User talk:Reverosie

🌷User page🌷 💞Talk page💞 🎆Barnstars🎆 🎀Contributions🎀

💞 Welcome to my talk page! 💞
💞 Please don't be afraid to reach out! I'm always happy to chat, and I reply to messages on my talk page as soon as possible 💞 Please remain civil, per Wikipedia's guidelines

Welcome!

Hello, Reverosie!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Whpq (talk) 18:04, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the welcome! I really appreciate it :) And thank YOU for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Reverosie (talk) 18:06, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Godehilde of Tosny has been accepted

Godehilde of Tosny, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:44, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! I was absolutely not expecting my draft to be created as an article so quickly!! Thank you so much!!! I'm so happy I could contribute to Wikipedia like this, and I plan on making more contributions in the future! Reverosie (talk) 18:48, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SNR 0519-69.0 has been accepted

SNR 0519-69.0, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 22:18, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Thank you so much again!! I wasn't expecting this quick of a publish for a stub article. Cheers to many more articles! Reverosie (talk) 22:20, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	You have less than 100 edits, yet you have already written multiple articles with such a positive attitude. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Tarlby ^(t) (c) 03:58, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish, you should join Wikiproject History and/or Wikiproject Middle Ages. Wikiprojects are a collaborative group of editors especially interesed in one topic. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 04:00, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How do I join? Reverosie (talk) 04:02, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like WP History has their participants list here while WP Middle Ages has the list on their front page. You can add your name to both. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 04:05, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Reverosie (talk) 04:06, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!!!! I honestly don't know what to say. I'm so glad that I've made a positive impact on Wikipedia, and I plan on continuing with more article creations and edits soon! Reverosie (talk) 04:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded! Thanks for your positive/friendly attitude + 2 well-written articles and numerous constructive edits within only a week of joining! GoldRomean (talk) 03:09, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! Reverosie (talk) 03:12, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll just echo the other editors. You are off to a great start. Thank you for your contributions. -- Whpq (talk) 17:28, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! I'm so happy to help Reverosie (talk) 17:30, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Hello!

I've been working on improving a Wikipedia article for a bit of time now (I haven't been here long, but I've made a sizeable amount of edits per the article's failed good article assessment), and I was wondering if it could be upgraded from C-Class to B-Class. I was told at the teahouse that anybody could change the assessment as they saw fit, but I'm worried about bias since I'm the one who made these changes and therefore want a second opinion. The article is Baldwin IV of Jerusalem for reference. Please tell me if I'm good to go in terms of increasing the class, and anything I can improve, regardless of class, as well!

Thank you! Reverosie (talk) 17:13, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can make a request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Assessment#Assessment requests. You might also consider asking the editor who did the GA review at Talk:Baldwin IV of Jerusalem/GA1. -- Whpq (talk) 17:27, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I also noticed that you happen to be my mentor, so thank you again for looking out for me! Reverosie (talk) 17:28, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Baldwin & Runciman

The year in the {{sfn}} has to match the year in the citation template. So for Runciman, Steven (1989) [1952]. The Kingdom of Jerusalem and the Frankish East, 1100–1187. A History of the Crusades. Vol. II. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-06163-6. you need to use 1989 inside the sfn, not 1952. HHope this helps! DuncanHill (talk) 20:05, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!! I managed to fix this by copying the working citation from another article :) Reverosie (talk) 20:07, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You've fixed the ISBN date problem, but broken the links between the {{sfn}} and the citation template. I'll show you what needs to be done. DuncanHill (talk) 20:11, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! I didn't mean to break it. Your help would be much appreciated since I'm still new to these things Reverosie (talk) 20:11, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK, sfn references can be hard to get right. If you look at this edit you'll see that I changed 1952 in the sfn to 1989, to match the year in the citation template. This fixes the no-target errors that the mismatch of years had caused. DuncanHill (talk) 20:15, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That makes a lot of sense, thank you so much for the help! Reverosie (talk) 20:16, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Hello!

First of all, I'm sorry if this is very similar to my last question; I'm new to Wikipedia and still trying to learn as much as I can! I already posted this at the teahouse, but it's been nearly 4 hours without a reply, so I'm wondering if I could get an answer this way instead :)

I was curious about the process of promoting articles from B-Class to Good Article status, and have a few questions about it:

1. If an article fails a nomination, how much time do you have to wait before it can be nominated again? 2. How much time do you have to fulfill requests by a reviewer before said reviewer fails you? I'm worried about this because of my own schedule 3. How long does the process of review take in the first place, and how rigorous is it? How many nominated articles usually pass? 4. What's the difference between a good article and an A-Class article in the first place? Which rating is "higher"? 5. Most importantly of all, is the article I've been preparing ready to be nominated? Why or why not? The article is Baldwin IV of Jerusalem as I've said earlier (sorry again!)

Thank you so much in advance, and if this question is too similar to the last one, please let me know! Reverosie (talk) 21:47, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Reverosie. It looks like your question at the Teahouse was answered. Would it be okay with you if the {{help me}} template is nullified now? 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 06:08, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you! Reverosie (talk) 12:18, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: I just want to see what trouting someone looks like Reverosie (talk) 15:11, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Things

In Baldwin IV of Jerusalem it says but it was captured and destroyed by Saladin after two previous to the sultan. Something is missing. I am not qualified to do a full review but I made some minor changes. Polygnotus (talk) 18:24, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely right! The sentence had a missing word. Thank you so much for pointing this out!!! Reverosie (talk) 18:28, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In Godehilde of Tosny the mother is referred to as Isabel of Conches in the infobox and as [[Isabel of Conches|Isabel of Montfort]] in the lead which is a bit confusing.

