User talk:CNMall41

This is CNMall41's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

Archives

Alltroo Draft Response

Hi @CNMall41 — appreciate your note. The Sports Business Journal piece includes discussion of Alltroo’s founding, operations, and fundraising totals, which extends beyond a simple partnership announcement. Along with the Twin Cities Business feature and the People Magazine profile, I believe these three meet WP:THREE and satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH.

Let me know if i should continue to look for other sources though! Hbronken (talk) 19:31, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hbronken:, thanks for the note. For the People.com reference, what part of that meets WP:CORPDEPTH about Alltroo? The reference is about a campaign and says that it is on the platform, but nothing in-depth about the platform itself. The Twin Cities Business reference looks fine. The SBJ source I still believe is routine coverage and would not meet CORPDEPTH as stated in the note at the top of the draft. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:52, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fast response! Let me do some more digging on sources! Hbronken (talk) 19:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Point72 updates

Hi CNMall41, as per your feedback, I opened a new request here: Talk:Point72 Asset Management#Tweak language, subsection names, including quotes from the paywalled articles. I'd appreciate you taking a minute to look over the request to further update the article. Thank you Mrsnewyork (talk) 16:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mrsnewyork:, Thanks for the note and the ping. I took a look and think it would be best for me to pass on this and allow another reviewer to take a look. As it stands, the propose addition removes the origin history and since Point72 has its origins in S.A.C, I think leaving that would be relevant. I am also on the fence about the second request as I still think it is WP:SYNTH but I am pretty strict when it comes to SYNTH so another may implement the request. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:33, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: La Beuze has been accepted

La Beuze, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Agent 007 (talk) 17:27, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:True North Mortgage Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:True North Mortgage Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 02:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Help with my draft Accessreqdy (talk) 22:52, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See your talk page. The draft you submitted was moved to the mainspace weeks ago. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:28, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, maybe you were asking about Enpaia Foundation? It has been moved to mainspace. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:48, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wicked: For Good – The Soundtrack

I wanted to let you know that I have gone ahead and promoted Draft:Wicked: For Good – The Soundtrack to mainspace. No disrespect intended, but I disagreed with your decision to decline at the time (I thought the Variety article alone was substantial enough). I have added another source of comparable depth. Given the subject matter, I see no reasonable prospect of this being successfully nominated for deletion, and I don't see how continuing its existence as a draft benefits the reader. BD2412 T 21:54, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No disrespect intended here either, but I still disagree. The sources are mainly announcements, no reviews, no charting, etc. I will agree with you about the deletion discussion though. With it being so close to the release date, I doubt anyone would bother nominating it and if they did I doubt people would vote to delete it since it will be out in the next 30 days. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:16, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting Your Guidance

You declined requests I made and wondering if you can tell me what to do. I thought the request was specific, but not understanding what else I would need to add. I am confused, but want to follow the rules so if you can guide me I would be thankful. CcpbPb (talk) 23:23, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CcpbPb:,The best links I can share are WP:PLAINSIMPLECOI and WP:COIREQ which can guide you. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) When dealing with a new editor like this, a little actual guidance, rather than an alphabet link to another guideline, is likely to be more helpful. BD2412 T 23:40, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BD2412:, normally I would agree and I am very helpful with guiding COI editors. Based on this and this I think the editor seeking advice was given plenty of advice on how to move forward. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:20, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will admit that I am coming out of SOCK fatigue at the moment and the Wikistress is not good to come out towards anyone, especially someone attempting to follow the rules. I will look at this more tomorrow. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:08, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do appreciate the fatigue and the stress of dealing with these situations, but even a broken clock is right twice a day. If an editor suggests a valid improvement to an article, like a typo fix or removal of content so trivial as to be undue, I would consider whether the edit will improve the article without giving a lot of thought to the motivations behind it. Cheers! BD2412 T 15:41, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:READERSFIRST, I get it. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yves Potvin has been accepted

Yves Potvin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank P. Alexander has been accepted

Frank P. Alexander, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:08, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Cooper Group

Hi CNMall41. Rocket Companies recently acquired Mr. Cooper Group. Would you be willing to take a look at the edit request I posted here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mr._Cooper_Group#Controversies_section? Thanks so much, Annie13478 (talk) 10:31, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I will look a little later if no one else gets there first. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:19, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Annie13478:, I took a quick look. The WP:NOCRIT heading is not a problem as it should be removed. Will just need to determine what information is suitable for the history section and ensure WP:NPOV. I think the best course initially would be to update the subheadings by years. Will do that a little later as I'm stepping away for a couple hours. Going forward, please ping me at the talk page so the conversation can stay in a single place. Cheers! --CNMall41 (talk) 16:50, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: American Jihad (film) has been accepted

American Jihad (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Absurdum4242 (talk) 16:33, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting some copy edit help

Greetings @CNMall41,

Improvement in language and grammar is advised for my article Draft:My Choice (2015 film).

