User talk:Johnson524

Archives

2022, 2023, 2024

January 2025 GAN Backlog Drive

January 2025 GAN Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for good article nomination reviews will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age of nominations reviewed. Each article review will earn 1 point; for each 90 days an article has been in the backlog, an additional half-point is awarded; one extra point will be awarded for every 2500 total reviewed words. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wilson Warbirds cap insignia.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wilson Warbirds cap insignia.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of UNICEF club

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article UNICEF club you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Velthorian -- Velthorian (talk) 11:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of UNICEF club

The article UNICEF club you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:UNICEF club and Talk:UNICEF club/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Velthorian -- Velthorian (talk) 18:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Johnson524, this has been raised on WT:GAN, and we are hoping your article can get a fuller review. Sorry for the inconvenience. CMD (talk) 14:13, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of UNICEF club

The article UNICEF club you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:UNICEF club for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Velthorian -- Velthorian (talk) 14:22, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of UNICEF club

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article UNICEF club you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SSSB -- SSSB (talk) 01:21, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of UNICEF club

The article UNICEF club you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:UNICEF club and Talk:UNICEF club/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SSSB -- SSSB (talk) 12:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of UNICEF club

The article UNICEF club you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:UNICEF club for comments about the article, and Talk:UNICEF club/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SSSB -- SSSB (talk) 10:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in WP:GARC

Hello, I noticed you are a user who frequents WP:GAN and thought you might be interested in Good Article Review Circles. It is an initiative that helps articles get reviewed more quickly through collaborative efforts. By joining, you will review another user's article and get your own GA nomination reviewed in return. Check out the project page for more details! — 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ ^{(CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST)} 12:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@LunaEclipse: Thanks for letting me know about this! I think I might check it out sometime this month 🙂 Cheers! Johnson524 13:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Oasis (Minecraft clone)

On 4 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Oasis (Minecraft clone), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an AI-generated Minecraft clone has been described as an early glimpse of the future of video games? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oasis (Minecraft clone). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Oasis (Minecraft clone)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

– 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 12:03, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 9,652 views (804.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ripken (dog)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ripken (dog) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 21:41, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ripken (dog)

On 9 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ripken (dog), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ripken wore a GoPro on his back while retrieving used bats and tees at major sporting events? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ripken (dog). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ripken (dog)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

1=Launchballer 00:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Wilson Warbirds

On 15 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wilson Warbirds, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Wilson Warbirds were nearly named the "Wilson Whirligigs" after the folk artist Vollis Simpson's whirligig sculptures in the town? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wilson Warbirds. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Wilson Warbirds), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

1=Launchballer 00:03, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Roddy MacLellan

On 17 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Roddy MacLellan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that before specializing in bagpipe making, Roddy MacLellan helped create one of the trophies used at the Super Bowl? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Roddy MacLellan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Roddy MacLellan), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

1=Launchballer 00:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Olde Raleigh Distillery

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Olde Raleigh Distillery you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:07, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Olde Raleigh Distillery

The article Olde Raleigh Distillery you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Olde Raleigh Distillery for comments about the article, and Talk:Olde Raleigh Distillery/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:02, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ai sponge

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ai sponge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 17:23, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ai sponge

The article Ai sponge you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ai sponge and Talk:Ai sponge/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 19:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ai sponge

The article Ai sponge you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ai sponge for comments about the article, and Talk:Ai sponge/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 13:22, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Olde Raleigh Distillery

On 2 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Olde Raleigh Distillery, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Olde Raleigh Distillery. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Olde Raleigh Distillery), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

charlotte ^👸♥ 00:24, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Standard cryptocurrency/blockchain notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

David Gerard (talk) 15:06, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Ai sponge

Hello! Your submission of Ai sponge at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pamzeis (talk) 12:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ai sponge

On 17 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ai sponge, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ai sponge. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ai sponge), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Great work on improving the 2025 New Delhi railway station stampede article! Your edits have added valuable clarity. Keep it up! EmilyR34 (talk) 03:46, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EmilyR34 Thank you so much for this! I really do appreciate it 🙂 Cheers from North Carolina! Johnson524 03:55, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An award for you!