Also Although it is possible that Godehilde could have married both Robert and Baldwin, it is highly possible that William made a mistake at the end is missing something. Polygnotus (talk) 18:39, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!! Both of these things are fixed! Reverosie (talk) 18:42, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure Isabel of Farabel existed? I googled that name and I can't find any evidence of a person existing by that name. I made some edits on SNR 0519-69.0 and Sibylla (wife of Bohemond III) btw. Polygnotus (talk) 18:56, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

About Isabel of Farabel: It's confusing. Bohemond III of Antioch's article has a bit more on that (but not really!). Also, thank you so much for the edits on those pages! I really appreciate the help! Reverosie (talk) 18:58, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is possibly Isabella of Farabel but I am not sure about that. Polygnotus (talk) 19:14, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is Isabella. I'm not sure why it said Isabel! Reverosie (talk) 19:16, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bohemond of Botron claims that Isabella(?) had a daughter called Isabel. Weird. Check out the query. Polygnotus (talk) 19:20, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bohemond of Botron was married to Isabella of Botron, not Isabella of Farabel. Confusing. Reverosie (talk) 19:25, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To make things even more confusing, because why not, Bohemond of Botron says:

He was the son of Bohemond III of Antioch and his fourth wife Isabel of Farabel.

Ok, so Bohemond of Botron is the son of Isabel of Farabel. Got it.

Then it says Whilst still a child, Bohemond was betrothed to Isabella

Ok, the son of Isabel was bethroted to Isabella. Why not.

Then it says: With Isabella he had four children:... Isabel Are these people insane? Your mom, wife and child have the same name? Then why not call yourself Isabel as well? Polygnotus (talk) 19:29, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm going to fix that now. To make things in this subject worse, Bohemond III of Antioch himself had two sons named Bohemond: Bohemond of Botron and Bohemond IV of Antioch Reverosie (talk) 19:31, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware that you own a time machine. I think we should give them all an UUID to make differentiation easier. Polygnotus (talk) 19:32, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think they're differentiated on wikidata but still awful Reverosie (talk) 19:34, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So then in the sentence He was the son of Bohemond III of Antioch and his fourth wife Isabel of Farabel. it should be Isabella, right? Polygnotus (talk) 19:37, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I'll fix that too. I think that both spellings are used, but we should really stick to using one Reverosie (talk) 19:38, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

fixed Reverosie (talk) 19:38, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Reverosie (talk) 19:32, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Was Sibylla (wife of Bohemond III) (fl. 1180) correctly categorized as a 13th-century women? Polygnotus (talk) 19:02, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. I'll re-categorize that now Reverosie (talk) 19:13, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some people dare call me a nitpicker! The audacity! Thanks! Polygnotus (talk) 19:42, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing these things out!!! Reverosie (talk) 19:42, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK reviewing

Hi, saw that you were interested in GA reviewing. I love your enthusiasm - I'm not acquainted with GAR , so I'll leave it to the mentors there to answer your question. However, I did want to recommend WP:DYK reviewing, which could help you get used to the whole "reviewing" thing. The process is similar-ish to GA, but simpler/faster as DYK's for new articles, usually, instead of, well, good articles. No pressure, just recommend a look ;). Cheers! GoldRomean (talk) 23:37, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! I'm definitely going to look into that. It's a bit scary waiting for your first review, so I want to be as prepared as I can :) Reverosie (talk) 23:40, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Previous account(s)?

Hello, Reverosie,

I just wanted to ask you if you had edited Wikipedia before with other accounts. It's not against policy to create a new account as long as the previous account(s) were not blocked. It's just incredibly unusual for a brand new account to accumulate more than 400 edits in their first 5 days of editing and you also do not edit like a new editor.

If you are actually a more experienced editor, just list your previous accounts on your User page. It's best to be open and honest on this platform. Thank you and if you have any questions about editing on Wikipedia or its many policies and guidelines, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you and happy editing! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:43, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

No, I haven't edited Wikipedia before! I really am a new editor :) I've just had a lot of time on my hands and grasped the source editor quickly thanks to a bit of experience with programming.

I've used the teahouse to my advantage so far and I plan to keep using it as long as I need it. Thanks so much! Reverosie (talk) 12:19, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Reverosie, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^Read! Talk! 06:44, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciation

Your user page is very nice :D 2409:4063:8E1D:DECA:1162:2C5D:C257:7942 (talk) 16:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! Reverosie (talk) 16:04, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, good job on the user page. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 00:21, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! You were actually my inspiration to make a decent userpage, so it's really nice hearing that from you! Reverosie (talk) 00:25, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sibylla, Queen of Jerusalem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maria Komnene. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much DPL bot! It's fixed Reverosie (talk) 12:21, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Reverosie! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Alternate to peer review for a potential good article nomination, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:19, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Reverosie! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Moving drafts to the article space, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:21, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you KiranBOT :) Reverosie (talk) 03:25, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New signature

Nothing special, just wanted to test out my new signature 🌷Reverosie🌷 (talk) 23:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

not sure why the talk link won't work 🌷Reverosie🌷 🌸talk🌸 23:25, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

? 🌷Reverosie🌷 (talk) 23:26, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i think that did it 🌷Reverosie🌷 (talk) 23:27, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no 🌷Reverosie🌷 talk 23:29, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

was it the space 🌷Reverosie🌷talk 23:30, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it said it worked in the preferences 🌷Reverosie🌷 (talk) 23:31, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no big deal 🌷Reverosie🌷 ^★talk★ 23:36, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

the space is still ugly though 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 23:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The talk link doesn't work here because it's a self link on your own talk page. If you put your signature somewhere else, like in your sandbox, it should work. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 00:45, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I should have tested that out somewhere else 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 02:31, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The talk is currently invisible to we the light-theme users, btw. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:53, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, thank you for pointing that out! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 15:55, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The World Destubathon

