User talk:Abdullah1099

Spectrum (rocket) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Spectrum (rocket), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ost (talk) 07:53, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daytona (rocket) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Daytona (rocket), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ost (talk) 07:54, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TDS-01 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to TDS-01. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Uncle Spock (talk) 16:52, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of spaceflight launches in July–December 2023, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page C59. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is also a ISRO's PSLV mission Code Abdullah1099 (talk) 11:13, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TeLEOS-2 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, TeLEOS-2, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Arabsat 7B (BADR-8) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Arabsat 7B (BADR-8). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to details

Hi, I've seen that you've become more active in the spaceflight pages, and I would like to remind you to pay attention to some important details like updating the sources whenever you make any edit like updating the status of a launch, keeping the payloads in alphabetical order, checking for duplicates, distinguishing when batches of satellites deserve a single entry or multiple entries and so on. It's nice to have an extra helping hand but not if that means double checking every new edit. Thanks. Fm3dici97 (talk) 12:50, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah1099 less than 24h after this message I see that you keep adding edits without caring for details: on top of them, the update of the Chandrayaan-3 launch date without updating the source, and the addition of a launch of Jilin-1 satellites in June 2023 with empty links ignoring that a page for the Jilin-1 constellation already exists. Again, since this kind of edits require a constant double check to correct mistakes and add extra references your work might be flagged as disruptive with all the consequences of the case. Please, modify your behavior. Fm3dici97 (talk) 09:54, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the trouble you got from my edits on the Wikipedia page.

But I am new and I didn't know how all the mechanisms for editing on Wikipedia works and l upload the edits on the basis of news from the Internet, newspapers, twitter,etc. Abdullah1099 (talk) 10:05, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You also add lot of speculated dates, do not do that. Read Wikipedia guidelines. Each piece of information added should have citation from reputable sources like official sources, news outlets etc and Twitter is not a reliable source.  Ohsin  22:12, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 03:39, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will take care about date of Launch of rockets.because I am new to Wikipedia editing.i need help on my some edits.

Thanks for the information provided by you.

Thank you Abdullah1099 (talk) 03:48, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I ask one thing,

Why you have deleted my edits on future pslv launches

But I had taken the information from Wikipedia only

You can find it on Spaceflight in 2024,2025,2026,2027,2028,2029.

If it is correct then please undo the deleted section.Ok

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully

Abdullah1099 Abdullah1099 (talk) 03:53, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We need Wikipedia:Reliable sources for every piece of information. Add citations in your next edit.  Ohsin  11:35, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 13:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add or modify information without citations!  Ohsin  21:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now I am adding or modify information with Citation. Abdullah1099 (talk) 02:55, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chollima-1 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chollima-1. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Missing edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! —Mykhal (talk) 12:19, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:08, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of sources and conventions ignored

Hi, I hate to repeat myself but here we go again. Whenever you make any change to the spaceflight timeline, you have to:

• Add an update source that confirms the change you're making, any information has to be supported by external sources and not solely by the fact that you read it somewhere;
• In every monthly section order the launches first by date, then alphabetically by launch vehicle, and finally alphabetically by the name of the payload.

Not respecting these rules means forcing other editors to constantly double check any change. I've already tried to advise you about these details above, please behave accordingly. Fm3dici97 (talk) 09:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 11:22, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah1099 as you keep engaging in edits without adding sources or updating preexisting ones, despite numerous attempts to make you change your behaviour both here and in the comments of your reverted edits, I'll bring the issue to the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents asking for restrictions on your editing permissions. Here's the formal notification:

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Fm3dici97 (talk) 15:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for inconvenience from my edits.

I will work with you and learn from your edits. From now onward i will do not so much editing on any subject. I will follow and tried to add some citations on any edit.

Please cancel my case from the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Sorry,Sorry..... Abdullah1099 (talk) 06:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, the case has been cancelled.. It's not a huge deal, we've all been through the moment where we had to learn from more expert users how to correctly handle wikipedia, making mistakes and listening to other people's advices about them. That's all I'm asking for. Thanks for your comprehension. Fm3dici97 (talk) 16:52, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bro for your help.

