User talk:Eastmain

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end.
 Start a new talk topic.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ward Pound Ridge Reservation has been accepted

[edit]
Ward Pound Ridge Reservation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rambley (talk) 10:35, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good job on the cleanup for this one by the way. Always nice seeing what was once a fully AI-generated piece get turned into a well-written, well-sourced article. Rambley (talk) 10:36, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karen Siale Ellett (June 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Aside from the sourcing issues (many of them offer passing mentions or no mentions at all), you might want to finish the two empty sections or simply remove them before resubmission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Rambley (talk) 12:15, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Eastmain! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rambley (talk) 12:15, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Escarpment Trail Race has been accepted

[edit]
Escarpment Trail Race, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

qcne (talk) 14:07, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liolaemus ramonensis has been accepted

[edit]
Liolaemus ramonensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Old-AgedKid (talk) 10:48, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CSD-logo-116x139.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CSD-logo-116x139.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 01:09, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dioscorea cirrhosa has been accepted

[edit]
Dioscorea cirrhosa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 14:26, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aeropro Business Charter Logo.gif

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aeropro Business Charter Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:18, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Mason County Historical Society

[edit]

Hello Eastmain. Thank you for your additions to the Mason County Historical Society article references. I admire your mission to improve articles that have been nominated to WP:AfD for deletion. Having checked over the references you added, it appears that 3 and 4 are inaccessible (at least to me). When I attempted to view them the webpage displayed this text: '451: Unavailable due to legal reasons. We recognize you are attempting to access this website from a country belonging to the European Economic Area (EEA) including the EU which enforces the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and therefore access cannot be granted at this time.' This could present as a problem for editors assessing the AfD. If there is a tag or some type of subst/note which could be added to those two references that highlight this, that would be very helpful. Thank you and happy editing! 11WB (talk) 09:05, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@11wallisb: Thanks for your message. A reference is valid even if it is not available online (for example, a printed book that is only available at a few libraries). I think people within the EEA encounter geoblocks like the ones you mention often enough that they will not be surprised by them. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:15, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this. That is unfortunate, however I am aware there are certain websites that have this type of thing in place. It just makes viewing references more difficult which is a shame. Definitely not our fault though! 11WB (talk) 09:22, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As a follow up, the references look to assist in providing notability for the article. I will be interested to see how this potentially affects editors opinions! You are also more than welcome to partake in the AfD! 11WB (talk) 09:25, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Acrosiphonia coalita has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Acrosiphonia coalita. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:28, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acrosiphonia coalita has been accepted

[edit]
Acrosiphonia coalita, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:29, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Taxa named by David J. Garbary

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Taxa named by David J. Garbary indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:25, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Taxa named by Larry Golden

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Taxa named by Larry Golden indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:27, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Taxa named by Robert F. Scagel

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Taxa named by Robert F. Scagel indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:27, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Taxa named by Michael W. Hawkes

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Taxa named by Michael W. Hawkes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:29, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Taxa named by David Pegler

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Taxa named by David Pegler indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:25, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 168th Street Bus Terminal has been accepted

[edit]
168th Street Bus Terminal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:18, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nanki Seibutsu

[edit]
Notice

The article Nanki Seibutsu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 05:46, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nanki Seibutsu for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nanki Seibutsu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanki Seibutsu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Randykitty (talk) 21:45, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Page mover granted

[edit]

Hello, Eastmain. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Salvio giuliano 10:11, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bauhcis (August 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Appears to be mostly unsourced
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 14:29, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Koelreuteria lunpolaensis has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Koelreuteria lunpolaensis. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:58, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Koelreuteria lunpolaensis has been accepted

[edit]
Koelreuteria lunpolaensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:58, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive

[edit]
September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prasinoderma coloniale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coccoid.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Zephyranthes treatiae has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zephyranthes treatiae. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:19, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zephyranthes treatiae has been accepted

[edit]
Zephyranthes treatiae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:19, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tettigettula pygmea has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tettigettula pygmea. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:12, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tettigettula pygmea has been accepted

[edit]
Tettigettula pygmea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:13, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bauhcis (August 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WeirdNAnnoyed was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Single-source article. Usually 2 sources is considered a minimum for clearing WP:GNG, and ideally at least one of these should be a secondary source.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:42, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mugdha Vaishampayan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chintamani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiClub Toronto Meetup

[edit]

Hello! It looks like you’ve shown interest in WikiClub Toronto meetups in the past. Our next meetup is scheduled for September 21, 2025, in Downtown Toronto. You can find more information here: Wikipedia:Meetup/Toronto/2025 Sept 21. Have a great day! SophieWMCA (talk) 19:05, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Csakvarotherium has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Csakvarotherium. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Csakvarotherium has been accepted

[edit]
Csakvarotherium, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:07, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of St. Xavier's School, Bhiwadi for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. Xavier's School, Bhiwadi, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Xavier's School, Bhiwadi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Taxa named by Tian-Yun Chen

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Taxa named by Tian-Yun Chen indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 18:39, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Taxa named by William Suárez

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Taxa named by William Suárez indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:10, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coelogenys (September 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Article wizard/Redirects. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 08:40, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coragyps seductus has been accepted

[edit]
Coragyps seductus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 10:52, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Otostigmus tricarinatus has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Otostigmus tricarinatus. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:58, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Otostigmus tricarinatus has been accepted

[edit]
Otostigmus tricarinatus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:58, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acer wehri has been accepted

[edit]
Acer wehri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

NotAGenious (talk) 14:34, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raja Goutham

[edit]
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DareshMohan (talk) 00:46, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]