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to help you buy books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for articles which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:33, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look, thank you! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 13:34, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Your page is so enchanting! I made mine as a teenager 17 years ago but never bothered to do anything creative with it. I have not even updated it for an entire decade! I hope you will stay on the project for at least as many years and not be discouraged by any criticism. Surtsicna (talk) 20:54, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! Ive been working to make my userpage interactive and fun for others, so that means a lot to me! I’ve seen nothing but positivity on Wikipedia so far, and I don’t plan on leaving anytime soon :) (Also, I’ll be starting the GA review in a few hours when I’m able to) 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 22:06, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See my userpage! :D

Hello! I took inspiration from your user page (and a little bit of wikitext too, hope you don't mind), do visit my userpage! :D NectarLupine🪻~Talk 15:05, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It looks absolutely amazing!!! I love the color scheme and your new nametag looks really cool too!. I don't mind you borrowing the wikitext at all, it actually makes me really happy that I inspired someone! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 18:01, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :D 2409:4063:2302:D212:44FE:DDFF:D8AC:A6B5 (talk) 17:49, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, I am not logged in...

I am User:NectarLupine 2409:4063:2302:D212:44FE:DDFF:D8AC:A6B5 (talk) 17:50, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agnes of Milly

Are we certain that Agnes of Milly is a notable individual? I cannot find anything about her other than who her father and husband were. There does not seem to be significant coverage. Surtsicna (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

She has articles in other languages, so I assumed it would make sense for there to be an English translation. However, looking into it a bit more, I'll have to find other sources regarding her. 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 19:26, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If I am unable to do so, I wouldn't object to the article being nominated for deletion on the grounds of notability 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 19:27, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome ...

story · music · places

... to WP:QAI! I love your enthusiasm! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:00, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! I've found myself to greatly enjoy reviewing GA nominees (And I currently have an article nominated myself). I was looking for some sort of WikiProject related to article improvement, and I'm glad I stumbled across this one! :) 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 21:02, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! - Stravinsky pictured on his birthday + Vienna pics - but too many who died + I have a "defiant" cantata up for GA! - I don't do GA reviews myself because I'm not a native speaker.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:23, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This looks very interesting! I'm opening the review now 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 19:28, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! - too many died, see my story and listen to Comfort ye (sung in German) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:14, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

... and today look at the autograph of Beethoven's last piano sonata and listen to the pianist who wanted to serve the compositions most of all - thank you for nominating! - I think I replied in the review, please check. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:38, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look at that now. Thank you! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 22:42, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review, and for gnomish talk page tagging! - I heard this music, yesterday, - streamed a day before at a different location. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:04, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! That's incredible. I'd love to see an orchestra myself sometime soon. 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 16:23, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was unusually good! We were told that the huge prominent instrument - an octobass - is one of eight worldwide. The composer also wanted 6 harps, - they had two ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:40, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulation to you your latest GA! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:28, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! I was speechless when I got the notification. I honestly still am! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 19:30, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You deserve it! - While you are of course invited to check out my recommendations any day, today offers unusually a great writer of novels, music with light and a place with exquisite food. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:04, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Surreal Barnstar
	A few weeks ago, another editor gave you a barnstar for your quality articles at under 100 edits. Now, you're nearly at 1,000! This is for your great GA reviews, absolutely decimating the royality GAN backlog, your awesome user page, and just overall great articles! Cheers,  GoldRomean (talk) 21:20, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PS: GARC should get it by then, but lmk if Baldwin doesn't get reviewed by mid-July. I'm not the biggest history person, but he seems interesting and I'd be willing to take a look if needed. And, FWIW, Fomalhaut is officially my favourite star now, since the only other one I know is Polaris. Cheers, GoldRomean (talk) 21:21, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually going to be extremely busy in July, and I've been very worried about getting the article reviewed before then, so this is a major reassurance for me! Thank you so much!!! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 21:29, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU SO MUCH!!! I really appreciate it beyond words. I've found that I really enjoy contributing to wikipedia, and I'm so glad that it's paying off. Thank you again for being so kind to me. 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 21:28, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Very well deserved. GoldRomean (talk) 22:13, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Depreciated sources

Could you please let me know which sources are considered deprecated in relation to Princess Si of Anding? I was informed that sources like Encyclopedia Britannica are credible, and I checked the Wikipedia page on deprecated sources but didn't find it listed. Can you help me understand how to identify deprecated sources? AJMgirl (talk) 21:30, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

There is a list of them here: Wikipedia:Deprecated sources. If you want help improving the article in any other ways, please let me know! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 21:31, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Closing reviews

Hi, not sure if it's a definite rule but it seems like GA discussions are usually closed after passing/failing (see Talk:Entyloma ageratinae/GA1 as an example). (Also it just tidies everything up ;) ). Cheers, GoldRomean (talk) 03:33, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! I'll definitely do that in the future. Thanks for letting me know! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 03:51, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) It’s really optional as I’ve also seen several GA reviews that weren’t “closed” even though the discussion clearly ended. The closure is usually automatically done if you’re using the GAReview tool. I think one should use the method they’re more convenient with, although the script is really nice in saving stress. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:23, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you so much! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 13:38, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, Reverosie, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already worked on women's biographies and hope you will be able to create many more. In this connection, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you tun into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:27, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I'll be working to create more women's biographies in the future! I am also a member of women in green, and contribute to good articles about women :) 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 13:38, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki translations

Regarding this summary, just one thing missing is wikilinking the xxwiki page, for example, if a translated from Spanish Wikipedia (eswiki), I would wikilink like this: [[:es:PAGENAME]] so that you can follow the instructions laid down at WP:RIA. Happy editing, please enjoy your stay. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:05, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!! I'll do that from now on 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 16:31, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Baldwin IV of Jerusalem

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Baldwin IV of Jerusalem you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:46, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

Sorry this [1] must have been a weird random miss-click, sorry. Theroadislong (talk) 18:28, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's totally ok! I was just a bit confused :) You're all good 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 18:28, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GARC: Invitation to review 2025 Indian Premier League

Hello, You have been paired at good article review circles to review 2025 Indian Premier League. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #45.