Thank you very much. Abdullah1099 (talk) 17:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rocket Factory Augsburg

In your edit of 07:24, 7 June 2023 (UTC) of Rocket Factory Augsburg, you inserted <ref name="LS_AU4702" /> without defining it. Kindly insert a definition for this ref name. —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:51, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Abdullah1099 (talk) 02:27, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This ref name is found in List of PSLV launches:

<ref name= "LS_AU4702">{{Cite web |date=29 March 2023 |title=Government of India, Department of Space: Lok Sabha, Unstarred question number 4702 |url=https://pqals.nic.in/annex/1711/AU4702.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230329144006/https://pqals.nic.in/annex/1711/AU4702.pdf |archive-date=30 March 2023}}</ref>

If that's the right definition, please copy it into Rocket Factory Augsburg. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nano-Satallite Launch vehicle

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nano-Satallite Launch vehicle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nano-Satallite Launch vehicle

Hello, Abdullah1099. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nano-Satallite Launch vehicle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:08, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of sources (again)

Hi, I'm reaching out to you because once again I noticed that you keep making edits in the spaceflight schedule without updating the sources. I would like to remind you that ANY kind of modification of that schedule has to be supported by updated sources, it's not sufficient to move things around according to your own personal knowledge. If you don't do it, other users are forced to track down your edits and intervene to correct your mistakes. This is the third time that I remind you this, so from now on I will treat any continuation of this behavior as an intentional disregard for Wikipedia rules and act accordingly. Fm3dici97 (talk) 13:35, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 13:38, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Fm3dici97 (talk) 10:35, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 11:16, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of spaceflight launches in July–December 2023, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CASC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:AgilSpace

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:AgilSpace, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Spectrum (rocket)

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Spectrum (rocket), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Daytona (rocket)

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daytona (rocket), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:TDS-01

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TDS-01, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:TeLEOS-2

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TeLEOS-2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Arabsat 7B (BADR-8)

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arabsat 7B (BADR-8), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Spectrum (rocket)

Hello, Abdullah1099. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Spectrum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Daytona (rocket)

Hello, Abdullah1099. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daytona".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:TDS-01

Hello, Abdullah1099. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "TDS-01".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arabsat 7B (BADR-8)

Hello, Abdullah1099. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arabsat 7B".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:29, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2024

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2024, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anik (satellite)

Check the links before you make them. All of these were circular redirects that returned the reader back to the Anik page. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DSN Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page H3.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Including sources

Hi Abdullah1099, you added information to Prophet's Mosque recently ([1]), but you didn't include any citations to reliable sources. Please remember that all content on Wikipedia must be supported by reliable sources, per Wikipedia:Verifiability. Can you please provide a source which verifies the names and positions of these imams at the mosque? (For example: an official source, if there is one, news articles from reliable sources, etc.) R Prazeres (talk) 00:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Abdullah1099 (talk) 02:10, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced edits

It has been one year, and you keep vandalizing the spaceflight launch pages with unsourced modifications all the time. Every time you make a change, the source you include should support the change you made. It is not enough to make changes just because someone told you, it's not enought to make changes just because you read it somewhere, it is not enought to make changes just by copypasting sources from a similar launch. On top of that, you keep ignoring the very basic convention of ordering launches alphabetically, by launch vehicle first and by payload for the same launch vehicle, despite multiple attempts to remind you of that. Please, pay attention to this or I will once again be forced to open a procedure against you in the administrators' board to restrict your edit permissions. Fm3dici97 (talk) 09:51, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will do the right steps told by you. Abdullah1099 (talk) 12:37, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mate you are still editing without any kind of source!!!!! All the times! Gio9999 (talk) 08:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I'm Ohsin. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kulasekarapattinam_Spaceport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Ohsin  19:33, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for your edits