I came to your user page from Recent changes. Requesting your visit and copy edit help in Draft:My Choice (2015 film) if topic interests you. Thanks Bookku (talk) 05:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft rejection

Yesterday I submitted Draft:Ink (upcoming film) for creation and I'm a little confused as to why you rejected it. Sources reported that the film had begun production, which I think makes it notable. WP:NFF states that for an upcoming film to have an article it needs to have both begun filming (check) and had the production reported by reliable sources (check).

This isn't me being bitter, I just want to know what I can do to get this draft up to standard. Since the rejection I've added a reference on the production start from BBC, if that adds any credibility. ThanatosApprentice (talk) 17:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ThanatosApprentice:, I understand. It wasn't a rejection, just a decline. You are free to work on it and resubmit if you feel it is notable. The decline is based on the portion of NFF that says, "Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines.". Most films are not going to be notable based on the promotional press announcements. I am only one opinion though. You could as at the WikiProject Film project to see if anyone has an opposite opinion. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:33, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Love Con Revenge has been accepted

Love Con Revenge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:40, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AngadSingh2004/Archive is interesting

It may be smoke from a different fire. @Trailblazer101:, fyi also. I am nowhere close to the details, but it seems to me you each have sufficient to file an SPI, and allow others to get the drains up. My goggles only show the surface layers. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 17:34, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, based on my experience, they are using different IPs from different locations so behavioral evidence will need to be evaluated. At SPI, CU is relied on heavily so there would need to be a lot of differences shows for SOCK. MEAT is clear at least. I know that their incivility, along with the other account I suspect they are MEATing with have long past the community's threshold so ANI would be the better option in my opinion. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:39, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. I just wanted to show you some history in case you had not yet found it, and in case it might have been helpful. Your goggles show more than mine do, I think. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 17:43, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate it. I did see that previously. There are also two dozen accounts who have done the same thing so not sure if it is fans, employees, UPE, or what at this point (likely a little of everything). --CNMall41 (talk) 17:45, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lover's Knot (film) has been accepted

Lover's Knot (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 23:39, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Altina (film) has been accepted

Altina (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 00:43, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft feedback for article

Hi CNMall41, thanks for the note re 'errant decline,' on Draft:Salcedo Auctions, I appreciate you taking another look at the draft! Regarding potential AI content, I did use AI models to check for grammar, but the article itself was written solely based off the sources I gathered on the topic and were cited accordingly. I think some sentences were reworded/structurally modified by the AI, it's possible I overlooked that. Although, I welcome any other feedback and revisions that could help improve the draft/increase its chances of being moved to the main space. Let me know if there's anything else I can clarify, thanks! M.reyes1987 (talk) 06:32, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Raphael Amit

Hello @CNMall41. A while ago you reviewed and declined my edit request on Talk:Raphael Amit. I have made a follow-up request to that. Can you please take a look when you have time? HRShami (talk) 05:41, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on the talk page. Although, this would again amount to original research. We need to summarize what the sources say, not infer. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:22, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sahilsambyal

Thanks for your report just now. There's an open report just above it at the SPI: would you mind merging your report there? Thanks. Wikishovel (talk) 16:38, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I could if you want but being that it is a different user not sure if it would be the best idea. Would a CU not do both at the same time? Let me know as I will move as you wish. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:40, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK as it is. Just trying to cut down on admin's workload where possible. There's overlap with another previously blocked sock at that article - I'll comment at the SPI. Wikishovel (talk) 16:45, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. I will move it you want. No issues. My experience has been when I start to add more SOCKs to an already filed SPI, it tends to slow things down. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:48, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're right, and it might be better to keep them separate for readability. Wikishovel (talk) 16:57, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:48_Hour_Film_Challenge

Hi, I am trying to do some more work on the draft submission I created and wonder if you could offer some advice on the feedback you have provided?

You say "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources" but when I check the information on reliable sources I am unsure of how my sources do not comply. In many instances the sources I have provided are in peer reviewed academic journals. Surely this is a reliable source?

Could you help me understand why you believe the sources I have provided are unreliable?

You say "Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed" while I understand the tone may need editing and I can work on that. The sources I have used refer to a wide range of published sources including a range of different 48 hour film challenge organisers. The article doesn't just refer to sources or materials produced by me.

Can you help me understand what is going on here and what the problem is so I can fix it?

I appreciate that I am a novice and I can learn to write in a more encylcopedic style, I am more than happy to try and do this. It seems thopugh that there are other issues at play that I need to fix first.

Are you able to help me workj through these issues and fix them?

What thanks

ROY HANNEY RoyHanney (talk) 12:55, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@RoyHanney:, sorry that my review was "vague, obtuse and unhelpful." I guess the comments made by myself and previous reviewers as well as links to the appropriate guidelines were not useful. First, let's start with disclosure. Please read WP:COI and make the appropriate disclosure regarding your conflict of interest. Once that is done, feel free to ask specific questions you may have about the submission decline. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:26, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reversal of edit

Hi, I am aware the reversal of edit was probably for a reason but what is COAT?? 19Arham (talk) 01:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COAT. Sorry, I don't always link as I assume experienced editors know. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:31, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've actually only been editing for a year. I just made this account five years ago to access dark mode lol. Thank you for the clarification! 19Arham (talk) 20:58, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Economy, trade, and companies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:PragerU on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 05:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]