User talk:AdobongPogi

This is AdobongPogi's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Cup of Joe (band)

Hello, I noticed that you submitted Cup of Joe (band) for good article status. I would like to notify you that while your article awaits review, I have made significant changes to the article to better prepare it for this nomination. You can see the changes I made in this diff. You can also check the article's revision history to see the summaries I have placed in each revision that provide details about the changes. The article still needs some cleanups and revisions to better conform to the Manual of Style, which you can do while the nomination awaits review. A reviewer may also point them out once the review process has begun.

Nevertheless, feel free to address any issues that may be found in the article anytime. If you have questions regarding the revisions I have made, feel free to also reach me out. Good luck with your GA nomination! AstrooKai (Talk • Contribs) 17:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cup of Joe (band)

The article Cup of Joe (band) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Cup of Joe (band) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 14:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Indo360! I'm checking the images in the Cup of Joe article, could you post links to where you found them and how you know other people are allowed to use them? There needs to be proof that the Facebook pages let other people use their images. It's not a huge deal, we just have to know these things for sure before we use the images. And in the meantime, thanks for writing the article! Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLove

Royiswariii has given you a fresh pie! Pies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a piping hot pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

I haven't heard you and you or maybe inactive in Wikipedia, i want just to let know if you are okay.

Spread the tastiness of pies by adding {{subst:Give pie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Royiswariii Talk! 11:20, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Royiswariii, Thank you for the pie! Sorry if I haven't been very active on Wikipedia, especially in WP Tambayan Philippines. I've been a bit busy and stressed, so I couldn't reply to messages right away. I really appreciate you checking on me. I hope you're doing well, too, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!. Indo360 (talk) 09:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, I hope you're okay too! Royiswariii Talk! 10:15, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello

Hello, AdobongPogi. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

@Indo360 Thank you so much for your time! Have a great week! Phoebezz22 (talk) 23:45, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mercy Sunot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Junnie Boy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Reid. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Your edit to Silakbo (album) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. AstrooKai (Talk) 16:00, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, AstrooKai

I'm sorry for what happened regarding my edit to the Silakbo article. I understand now that the content I added may have included copyrighted material, and I appreciate that it has already been removed. I assure you it wasn't my intention to violate Wikipedia's copyright policies.

Moving forward, I'll be more carefull to write the content. I hope the article can still be improved, as I believe it has the potential to be expanded and developed properly with reliable sources. Thanks for your understanding, and again my sincerest apologies.

AdobongPogi (talk) 00:18, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Alfredo Palacio

On 28 May 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Alfredo Palacio, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede 66 01:28, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daniel Williams (musician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Williams (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Williams (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

guninvalid (talk) 03:16, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The World Destubathon

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize and $300 top prize for most Science and Tech destubs and improvements. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:52, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi AdobongPogi. Thank you for your work on Popo (film). Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hi, I marked the page you created as reviewed as it has partially met GNG & SNG Films - but more citations are needed with depth coverages for verification.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 08:47, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cho Sang-woo

Hi, great job on Cho Sang-woo (Squid Game)! I do have to suggest tweaking the text in such a way to clarify things as being the way the character was written. I.e., "Sang-woo's character is not a traditional villain but as a complex and morally conflicted character." feels awkward when written in wikivoice, especially since things like "complex" are a POV that the creator or actor may hold for the character, but a reader may not. Thanks! Cukie Gherkin (talk) 15:28, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I added some Korean-language ref ideas. You'll have to use machine translation (or translate yourself if possible), but the links include both reception and interviews. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 16:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hello, slr, I just want to say you're right, that part sounds a bit off me in tone. I'll reword it to make it clearer. Thanks again! i'm appreciate your feedback. AdobongPogi (talk) 16:22, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

noted AdobongPogi (talk) 16:22, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The DCWC is open!