History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:57, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, thank you for your edit to my user page, I messed up a bit of code and deleted the wrong thing. Thanks. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:35, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sibylla, Queen of Jerusalem

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sibylla, Queen of Jerusalem you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MallardTV -- MallardTV (talk) 16:44, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Reverosie! The thread you created at the Teahouse, May have discovered a hoax, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:28, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar A new editor on the right path
		If you continue the path you're going right now, you could very well be a truly good member of the community. Keep up the good work in the GA reviews and noms! (And yes, I did time it so I'd give you this when you became an extended confirmed user) Yelps ᘛ⁠⁐̤⁠ᕐ⁠ᐷ critique me 07:42, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!!! That's so kind of you!!! I plan to keep contributing to Wikipedia for a very long time :) 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 19:04, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New articles required

Your dedication to preserving the memory of those who walked the storied paths of the Crusader era is both admirable and inspiring. Each name you revive breathes again in the corridors of history, thanks to your effort. If your interest remains keen, I would be honoured to collaborate with you in creating or expanding articles on several lesser-known, yet intriguing figures of this era. I would be glad to assist in developing entries for:

• Hugues du Quiliou
• Robert Fraisnel
• Hugues de Montlaur
• Geoffroy de Vandac
• Pierre de Sévery
• Philippe II de Toucy
• Anna of Provence
• Walter de Sourdeval
• Bertrand Mansoer
• William II Embriaco
• Hugh II Embriaco

Together, we could help ensure their legacies endure in the light of scholarship. With all appreciation and respect for your work. 2003:100:3700:3200:259C:3E31:B8B5:5633 (talk) 02:04, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! I really appreciate it. I'll absolutely be working on this list :) I'd also suggest creating an account if you want to make any articles yourself, since autoconfirmed users can create articles without having to wait through the articles for creation process. 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 02:24, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

Totally out of curiosity, where are you finding the lists of articles that you've been assessing recently? Also, probably unnecessary, but you might find WP:RATER helpful if you don't know about it already. Anyways keep up the great work as usual. Cheers, GoldRomean (talk) 20:25, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm using the category Category:Unassessed articles :) 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 20:27, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yikes, I did try working with that a while ago, but with a backlog at 167,137 we should be able to get it down to 5,000 with a few thousand volunteers and a few decades of work ;). But seriously, every bit helps :). Happy editing, GoldRomean (talk) 20:31, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'm currently learning the ropes of the rater tool now 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 20:32, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, it does load kind of slow which is annoying but on the other hand it allows you to rate from the article itself and not have to edit the talk page. Honestly a preference thing for if you want to use it :). GoldRomean (talk) 20:38, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I got the hang of it. It's extremely helpful 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 20:40, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yay, awesome! GoldRomean (talk) 20:41, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For all your article rating activities! Kj cheetham (talk) 22:17, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! I've been looking for more ways to improve wikipedia and found that I really enjoy rating :) I plan on doing more! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 22:28, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These are a lot of barnstars. Congrats! Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 22:43, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 22:46, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Simple English Wikipedia link

Heyo. I've added the link to the Simple English Wikipedia version of Baldwin IV so that it'd fit the Simple English section. You can look at WP:INTERWIKI to see how to do this :) Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 00:36, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 00:37, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sibylla, Queen of Jerusalem

The article Sibylla, Queen of Jerusalem you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sibylla, Queen of Jerusalem for comments about the article, and Talk:Sibylla, Queen of Jerusalem/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MallardTV -- MallardTV (talk) 19:21, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sibylla GA

Please forgive me for appearing to disregard your contributions to the article about Sibylla. I had hoped for years to see the article marked as a GA, but I would love that distinction to be earned. I am proud when you pass my nominations because you take the reviews so seriously, and I believe that you deserve an equally serious approach.

It is regrettable that you did not inform me before nominating (per WP:GAN/I#N1). The reason why I had not nominated Sibylla earlier is because it had been my intention to improve the article about Guy first and nominate them simultaneously, in order to be able to propose a double hook for DYK about Sibylla choosing and crowning Guy. This clever and emotional move would have made a powerful hook, but that appears almost impossible now. Surtsicna (talk) 20:35, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

First of all, I'm so sorry that I did not inform you! I absolutely should have let you know, and this was a major error on my part. I take full accountability for my mistake. You also didn't appear to be disregarding my contributions at all.

In regards to the DYK, I'd like to delay Sibylla's DYK nomination until Guy's article is also ready so that this double hook can still happen (if that is possible).

And I too was quite shocked by Sibylla's promotion being so sudden. I'm now taking it upon myself to improve the article on my own to make sure that it is not stripped of its badge.

From now on, I will always tell you when I am nominating an article that you've worked on tremendously.

