User talk:Jimfbleak

  1. Home
  2. Wiki
Jim Talk Contribs Sandbox Logs Blocks Deletions Protections Scripts Bird talk Commons

Please add your message to the bottom of this page, give it a heading and sign it using four tildes ~~~~.


Request to restore deleted draft: Suresh Maliyadde

[edit]

Hi Jimfbleak, I noticed that my draft article \"Suresh Maliyadde\" was deleted under G11. I’m the subject of the article and have disclosed a conflict of interest. I tried to follow neutral tone and include reliable sources (press articles, awards, etc.).

Would you consider restoring the draft to my user space so I can keep improving it? Thank you very much. Maliyadde (talk) 11:15, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maliyadde, I've seen your message, just about to go out, so might be tomorrow before I can take a look Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:03, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Now replied on user talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:02, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request to restore deleted draft: Ba4boy (Yusif Taghizade)

[edit]

Hi Jimfbleak,

I noticed that my draft article "Ba4boy (Yusif Taghizade)" was deleted under G11. I'm the subject of the article and I’m working on improving the tone and adding more reliable sources.

Could you please restore the draft to my user space so I can edit it further? I truly want to meet the Wikipedia guidelines and ensure the article is neutral, verifiable, and encyclopedic.

Thank you very much for your time and help! – Ba4boy Official Ba4boy Official (talk) 12:20, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on user talk page, unreferenced self-promotion Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:03, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Advice Required

[edit]

This matter pertains to a user named @user:Reeshavp, regarding which I had previously posted in the Administrators/Incidents section. Unfortunately, no responses were received, and the thread was subsequently archived.

The user @Reeshavp has been appending honorifics to the names of several college and university chancellors, presidents, and other esteemed figures. Despite receiving prior warnings and further advisories, they have persistently engaged in this inappropriate practice. As evidenced by their recent edit made on May 7, 2025, and the majority of their edits, their disregard for warnings necessitates immediate attention and rectification.

Consequently, it is imperative to address the ongoing honorifics agenda and repeated violations of the policy of this user. They have continued to add honorifics to names, even after receiving this warning, as evidenced by their edit made today (May 11, 2025). VeritasVanguard: "Seeking truth in every edit" 11:12, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Veritas if you want to link to a user without them seeing, use {{noping|user name}} Can you clarify what policy you think they have broken? They haven't put honorifics in an article title, which is clearly wrong, and I'm not sure that Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography#Titles of people, Honorifics section, forbids the use elsewhere. If they are persistently breaking the rules, I'll issue a stop-or-else warning, but I need to be sure of my ground to do. Please clarfy why you think they are wrong, with a link to the policy if it's not the one I've looked at Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:00, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
MOS:DOC. They keep adding honorifics to the names of several college and university chancellors, presidents. They have ignored and continue to ignore the warnings. You can see their contributions and see they are on an editing spree where they add the PHD title.
They have been warned twice. This must be stopped.
One more warning in this regard was added. I think the "stop-or-else" warning you were refering to has already been issued to them by @Benison. VeritasVanguard: "Seeking truth in every edit" 14:28, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Veritas , OK, I've posted on their talk now Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:50, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
and blocked... Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:42, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I really appreciate your attention to this matter and the actions you've taken. Thank you for carefully reviewing the situation and for your openness to seek clarification. Your decisive response in maintaining Wikipedia’s standards and policies means a lot to me. VeritasVanguard☎ 10:49, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 68

[edit]
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 68, March–April 2025

In this issue we highlight two resource renewals, #EveryBookItsReader, a note about Phabricator, and, as always, a roundup of news and community items related to libraries and digital knowledge.

Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:18, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shakespeare Distillery

[edit]

Rather than deleting this page could you give some comments on approval - there are other distilleries listed on Wikipedia with the same statement of facts around their operation and facilities for visitors.? I am not sure why you see this vs Cotswolds Distillery, Oxford distillery etc as any different? PMShakespeare (talk) 15:31, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PMShakespeare, we have cross-posted on this, read my comment on your talk. Also note that you can't rely on other articles, either they meet our criteria, or they should be deleted too. More in due course, no time now Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:34, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 May 2025

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ruth Sacks

[edit]

Hi, you protected this article in 2018. I thought given it's now over 6 years the protection could be now removed? LibStar (talk) 01:42, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]