AdobongPogi, for the second running of the Developing Countries WikiContest, it is now open for submissions. Welcome to the contest! You can now list your work at your submissions page to earn points. The coordinators have addressed some of the queries at the last contest and we are hopeful that it'll turn out great for you—yes, you! If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions on the talk page.
Got open nominations? List them at the review requests sidebar.
Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews. Remember, reviews now award 10 points!
Not sure if your article qualifies? See the scoring rules for more information or contact a coordinator.
Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open throughout the contest, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you the best of luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:52, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced sections

The article Richard Raaphorst has two unsourced sections. You may want to look into this, so it won't be a problem for your good article nomination. Success with the article and nomination! – Editør (talk) 22:12, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you Editør for pointing that out! I'll review the article and try to identify which two sections are lacking or not realible sources. AdobongPogi (talk) 23:54, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for looking into this. I had added templates, so you'll see where it is. – Editør (talk) 07:31, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ebe Dancel has been accepted

Ebe Dancel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ROY is WAR Talk! 09:56, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IV of Spades

Hello. Could you please take a look at the picture that was added to the infobox of the IV of Spades article? From what I can see, there are only three members in the photo, but someone keeps changing the caption and insisting that Unique is also in it. However, from my point of view, he’s not in the picture at all. - Arcrev1 (talk) 10:00, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I completely agree with you. Looking at the current image in the infobox, it's clear that only THREE members are in the photo. Unique isn't there at all, so adding him in the caption doesn't seem accurate. It's been a bit frustrating to see the caption repeatedly changed even though the photo clearly shows only three members.

For comparison, the current image uploaded by fellow editor Royiswariii, actually shows all four members, including Unique. Personally, I think that version was more fitting for the infobox since it represents the original full lineup. I had planned to restore it, but I've held back because the caption keeps getting edited and I'd rather avoid any back-and-forth. Also, the current image might meet the first non-free content criterion, which could be another issue to look into. AdobongPogi (talk) 14:12, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Rendon Labador is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Rendon Labador is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheNuggeteer -- TheNuggeteer (talk) 10:13, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Rendon Labador is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Rendon Labador has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheNuggeteer -- TheNuggeteer (talk) 08:49, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Basti Artadi has been accepted

Basti Artadi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

sk satsuma 09:21, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Rendon Labador has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Rendon Labador has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheNuggeteer -- TheNuggeteer (talk) 11:42, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

About your edits to the DCWC leaderboard

Hey AdobongPogi, thanks for your participation in the Developing Countries WikiContest. I wanted to ask that you leave updating the leaderboard to the coordinators, since points being added to the table reflect — among other things — whether or not the submissions have been checked for eligibility, given bonus points, and vetted against the scoring rules. I understand you were probably trying to help out, and I appreciate you for that, but there are three of us — we've got it covered. :) Please let me or one of the other DCWC coordinators know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 20:50, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AdobongPogi, I can see that you updated the leaderboard again. Again, please do not update this page yourself — that's what the coordinator team is around for — all you need to do is list the article at your submissions page and we'll take care of it from there. Please let us know if you have any questions. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:01, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just saw your message NOW. Sorry for the late reply, my notifications didn't show up, I'll try clearing my cache. About the leaderboard update, that was my mistake. I understand now that its for the coordinators to handle. Thanks for the reminder and sorry! AdobongPogi ^{masarap 🍛} 03:10, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, these things happen! Thanks for understanding and thanks again for your participation — keep it up. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:35, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi AdobongPogi, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:11, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:15, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabby Alipe has been accepted

Gabby Alipe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ROY is WAR Talk! 01:33, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jugs Jugueta has been accepted

Jugs Jugueta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ROY is WAR Talk! 01:50, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

About your DCWC submissions

Hello again, AdobongPogi. This is just a friendly nudge that, for scoring purposes, please limit the number of flags you submit articles under to one. For your submission of Durrani–Qing relations' review, I accepted it under Afghanistan, since that provides the 1.5× multiplier (please let me know if you'd like to change this). As a side note, if you aren't already, please make sure to include (and explicitly note that you have completed) text–source integrity spot-checks in your GAN reviews — note that they are required in the reviewing instructions. Please let me or another coordinator know if you have any questions about this! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:39, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @TechnoSquirrel69 I accepted also your opinion about the flag, and about the note for GAN, I'm sure and I'll make a point some context of this article, since I'm focused on giving the nominator recommendations about the writing style and identifying missing parts of the article, but I'll be more mindful of including source checks too. Thank you again! AdobongPogi ^{masarap 🍛} 09:18, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up

