User talk:BengalMC

This is BengalMC's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome

Hello, BengalMC, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 10:43, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jongole Mitin Mashi (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jongole Mitin Mashi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:43, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BengalMC! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:43, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BTS: Yet To Come In Cinemas (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NALBUM -

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BTS: Yet To Come In Cinemas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:03, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jongole Mitin Mashi (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Cocobb8 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jongole Mitin Mashi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 13:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yet To Come In Cinemas

Hello, BengalMC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yet To Come In Cinemas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:BTS: Yet To Come In Cinemas

Hello, BengalMC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BTS: Yet To Come In Cinemas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Yet To Come In Cinemas

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Yet To Come In Cinemas, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adarsh Telemedia moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Adarsh Telemedia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Otuọcha (talk) 07:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adarsh Telemedia (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adarsh Telemedia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jongole Mitin Mashi

Hello, BengalMC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jongole Mitin Mashi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boomerang (2024 film) (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lots of WP:PEACOCK terms.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boomerang (2024 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 15:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jongole Mitin Mashi

Hello, BengalMC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jongole Mitin Mashi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kaliachak Chapter 1

Hi! This is regarding your article Kaliachak Chapter 1. A number of maintenance tags has been attached to the article as per the problems.

After doing a research, it has been found that a large number of articles are present regarding the film. So, if you can attach the articles as citations from reliable sources, the maintenance templates could be eventually removed.

You are also requested to avoid close paraphrasing from a source as you did in the plot section of the film. Always try to write in your own words as per the Wikipedia policies.

Thanks

For any queries, feel free to ping me in my talk page. BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:26, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

although there is a large number of articles present in the internet regarding the film, however it turns out that most of the articles are outdated as many of them has the older 14th june release date.

thanks BengalMC (talk) 04:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed most of the maintenance templates.

Coming to the citations, the information written in the Reception section seems to support WP:Peacock if a citation can't be provided. (Film reviews could have been added to the section, but I personally didn't find any review article from reliable sources. You can add if you find any later). Since appropriate citations are not present, as of now you can remove the Reception section.

Besides, you can add the Music section. There are a few article about the 1st song, which you can add and improve the article.

Thanks

And keep up the good work. 👍 BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:18, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Modest Barnstar

You did a nice job by editing articles as per the Wikipedia policies.

Keep up the good editing!

BhikhariInformer (talk) 10:21, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Appu (2024 film) (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Appu (2024 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:16, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Adarsh Telemedia

Hello, BengalMC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Adarsh Telemedia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Boomerang (2024 film)

Hello, BengalMC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Boomerang (2024 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shreeman vs Shreemati moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shreeman vs Shreemati. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because almost all sources are broken and it is unclear this meets WP:NFF. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BOVINEBOY2008 10:57, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shreeman vs Shreemati has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shreeman vs Shreemati. Thanks! RangersRus (talk) 14:26, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shreeman vs Shreemati (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs multiple critical reviews with sources to pass notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shreeman vs Shreemati and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 17:20, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nandy Movies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeet. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nandy Movies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nandy Movies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nandy Movies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rahmatula786 (talk) 04:10, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

Your editing history shows that you are using multiple accounts. Please disclose any and all accounts you are currently using or have used in the past while editing Wikipedia. CNMall41 (talk) 06:09, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

my other accounts are ABMSalt only which i do not use rn BengalMC (talk) 06:52, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is one I have on my compiled list. Please name the others, including the more recent ones that are still active. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:58, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

the other is my home ip starting with 202 BengalMC (talk) 07:07, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are four more I can connect to you and more will likely be found at SPI. You also need to make a declaration per WP:COI and WP:PAID as one account you are connected to is WP:UPE. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:51, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

do i need to declare it in my userpage? BengalMC (talk) 07:54, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. You will also need to list all accounts in use currently and in the past. Not just the one you named above. --CNMall41 (talk) 08:00, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

so i remember owning abmsalt, my home wifi with 202 , mobile data ip with 114, but the confusing part is that i do not remember any other accounts other than the 4 mentioned, plus there is one instance when i accidentally clicked i am paid to create this wiki page, but back then i was not that experienced BengalMC (talk) 08:16, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

so do i need to put them on my babel infobox? BengalMC (talk) 08:17, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gautam Kundu (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I removed material about other people due to WP:BLPCRIME (read that) and material where the cited source made no mention of Kundu. Please read Wikipedia's Biographies of living people policy. It may be better to write an article about the scam rather than Kundu. S0091 (talk) 16:34, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

is it okay if i instead expand the Rose Valley financial scandal page with the sources i provided on the draft page? BengalMC (talk) 05:11, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gautam Kundu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:34, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nilayan Chatterjee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dev (actor).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aankhon Ki Gustaakhiyan has been accepted

Aankhon Ki Gustaakhiyan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Afstromen (talk) 04:57, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olot Palot (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Destinyokhiria was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fail WP:NFILM

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Olot Palot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Destinyokhiria (talk) 11:20, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shreeman vs Shreemati (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Shreeman v/s Shreemati instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shreeman vs Shreemati and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:32, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raghu Dakat (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raghu Dakat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 07:52, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raghu Dakat (film) (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Pre-release publicity does not establish notability. "Upcoming" is pretty much an alternative spelling for "not yet notable".