Thank you, 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 20:43, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are very kind, Reverosie. The double hook still has a chance of being realized if Guy's article can be improved within 7 days. Is that something you could do? You have Nicholson's biography of Sibylla, which should prove helpful. Surtsicna (talk) 20:51, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can certainly try! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 20:54, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That would mean a lot to me. I've been dreaming about this double hook for two years... Surtsicna (talk) 20:58, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm getting to work now. I sincerely hope that I'll find a GA reviewer on time! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 20:59, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Surtsicna: I've started my extensive work on Guy's article, and as long as things are smooth sailing from here, I'll most likely get it to GA status on time (if not a bit early). However, the problem of finding a GA reviewer and finishing the review before my seven days are up might be the problem. Perhaps I could post to the reward board, but I'm not sure how well that would work; my best bet would either be joining a review circle and hoping for a miracle or having you review it. Please let me know what you think 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 00:34, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think it would be right for me to review it because I am (rather obviously) looking to see it promoted ASAP... but I know editors who would jump at the opportunity and who do not care about my DYK dreams haha We'll get that sorted! The sooner we can nominate it, the better our chances. Surtsicna (talk) 07:08, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. If you could get in touch with an editor who would be willing to open the review the instant that I nominate it, that would be ideal for the DYK 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 16:01, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'll let you know when I'm done improving the article so that you can iron it out before I nominate it; you're a far more experienced editor than me and I always appreciate your edits to my work :) 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 16:12, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's always better to have more eyes on any given project. I'll be hunting for reviewers in the meantime :D Surtsicna (talk) 19:17, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for interrupting. Preferably, if you can get this to WP:GARC in time, I'd be happy to start a circle. Otherwise, I'm willing to review this, provided you give me 2-3 days to work with and access to any sources I may need :). I don't want to get your hopes up too much though so small disclaimer that life might happen and I might have to step out suddenly, but hopefully that doesn't happen! Best, GoldRomean (talk) 00:35, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GOLD, THANK YOU SO MUCH!!! You really have no idea what a relief this is to both of us!!! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 00:41, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @GoldRomean. I think you will enjoy the article too. The subject was a rather controversial man and Reverosie has a knack for writing! Surtsicna (talk) 06:37, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Surtsicna: An update: Since it has taken me a bit longer than I thought to get this article to GA status, I'm going to nominate it as soon as it is done today to ensure that we can complete this task on time. I am going to co-nominate the article with you. The article will almost certainly be done by the end of today (in my timezone), though; unless something major and extremely unexpected comes up, it will be ready! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 18:11, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Major update: I am pleased to let you know that the article is now ready to be nominated for GA status!!! The size of the article has doubled (from 20,000 bytes to 40,000), and there are over 120 in-line citations from a large variety of sources. I'll be nominating the article now!!!

@Surtsicna: I couldn't have done this without your guidance from the very beginning of my time on Wikipedia, so thank you again! You've made so many great contributions to this topic, and it thrives thanks to your work.

@GoldRomean: Thank you so much again for offering to review this article so quickly even though this isn't a preferred topic of yours. Your kindness truly knows no bounds, and I am extremely grateful for your incredible consideration for other editors. 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 02:37, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's very sweet, Reverosie, but I cannot accept any credits here. This is all your work. Thank you for all your effort. I hope the article can be reviewed and passed by Wednesday... Surtsicna (talk) 06:20, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GoldRomean started the review just 14 minutes after the nomination, so my hopes are very high! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 06:31, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, oops, sorry about that . I'm working on it :). GoldRomean (talk) 01:49, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Baldwin IV of Jerusalem

The article Baldwin IV of Jerusalem you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Baldwin IV of Jerusalem and Talk:Baldwin IV of Jerusalem/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:03, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red July 2025

Women in Red | July 2025, Vol 11, Issue 7, Nos. 326, 327, 341, 342, 343 Online events: New: Alphabet run M & N | Women in Red turns 10 | Kenya Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: The World Destubathon, 16 June - 13 July 2025 Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,514 articles during this period! 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280 bios; 415,618 women) 23 Jun 2025: 20.130% (2,072,236 bios; 417,132 women) Tip of the month: A nuanced article is more useful than a shiny pedestal. Readers can find hope in your subject's survival or achievements, but they can also learn from your subject's mistakes and limitations. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:21, 30 June 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Thank you so much! I'll have to find a woman whose name starts with M or N and give her the article she deserves :) 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 16:42, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Baldwin IV of Jerusalem

The article Baldwin IV of Jerusalem you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Baldwin IV of Jerusalem for comments about the article, and Talk:Baldwin IV of Jerusalem/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:45, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

story · music · places

Congratulations! - I noticed your question about DYK and a double hook. I nominated one, mentioning another subject, and when that subject later had an article, inserted a bold link in the existing nomination. Quite generally though, I prefer two hooks = two chances to tell something different. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:30, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 17:15, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Check out my talk, - if you have little time, listen to Gilda Cruz-Romo in the final scene of Aida, if you have more read her article, and if you have still more check out my music, some sung with me in choir, some played by friends, all heard with friends. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:00, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Today is Bastille Day, commemorated by a DYK as my "story" and a visit to the Bastille Opera in "music". I like the interview coming with the story, on the day before the big event, but for pomp and circumstance, the affair with 600 singing children and orchestra, and the singer dressed in the national flag, was also captured on videos, much slower. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:03, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Three Ukrainian topics were on the main page today, at least at the beginning, RD and DYK, - see my talk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:21, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Three of "my" recent deaths bios are on the main page right now, one my story today, Gary Karr, and I loved to find his breakthrough concert in 1962 as a video. In my music today I match it with 9 other double bassists, 7 conducted by a person who's birthday is today - coincidence ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:48, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats to your GA on the main page! - On Bach's day of death (also there), I decorated my user pages in memory, with his music, and my story ends on "peace". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:15, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Gerda!! And your userpage looks beautiful! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 15:00, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rating articles

I don't know if you're interested in this or not, but since you seem to like rating articles, you might want to check out this script, which has a few minor features that can make assessing articles faster. It also works with the rater script you already have installed. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 08:06, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! I just installed it :) 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 17:18, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sibylla DYK

