User talk:Bunnypranav

Selected WikiLove

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thanks for your help Avalotto (talk) 10:29, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]


A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thanks for your help Avalotto (talk) 10:29, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome! Happy to help anytime. :) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:11, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025 AfC backlog drive award

[edit]
The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia   
This is awarded to Bunnypranav for accumulating more than 500 points during the June 2025 AfC backlog drive. Your dedication and sustained efforts in reducing the backlog and contributions to Wikipedia's content review process are sincerely appreciated. Thank you for your participation! --☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(😐🗨️✉️📔) 14:20, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Teamwork!

[edit]
The Teamwork Barnstar
Thank you so much for your work on the drive, and thank you so much for your whopping 155 re-reviews!! You helped keep this drive flowing and this wouldn't have been possible without you, so thank you! Sophisticatedevening🍷(talk) 15:16, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Vraeneix (18:52, 10 July 2025)

[edit]

Hello! I just created my account an hour ago. I want to contribute to Wikipedia by making edits and creating aricles about films from my country the Philippines. I always use this website for searching of articles about movies to know more about the specific film but sometimes it is not available on Wikipedia but present to other sites, it would make easier and accessible for future viewers if I make the unavailable contents here as Wikipedia is more cohesive and coherent sites than others.

My question is, is it true that I can only make article if my account is 4 day old, Make atleast 10 minimum edits, and do you have tips for me as a new here.

Thank you in advance! --Vraeneix (talk) 18:52, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vraeneix Welcome! If you're account is not yet 4 days and 10 edits old, then you cannot directly create articles in the mainspace (simply said, the part of the wiki most public will see). You can, however, still create them in draftspace, which is a place for incubation of newer articles.
I would advice you to have a look through Help:Your first article and the further links given in it. That is a really good place for you to start and learn about the policies with advice on writing articles. Hope this helps, and happy editing! :) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:10, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Srinivas zeal (06:07, 11 July 2025)

[edit]

where to create a article --Srinivas zeal (talk) 06:07, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Srinivas zeal Please see page for a guide to writing an article here. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:52, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Lesegothami on Emre Aydın (11:21, 11 July 2025)

[edit]

The probe will land on Mars in 2026 --Lesegothami (talk) 11:21, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I did not understand your question. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:51, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Remyroiz on User:Remyroiz (12:31, 12 July 2025)

[edit]

Hello can I ask you a question. How can I create my public profile as an artist --Remyroiz (talk) 12:31, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Remyroiz, writing an autobiography is highly discouraged on Wikipedia, have a look at Wikipedia:Autobiography for more on why. We have strict policies on Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. If you still want to go ahead, do read all of these policies thoroughly, create a Wikipedia:Drafts by going to Wikipedia:Article wizard and following further instructions. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:24, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC

[edit]

Hey Bunnypranav! Thanks for helping out at AfC :). Totally optional thing during the review process, many AfCers don't always take this step, but feel free to tag drafts like Draft:Aureus ERP for G11 if the draft content needs absolute WP:TNT to pass. Whole thing was unreferenced, with sections like "why should you choose Aureus" and their bulleted list of reasons followed. The only two links on the page were for 1: the Github, and 2: the framework it was built on. Your decline of the draft was totally correct, but I would've gone a step further and CSD'd it after declining it. (They ended up resubmitting the same thing with more promo content which is why I saw it end up back in the AfC queue.) Thanks for your good work! Utopes (talk / cont) 05:36, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Utopes, thanks for the note. I do sometimes CSD tag drafts, see User:Bunnypranav/CSD log for some examples. I was in a bit of a hurry yesterday IRL, so missed the del tagging after decline. Thanks again for the note in any case! :) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:15, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(trialing replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (talk|botop) 08:30, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See also section on movie Jeepers Creepers Reborn

[edit]

The see also section for the film, Jeepers Creepers: Reborn is a bit editorialized in so far as the see also content makes no back reference to jeepers creepers reborn. This movie may be quite bad. This movie may not be quite that bad. Referencing a see also section of worst movies that doesn’t list this movie as a bad movie is clutter without citation that does not contribute clarity to an article about this movie.

For my own purposes, I’ve checked for Metacritic scores and IMDB scores for worst movies of 2020s and unfortunately, this movie hasn’t been widely reviewed enough by critics to make those lists. Likewise, it only has 15 critic reviews on rotten tomatoes so it doesn’t yet qualify for the list of zero score films on rotten tomatoes.


