User talk:Behappyyar

Welcome!

Hello, Behappyyar, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:03, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Behappyyar, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:04, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Department of Financial Services (India) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Department of Financial Services (India). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Charlie (talk) 18:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Frequency Allocation Board moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Frequency Allocation Board. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text and therefore may provide incorrect information (see WP:LLM). I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:33, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eshanya Maheshwari moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Eshanya Maheshwari. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, currently it also doesn’t have any source showing Significant Coverage. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Pizza on Pineapple🍕 (talk) 20:09, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Masoom Shankar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Masoom Shankar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masoom Shankar. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wiiformii (talk) 18:54, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kaavya Sha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kaavya Sha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaavya Sha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:41, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Thanks for message, I assume that you meant ColorPlus (brand)

If an article isn't ready, you should create as a draft, not in article space, I see above that you have been advised of that more than once previously. You have also misread the deletion tag, I deleted as G11 promotion, not A7, although that would have been equally valid.

You wrote a promotional article. If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at Behappyyar. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Behappyyar|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block.

I'm sure that you know that you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls

The Economic Times. and The Times of India need to be used with some caution. Your references include press releases, input from Bhatia, "sources" and "two persons familiar with the development said" How can these be independent third-party sources?
You must not accuse a company of bad behaviour if you don't source the text, that leaves us open to defamation claims. And the alleged bad behaviour is described so vaguely as to be meaningless.

The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

It's all about what the company sells, little about the company itself other than its location, India. No headquarters? To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, management structure, turnover or profits, you had none of these.

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

Promotional language includes known for offering smart casual apparel... is recognized for its focus on contemporary designs and high-quality fabrics... to provide stylish and durable clothing for men, catering to those seeking versatile, smart-casual wear. Over time, the brand has become a notable name in the Indian fashion market... a significant retail presence across India... a growing online presence. — fact-free spam, especially as they appear to be just your opinions; the claims are unsourced except for one where the source doesn't confirm what you say.

There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

I didn't check.

I can't see that there is anything worth restoring, there are few real facts, just your opinions of their products

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:17, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jimfbleak - talk to me? First of all, i am not affiliated with the company or not working as paid editor. I am working with WikiProject: India (Requested Articles)

Secondly, I will make sure that i will remove the promotional content and tone as well. And be careful next time. Kindly restore the article and move it to the draft. If this is not done, my profile will be affected. This one is my request.

Here are some reliable resources : [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

[8] [9]

Here are the references about the revenue and workers info and so on. [10] [11].

[12] Link for the structure of the company.

Behappyyar (talk) 17:24, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing where Jimfbleak left off, your edits give an appearance that you have a conflict of interest. Can you clarify what you mean by working "with WikiProject India?" Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID and disclose any affiliation you may have. Also, please note that AfD discussions are NOT a vote count. You must leave reasoning for why you want to keep pages from being deleted. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:29, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Working with WikiProject India" means working on those articles which are related to the Indian cinema, indian politics and biographies etc. Behappyyar (talk) 14:39, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What does "If this is not done, my profile will be affected." mean? Doug Weller talk 14:00, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm specifically referring to the kind of article creation history or standards usually considered when granting autopetrol and new page reviewer rights. Behappyyar (talk) 14:08, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Behappyyar. Thank you for your work on Masoom Shankar. Another editor, Reconrabbit, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

For future reviewers: This page was deleted following a discussion from 2019. Other sources have been published discussing her since then.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Reconrabbit}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Recon rabbit 16:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ❤️ Behappyyar (talk) 17:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Samreen Kaur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samreen Kaur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samreen Kaur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Garvitpandey1522 (talk) 15:45, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Other accounts

In addition to the COI request above, what is your connection to user:Singhaditya94 and/or user:Thinkmachineads? CNMall41 (talk) 06:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CNMall41 (talk) Thanks for asking ❤️. I don't know these users and I have nothing to do with them. Whats happened?. Is everything right?? Behappyyar (talk) 14:33, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. This page was created originally as part of a large sock farm to which I watch regularly to compare new editor activity who may be (and often are) connected to the farm. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:44, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aurangzeb Ahmed moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aurangzeb Ahmed, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 09:16, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion

Sorry for the confusion, I really didnt mean to override your article. Extremely sorry for it, wont do the mistake further :( 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 11:07, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay dear!Behappyyar (talk) 12:19, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for understanding :). 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 13:07, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics alert

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 13:22, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you mention these edits here? Behappyyar (talk) 13:50, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now I'm confused. What edits have you made that aren't relevant? Doug Weller talk 14:34, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Behappyyar. Thank you for your work on Grace Wick. Another editor, JSFarman, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Enlightening article. Thanks for writing it.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|JSFarman}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JSFarman (talk) 01:23, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JSFarman: Thanks for appreciation. Behappyyar (talk) 13:34, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maanu (singer) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Maanu (singer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mekomo (talk) 09:24, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Umair (music producer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Umair (music producer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umair (music producer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 17:39, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

take that article Umair (music producer) to your workshop so that you can make improvements and consult before publishing it. In my opinion, it doesn't look so bad, it just needs more personal life.. 190.140.190.217 (talk) 23:36, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Sajjad Ghani

Hello Behappyyar, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sajjad Ghani, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajjad Ghani.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 13:31, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Aqeel (general)

reason for moving Muhammad Aqeel to Muhammad Aqeel (general)? There is only one article of a person named Muhammad Aqeel, hence no need to add "(general)". This is only done when there are multiple article on multiple people named a same name. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 14:54, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking. There was page name Mohammed Aqeel. I thought it will create confusion, then i move Mohammed Aqeel to Mohammed Aqeel (militant) and Muhammad Aqeel to Muhammad Aqeel (officer). Behappyyar (talk) 15:07, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay, it was necessary to do so. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 15:18, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Behappyyar (talk) 15:46, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sajjad Ibraheem

The article Sajjad Ibraheem has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of WP:SIGCOV for this young cricketer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 20:21, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JTtheOG (talk) I have left a message on your talk page. Please check it out. Behappyyar (talk) 18:26, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sajjad Ibraheem for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sajjad Ibraheem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajjad Ibraheem until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 20:44, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hamid Rashid Randhawa

Why did you add his name in the list or serving marshals of the pakistan air force? He is a retired officer. Incumbent DCOAS (operation) is Aurangzeb Ahmed. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 12:21, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because I didn't find any reference to his retirement. If you have one, mention it. Behappyyar (talk) 12:39, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

the page is regularly updated by PAF officials via IP account. If the name isnt in the list, it means he has retired. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 12:41, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then who is the DCOAS (operation)? Behappyyar (talk) 12:43, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AVM Aurangzeb Ahmed. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 12:44, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SOURCE?? Behappyyar (talk) 12:45, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DG ISPR press conference. He himself admitted that. Hamid Rashid Randhawa retired from air force in 2025. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 12:46, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And also, hamid rashid randhawa doesnt have TBt. He has HI(M), SI(M) & TI(M) 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 12:48, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[13]

But this post from official account say Aurangzeb Ahmed served as DCOAS (operation). Behappyyar (talk) 12:48, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it says assistant not deputy. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 12:49, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Behappyyar (talk) 12:53, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Its okay. I am revamping Hamid's article, and adding some more valuable information. Otherwise it might get an AfD, because the article states only 4 refs. Cheers! 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 12:54, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. By the way, he is Hilal-i-Imtiaz Military (2nd highest) award's recipient. Even if goes in AFD, I don't think any editor would support deletion. Behappyyar (talk) 13:03, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

None would but still an AfD is not a good sign for an article :) 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 13:15, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's true.