Perhaps the best way to go about this is to nominate Sibylla tonight and then in the nomination ask for a little extension so that Guy can join her! I think it will be smoother. Surtsicna (talk) 17:53, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That works! Ignore my message on your talk page, I'll revert it :) 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 17:55, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since this was your idea (and I'm working on Baldwin IV's DYK) I'll leave this to you! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 17:55, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Right. I'm on it then! Surtsicna (talk) 18:03, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar

Hi Reverosie! I would love to thank you for your work at GAN! I am definitely impressed at your 14 GAN reviews, especially since you only have 2800 edits and after only a month of editing. For comparison, I have 3400 edits since June 2020 (though I haven't edited until late-2023). I just passed Talk:Kelston toll road/GA1 today where both me and the nominator are new to GAN. Since everyone makes mistakes, I think you would find that my first GAN is pretty impressive! Keep up the good work! JuniperChill (talk) 20:22, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! Your GA review looks really good, and it's very impressive for a first-time reviewer! I really enjoy my work at GAN, and I hope that you do too! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 22:17, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think that in the future, you'll be a perfect GA mentor! I never thought I could review a DYK or a GAN with zero help. It's even more impressive that I took a break from Wikipedia between Dec 2024 and Jun 2025 to do a review shortly after editing again! JuniperChill (talk) 00:27, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!! I plan on becoming a mentor in August! And you should absolutely be proud of yourself for your achievements :) 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 00:29, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Million Award for Baldwin IV of Jerusalem

	The Million Award
	For your contributions to bring Baldwin IV of Jerusalem (estimated annual readership: 1,600,000) to good article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! — ImaginesTigers (talk) 18:39, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 18:49, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	i'm surprised you're a fairly new editor. also, your userpage is sooooo cute! can you give me some tips with userpages? drinks or coffee ᶻ 𝗓 𐰁 ₍ᐢ. .ᐢ₎ choose only one... 14:17, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! This is so kind of you :)

Feel free to copy any code from my userpage for yours! My top recommendation is using gradients and templates to your advantage and organizing long sections into collapsible parts. Using your sandbox to experiment also helps a lot! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 14:19, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great job having eight awards in only two months of editing (including one from me)! I think that's the most Wikipedia ever has within that time period. After 20 months of editing, I only ever had one at User_talk:JuniperChill/Archive 2#A9 dualling project That article is due to be my 2nd GA (don't worry, its already under review)! JuniperChill (talk) 15:58, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! I'm incredibly grateful for all of the love I've received, and I always try to return the kindness I've been shown :). WikiLove is perhaps one of the greatest parts of Wikipedia, and it's a massive reason I'm this dedicated to the project! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 16:03, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLove

AdobongPogi has given you vanilla ice cream! Vanilla ice cream promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else vanilla ice cream, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

WOW! I'm genuinely amazed at how awesome your edits are! 😲 You've shown great attention to detail and care for improving articles as a new user, seriously impressive! Keep up the fantastic work, you're doing better and better each time. Sending you this sweet treat as a little recognition for the effort and good vibes you bring to the wiki! 🍦✨ AdobongPogi ^{masarap 🍛} 22:54, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!! This is (quite literally) so sweet of you!!! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 15:30, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To spread the goodness of vanilla ice cream, you can add {{subst:Vanilla ice cream}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Holidays :D

Hello Reverosie! I am you did enjoy your holiday and still in the process of doing so. Whenever you can, I still have Owodo pending GA review, you're more than welcome to review it as I think it is interesting. Continue enjoying your vacation! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:08, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I'll likely pick this up once I get home 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 08:09, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great to hear that! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:00, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Baldwin IV of Jerusalem

On 28 July 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Baldwin IV of Jerusalem, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that teenage King Baldwin IV of Jerusalem fought one-handed and still went to battle after becoming blind and immobile at 22? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Baldwin IV of Jerusalem. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Baldwin IV of Jerusalem), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2025

Women in Red | August 2025, Vol 11, Issue 8, Nos. 326, 327, 344, 345, 346 Online events: New: Alphabet run O & P | Indigenous women | Film and stage Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: Wikipedia:Developing Countries WikiContest runs 1 July 2025 until 30 September 2025 Tip of the month: Read the essay Determining Native American and Indigenous Canadian identities to understand the criteria for status as Native American or Indigenous Canadian Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:51, 30 July 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Signature accessibility

Hello, I'm Femke. I wanted to let you know that your signature does not meet the requirements for signature appearances. Your signature may have too little contrast. You can use a tool to check the contrast to determine if you're signature meets the minimum contrast ratio of 4.5. If you have any questions, feel free to reply or ask for help at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 16:55, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Femke thank you so much for letting me know!!! I’m going to fix this now! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 16:48, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Reverosie :). While I've got you: you probably want to have a similar look at your user page; I don't think it meets minimum contrast requirements either. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 16:55, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for telling me! I'll get to work on that as soon as I can :) the link you gave me for the contrast was also very helpful! ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 23:24, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{Crusades top icon}}

Regarding this edit, I think I had something to do with it. However, adding a top icon to a user category should not have this effect, so I don't know how it happened. I could just remove the category for now. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 00:17, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I think I fixed it. Try adding it back and see what happens. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 00:20, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's fixed now. Thank you so much!!! ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 03:13, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Baldwin I of Jerusalem is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Baldwin I of Jerusalem is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tokeamour -- Tokeamour (talk) 07:45, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Baldwin I of Jerusalem has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Baldwin I of Jerusalem has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tokeamour -- Tokeamour (talk) 22:05, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article is being copy&pasted by a Sea Cadet Unit, I have evidence

The article has been copy&pasted to a website without citing wikipedia by a Sea Cadet Unit and is acknowledged by the website terms and conditions they just changed words! http://www.monroeseacadets.com/ I would compare the two I think its a direct copy by the website wtf. And often the cadets will edit the website of there unit. "This site may include links to other sites, which are provided as a convenience to you and as an additional access to the information contained therein. We are not responsible nor are endorsement implied for the content of any other sites or any products or services that may be offered through other sites. " Tokeamour (talk) 00:51, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.monroeseacadets.com/about-the-usnscc.html Tokeamour (talk) 00:56, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In addition this text was stolen, stolen by the sea cadet units website, I want to know when it was last changed so that it can be taken down as its my work.

