films. Harryhenry1 (talk) 16:52, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay my bad. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 16:52, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I hope this has been a learning experience for you. Harryhenry1 (talk) 16:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kitty Clive

A Wikipedia page I recently created named Kitty Clive and I've recently there was a previously a Wikipedia page also called that as well but there is nothing on the page. Here’s the link Kitty Clive. {{delete|[I want this page removed so there’s no confusion with the Wikipedia page I created which is also titled Kitty Clive (TV play)]}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bristol Entertainment (July 3)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

qcne (talk) 20:11, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Chem. Lab. Mystery (July 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Non-notable TV show with clearly not enough sources.

qcne (talk) 13:26, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rocky Hollow (TV series) (July 6)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

qcne (talk) 16:04, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you either removed an Articles for deletion notice from an article, Rocky Hollow (British TV series), or removed another person's comment(s) in an Articles for deletion debate. Removing AfD templates or editing others comments might make it difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment on the AfD discussion instead. Thank you. qcne (talk) 17:12, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hotel! (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hotel! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 17:21, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rocky Hollow (British TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rocky Hollow (British TV series), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocky Hollow (British TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Belonging (TV play).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Belonging (TV play).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:09, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HearttoHeart.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HearttoHeart.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rocky Hollow (British TV series).webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rocky Hollow (British TV series).webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Room Service.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Room Service.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SheLovesMe.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SheLovesMe.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:57, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:StrangeExperiences.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:StrangeExperiences.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:01, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheAdventuresofAlice.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheAdventuresofAlice.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:02, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheDiaryofSamuelPepys.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheDiaryofSamuelPepys.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:02, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheSnowdropper.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheSnowdropper.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:03, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheTenCommandments.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheTenCommandments.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:04, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Wind In The Willows Title.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Wind In The Willows Title.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:08, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Wind in the Willows.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Wind in the Willows.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:08, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WhoKilledLamb?.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WhoKilledLamb?.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:11, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WorldTheatre.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WorldTheatre.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:12, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Bristol Entertainment

{{delete|[I've given up on this Wikipedia page draft for The Bristol Entertainment]}} Matthew John Drummond (talk) 13:51, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hotel!.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hotel!.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:03, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Musical Television Actors

A tag has been placed on Category:Musical Television Actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 02:10, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Chem. Lab. Mystery

{{delete|[I've given up on this Wikipedia page draft for The Chem. Lab. Mystery]}} Matthew John Drummond (talk) 19:35, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bristol Entertainment (July 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This was declined several times before being G7d a couple days ago just to recreate it which is considered disruptive by WP:GAMING the process. S0091 (talk) 15:28, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

S0091 (talk) 15:28, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Don't Ever Talk to Clocks (July 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

S0091 (talk) 15:51, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:The Bristol Entertainment. S0091 (talk) 22:22, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing: this editor is just wasting other editors' time. See my reject above regarding Draft:The Bristol Entertainment (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) where they gamed G7 just to recreate the draft and they have now reverted not to mention all the non-free files they have uploaded and WP:Articles for deletion/Rocky Hollow (British TV series) which was declined several times before they moved it to mainspace. S0091 (talk) 22:35, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He's created another gamed draft for The Bristol Entertainment as Draft:The Bristol Entertainment (TV play) Harryhenry1 (talk) 02:07, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The Wind in the Willows.png

A tag has been placed on File:The Wind in the Willows.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 00:53, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Belonging (TV play).jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Belonging (TV play).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 00:53, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Room Service.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Room Service.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 00:53, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:TheAdventuresofAlice.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:TheAdventuresofAlice.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 00:54, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:TheSnowdropper.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:TheSnowdropper.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 00:54, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:11, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I expect I don't really need to tell you why I've blocked you, but just in case it isn't obvious, the block is for repeatedly gaming the system and other disruptive behaviour despite countless warnings and advice. You were told some three weeks ago that if you continue wasting other editors' time, you will be blocked, but you seem to have ignored that warning, so here comes that block now. You seem capable of producing good work, even if it is occasionally of borderline notability, but you need to start working better with others, not trying to fight the system when you don't get your way, and you certainly need to stop the blatant gaming behaviour. I hope this short block gets you to understand that, because if you continue in this fashion, the next block will be considerably longer. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:19, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Another Rocky Hollow draft has been made as Draft:Rocky Hollow (British TV series), the same "gaming the system" name as the article that was just deleted. Harryhenry1 (talk) 07:34, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wallace & Gromit Fun Pack