And one more thing Article has been marked as reviewed almost 18 hours ago. ❤️ Behappyyar (talk) 13:23, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's great! 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 13:29, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the air force flag officers retirement isnt announced unless he is a four star officer. But that doesn't refer that they are still serving. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 12:42, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Muniruddin Ahmed (fighter pilot)

Your article on him is a large scale copy-paste, and might get drafted because most of the things you have written are copied directly.
I will not draftify it, but will remove the present informations and add the upgraded version. Thus it won't get deleted nor drafted. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 18:11, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not to be mentioned, the multiple sources mostly say same thing. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 18:13, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the article with much more reliable sources, and it looks much better now. I have additionally added his citation of SJ & the awards and decorations section. Alongwith that, I added his service number, his family background & the people he has took part in the operation. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 18:45, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dear 💞 Behappyyar (talk) 04:54, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime. If you have any problem or need to upgrade an article, please mention here. I'd be glad to help. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 07:51, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I appreciate your support. Could you please help improve the "Awards and decorations" section of the articles? It would be great to have that part enhanced with proper formatting and reliable sources.

Thanks again! Behappyyar (talk) 17:46, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He had Tamgha-e-Jamhuria before his Shahadat, and was awarded SJ later. All the officers who actively participated were awarded Tamgha-e-Diffa, Sitara-e-Harb & Tamgha-e-Jang. This is what the awards state itself. No source applies here. Similar thing has been done for Raja Aziz Bhatti and Sarfaraz Ahmed Rafiqui. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 18:18, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am saying not for only this article but for others. You can check out the articles here 👉🏻 Articles by User:Behappyyar Behappyyar (talk) 18:24, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will start doing that. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 08:12, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Behappyyar (talk) 10:16, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kanwal Aftab moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kanwal Aftab. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because when i clicked the links to check your sources the majority did not exist. You can find the sources in the draft talk page.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 22:15, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe there is a problem in reference. I'll check. Thanks Behappyyar (talk) 00:26, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kanwal Aftab has been accepted

Kanwal Aftab, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 16:05, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aina Asif

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aina Asif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aina Asif (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CNMall41 (talk) 16:17, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the deletion tag since this doesn't seem to be the same article that was deleted.

Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 01:45, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aina Asif for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aina Asif is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aina Asif (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 01:55, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm Scaledish. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Kanwal Aftab in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 17:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 2A10:D582:A118:0:3023:B6D:B661:79B1 (talk) 03:21, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology), you may be blocked from editing. 2A10:D582:DF66:0:55A7:F3C9:8739:C18 (talk) 03:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Have you logged out to edit?

Hello. I have reviewed the contributions of this IP address and it made me to ask: have you logged out on June 6 in order to support your opinions at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umair (music producer) and edit the relevant article. Or have you encourage some close relative/friend to do so, in violation of WP:MEAT? It true, you should read WP:LOUTSOCK, and consider this as a notice, less than a warning as per WP:AGF. It looks like a coincidence, but I am just wondering.

I see that you have been using LLMs to write content on Wikipedia, which is often frowned upon here. You should really stop doing so; otherwise, you will find yourself blocked. ToadetteEdit (talk) 08:15, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, I didn't log out and give any opinion, nor I ask a friend or close one to give an opinion. I have nothing to do with this IP. Thanks for asking. Behappyyar (talk) 10:04, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for answering. Happy editing! ToadetteEdit (talk) 13:14, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is your connection to user:Shubhamgawali1? Your AI response is formatted almost exactly like theirs in previous AfD discussions. I also have a few other accounts I can show you but hoping for an honest response here prior to filing a SPI. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:27, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing to do with this account. That's the only account I have trough which I am replying.

I know that misusing two or more accounts leads to a block, so I wouldn't make such a mistake. Behappyyar (talk) 03:01, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LLM

I'm guessing you use LLM to find sources or generate article, please stop doing so.
Many of the sources you use are faulty, and you write wrong information in the articles. Such as you wrote Salahuddin Satti served as Commander Rawalpindi later and CGS before but he served as CGS after and Commander Rwp before. You also said he retired in 2007, but he retired in 2008. You also said he's from Baloch regt, but he was commissioned in the 40th Punjab. If you don't have information dont use but dont present faulty information please. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 07:01, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since you once told me to review your articles in my talk, I have done that. I'm gonna be straight forward, please don't create any other articles for some time. It's hard to review all the articles and fix them, though I try to at least 3 to 4 articles of yours to make them meet wikipedia standards. I have already fixed numerous articles, I'd request you to refrain from using LLM and creating more articles. Once I'm done reviewing, you can continue. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 07:13, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I appreciate your support and help. Behappyyar (talk) 13:17, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Khalid Nawaz Khan