Hi, I've seen that in many cases for upcoming Chinese launches you've attached as source the Chinese Wikipedia. I'm sorry but that's not a valid source, either you link the original source for that specific launch, or you leave the launch out. (And to be fair, I know the guy who is taking care of the Chinese Wikipedia, half of the time his edits are based on his personal speculations, so he and the page are not to be conisdered reliable sources). Please update the sources or remove the launches that cannot be linked to a reliable source. Thanks, Fm3dici97 (talk) 10:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove them because it is part of Wikipedia but in Chinese and both are similar and it gave us a speculation and Tentitive launch time and if the launch does not occur at the given time in the month and no updates come from the specific launch then i will remove them. THANK YOU. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:39, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Abdullah1099 all the things published in Wikipedia must come from a reliable source, without exceptions. Cross-referencing a Wikipedia in another language whose contents come from guesses and speculations is the opposite of using a reliable source. So either you find an alternative source to the Chinese Wikipedia, or you remove the launch. Fm3dici97 (talk) 07:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 08:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1968 in spaceflight, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Voskhod and LC-13.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rapid Launch Small Satellite moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rapid Launch Small Satellite. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Abdullah1099. Thank you for your work on Gaganyaan-3. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1970 in spaceflight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LC-13.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2025 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2025. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 10:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Isaidnoway (talk) 04:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to List of spaceflight launches in July–December 2024, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Isaidnoway (talk) 04:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of spaceflight launches in July–December 2024, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vulcan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Long March 6A G6 launch

Hello, I was just wandering where you got the launch time for LM6A G60 launch on 5th of August from?, I’m just very curious and could use it for a source in the future. 51.37.127.70 (talk) 15:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes, But i didn't added the LM6A G60 Launch. Abdullah1099 (talk) 15:30, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You added the G-60 launch on the page “Long March 6A” “List of launches” 51.37.127.70 (talk) 18:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of star systems within 500-550 light-years

The article List of star systems within 500-550 light-years has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While the nearest star systems to Earth are regularly discussed as a group, there doesn't seem to be such list notability for these farther away. If this site can be believed, "There are 271,732 stars within 1,000 light-years of Earth which are visible in a backyard telescope." Are we really going to list them all by distance to Earth?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not listing all stars in 1000 light years, i am only adding some variable stars and stars with planets, Supernova Candidate,etc. I am adding stars and expanding this to help the future generations. So, No need need of delete the article. Thank you. Abdullah1099 (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of star systems within 500-550 light-years for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of star systems within 500-550 light-years is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of star systems within 500-550 light-years until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 14:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why there is need of deleting this. Abdullah1099 (talk) 09:28, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what are the concerns of this article please tell me. Abdullah1099 (talk) 09:29, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And last but not the least, My humble request is to cancel the deleting process. Abdullah1099 (talk) 09:31, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the problem is that in 1000 ly is 2000+ Stars or every star can be seen by Amateur Astronomer or What. Abdullah1099 (talk) 09:36, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then first think of people who Catalogued every star is more hard than adding stars in the table like format is much much easy than Cataloguing every Stars. These list of stars are a tiny bit or less than 10% of what the peoples who Catalogued each stars and every thing has done. Abdullah1099 (talk) 09:39, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why you guys are becoming inhuman like. It's our duty to expand these list of stars within one ly to another ly to as much as 5,000+ ly as the more sources has come to us and more stars had already been Catalogued. Abdullah1099 (talk) 09:43, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why your mouth is shut up now what happened to you. Abdullah1099 (talk) 14:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only you are making nuesense and difficulty to make this when there is no lack of sources, (Personal attacks removed) Abdullah1099 (talk) 14:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of supernova candidates, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carina.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of star systems within 700-750 light-years for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of star systems within 700-750 light-years is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of star systems within 700-750 light-years until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 16:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with List of star systems within 700-750 light-years. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 16:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The main problem is no reply come from other side and rude behaviour from this guy Fram. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think 3-4 days has gone but no reply has been given by other side and thus no identification of the problems. Thus, these kind of behaviour made this a kind of nonsense that no one can increase anything even many new information has come. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of Fram's behavior, you must not remove AfD notices while the discussion is still ongoing. jlwoodwa (talk) 16:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also know but no reply make us aggressive, how can we join the discussion. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion is happening at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of star systems within 700-750 light-years. Please remember not to be aggressive, even if you disagree with other editors or feel that you are being treated poorly. jlwoodwa (talk) 16:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 16:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of star systems within 800-850 light-years for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of star systems within 800-850 light-years is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of star systems within 700-750 light-years until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