		The Deletion to Quality Award
		For your contributions to bring Ai sponge (prior candidate for deletion at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ai sponge) to Good Article status, I hereby present you The Deletion to Quality Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! – 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 13:15, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hilst: Thank you so much! I didn't even know this award existed, I really appreciate it 🙂 Cheers from North Carolina! Johnson524 15:17, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rico Krieger

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rico Krieger you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Acer-the-Protogen -- Acer-the-Protogen (talk) 15:42, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Durrr Burger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Durrr Burger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durrr Burger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:38, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2025 New Delhi railway station crowd crush

On 23 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2025 New Delhi railway station crowd crush, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that there was initially an attempt to cover up any casualties during the 2025 New Delhi railway station crowd crush? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2025 New Delhi railway station stampede. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2025 New Delhi railway station crowd crush), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Titanic Memorial (Washington, D.C.)

Thanks for your help in the GA review last year. I noticed the article is the topic of discussion on Reddit. I'm sure the 50,000+ readers in the past two days are glad the article is in its current shape. Have a great week. APK hi :-) (talk) 06:46, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@APK: Thank you so much of going out of your way to tell me this, I love hearing about impacts like that! 🙂 I would've never heard about this if it wasn't for you, so thank you, and cheers from North Carolina! Johnson524 17:18, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rico Krieger

The article Rico Krieger you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rico Krieger and Talk:Rico Krieger/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Acer-the-Protogen -- Acer-the-Protogen (talk) 11:06, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, reminding you about your nomination. I realize it's difficult to comeback to something you wrote half a year ago, expeccially about this confusing case. Good day! LastJabberwocky (talk) 07:49, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Durrr Burger.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Durrr Burger.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rico Krieger

The article Rico Krieger you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rico Krieger for comments about the article, and Talk:Rico Krieger/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Acer-the-Protogen -- Acer-the-Protogen (talk) 17:22, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Durrr Burger (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Note to AFC Reviewers: This draft is for a title that was previously an article, but was then cut down to a redirect. If this draft is accepted, the history should be preserved. Do not tag the redirect for G6.

If you find that this draft should be accepted, and do not have the Page Mover privilege, please request assistance in moving the redirect to preserve the history.

Reviewers should check the history and verify whether there was a consensus to cut the article down to a redirect, or whether the action was taken boldly without discussion. If there was a consensus for the cutdown, do not accept this draft without verifying that the draft improves the article or that consensus has changed. If in doubt, please discuss.

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durrr Burger.

This draft does not appear to be significantly different from the article that was redirected in place of deletion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Durrr Burger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:24, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Robert McClenon, I hope you are well 🙂 I've read your feedback, but the article really has received a significant amount of new quotes (and even a photo) about the character's real-world impact since the deletion discussion: with multiple new examples of people choosing sides over support of the character, and the character's game mode influencing "the direction of the game as a whole", in addition to all the previously listed items in the article. These were some significant additions which I really do believe pushes the article over the threshold into real world notability, could you please take another look at it if you have the chance? Thank you. Johnson524 04:11, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See my reply on the draft talk page. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:39, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Andrew Artiaga

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Andrew Artiaga you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 15:41, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Andrew Artiaga

The article Andrew Artiaga you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Andrew Artiaga and Talk:Andrew Artiaga/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 10:22, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Andrew Artiaga

The article Andrew Artiaga you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Andrew Artiaga for comments about the article, and Talk:Andrew Artiaga/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 12:23, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Chill Guy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chill Guy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Locust member -- Locust member (talk) 02:02, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Senior assassin

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Senior assassin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Locust member -- Locust member (talk) 14:03, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Chill Guy

The article Chill Guy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Chill Guy and Talk:Chill Guy/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Locust member -- Locust member (talk) 23:24, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Chill Guy