Hey, who told you he was commissioned in armoured corps? He is from 3 Baloch. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 17:30, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The World Destubathon

Hi! Thank you for your contributions! On behalf of Dr. Blofeld, I would like to invite you to participate in The World Destubathon, taking place from Monday, 16 June – Sunday, 13 July, UTC. With primary intention to eliminate the stub articles, it is in fact also the Cleanathon/Sourceathon to help other articles grow as well, and there is a prize money for it who does best. Even if you can only manage a few articles, they would be very much appreciated! Therefore, please sign up on the page in the participants section if interested, and look out for any subject which you feel likable to edit.

Also, since you have been actively looking out for the articles related to Pakistan, I would like to invite you to sign up at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan/Members to help us grow our community. Thank you! M. Billoo 17:31, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the kind invitation and for thinking of me! I'd be happy to participate in The World Destubathon. I have added my name in participant list and will try to contribute as much as possible during the event. Can you guide me further?

I've also added myself to the list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan/Members to stay more engaged with the community. Behappyyar (talk) 03:35, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. You can study the rules: Wikipedia:The World Destubathon/Rules. In short, what I can say is:

You need to select an article. Find some reliable references that may be appropriate to include.
Extract out the content, and make an addition – which should only be a readable prose of at least 1500 bytes and not a list or table, into the article. (You can see on edit histories a green positive number or a red negtive number.)
Mass use of AI Chatbots is strictly not allowed, since they might give statements which fail WP:N, WP:RS, WP:NPOV or other policies.
Fully furnish the reference (See Template:Cite Web and Template:Cite News). Relevant parameters include url, title, date, accessdate, website, author, language (only if not English), or others if applicable. However, the references are also not counted in 1500 bytes. The citation tools may not automatically provide each and every relevant parameter for some websites, so you can insert them manually as well.
Only those entries at Wikipedia:The World Destubathon/Entries will be accepted which are edited and submitted within the dates. Any earlier edit or some sort of deceiving game is not acceptable. Once accepted by Dr. Blofeld, you have to also submit your entry to the Destubathon main page.
It should not be exact WP:C-P or WP:Copyvio. To confirm your edit, you may use Earwig's Copyvio Detector.
If you find any article with very small intro/lead paragraph, but it may have sufficient and sourced content in the article body, you can write the lead as well.
You are permitted to nuke articles and rewrite them from scratch if in a bad state.
In the end, make sure no unstable tags or unsourced statements are left in the article.

If you have any confusion, you may proceed to the talk page Wikipedia talk:The World Destubathon. Thank you! M. Billoo 14:51, 16 June 2025 (UTC) [Updated: 07:03, 18 June 2025 (UTC)][reply]

Thanks for detailed information. I have a query: Will I have to add entres myself on this page (Wikipedia:The World Destubathon/Entries)?? Behappyyar (talk) 16:25, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Along with stating the country. M. Billoo 20:47, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Any shortcut to find out articles those who need to be aprove? Behappyyar (talk) 04:30, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Stubs. You can go through it and select article(s) as you wish. M. Billoo 16:03, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dananeer Mobeen has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dananeer Mobeen. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 18:15, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dananeer Mobeen (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See talk page. S0091 (talk) 18:51, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dananeer Mobeen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:51, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2025 Jacobabad railway track blast for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Jacobabad railway track blast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Jacobabad railway track blast until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alampe (Talk – Edits) 13:51, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are you using AI?