jlwoodwa (talk) 16:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasy times

Please stop adding fantasy times such as "5:79" into the List of spaceflight launches in July-December 2024. You've done it multiple times so if it's just a mistake I'm unsure how you would make the same mistake with several fantasy times that often. It's been adressed on the article's talk page already. 2001:4BC9:1F98:459E:B4D4:EED1:1F40:82ED (talk) 11:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is kind of calculation mistakes done by me while converting IST to UTC. Sorry Abdullah1099 (talk) 13:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Abdullah1099. Thank you for your work on Gaganyaan-2. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thank you very much. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But, I have a question how this reviewing mechanism works, Can you please understand me this. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of star systems within 550-600 light-years

The article List of star systems within 550-600 light-years has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List is blank, and per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of star systems within 500-550 light-years, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of star systems within 700-750 light-years

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rapid Launch Small Satellite

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rapid Launch Small Satellite, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:49, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of New Glenn first-stage boosters moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of New Glenn first-stage boosters. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it needs a lead section. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of spaceflight launches in July–December 2024, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ariane.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Your edit to Hera (space mission) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. -- Diannaa (talk) 21:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2025

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2025, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I will edit it. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:15, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2025 (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This draft is too soon to be published. Please wait until 2025, when more informations will be available.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2025 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 09:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abdullah1099! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 09:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks!

This isn't the first time that you've been asked to provide summaries with your edits. IS there a reason you're not willing to do so? -- mikeblas (talk) 17:22, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thank you very much. I every time forgot to add summarise. Sorry for that. Abdullah1099 (talk) 04:09, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Astra 1P, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SES.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2021 in spaceflight

Just letting you know that I undid your merge of List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2021 and List of spaceflight launches in July–December 2021 into 2021 in spaceflight, as it caused the latter page to be WP:TOOBIG to comfortably read and edit and broke the citation templates because it exceeded the WP:PEIS limit. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:31, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of spaceflight launches in January–June 1958 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of spaceflight launches in January–June 1958. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I Started this now and will be completed by tomorrow So, Did not make it into draft Abdullah1099 (talk) 15:50, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I moved from draft as i given the necessary sources. So, It depends on you when you gave your approval. Main work of these edits to maintain and refurbish the old spaceflight information and as launches pass the editing and making limit So, I divided into halfs. There is almost no new thing. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:14, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful

Hello! I think that I've drawn to your attention referencing errors caused by your edits several times over the last few months. I want to ask you to be more careful when editing because I'm still finding errors in your edits. You should preview your work before publishing your changes and make sure you're not adding more errors each time you make an edit. -- mikeblas (talk) 21:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, No Problem Abdullah1099 (talk) 02:12, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Axiom-5

Hello Abdullah,

I see you've made a series of edits recently about the potential crew of Axiom 5 on several articles. Please note: The contract for this flight has not been confirmed, and therefore for the moment at least, any crew is merely speculation. Also, sources which publish potential seat purchases for Axiom flights only specify "future", not a particular flight number. Wittylama 09:43, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know that but i thought and many peoples are telling Axiom-5 will be all UK people to launch to ISS and Axiom-5 will launch in accordance with ESA. Yeah, It will confirmed by Axiom or the following users. Thank you for reminding me. Abdullah1099 (talk) 10:49, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of schools in India

Hello. Your recent edit to List of schools in India appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:01, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of St. Joseph's School, Jhajha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. Joseph's School, Jhajha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Joseph's School, Jhajha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rahmatula786 (talk) 02:54, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Project: Spaceflight!

