User talk:LunaEclipse
![]() | I will NOT accept paid editing in any way, shape, or form; requests for such activity on my talk page will be removed with no hesitation. |

WP:RETENTION: This editor is willing to lend a helping hand. Just ask.
![]() | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
Question from Clarence1539 on Crocodile attack (14:28, 5 August 2025)
[edit]Hello I have been reading Wikipedia daily for several years, and I absolutely adore this site. I have just registered to Wikipedia - I would like to add some important information regarding the article "Crocodile attack". The information I want to add involves me personally and it is based on my personal experience as the only known survivor to survive an attack by three massive Nile crocodiles. The problem is, my story was published widely, but the publications in the press were misleading, not telling the true story. After the attack, I was hospitalized and wasn't able to talk for several months. When I regained the ability to talk, I refused to talk the press - I would like my story to appear on Wikipedia rather then the press. My question is whether I could edit the article without the misleading citations that were published on the press, but rather base my addition on my personal documents, such as my medical reports? Of course, I wouldn't want my medical information to go public. Thank you very much! --Clarence1539 (talk) 14:28, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- Welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunately, adding your own experience is forbidden as we are not an archive of original research. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 19:39, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I have a pretty specific (+ long) question I'm hoping you can help with. I've been working on translating articles from the Japanese language Wikipedia into English to improve the English-language articles. The article I'm working on right now (Yu Chin-san/柳珍山) is largely formatted like a timeline in the Japanese, rather than a prose biography, so I'm wondering if you have suggestions for the best way to format my translation in the English article. Should I keep the timeline format, for loyalty to the translation, or try to integrate my translation into the English prose? --SRF2806 (talk) 22:49, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- I would recommend translating as much as possible into prose. If you need help, check Wikipedia:Translate. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 01:58, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
I need help with getting started
[edit]I hope you’re doing well. I’m currently working on creating my Wikipedia page, but I’m a bit stuck on how to properly add my references and format the page so it meets the notability requirements. Could you please guide me through the next steps?
Thank you so much for your help!
— Linda Etienne (Coach Linda) LindaEtienne (talk) 17:25, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 August 2025
[edit]- News and notes: Court order snips out part of Wikipedia article, editors debate whether to frame shreds or pulp them
- Discussion report: News from ANI, AN, RSN, BLPN, ELN, FTN, and NPOVN
- Disinformation report: The article in the most languages
- Community view: News from the Villages Pump
- Crossword: Accidental typography
- Traffic report: I'm not the antichrist or the Superman
(This message was sent to User talk:Davest3r08 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive
[edit]September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol | ![]() |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
Question from JessEli1 on Aleksander Michałowski (16:18, 25 August 2025)
[edit]I am looking at the suggested entry for Aleksander Michalowski, the entry first suggested to me. I think the entry itself looks complete but have found several names that need a link with further descriptions of their work (i.e., Stanislaw Urstein, Edwarda Chojnacka, etc) . Is this something I should note? Somewhere I can pass this information on? Or do I need to be concerned with links at this point? --JessEli1 (talk) 16:18, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- JessEli1, I recommend going to your local library or using a search engine like Google Scholar. — 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 00:06, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Question from ESTEBANRFP (07:41, 26 August 2025)
[edit]I'd like to write about GenosDB. I'm the creator. I'd like to share the documentation, tutoriales, etc, distributed technology, and contribute my knowledge of the topic. Is this possible, or is it self-promotion? I've worked on GenosDB documentation for years, and I'm the creator of its documentation platform. I recently registered here on Wikipedia. https://genosdb.com/ --ESTEBANRFP (talk) 07:41, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
- ESTEBANRFP, I recommend you use the article wizard and declare your conflict of interest there. Writing about yourself is discouraged on Wikipedia. — 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 00:05, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Question from Ladyignorer (12:11, 27 August 2025)
[edit]Hello, Luna. I was wondering; if we want to add more information to an article, where are we supposed to find it? As Wikipedia is the main source for most of the knowledge, and the information is not currently on it. --Ladyignorer (talk) 12:11, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
- Ladyignorer, you should follow the tips at Help:Your first article. — 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 00:04, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
WikiCup 2025 September newsletter
[edit]The fourth round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 29 August. The penultimate round saw three contestants score more than 800 points:
BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,175 round points, mainly from sports-related articles, including 17 good articles, 27 did you know articles, and 9 in the news articles
Arconning (submissions) with 1,090 round points, mainly from articles about athletes and politicians, including a featured article on Philippines at the 1924 Summer Olympics, 9 good articles, 28 did you know articles, and a wide assortment of featured and good article reviews
AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 854 round points, mostly from a high-scoring featured article on the Indian leader Rani of Jhansi and two good articles, in addition to 13 featured and good article reviews
Everyone who competed in Round 4 will advance to Round 5 unless they have withdrawn. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far, while the full scores for Round 4 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 9 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 98 good articles, 9 good topic articles, more than 150 reviews, nearly 100 did you know articles, and 18 in the news articles.
In advance of the fifth and final round, the judges would like to thank every contestant for their hard work. As a reminder, any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed in Round 5. In addition, note that Round 5 will end on 31 October at 23:59 UTC. Awards at the end of Round 5 will be distributed based on who has the most tournament points over all five rounds, and special awards will be distributed based on high performance in particular areas of content creation (e.g., most featured articles in a single round).
Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges – Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), Frostly (talk · contribs), Guerillero (talk · contribs) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) – are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck!
If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Question from H.L.Howard229 (13:08, 30 August 2025)
[edit]Hi, Luna,
I need to build 10 edits to publish my page from sandbox into main, how I can find the page so I can work to edit it?
any other suggestions so I can publish my page?
Thanks -Howard --H.L.Howard229 (talk) 13:08, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hi H.L.Howard229, I recommend using the article wizard for the time being. — 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 02:26, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Question from H.L.Howard229 (13:11, 30 August 2025)
[edit]Stella,
thanks for being my mentor! Any suggestions for questions? --H.L.Howard229 (talk) 13:11, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
(trialing replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 20:31, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red September 2025
[edit]![]() Recognized as the most successful topic-based WikiProject by human changes.
Announcements:
Tip of the Month:
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 23:51, 31 August 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
(This message was sent to User talk:Davest3r08 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
Women in Red September 2025
[edit]![]() Recognized as the most active, topic-based WikiProject by human changes.
Announcements:
Tip of the Month:
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 23:54, 31 August 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, I noticed the article on APAC Tower was rejected for notability. I would like guidance on whether the coverage I have from independent sources is sufficient, or what additional sources would be needed. --Kay3233 (talk) 13:53, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Question from QAExplorer (07:04, 3 September 2025)
[edit]Hi Stella, I'm writing because I need some help with a Wikipedia edit I made. I'm a first-time contributor and I added a section to the API simulation page to list more tools for users, making sure not to add any external links.
I saw that it was flagged for deletion, and I'm not sure why. I would really appreciate it if you could take a look and let me know what I should do to fix it or make it acceptable. Thanks --QAExplorer (talk) 07:04, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Question from Dorilla Leblac (11:22, 3 September 2025)
[edit]I suffer from brain trauma injuries which resulted in "Detour Eye Disease" I'm a photographer looking to update my community information page "A Bouctouche". --Dorilla Leblac (talk) 11:22, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- Dorilla Leblac, Wikipedia is not a web host or a social media platform. You might be looking for Instagram or Flickr. — 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 11:23, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you Dorilla Leblac (talk) 11:24, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Hi! Can you explain how all the little features on the top bar work while editing? Thanks a lot, you're a lifesaver! --Star5656 (talk) 20:12, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Question from Kayjonqueen on Pinky (dolphin) (12:35, 4 September 2025)
[edit]Can I upload a picture? --Kayjonqueen (talk) 12:35, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I'm editing the draft name " APAC Tower" Do you think my draft is neutral and based on reliable sources? Am I on the right track now? --Kay3233 (talk) 16:30, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Thank you!
[edit]Dear @LunaEclipse, thank you so much for taking the time to review my article about the artist David Chichkan. I'm still working on it and trying to make it better. Anonymous-anonym (talk) 17:47, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Question from Dorilla Leblac (18:23, 7 September 2025)
[edit]Where is the best place to photograph solar ecliose --Dorilla Leblac (talk) 18:23, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I don't have that information as it isn't related to editing. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 18:40, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 September 2025
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation loses a round in court
- In the media: Congress probes, mayor whitewashed, AI stinks
- Disinformation report: A guide for Congress
- Recent research: Minority-language Wikipedias, and Wikidata for botanists
- Technology report: A new way to read Wikisource
- Traffic report: Check out some new Weapons, weapon of choice
- Essay: The one question
(This message was sent to User talk:Davest3r08 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
Как ссылаться на источник --Sksjwj (talk) 06:25, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
- Note: SP9947's mentor Fieryninja is away.
I want to make a user page. --SP9947 (talk) 17:58, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Cite Unseen September 2025 updates
[edit]Hello! Thank you for using Cite Unseen. We are excited to share details about a big update we just deployed. With grant support from Wikimedia CH, we've added several new features, including a citation filtering dashboard, settings dialog, support for localization, and the ability to easily suggest domain categorizations. Cite Unseen now also lives on Meta Wiki, as part of our effort to serve all Wikimedia projects. Our source lists are now also on Meta-Wiki, where they can be collaboratively edited by the community.
Please see our newsletter on Meta-Wiki for full details. If you have feature ideas, notice any issues with our new updates, or have any questions, please get in touch via our project talk page. Thank you!
This message was sent via global message delivery. You received this message as you've been identified as a user of Cite Unseen. If you are not a Cite Unseen user, or otherwise don't want to receive updates in the future, you can remove yourself from our mailing list here.
Hi! 🙌
[edit]Hi, just wanted to say I just checked my notifications and saw that you're my new Wiki mentor. Great to meet you here, look forward to working together, and get well soon if you've been unwell at all! All the best! 🙌 Ed S0236078 (talk) 03:09, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Women in Green's 9th Edit-a-thon
[edit]
Hello LunaEclipse:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in October 2025!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2025, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event with the theme What Women Do! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 different occupations or professions (or broader roles in society) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk), Spookyaki (talk) & Alanna the Brave (talk)
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:38, 17 September 2025 (UTC)