Hello, Matthew John Drummond. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wallace & Gromit Fun Pack, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On Draft:Rocky Hollow (British TV series)

Recreating a deleted article with the same title, previously submitted and rejected twice before under different names is a case of WP:GAMING the article draft system, the same kind that led to your ban. If you don't want to get further bans, I implore you to stop doing this. Harryhenry1 (talk) 07:37, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing fyi, they did this after the block expired. S0091 (talk) 17:43, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:The Wind in the Willows (TV series) (1984).jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Wind in the Willows (TV series) (1984).jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under the non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:18, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've added an explanation. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 04:19, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is not sufficient. See WP:NFUR for more information. Each usage of a non-free image requires its own separate and complete non-free usage rationale explaining how the non-free usage criteria are all met. -- Whpq (talk) 06:11, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve added more information about the image. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 13:14, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen the warning Qcne sent? Harryhenry1 (talk) 13:37, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On Draft:List of the worst films based of a television show

Do you have any other examples, or do you just want a page to dunk on Thomas and the Magic Railroad? Harryhenry1 (talk) 09:31, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do but it will take a long time to complete the draft. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 12:53, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Matthew John Drummond, have you seen the warning that you might have your account blocked if you keep submitting rejected versions of drafts? qcne (talk) 13:06, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I'm not even sure if Thomas and the Magic Railroad would even count for such a list? The current sources are just negative reviews of the movie, which (in my opinion) isn't enough to consider it for a list of "the worst films ever based on a television show". Harryhenry1 (talk) 13:37, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rocky Hollow (British TV series).webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rocky Hollow (British TV series).webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Of Funerals and Fish.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Of Funerals and Fish.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under the non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:30, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Prometheus- The Life of Balzac.png

Thank you for uploading File:Prometheus- The Life of Balzac.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:33, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ben Whitehead.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Ben Whitehead.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://www.thevoiceagency.co.uk/artists/ben-whitehead and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 15:34, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Kate (TV series).jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Kate (TV series).jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:53, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Adventures of Alice.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:The Adventures of Alice.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:58, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Leave it to Charlie.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Leave it to Charlie.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:59, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Nick Park, Peter Sallis and Steve Box.webp

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Nick Park, Peter Sallis and Steve Box.webp. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under the non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:12, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Matthew John Drummond! Your additions to File:Ben Whitehead.jpeg have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:14, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:25, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Matthew John Drummond (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

You haven't given me a chance to see were I went wrong with the images. Also for the drafts that I've just started on I haven't been able to get the reliable references for them now they can't be submitted such as my draft for Jackanory Playhouse and Premiere (1977 TV series)

Decline reason:

What nonsense. You were first warned about copyright in August, 2024. Ten months is more than enough time for you to see where you were going wrong with copyright. That you were unwilling to change your behaviour is why you were blocked. Yamla (talk) 18:19, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• You have received many notices about copyright on your talk page going back nearly a year. You are still uploading random images you find on the internet today. Enough is enough. There are significant issues with your edits, which you don't seem able to understand no matter how many times they are explained. Not everyone who wants to contribute is able to do so productively and within our policies and guidelines. That seems to be the case here and you'll need to demonstrate a much better understanding of notability, sourcing, the article creation process and copyright if you would like to edit here in the future.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:52, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Is there anything that’s gonna happen to me. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 17:54, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See also their previous block in part related to User talk:Matthew John Drummond#Final warning along with the note I left at User talk:DoubleGrazing#Matthew John Drummond a minute before this block. There is more to address than copyright violations. S0091 (talk) 17:46, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything else that is gonna happen. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 17:51, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what you mean but an admin will review your unblock request but it may take a while as unblock requests are chronically backlogged (there's 102 right now). In the interim, I suggest reading WP:GAB as I don't think what you written is sufficient. S0091 (talk) 18:06, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Matthew John Drummond From the interactions we've had, the drafts you've made, the copyright issues: I genuinely don't think you have the competence required to use Wikipedia at this time. You are clearly passionate about older television plays, I would really recommend making your own blog where you detail these, because they are not appropriate for Wikipedia and you are now blocked. A personal blog would give you the freedom and creative control to build the types of articles you want. qcne (talk) 19:08, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There' also Fandom (website) which might have a wiki. S0091 (talk) 19:12, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Slight clarification: I don't think it's television plays he's passionate about, rather it's just the plays (or really just any piece of media) that features Peter Sallis in it - his article has been bloated to mention everything Sallis has been involved with, and he's been insistent on pushing articles on subjects that feature Sallis, even when they don't meet the reliability standards of this site. Harryhenry1 (talk) 02:58, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLANKING

You are not permitted to remove (or edit) declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 19:27, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

M

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Matthew John Drummond (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The drafts for Wallace & Gromit Fun Pack, Jackanory Playhouse, Premiere (1977 TV series) and Rat (The Wind in the Willows) are far from unfinished and will be deleted with out getting the BBC Genome Project references for the tv show ones the book references for the character of Rat for The Wind in the Willows and the video game websites that detail information for Wallace & Gromit: Fun Pack. Also they will be deleted in about 4 to 6 months. Also if you want me too I'll give up on adding images for Wikipedia pages until I'm way better than before.

Decline reason:

Based on the below conversation, there appears to be competence issues in addition to copyright. You should address both in your next unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 14:03, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Matthew John Drummond (talk) 23:11, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to think copyright only applies to images. Nor is the rest of your unblock request at all relevant. --Yamla (talk) 00:27, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A good starting point is to answer the questions at User:Yunshui/decline copyvio. Answer in your own words, without copying and pasting and without using AI. --Yamla (talk) 00:29, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen that image of Of Funerals and Fish.JPEG and there needs to be another source that has the same image and this link from express.co.uk that has the same image. The file needs to links to support it other wise it will be deleted. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 03:08, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

here’s the link https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/2003605/last-summer-wine-michael-bates-bill-owen-feud Matthew John Drummond (talk) 03:12, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

When I say it needs this link I'm referring to the other version= part of the summary. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 03:14, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is incoherent and certainly doesn't answer the questions posed to you. --Yamla (talk) 09:50, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Where did I go wrong then. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 13:31, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from not writing in a coherent manner, you didn't even attempt to answer the questions posed at User:Yunshui/decline copyvio. --Yamla (talk) 13:36, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can't talk to him. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 13:45, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody's asking you to. You were asked to post your answers here. WP:CIR appears to be a significant concern here. --Yamla (talk) 13:46, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is it because of the websites, some of the photos being in low quality and there being not a better description. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 13:50, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YOU ARE NOT ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS from User:Yunshui/decline copyvio. If you are not able to follow directions, there's no possibility you will be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 13:52, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I get what the page is trying to say in the Responding to suspected lack of competence with me Repeated mistakes, I've also been making repeated mistakes, verify whether the user has been given any advice or instruction in how to do things correctly. Most users want to contribute productively but simply may not know how to do so. If it appears no-one has explained a problem with their edits, doing so should always be the first step. The page User:Yunshui/decline copyvio and Wikipedia:Competence is required explains fully why I got banned. Which is why I said it’s best if I stop trying to add images to Wikipedia. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 14:01, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's very clear you lack sufficient competence to understand what you are being told, or to communicate with other editors here. If English is not your primary language, please consider contributing on the version of Wikipedia in your own native language. en.wikipedia.org isn't the place for you. I will not respond further. --Yamla (talk) 14:07, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

When the page Wikipedia:Competence is required says the lack of clean up on Wikipedia pages. For the pages I've made drafts for such as Candida (1961 TV play) I've cleaned up this page many times and the final draft version I made was able to get submitted. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 14:20, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Candida (1961 TV play) has required a LOT more clean up since! Theroadislong (talk) 15:31, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What about these Wikipedia pages I created that being World Theatre (TV series), She Loves Me (1979 TV play) The Secret Agent (1975 TV play), The Snowdropper and The Adventures of Alice Matthew John Drummond (talk) 19:49, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed inappropriate tone from those. Theroadislong (talk) 19:57, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I mainly had words like sadly in the pages to make it look more real and added sources online like the era.org one's to show as much information about them as possible. Also when I looked at the Joshua Jones (TV series) Wikipedia page I saw that page had only 5 references and many bits of information some without a reference connection. So my draft of Draft:Rocky Hollow (British TV series) I added lots of information about the series with up to 6 to 8 references, but didn't make the sentences sound better. I apologise. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 20:05, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Using words like "sadly" in your drafts doesn't make your pages "more real", it makes them seem more like amateur blog posts and not professional articles. Harryhenry1 (talk) 02:15, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also I mainly made the sentences long or short some times for every draft I made so that way they did look the same. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 20:10, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