As I note that you are said to have done this for 2025 Jacobabad railway track blast Doug Weller talk 14:01, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I had mentioned earlier in Afd for Umair (music producer) and on Administrators discussion board that I used ChatGPT in some of my earlier drafts, but not blindly. Secondly, I know using such tools isn’t against the rules, as long as the content is carefully checked and based on reliable sources. But still , after suggestions from experienced editors, I’ve stopped using it for article writing or finding references. Behappyyar (talk) 14:19, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But you used it for the article I mentioned, right? Doug Weller talk 16:17, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, I didn't use for that one. Behappyyar (talk) 17:00, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ZeroGPT says you used it a bit for Anahita Bhooshan. Doug Weller talk 09:57, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why. Could you please attach a link to it?? Behappyyar (talk) 11:04, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See here Behappyyar (talk) 11:33, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arishfa Khan (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arishfa Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 07:11, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea This was created using AI. Doug Weller talk 09:49, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Simply paste a well-crafted Wikipedia article into the ZeroGPT tool, and it will indicate that the text was generated by AI. This is expected, as organized and factual content frequently gets marked by these detection tools, regardless of whether a human wrote it. Therefore, depending only on tools like ZeroGPT is not a reliable approach. Behappyyar (talk) 11:32, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Examples? I'm talking about 80%, 100%, etc. Doug Weller talk 13:50, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's showing me 53 percent. Behappyyar (talk) 14:10, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Using? [14] 89.38. First version of Dananeer Mpben 100% Doug Weller talk 15:32, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But for me it showing 45.44% AI GPT for Dananeer Mobeen's first version. Behappyyar (talk) 16:03, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is AI GPT? Link please. Doug Weller talk 18:13, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Check out here Behappyyar (talk) 00:26, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect you added the whole page. I added only:\

Dananeer Mobeen (born 27 December 2001) is a Pakistani social media influencer, and actress. She rose to fame in 2021 after a short video she posted went viral on social media with the phrase "Pawri Ho Rahi Hai", leading to widespread meme culture and media attention in both Pakistan and India. She made her television debut in the Hum TV drama serial Sinf-e-Aahan.

Early life and education

Dananeer was born in Islamabad to a Pakistan Army family. Her father served as a doctor in the army. She completed her schooling from Roots Millennium School, Khyber Campus, and later obtained a degree in Film and Digital Art.

Career

Prior to her viral fame, Dananeer had been active on social media since 2017, creating content related to beauty, lifestyle, and travel.

In February 2021, Dananeer uploaded a Instagram video while on a trip to the northern areas of Pakistan. The clip quickly went viral across social media platforms. The video was widely shared across social media, and many actors from both the Bollywood and Pakistani entertainment industries appreciated it and recreated their own versions, further fueling its popularity. It was widely remixed, including by Indian music producer Yashraj Mukhate. She became popularly known as the "Pawri Girl". She later signed multiple brand deals with companies such as Sunsilk and frequentlyappeared in television interviews and campaigns.

Dananeer made her television debut in the Hum TV drama serial Sinf-e-Aahan (2021–2022), in which she portrayed the character of Syeda Sidra. The drama focused on women cadets in the Pakistan Military Academy.

She played a lead role in Meem Se Mohabbat opposite Ahad Raza Mir. Doug Weller talk 08:53, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It showed me 91 percent this time. Anyways the good thing is this the article has been updated by an editor. Thanks for asking. Behappyyar (talk) 10:08, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is partially true, but it doesn't change the fact that this draft has many of the negative hallmarks of an AI creation. @Doug Weller: I'm aware, but there are only so many decline reasons we can include on each decline. --bonadea contributions talk 13:36, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Doug Weller talk 14:10, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neha Malik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neha Malik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neha Malik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WikiMentor01 (talk) 11:49, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of serving generals of the Pakistan Army

The list of major generals has been changed, as alot of brigadiers have been promoted to major general. Along with that, their appointments have changed as well. Kindly, can you add their present appointments in the existing articles of the officers? 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 14:53, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking. Just to clarify — the names of certain major generals were removed from the list (Articles you are asking me to update). Does that mean they were not promoted and have no new appointments? In that case, should it be assumed that they’ve retired? Behappyyar (talk) 16:09, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think it is to be assumed that they have retired. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 16:34, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should those major generals now be marked as retired in their articles, or would it be better to wait for an official confirmation before doing so? Behappyyar (talk) 04:56, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mark them as retired unless they have been added to Lieutenant general section. Usually news of retirement of major generals don't come on news that much, only lieutenant generals come. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 05:18, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zephyr Noted. I've completed the task — the five major generals whose names were removed from the list have now been marked as retired in their respective articles. The officers are:

— Behappyyar (talk) 13:45, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Also, if they were DG/IG of an organization, change the name of DG/IG of the article of that organization. I'm sure they have been replaced by someone else. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 16:00, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Among the above five articles, the offices they held don't have separate articles except for Adnan Asif Jah Shad, who was the Director General of the Airports Security Force. I also checked the ASF's official website, and as of now, Adnan Asif Jah Shad is still listed as the Director General. Behappyyar (talk) 16:38, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing, if officers with existing articles have been assigned new postings, change their appointment in their article as well please. Sometimes, they are not linked properly in the list. So kindly, manually check them. Best Regards. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 16:19, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I manually checked the major generals who were removed from the list but have their separate articles. None of them have been assigned any new offices so far. Those who are still present in the list remain in their previous postings and have their separate article , as shown — no new appointments have been mentioned yet. Behappyyar (talk) 16:55, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, if it is done then change it so. Thanks in advance :). 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 17:27, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Destubathon runs until the 16th of July

Hi, just a courtesy message to notify you in case you haven't seen the Wikipedia:The World Destubathon contest update in the last few days that we've decided to run the full month until the 16th of July. For those who have been too busy to contribute, we would love some help in reaching 4000 articles by Wednesday night! At present we're about 480 articles short!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:46, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A friendly suggestion

User:Behappyyar

As we all know, many of Wikipedia article reviewers and checkers are from European and North American backgrounds, and in this day and age of fast-paced societies, they don't tend to spend much time trying to understand what you mean by Brecorder (when you should be saying Business Recorder newspaper to make it instantly clear to them). Also, doesn't 'The News International newspaper' sound and look better than 'www./thenews.com.pk' ...?

Hopefully, you'll take it the right way. Just trying to help and I very rarely do it with people. Mostly, I mind my own business and stay busy doing my own editing. I see a lot of potential in you as a Wikipedia editor and you definitely deserve credit for CREATING a lot of New Articles... full of energy and hard-working !!! Wassalaam...Ngrewal1 (talk) 18:53, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

JazakAllah for your kind feedback and support. I truly appreciate your time and suggestion. Will keep this in mind going forward. Wassalaam. Behappyyar (talk) 09:45, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anushka Kaushik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anushka Kaushik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anushka Kaushik (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Zuck28 (talk) 12:11, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shanaya Kapoor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shanaya Kapoor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shanaya Kapoor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rzvas (talk) 10:46, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Ishaq Khattak (officer) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Muhammad Ishaq Khattak (officer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:08, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muhammad Ishaq Khattak (officer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammad Ishaq Khattak (officer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Ishaq Khattak (officer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:02, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mumtaz Hussain (officer) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mumtaz Hussain (officer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:06, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zafar Iqbal Marwat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zafar Iqbal Marwat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zafar Iqbal Marwat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:45, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nikeet Dhillon moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Nikeet Dhillon. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and Fails WP:NACTOR. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Bakhtar40 (talk) 13:17, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:20, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to better understand this block. Could you please specify which edits or pages were considered undisclosed paid advocacy, so I can review them and address the concerns?