I believe this section should be stricken, and I stand by that assertion. Do you have an argument to keep it in place? Madsmith (talk) 14:46, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On searching for 0% on List of films considered the worst, the first four results I found are The Garbage Pail Kids Movie | Rotten Tomatoes, Mac and Me | Rotten Tomatoes, They Saved Hitler's Brain | Rotten Tomatoes and Manos, the Hands of Fate | Rotten Tomatoes. Only the second one has more than 15 reviews by critics, with one even having only 5. On my first glances, I think Jeepers Creepers: Reborn may even satisfy a mention in that list, but I will not argue for that now since I haven't looked through it enough.
I still think the mention is fine, and suitable to link to. Having a see also link does not mean the move is so bad, nor do I think it is editorializing. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:21, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Tinybabyfishy (11:26, 23 July 2025)

[edit]

Hello! I have a question which pertains more to etiquette than editing exactly - is it appropriate to ping a user to ask for information on an edit they made? For context, I'm adding a section to an article's talk page, to seek clarification on a citation which doesn't actually seem to provide evidence for the claim, and I worried that it might be a faux-pas to ping the person who made the edit in question. Thanks for your guidance! --Tinybabyfishy (talk) 11:26, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Tinybabyfishy! You are welcome, and encouraged, to drop a message in talk pages of users from whom you would like a clarification. Communication is essential, and consensus runs in the blood of this project. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:17, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How do I add a photo of the castle --Bernard Akin of Murroes Castle (talk) 19:13, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Bernard Akin of Murroes Castle! For a guide on uploading images respecting copyright laws, have a look at Wikipedia:Uploading images. Once that is done, Help:Pictures will guide you on how to add an image into the article along with the various formatting options available. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:51, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Tk42juan (20:36, 31 July 2025)

[edit]

Hello Bunnypranav! I have a question about how to move an article from my sandbox to the main Wikipedia. I am not part of the Hurston Wright Foundation nor the Zora Awards (the article I created) but I am a volunteer that works in nonprofit publishing and want to help raise the awareness of the rebranding of the Zora Awards for all authors of color. I am new to Wikipedia editing and page creation, any advice or direction you can give me would be so helpful. The fully written Zora Award entry for Wikipedia (with citations and links) is in my sandbox. Thanks so much for your help and guidance! --Tk42juan (talk) 20:36, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Tk42juan, apologies for the delayed response. I have done a quick skim of your article User:Tk42juan/sandbox, and have a couple points. Firstly, the language does not seem Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and sounds promotional in some places. Also, did you use ChatGPT or some other AI for writing some parts of the article? If yes, that is highly discouraged in Wikipedia, have a look at Wikipedia:Large language models for some reasons on why.
Due to my real life reasons, I unfortunately do not have the time to go through it in detail. Once you are done fixing the problems I said above, feel free to add {{submit}} at the top of the draft, and one of the Wikipedia:Articles for creation members will review your draft and give you some feedback on improving it. In the meantime, I say you have a look through Help:Your first article for some beginner advice. Hope this helps! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:15, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Signature contrast

[edit]

Hi bunnypranav. I like your signature, but.. it doesn't meet the requirements for signature appearances. Your signature seems to have too little contrast, especially for the small font size. You can use a tool to check the contrast to determine if your signature meets the minimum contrast ratio of 4.5 (the draft new web accessibility guidelines are even more strict for small-font text). —Femke 🐦 (talk) 08:35, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice Femke, and apologies for not realizing that the colours are not appropriate until now. I'll change it in a couple hours once I'm on my PC. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 04:33, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have now updated the lighter blue to a ratio of 4.6:1, hope this helps. Thanks again for the notice! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:07, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good! Thanks :) —Femke 🐦 (talk) 11:04, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary account IP viewer granted

[edit]
The temporary account IP viewer logo, composed of the Wikipedia globe with a user and an IP address

Hello, Bunnypranav. Per your request, your account has been granted "checkuser-temporary-account". You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

  • You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
  • Access should not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

  • When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
  • Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
  • Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with an IP address or CIDR range.

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. Happy editing! Sohom (talk) 04:34, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That was really quick, thanks a lot! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 04:35, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]