"The United States Naval Sea Cadet Corps was established by the Navy League of the United States, at the request of the Secretary of the Navy in 1958. And in 1962 it was recognized federally to foster interest in the Navy among young men. In 1974, young women were first permitted to join." Tokeamour (talk) 01:04, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a problem you need to deal with, though should keep this in mind as you review, I will let an admin deal with it, I'm putting a ticket. @Reverosie Tokeamour (talk) 01:50, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

29.485

The number of people who saw your work at Baldwin IV of Jerusalem on 28 July :) Surtsicna (talk) 22:43, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's absolutely incredible!! I'm so happy I got to share his story with so many people. But I can't take all of the credit here. You wrote most of the article and created the DYK on your own. Both of us achieved this :) ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 23:55, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On this topic, one of your DYKs is featured on the homepage today! ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 00:01, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Guidance Barnstar

		The Guidance Barnstar
		Thanks for the suggestions and so far being a great reviewer, for a new nominator! Tokeamour (talk) 18:06, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! That's so thoughtful of you. I really appreciate it :) ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 22:18, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Am done by the time you read this! If not I will be in 10 minutes!

Thanks! Tokeamour (talk) 01:32, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Guidance with nominating for DYK

I would like some help with this, and also some instructions on were to go to find someone who has the expertise to add more information and is even more informed then me for A class nomination later down the line. Tokeamour (talk) 07:16, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I already have a fact ready, so that should be not something of issue. Tokeamour (talk) 07:19, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sadly, I'm not familiar with DYK at all, and I don't think I'm the person to ask about that. From what I've seen, the people at DYK are super friendly, so don't be afraid to reach out to them! As for A-Class nominations, I could help you there. ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 15:51, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tokeamour and Reverosie: I can help with DYK, seeing as I often work there. To nominate an article for DYK, the article must be at least 1500 characters long (in prose). It also needs to have been created (or passed GA) within the last seven days, along with the hook needing to be interesting. For more information, see the DYK rules. To get help, leave a message at WT:DYK. JuniperChill (talk) 17:37, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JuniperChill Who needs to do QPQ me or my nominator? Tokeamour (talk) 22:20, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This message will be in the WT:DYK as well. Tokeamour (talk) 22:21, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

and sorry reverrosie this totally doesn't involve you xD Tokeamour (talk) 22:25, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! I'm learning from this too. ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 22:28, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Lebanon

Hi, just wanted to thank you for promoting the page to GA! Also, don't beat yourself up too much, I don't mind the slight delay with the GA process; we all have stuff going on outside of WP :) Nehme₁₄₉₉ 17:42, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering, is there any way to credit Elias Ziade with the GA promotion as well? He also played a big role in bringing the article to where it is now. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 18:28, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly there's not. The only person who gets the credit is the nominator. ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 20:10, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

Users Tarlby and GoldRomean submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

Reverosie is a polite, enthusiastic, and determined editor interested in astronomy and, especially, medieval history. Within two days of joining Wikipedia, she created these two excellent quality articles, Godehilde of Tosny and SNR 0519-69.0. Just a week later, she began reviewing GA's and has now conducted 14 GA reviews in medieval history and also successfully brought Baldwin IV of Jerusalem and Sibylla, Queen of Jerusalem to GA status, with a current active nomination for Guy of Lusignan (at the time of writing), which are all pretty huge articles. Though Reverosie is still relatively new here (she only gained her first 1,000+ edits in a month), a quick look at her responses to the four barnstars gifted to her is clear evidence of her politeness and enthusiasm. There's no doubt that Reverosie is a clear net positive to the community, and I'm sure that she'll continue to be one in the years to come. This nomination was seconded by AirshipJungleman29, Vacant0, Yelps, Surtsicna and Vanderwaalforces.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}

Reverosie

Editor of the Week for the week beginning August 17, 2025

A polite, enthusiastic and determined new editor interested in astronomy and medieval history. Within days of joining Wikipedia, she created two quality articles, Godehilde of Tosny and SNR 0519-69.0. A week later, she began reviewing GA's and has now conducted 14 GA reviews in medieval history and successfully brought Baldwin IV of Jerusalem and Sibylla, Queen of Jerusalem to GA status along with Guy of Lusignan which are all huge articles. After four months, a quick look at her talk page is clear evidence of her politeness, enthusiasm and potential.

Recognized for

being a net positive to the WikiPedia community

Notable work

reviving WikiProject Crusades

Submit a nomination

Thanks again for your efforts! Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 17:32, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats Reverosie for the EOTW!!! I knew she would be a perfect candidate seeing as she reviewed so many GAs within a few months, but I didn't expect the award to go out this month!! I hope you get an FA soon (by 2026), seeing as I have plans to get Animal Crossing: New Horizons to that level! JuniperChill (talk) 19:14, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have words to express how thankful I am for such a massive honor. From the moment I joined Wikipedia, I knew that I wanted to make an impact, but I never could have guessed just how greatly this community would impact me.

I can hardly comprehend how I've gone from drafting the articles I wanted to create on a measly google document to seeing them mentioned in my very own Eddybox. How a Wikiproject I drafted in my notes app on the highway ended up with so much support from so many amazing people. How this website as a whole has had such a positive impact on my life.