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raghu Dakat (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:39, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramel Industries Financial Scandal (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ramel Industries Financial Scandal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 12:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pokkhirajer Dim (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please wait until it is released inorder to get reviews and more sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pokkhirajer Dim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raghu Dakat (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raghu Dakat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 21:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to know you

Hi, Dear. Nice contributions. I'm ronit from bengal too. I'm new in here. So I'm searching a friend like you to guide and talk. Thanks. Ronit creator (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khanna & Iyer (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Khanna & Iyer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Baqi:) (talk) 07:13, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Like Father Like Son (2025 film) has been accepted

Like Father Like Son (2025 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:03, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm BuySomeApples. An edit that you recently made to Like Father Like Son (2025 film) seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BuySomeApples (talk) 05:34, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Man with No Past (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Man with No Past and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 05:52, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhaggyolokkhi (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Lijil were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only one actual review of the movie is not yet enough for it to fulfil notability criteria. I rewrote the summary of the review which was described as far more positive than it actually was. In addition I deleted the first sentence of "Reception" because it pretended that two pre-release articles citing actors and the trailer were reviews, which is dishonest.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bhaggyolokkhi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lijil (talk) 17:37, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shreeman vs Shreemati theatrical poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shreeman vs Shreemati theatrical poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:00, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Manindra Gupta moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Manindra Gupta. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Allblessed (talk) 09:15, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dhumketu (2025 film) (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wait until reviews done by known citric and WP:TOOSOON for now.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dhumketu (2025 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 15:57, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of new articles

Hey, BengalMC, it is a request from my side to create articles for the recently released Bengali films Onko Ki Kothin, Raas and Grihapravesh.

Your kind work will be highly useful and beneficial. Sahajitbro (talk) 05:25, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thank you for informing, I have done Onko Ki Kothin and as of now,I am working on Grihapravesh But raas has less notable review so it will take some time BengalMC (talk) 05:51, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jatileswar Temple

এই মন্দিরের ইতিহাস অনেক পুরনো।তাই আপনি এই পেজটি সম্পুর্ণ ভাবে গড়তে সাহায্য করুন। Mr. Roy 2001 (talk) 05:07, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

: নমস্কার, তথ্যটি জানানোর জন্য আপনাকে ধন্যবাদ। আমি আপনার নিবন্ধটি পরীক্ষা করেছি এবং যা পড়েছি তাতে এটি '''চমৎকার অবস্থায়''' রয়েছে। সম্প্রতি ইন্টারনেটে মন্দিরটি সম্পর্কে অনুসন্ধান করার সময়, আমি '''জলপাইগুড়ি প্রশাসনের আধ্যাত্মিক পর্যটন পরিকল্পনা''' সম্পর্কে নতুন তথ্য পাই। এই উদ্যোগটি ময়নাগুড়ি ও সদর ব্লকে অবস্থিত জটিলেশ্বর মন্দিরসহ অন্যান্য ধর্মীয় স্থানগুলিকে একটি পর্যটন সার্কিটের অন্তর্ভুক্ত করতে চলেছে। এই প্রাসঙ্গিক তথ্যটি আমি নিবন্ধের "Tourism" শীর্ষক একটি নতুন বিভাগে যুক্ত করেছি।

:

: পরিবর্তনগুলির সারাংশ:

: * জলপাইগুড়ি সদর মহকুমা প্রশাসনের পরিকল্পনার বিবরণ যোগ করা হয়েছে

: * সংযুক্ত পর্যটন সাইটগুলির (জলপেশ মন্দির, ভট্টেশ্বর মন্দির ইত্যাদি) তালিকা অন্তর্ভুক্ত করা হয়েছে

: * রাস্তা সংস্কার ও নিরাপত্তা ব্যবস্থার তথ্য যুক্ত করা হয়েছে

: * একটি নির্ভরযোগ্য সূত্র (Millennium Post) সংযুক্ত করা হয়েছে

:

: আপনার মূল নিবন্ধের কাঠামো বা অন্যান্য বিষয়বস্তুতে কোনো পরিবর্তন করা হয়নি। '''জদি কোনও দরকার থাকে''', তবে আমাকে জানাতে পারেন। —BengalMC (talk) 05:24, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bramhaarjun poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bramhaarjun poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:14, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for You!

		The Special Barnstar
		Thank you for your tireless contributions in creating pages of numerous Bengali films on Wikipedia. BhikhariInformer (talk) 06:37, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a piece of Shorshe Ilish for your tireless contributions

		A piece of Shorshe Ilish for you
		Here is a piece of Shorshe Ilish for you. Shorshe Ilish, a Bengali dish made of Hilsa fish and it is mostly popular in Eastern India and Bangladesh. Thank you. BhikhariInformer (talk) 07:01, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply] For more Indian dishes, visit the Kitchen of WikiProject India.

BhikhariInformer (talk) 07:01, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SSR Cinemas moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to SSR Cinemas. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 18:39, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]