The article Chill Guy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chill Guy for comments about the article, and Talk:Chill Guy/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Locust member -- Locust member (talk) 13:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnson524 I wonder what's your next project about internet meme. Would that be trollface? hehe 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 16:20, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I kind of love that idea 😂 Its good to see you @Boneless Pizza!, cheers! Johnson524 16:27, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I recently moved out to the fictional character articles and started looking at internet meme articles then chose Poop emoji lol. Hopefully it would survive at GAN rn. Cheers! 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 16:29, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Senior assassin

The article Senior assassin you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Senior assassin and Talk:Senior assassin/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Locust member -- Locust member (talk) 15:05, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi Johnson524, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:45, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Senior assassin

The article Senior assassin you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Senior assassin for comments about the article, and Talk:Senior assassin/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Locust member -- Locust member (talk) 16:23, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The best part of this article has to be the staged photo. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 21:58, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TrademarkedTWOrantula: Haha thank you so much! The whole article from the writing to the picture was fun to make 😄 Johnson524 22:14, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ripken (dog)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ripken (dog) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 21:45, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daughters of Mary, Mother of Our Savior for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daughters of Mary, Mother of Our Savior, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daughters of Mary, Mother of Our Savior until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Johnson524! The thread you created at the Teahouse, How to deal with talk page blanking of repeated warnings, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Durrr Burger (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

It still fails to address why it was deleted, and I'd argue the problem cannot be remedied without more analysis which it simply does not have. The article mentions lots of stuff that is tangentially related to Durr Burger but does not increase the notability of the fictional chain itself. See also WP:AKON. It would probably be better to focus your efforts on something else.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Durrr Burger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:08, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zxcvbnm: Did you see my message on the draft talk page Draft talk:Durrr Burger#Second attempt? What is missing? I've read through WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV multiple times, and I don't see how this article doesn't meet requirements. This is repeated in greater detail on the above wikilink, but there are a 44 reliable (none even situational) citations per RS/P and VG/S used, with 18 of these including the character in the title, and many more discussing the character not necessarily as the "main topic of the source material", but "more than a trivial mention": per the wording of the SIGCOV policy. I don't believe WP:AKON applies here either, as the information I've added since the article became a draft provide further commentary (IGN India) or recognition (New York magazine), which you said the article was lacking. If the article doesn't meet criteria then it shouldn't be in the main space, but there are a number of analysis' made by reputable sources at this point.

On a more personal note, I'm truly sorry for being a squeaky wheel, and I really do appreciate the time you've put into reviewing and commenting on this draft. Can someone else take a look at the draft, or are you passionate enough to where you do not want to see it submitted again? Have a blessed day, Johnson524 18:24, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your article already got unequivocally deleted. That means the hurdle to find better sources is absolutely immense, and it would have to be something numerous people somehow missed or ignored. This is absolutely an AKON situation, regardless of how much you claim it's not.

The main problem here is that your "sources" do not talk about Durr Burger, but other stuff that is related to it, but are not actually Durr Burger, like the ARG that was conducted by Fortnite featuring imagery of the fictional chain. That makes the article something like a WP:COATRACK. The vast majority of them only have trivial mentions of the chain.

If you still want to say it's notable, post your WP:THREE best possible sources that were missed by the AfD. Rather than quantity (i.e. claims of "44 sources", we should be talking about quality - which sources are actually significant). ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:25, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zxcvbnm If the sources can discuss nothing but the character, I'd have to say Fortnite Beef Boss Skin: How Do You Get the Durr Burger Outfit in Fortnite? (Dot Esports), Fortnite Beef Boss Skin: How Do You Get the Durr Burger Outfit in Fortnite? (GameRevolution), and Wendy's streams Fortnite just to destroy Durrr Burger over and over again (PCGamesN), which are admittedly pretty lousy on their own. I guess it really was a misunderstanding of policy. I was really in disbelief at the second rejection because there was so much commentary and recognition the character had received overall, but few to no good singular sources. I don't think I understood that until now. Thank you for continuing to comment on this draft, I finally understand where you're coming from, it's just unfortunate all 30,000 bytes I put into writing that article will never be seen. If nothing else I gained a better understanding of policy which I'll definitely not forget moving forward, but I don't think I'll write any more video game articles for a long time. Thank you, and have a blessed day. Johnson524 14:42, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's unfortunate, and while I'd love to see more articles on notable gaming minutia, it is incredibly hard to get one past not only GNG policy but also veteran editors. I've seen some of my own articles with sourcing that I think is a slamdunk get merged anyway. Simply, the standards are way higher than your average page. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:27, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ripken (dog)

