User talk:Sksatsuma

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

A Barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Music Barnstar
I gave cookies before, but I think you deserve some more substantial recognition for all the work that you've been doing for electronic music articles, particularly your work around Ivy Lab and Djrum. It's clear you've been working hard on improving a sometimes overlooked area of the project, and I thank you for that. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 14:50, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much very appreciated! Even outside of Wikipedia I feel like Djrum is somehow underrated/underappreciate despite how much of an impact he's made.
It's been a fun learning process too I've learnt so much about notability and general good article practice. sksatsuma 15:09, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

[edit]

hello 2409:40D1:110C:340E:D568:661D:8A17:A1E9 (talk) 13:00, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Did you have a question for me? Is this related to the record label articles? I'm more than happy to answer any questions you have and please let me know if you think I've made a mistake. sksatsuma 13:09, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

[edit]
Thank you so much for accepting my submission of the article Basti Artadi — I truly appreciate your support! AdobongPogi (talk) 17:22, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just doing my duty! Good work with the article, seems very well-researched and presented. sksatsuma 10:27, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Julkar Nine

[edit]

Hello dear, I have written an article in the name of the Draft:Julkar Nine he is an Bangladeshi author/novelist to create his page, but without yours help and reviewing it is not possible to convert it into an article by draft it, so I request you to help by reviewing the page. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azarelvis (talk • contribs) 12:06, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi There, when I declined the draft article, it was because the references in the article did not demonstrate that the subject qualifies for a wikipedia article.
Essentially, the draft needs to demonstrate WP:NOTABILITY. There are specific author based requirements at WP:NAUTHOR, however I expect that your draft will probably be assessed with WP:BIO.
I would highly suggest reading the above guidelines to make sure that your draft is suitable. There is also a brilliant guide to article writing at WP:FIRST.
Good luck and if you need any further help, let me know, or visit the AFC help desk to ask for help from other experienced editors. sksatsuma 12:31, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sksatsuma

[edit]
Resolved

ya no quiero que pongas AFC EN mi pagina solo quiero que este asi ya no quiero enviar otro borrador siempre me lo rechazan porlo menos aceptame uno o dos Rafael2345 (talk) 02:38, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I've stopped re-adding the templates since you told me on your other account that you don't want to submit anymore.
The reason reviewers keep rejecting your drafts is because they do not cite any sources. As I've mentioned elsewhere I would highly suggest reading your first article which helps you create articles that are well-sourced by reliable, independent and secondary sources.
All articles for Wikipedia need to meet notability guidelines. I highly suggest you read this before submitting drafts for review.
Do let me know if you need any help and the teahouse is a really helpful resource for getting help from experienced editors. sksatsuma 02:49, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, it appears that the draft is for a gaming tournament you are participating in? In which case, it may not be suitable for Wikipedia. sksatsuma 02:53, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
A barnstar for you!
You're doing a great job at AFC. Baqi:) (talk) 12:25, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! Trying to do my best to help new authors and stub out the blatant self promo ;) sksatsuma 13:19, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Mike Amon-Kwafo

[edit]

Hello there @Sksatsuma. My draft was declined due to some reasons. I have corrected them and I hope it gets approved into an article after submission. Thanks. Metamender (talk) 21:04, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, it seems that the issues are still present! There are two references. One of these goes to a dead link, and the other one links to a news page homepage, rather than a specific article.
None of the claims in the article are supported by the sources. I would suggest reading your first article for help. sksatsuma 21:07, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, the draft and your user page appear to be generated from a large language model. Generally this should be avoided due to a number of issues – please see WP:LLM for more information. sksatsuma 21:10, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]