Thank you. Behappyyar (talk) 22:05, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Behappyyar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I confirm that I have read and understand the Wikimedia Foundation Terms of Use and the paid editing disclosure requirements. I would like to clarify that I have never received any payment or other compensation for any of my edits, and I am not User:NasirRanjhyWala nor related to any sockpuppet accounts. Any overlap in pages edited (Nikeet Dhillon, Kanwal Aftab, Shanaya Kapoor, Arishfa Khan, Dananeer Mobeen, Aina Asif) is coincidental and based on shared public interest, not coordination. I understand that some of my editing patterns, including participation in AfD discussions and applying for NewPage Reviewer rights. May have been misinterpreted as WP:GAMEing. This was not my intentions at all, but I will take extra care in the future to ensure that my participation fully aligns with Wikipedia’s policies and community norms. Regarding the use of language models (LLM), currently i am not using any ai tool to edits or for creation of articles. If i will use it in future, i will ensure that any such use strictly follows content policies and is properly reviewed before submission. I respectfully request reconsideration of this block and am committed to transparent, policy-compliant editing going forward. Behappyyar (talk) 22:15, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This boils down to just a denial- which is unpersuasive. I see no reason that the block is incorrect. It might help if you agreed to completely abandon editing about South Asian actresses/influencers, but I'll leave that to the next reviewer. 331dot (talk) 08:58, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rabia Anum moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rabia Anum. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. S0091 (talk) 14:44, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kangna Sharma moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kangna Sharma. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. S0091 (talk) 16:11, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nikeet Dhillon moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Nikeet Dhillon. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. S0091 (talk) 16:17, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Created by a sock in 2023. BH's recreation was moved to draft but BH moved it back. S0091 (talk) 17:45, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maanu (singer) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Maanu (singer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. S0091 (talk) 16:19, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This was moved to draft but BH moved it back. S0091 (talk) 17:46, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jannat Mirza moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jannat Mirza. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. S0091 (talk) 16:32, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anahita Bhooshan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Anahita Bhooshan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. S0091 (talk) 16:40, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kanwal Aftab moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kanwal Aftab. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. S0091 (talk) 17:11, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tichku was blocked on Simple as a sock of Nasir Zaman who renamed to Jxggii and was blocked as a sock of Zimidar - SPI (last check in May) S0091 (talk) 18:20, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Behappyyar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I accept a voluntary indefinite topic ban from all articles, drafts, and discussions related to South Asian actresses, models, and influencers. I will edit only in unrelated areas and follow all Wikipedia policies. I respectfully request my block be lifted cheerer this condition.

Decline reason:

Based on the evidence presented, I think you are a sock. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:57, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Voorts Firstly, I am not a sock. You can check out the comment by Ivanvector below. Secondly, if you think so and still have doubts then open the SPI case. You can't reject the request depending on your "thinking".

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Behappyyar (talk) 18:23, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Behappyyar, can you explain as a brand new editor how you came across the draft created by an IP about Olta Ahmetaj and your interest in the subject? S0091 (talk) 18:42, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I came across the draft while browsing new and developing articles. The subject caught my attention because her background was uncommon for public figures in the region, including her decision to have children without being officially married. I thought the draft could be improved with better sourcing and formatting, so I contributed. Behappyyar (talk) 19:32, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And one more thing. The block reason also mentions suspicion that I am or may be a sock of User:NasirRanjhyWala. If you or the blocking admin believe this, please open an SPI case so the evidence can be reviewed there. Behappyyar (talk) 19:44, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing admin, in addition to the blocking admin's reasoning, please also consider the additional notes I added above for the articles I moved to draft (all after the previous unblock request) and Alisha Parveen below. S0091 (talk) 19:08, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser is

Inconclusive w/r/t Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NasirRanjhyWala, but based on historical data Behappyyar is at best

Unlikely. I see no evidence of ongoing sockpuppetry. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 12:44, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First, please post new comments outside of the unblock template. Second, Ivanvector said CU data was inconclusive/at best unlikely. I think the behavioral evidence is quite clear and admins routinely deny unblock requests when they believe editors are not being honest about socking. Feel free to file another unblock request and another admin will look at it. voorts (talk/contributions) 15:56, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dananeer Mobeen moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Dananeer Mobeen. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 03:18, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Iftikhar Hassan Chaudhary moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Iftikhar Hassan Chaudhary. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 03:25, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alisha Parveen moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Alisha Parveen. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 03:28, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peter Kemmis Betty

The article Peter Kemmis Betty has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Certainly valorous, but Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to support meeting WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:20, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sajjad Akram moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sajjad Akram. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 13:36, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hadia Hashmi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hadia Hashmi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 17:08, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aditi Budhathoki moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Aditi Budhathoki. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. - The9Man ^Talk 07:43, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]