The article Ripken (dog) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ripken (dog) and Talk:Ripken (dog)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 18:42, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation backlog drive

Hello Johnson524:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in June!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 1 month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 June 2025 through 30 June 2025.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3200 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Denys Davydov has been accepted

Denys Davydov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MWFwiki (talk) 21:57, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Denys Davydov channel profile.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Denys Davydov channel profile.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 23:43, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Johnson524! The thread you created at the Teahouse, NOTNEWS question, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:14, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The World Destubathon

You are invited to participate in The World Destubathon. It's currently planned for June 16-July 13, partly due to me having hayfever during that period and not wanting to run it throughout July or August in the hotter summer and will be run then unless multiple editors object. There is currently $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. As 250 countries and entities is too much to patrol, entries will be by user, but there is $500 going into prizes for editors covering the most countries. Sign up if interested! ♦ Dr. Blofeld

@Dr. Blofeld: Thank you for letting me know, and I'll keep you in my prayers that you get better soon! Johnson524 13:42, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ripken (dog)

The article Ripken (dog) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ripken (dog) for comments about the article, and Talk:Ripken (dog)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 19:47, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chill Guy

On 2 June 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chill Guy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a drawing of a dog was promoted by the president of El Salvador, caused an unaffiliated song to peak on the TikTok Billboard Top 50, and got its original creator doxxed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chill Guy. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chill Guy), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:02, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 23,843 views (993.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A fox for you!

For getting Chill Guy into GA and DYK. Amazing work!

Zinderboff (talk) 04:57, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zinderboff: Thank you so much! I really do appreciate it! 🙂 Johnson524 15:41, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Durr Burger" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Durr Burger has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 21 § Durr Burger until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 18:44, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Beef Boss" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Beef Boss has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 21 § Beef Boss until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 18:45, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025 NPP backlog drive – Points award

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Johnson524 for accumulating at least 25 points during the May 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 17,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:41, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCurious in Charlotte on Wed, July 2, 2025

Hi there!

You are invited to the event Wikicurious: Rewriting the Canvas on Wikipedia. The event will be taking place on Wednesday, July 2, 2025, 5PM to 8PM, at the Bechtler Museum of Modern Art in Charlotte, North Carolina. This free event is open to all. It is especially designed for people interested in Black American music and modernist visual art, and for peope who are curious about using Wikipedia to learn about these subjects, about getting started editing Wikipedia, or just meeting other Wikimedians. If you are interested, please sign up on the event page AND on their Eventbrite page.

You received this message because you are on the global message delivery list of the North Carolina Wikipedians, probably because you signed up on our user page or because you attended one of our events. If you would like to remove yourself, please e-mail me or remove your username from our global message delivery list.