I've met so many incredible people here, and I wouldn't have been able to make it this far without them. I'd like to thank a few of them now.

@GoldRomean and @Tarlby: Thank you, from the bottom of my heart, for nominating me to receive this award. The two of you have been nothing but incredible to me, and you've always been there to help me when I needed it. I'll never forget your kindness, and I'll always be grateful for all that you've done. From Tarlby awarding me my very first barnstar to GoldRomean immediately opening a GA review when I was searching for a reviewer, your thoughtfulness is enough to move mountains, and I'll never be able to thank you enough.

@AirshipJungleman29, @Vacant0, @Yelps, @Surtsicna, and @Vanderwaalforces: Thank you, truly, for seconding my nomination. I know some of you better than others, but all of you chose to support me regardless of how well you knew me. Seeing such overwhelming support come from so many different editors is a truly sobering experience, and I'm forever appreciative of your thoughtfulness.

@JuniperChill and @Gerda Arendt: Thank you so much for the kind messages you've left for me regarding my selection, and thank you for all of the kind messages you've left for me on my talk page. I've greatly enjoyed our conversations thus far, and I'm eagerly anticipating many more to come.

And, of course, @Buster7: Thank you so much for doing this. Thank you for operating such an incredible WikiProject, thank you for making hundreds of people feel so incredibly appreciated, and thank you for giving me such an incredible honor.

I've only spent a few months on Wikipedia, but I have many years here to come. I am grateful that I will get to spend them with people like you. ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 03:04, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And today, I received a QAI award from Gerda Arendt at User talk:JuniperChill#Precious for improving cozy game articles and working at DYK! JuniperChill (talk) 10:29, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

story · music · places

Congrats from me as well! - Today's story mentions four singers which I all heard, - enjoy listening to the soprano in a Telemann aria! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:36, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

adding: check out my talk for an Independence day, or: the pic of Oksana Lyniv was taken on 24 August. There's listening and reading in today's story, and I like both. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:27, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos to you, Rev! Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 14:05, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, again. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 11:10, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Really well deserved :). GoldRomean (talk) 01:10, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Guy of Lusignan has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Guy of Lusignan has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GoldRomean -- GoldRomean (talk) 20:43, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your review

Hello Reverosie, I hope you're doing well today. Regarding the Owodo article and that Ero, Osayomwanbo source that was flagged as unreliable during your review. I want to let you know that I have fixed the article; removing all materials from the said source. I recall that you were almost done, if not done, with the review that day, and that the last question I asked was if I could add an image of File:Ikhaladerhan.jpg when you asked for an image. Please let me know what you think and if I should renom. Thank you already! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:47, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

From a quick skim, it looks very good to me, but I'll have to look at it more in-depth to determine if you should re-nom the article so soon. Also, you can definitely add that image! ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 17:20, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thank you for looking! I don't know of renominating an article after previous review to have a certain period of time interval, lol, I mean, since you're the same reviewer and it was a singular issue too. Okay, thank you, I will add that image. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:33, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Checking in ... :) See, for example, Talk:Udagbedo where Jens asked for a new nom and just followed process after giving initial comments :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:43, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Reverosie, I hope you're fine. What do you think now? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:24, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Katseye review

Thank you again for reviewing the Katseye nomination, it’s very appreciated! And I am sorry I wasn’t more communicative during the process, I knew this would be a possibility so I did try to make do but I would have liked to have been more responsive. Thanks again! orangesclub 🍊 05:49, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! I'm sorry for the late reply, I was a bit busy yesterday. I should have been more efficient and communicative too, but you were very pleasant to work with and the article was very well written. I'm currently considering creating articles for the members of Katseye because of the review. I'd love to work with you again! ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 21:22, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sibylla, Queen of Jerusalem

On 29 August 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sibylla, Queen of Jerusalem, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Queen Sibylla agreed to divorce her unpopular husband, Guy, on the condition that she could choose her next husband, only for her to choose Guy again and crown him king (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sibylla, Queen of Jerusalem. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sibylla, Queen of Jerusalem), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for a good story! Have you considered FAC? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:06, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red September 2025

Women in Red | September 2025, Vol 11, Issue 9, Nos. 326, 327, 347, 348, 349 Recognized as the most active, topic-based WikiProject by human changes. Online events: New: Alphabet run Q & R | Women writers & their works | Microstates Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: Wikipedia:Developing Countries WikiContest runs 1 July 2025 until 30 September 2025 Tip of the Month: Researching historical women writers who used pseudonyms requires careful investigation across multiple sources, as many women adopted pen names to avoid gender bias and judgment (e.g., being labeled a bluestocking) and, ultimately, to get published. Progress ("moving the needle"): The WikiProject Women in Red homepage is usually updated weekly, using the Humaniki tool. Sadly, Humaniki has been out of action since 23 June. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:55, 31 August 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nomination for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Geometry Dash Review

Hey, this is the GA nominator for Geometry Dash. I don't mean to rush you, but it's been a while since you've made any comments. I addressed your concerns about 10 days ago and replied to your post a few days ago, but I still haven't heard anything. Just checking in to make sure you were still okay with the review. ZKevinTheCat (talk) 13:31, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! First of all, I'm so sorry for the late reply! I was very busy off of Wikipedia. Second of all, I believe that the article could very much be passed, but I'm still pondering over the game's history section. I'm not sure if a second opinion may be needed. ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 00:35, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As promised

Hi Reverosie, as you promised, would you be able to review Independence Day (Nigeria)? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:22, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'll open the review later today when I'm available! ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 14:05, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Reverosie, thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:22, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just sending a reminder, Reverosie :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:00, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]