None of your replies show an indication you have the competence to edit Wikipedia. I'm really sorry. I really suggest you get a blog where you can create these articles without the rules and policies on Wikipedia. qcne (talk) 20:12, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Matthew John Drummond Did you see my earlier advice to perhaps get a personal blog for your television show drafts, instead of Wikipedia? I think that would be easier for you. qcne (talk) 14:26, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your own drafts have contained plenty of examples of bad grammar and un-encyclopedic language that I've had to clean up after the fact. And just being able to clean up Wikipedia pages isn't enough to be considered competent for the site. Do you understand why your poor grammar and confusing language might be turning editors off from allowing you back? Harryhenry1 (talk) 15:21, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hotel! (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GoldRomean were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hotel! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoldRomean (talk) 00:45, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Secret Diaries of the Film Censors (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoldRomean was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Secret Diaries of the Film Censors and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoldRomean (talk) 00:46, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

You are blocked from editing. That means you cannot edit Wikipedia using this account, via an IP address, or with another account. Using other means to edit is block evasion and is not allowed. It's quite clear that this edit is you editing logged out. The only thing you may do is to use your talk page to appeal your block. -- Whpq (talk) 18:38, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

M

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Matthew John Drummond (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I've realised many of my mistakes I've done with some of my Wikipedia draft and I will and improve on the spelling pits. I will also go back and correct the mistakes on the Wikipedia pages I created. Also I'll try and improve on the drafts that was working on before hand like Wallace & Gromit Fun Pack, Jackanory Playhouse, Premiere (1977 TV series) and Rat (The Wind in the Willows). Also if you want me too I can stop adding images to pages on Wikipedia because of copyright problems. Although if you want me too I can improve the images for The Adventures of Alice, Leave it to Charlie and the Of Funerals and Fish image. Or delete them if you want to because I don't mind since I'm not to happy with some of them now that I look back at a few of them.

Decline reason:

This barely comprehensible appeal in no way convinces me that it would be safe to unblock you. You need to address all the reasons that have brought you to this point, and do that in a clear and compelling manner, which this isn't.

PS: If there is something affecting your ability to communicate clearly, it might help your case if you shared it with us. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:39, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Matthew John Drummond (talk) 17:20, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoubleGrazing

User:DoubleGrazing Do you mean the copyright info from Yamla that I had been told about back in August of 2024. I completely forgot about that. Also I can't find the warning from that time period. Also I have autism in case you want to know but I'm completely fine. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 16:09, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Matthew John Drummond I truly think you might not have the skills to contribute to Wikipedia, and I would really suggest setting up a blog where you can add Peter Sallis-related articles, without having to work within our strict rules. What do you think of that as an option? qcne (talk) 17:46, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

M

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Matthew John Drummond (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I've noticed that the Wikipedia page Ben Whitehead from the File:Ben Whitehead.jpeg is what caused me to get block because they have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain. I do apologise for using the link. I will look for more suitable sources and provide more evidence. Also I will go back and correct the mistakes and issues with the Wikipedia pages photo files for The Adventures of Alice and Leave it to Charlie. Also I'd like to ask for a retraction from the original complainant. Also my gramma mistakes as well as some of the references I added to some of the Wikipedia pages I created I would like to change because I'm not so happy with them now looking back at them. That's another reason why I want to be unblocked.

Decline reason:

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Matthew John Drummond. asilvering (talk) 07:47, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Matthew John Drummond (talk) 22:02, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's time to revoke talk page access for at least six months or indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 22:07, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This editor does not get it and the images were far from the only problem. S0091 (talk) 22:40, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew John Drummond, you were warned about editing and removing declined unblock requests for your currently active block. You did it again. This is the end of the line, whether because of trolling or WP:CIR issues. --Yamla (talk) 23:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked because an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.