Thanks so much -- I hope to see you in Charlotte! -- Gaurav (talk) 14:04, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Many thanks for your thanks and kindness and for being an all-around amazing editor! :) They go a long way and it always means a lot to be appreciated, especially with edits on more obscure pages. Dan the Animator 18:40, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also noticed you posted about going and coming back from boot camp and as a fellow American from NY, wanted to say, thank you for your service! Hope the boot camp went well and great to see you editing again :) Dan the Animator 18:46, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much @Dantheanimator, this has made my day! While I'm very glad I can say I completed NSI, I'm also very grateful I'll never have to do it again lol. While you're here, I wanted to mention that I've loved stalking the Featured List feed these past few months and seeing all the Ukrainian topics you've gotten to the prestigious status! Your contributions are seen and truly appreciated. Thank you for spreading positivity around the encyclopedia, and cheers from North Carolina 🙂 Johnson524 18:59, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I can imagine lol but at least you made it through. And about Featured lists, thanks thanks! :) My past few FLs have definitely been some of the tougher ones so the thanks are very appreciated. Although I have a few too many projects I've been working on, feel free to let me know if you'd like to see something else promoted eventually too. Thank you for your contributions and work and positivity too and cheers from New York ;) Dan the Animator 19:16, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thanks.

Thank you kindly for your two thank you notifications, for my two small edits, in mid-July, to Template:Russian invasion of Ukraine. You are one of the friendlier editors, no doubt! I will leave a small reciprocal gift for you on your main User page. Best wishes. --Jerryobject (talk) 13:58, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Jerryobject! I really appreciate your kind words and for your contributions improving the highly-viewed template 🙂 Oh, and I never even knew a 'this user plays Tetris' userbox existed, that's a really neat find! Believe it or not though, I've probably only played three or four games of Tetris in my life lol. The main reason I love contributing to it on the encyclopedia is because, for a fun-to-watch game with such a large fanbase, there appeared to be zero active editors! That inspired me to learn about the game and start contributing: and I'm glad I did, because the five articles I've created on major modern Tetris players have become some of most viewed of the eighty articles I've created total. Your contributions are seen and truly appreciated, cheers from North Carolina! Johnson524 00:20, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To be brutally honest, I am a Tetrisholic. However, I am recovering: deeply ashamed and traumatized, but still alive. I have been clean for over a decade, so I also do not, indeed dare not, play that so-called "game" (Yeah, right! Game! Sure!) any more.

Slightly more seriously, you did not post the Tetris userbox I left on your user page, because you play it so little, right? That causality is intimated above, but not stated explicitly. Good luck. --Jerryobject (talk) 14:18, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jerryobject: That's one of the best comments I've ever read on this encyclopedia. Yeah, at least for now I don't think I'm worthy enough to display the 'this user plays userbox', but I've seen what the "game" has done to friends of mine... and if one day you see it added to my userpage... I've become terribly addicted and need help. Johnson524 15:39, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive

September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious

One year!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:12, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Thank you so very much for this, it is appreciated more than you know 🙂 Cheers from North Carolina! Johnson524 06:16, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hiding an image's location

How did you redact your geocoded location in this image? TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 21:29, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @TrademarkedTWOrantula! I apologize for the late reply, I've been quite busy recently 😅 I plugged the image into a website which scrubbed the location data (many do this for free) and then I found that neat template on commons to disclose that fact. Hope this helps, and good luck on any ongoing projects of yours! Johnson524 12:57, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025 GAN Backlog Drive

October 2025 GAN Backlog Drive
On 1 October 2025, a one-month backlog drive for good article nomination reviews will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog and to reduce old nominations. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age of nominations reviewed. Each article review will earn 1 point; for each 90 days an article has been in the backlog, an additional half-point is awarded; one extra point will be awarded for every 2500 total reviewed words. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:57, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dix Park (Raleigh, NC) October Hybrid Event Series

A colorized postcard showing the Dorothea Dix Hospital in Raleigh, NC circa 1910

You are invited to an October event series focused on improving content about Dorothea Dix Hospital and creating a Wikipedia page for Dix Park. Join us for one or all three of the following: online kickoff October 5, in-person tour of the Hospital site at Dix Park on October 10, and an online editathon with a special guest from the State Library of North Carolina on October 19. Instructions on registering for the tour and joining us for the editathons on Zoom are included in the Meetup page.