Just wanted to give you a heads up there's an IP that repeatedly keeps adding unsupported genres on Head over Heels (Paula Abdul album) - I noticed you approved their edit but they repeatedly keep creating new IP's to vandalize it, just in case if they attempt to do it again (as they most likely will continue to do) - do not approve it. Pillowdelight (talk) 15:48, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cho Sang-woo (Squid Game)

Hello, AdobongPogi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Cho Sang-woo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:37, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Richard Raaphorst is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Richard Raaphorst is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 05:26, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DCWC August update

We're a month into the 2025 Developing Countries WikiContest, with stiff competition at the top of the leaderboard already! Our current top five contestants are:

Spookyaki (submissions) – 256 points, mostly from a handful of GAs about women's history in Latin America as well as the 1991 Haitian coup d'état.
vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) – 229 points, back with a number of articles on abortion in various African countries.
simongraham (submissions) – 213 points, mainly from GAs on species of jumping spiders in both Africa and Azerbaijan.
PizzaKing13 (submissions) – 200 points, with five GAs on articles relating to Salvadoran politics, history, and griddle cakes.
BeanieFan11 (submissions) – 168 points from a few GAs, a few DYKs, and a few ITNs on athletes from a variety of countries.

Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a few review requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed at eligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier!

On behalf of the coordinators, we'd like to thank all the participants for helping to combat systemic bias on Wikipedia! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:36, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Richard Raaphorst is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Richard Raaphorst has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 14:07, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

@AdobongPogi, hi, I created an article you made, Amon (Character). The name used to be "Amon (The Legend of Korra)" but the name exists in another page as a redirect so I changed the name. ~Rafael! (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 21:26, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. I'm also planning to submit a CSD request for the existing article "Amon (The Legend of Korra)", if possible. Thanks! AdobongPogi ^{masarap 🍛} 23:36, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@AdobongPogi you can't do that because it already exists and you can't delete it or else all history will be removed. ~Rafael! (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 23:39, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it more

@AdobongPogi I fixed our article we created together which is called Amon (Character). It had a few mistakes, like a waterbending and bloodbending text in an infobox links to Avatar: The Last Airbender ~Rafael! (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 23:38, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks to unlink some unnecessary from infobox. Id rather say if is anything chance to revise the Creation and conception section since some citations there especially on "design" is from The Legend of Korra: The Art of the Animated Series Book One – Air on Google Books. AdobongPogi ^{masarap 🍛} 23:58, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rendon Labador

On 21 August 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rendon Labador, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rendon Labador was invited by the Philippine National Police to lead a 93-day fitness program, but his involvement ended abruptly after just a few days? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rendon Labador. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rendon Labador), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming expiry of your patroller right

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 28 August 2025 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:42, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agreement with your edits on Katara (Avatar: The Last Airbender)

Particularly bringing back the original image which replaced one extracted from a NickRewind video of Katara waterbending. I'm still fuzzy on the rules, but I will say the one that user added is too dark compared to the usual one, so aesthetically, File:Katara.png, which @User:Sage of Ice shared back in 2022, is better. I also don't support its deletion either. I feel like the proposed deletion of File:Katara.png is going to be pushed through quickly so that the NickRewind video be used, and File:Katara.png surely falls under fair use. I reversed their addition of the proposed deletion, but honestly the user will probably reverse me, if I have to guess. Historyday01 (talk) 18:25, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for your help, but we have a problem because the user was repeating to submit the CSD F7 and he wanting to me request a reason to why the image is not deserve to remove. See, here. And the reason I undo her/his edit because there's no issues or problem this template Katara.png Ive found, and also I added the summary description since it is missing parts. I'm pinging you again if you have suggestion to stopping the user editing unnecessary. Thank you!. AdobongPogi ^{masarap 🍛} 08:15, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See here AdobongPogi ^{masarap 🍛} 09:10, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated the page they suggested as a "replacement" for deletion here. I would suggest taking action against this user. Also, I they are attempting to delete File:Katara.png. I added a justification to keep it, but I'm not sure how this will shake out. Historyday01 (talk) 15:51, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can't they be flagged for edit warring or something? Because the edits on Katara.png seem to qualify for that. Historyday01 (talk) 13:55, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pinging the task force here, for participate the discussion AdobongPogi ^{masarap 🍛} 01:16, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive

September 2025 Backlog Drive \| New pages patrol
On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:30, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Richard Raaphorst has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Richard Raaphorst has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 09:06, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]