You received this message because you are on the global message delivery list of the North Carolina Wikipedians, probably because you signed up on our user page or because you attended one of our events. If you would like to remove yourself, please remove your username from our global message delivery list or e-mail me for help.

Hope to see you at one of these events! -- Gaurav via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:41, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025 NPP backlog drive – Points award

		The Invisible Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Johnson524 for accumulating at least 5 points the September 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Utopes (talk / cont) 03:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Durrr Burger

Hello, Johnson524. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Durrr Burger, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vectorifying the image u uploaded

I noticed you created an article (City of Oaks Marathon with a png and was letting you know im gonna try and vectorfy the image for you, feel free to lmk if u have any issues JoBo Gamer 09:00, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JoBoGamer: Woah thank you so much! I really do appreciate it, and thanks for reaching out! 🙂 Johnson524 09:09, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

wasnt able to vectorfy your image but i was able to find a higher quality version and will upload in a sec JoBo Gamer 10:43, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of City of Oaks Marathon

Hello! Your submission of City of Oaks Marathon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 4meter4 (talk) 15:49, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aviation article issues

Hi @Johnson524! Fellow new page reviewer here! Just wanted to let you know that 2025 Ekalaka helicopter crash has some issues relating to sourcing. I don't think it was ready to be marked as reviewed yet. Some of the sources (for me at least), return 404s and there are also some questionable sources that have been used as well. Not a big deal, just an observation I made that I felt it best to let you know about. Thanks! 11WB (talk) 03:43, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm reaching out in regards to an article you marked as reviewed recently, 2025 Ekalaka helicopter crash. Looking at the version which was reviewed, all nine sources used are now leading to 404 errors or similar redirects, leading me to believe they are LLM-generated/hallucinated. Please be careful when reviewing, as this should have likely been flagged as a G15 CSD. See WP:AITELLS for other things to watch for. – {{u|hekatlys}} 03:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@11wallisb, @Hekatlys: I don't think I've ever run into hallucinated sources before so this was a new issue for me, but I completely agree! Thank you for making me aware of this. Cheers! Johnson524 17:59, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cite Unseen tool for assessing sources

I saw your comment in the RSP to subpages discussion. You might want to check out the Cite Unseen tool that lets you quickly see how references on a new article stack up. (WMCH gave a grant for it!)

Jenny8lee (talk) 23:34, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jenny8lee: Thank you for reaching out! I was vaguely aware that this feature was being developed but I'm so happy to see its finally being rolled out! I may give it a try, cheers! Johnson524 23:58, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnson524 You should talk to @SuperHamster and @SuperGray for more info! Jenny8lee (talk) 02:20, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation backlog drive

Hello Johnson524:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in December!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than half a month of outstanding reviews from the current 2+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 December 2025 through 31 December 2025.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:07, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Johnson524. Thank you for your work on Eric Tolt. Another editor, Aszx5000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

You are creating high quality and well constructed articles; I think you should be autopatrolled? thanks.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aszx5000 (talk) 16:10, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Aszx5000: Thank you! I may very well apply for that soon. Thank you for the complement, and have a great rest of your day 🙂 Johnson524 16:25, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Huliaipole

Hi Johnson524, hope all is well! Two weeks ago I created the page Huliaipole offensive, but it has not been reviewed yet. In the meantime, fighting has reached the outskirts of the city. It would be nice to get the article indexed, so that it could create more visibility. I noticed that you are a patroller and was wondering if you were able to review this page. I’d completely understand if you are busy at the moment. Regards I Know I'm Not Alone (talk) 19:14, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reaching out @I Know I'm Not Alone! After first discovering the page I wanted to see how the event would play out/if the attacks would actually reach the city itself before a thorough review, but as the situation has become more dire and news coverage has increased, I see no reason why it wouldn't pass notability now. Let me give it a through review now 🙂 Cheers! Johnson524 00:50, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Daughters of Mary, Mother of Our Savior is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Daughters of Mary, Mother of Our Savior is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Darth Stabro -- Darth Stabro (talk) 16:08, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]