		The SPFLT Achievement Patch
		For your hard work on things spacey! Neopeius (talk) 18:46, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Neopeius bro. Abdullah1099 (talk) 09:02, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abdullah! I see you're diligently working on the various timeline articles. I have been working my way through them methodically from the beginning (I got Spaceflight before 1951, 1951 in spaceflight, and 1952 in spaceflight up to featured list, and I did 1953 in spaceflight, 1954 in spaceflight, 1955 in spaceflight, as well as the lead for 1956 in spaceflight. User:Sotakarhu did the table work for the 1956 article and 1957 in spaceflight.

I don't know if he's interested in continuing this work, and it seems like you enjoy it. I would ask that you take a look at those featured articles and do your best to emulate that style so we have consistency across the pages. In particular, be sure to use the color scheme Sotakarhu came up with User_talk:Sotakarhu#Spaceflight_Colors and I also prefer inline citations rather than a reference list at the bottom.

What do you think? :) --Neopeius (talk) 18:46, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am very interested in continuing the Spaceflight work and you are correct i am very enjoying doing this and working on other topics like astronomy, etc. I will do everything you are telling to me. I want to tell this is my part-time hobby. Thank you very much for your appreciation to me bro. Abdullah1099 (talk) 04:30, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But where is to use these colours Schemes. Any details about the formats. Abdullah1099 (talk) 04:39, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You can find our early rocket scheme here.

(I've also added you to Wikipedia:WikiProject Spaceflight/Timeline of spaceflight working group/Members --Neopeius (talk) 18:48, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very much thank you for doing this. Abdullah1099 (talk) 04:31, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! And if you want me to see when you've responded, be sure to ping me ( @Neopeius:, for example) --Neopeius (talk) 04:39, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Abdullah1099 (talk) 04:47, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Qianfan into Guowang. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:53, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i will provide it Abdullah1099 (talk) 01:30, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But, How to put attribution on article. Can you explain the whole process Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:13, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

At the time you make the edit, say in your edit summary "copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution". If you forget to do it, you can later perform a small useful edit on the page and use the edit summary at that point. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:51, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, But it is for one time work or be written everytime i do an edit Abdullah1099 (talk) 02:07, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Spaceflight launches July-December 2025

Will you be splitting this article into July-September and October-December soon. I believe it would be easier to do before all the Starlink launches are added as they are launched. AmigaClone (talk) 16:30, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the amount of launches these days, Definitely yes. What your thoughts on this matter. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:49, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Might as well take care of splitting the second half now. AmigaClone (talk) 22:51, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 02:24, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have created the List of spaceflight launches in October–December 2025 article. At this time I have not touched the List of spaceflight launches in July–December 2025 except to copy the last three months (orbital ans suborbital) to it. AmigaClone (talk) 05:52, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Possibly what you had made is needed in second half of this year. Abdullah1099 (talk) 07:01, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of O-type stars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wolf-Rayet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Samastipur-Darbhanga-Raxaul-Gorakhpur line

Template:Samastipur-Darbhanga-Raxaul-Gorakhpur line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:36, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Serial number LM-3B and 3C

Where did you find the serial number information for the last two Long March 3Bs? Y108 and Y109.

I looked everywhere and couldn't find it, and even the 3C that was recently released didn't advertise a serial number, there's no serial number on the 3C page. Lazaro Fernandes (talk) 20:43, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can find it on the Chinese Version of list of Long March launches. Abdullah1099 (talk) 02:28, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of FTV and OPS satellites

Hello, Abdullah1099

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Klbrain, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, List of FTV and OPS satellites, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 16:04, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I had made these lists for earlier US military satellites but due to not having sufficient time to add all the info the list was not completed. Hey Klbrain, Can you give me one or two week time to complete this. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:12, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Abdullah1099. Thank you for your work on List of USA satellites (501-1000). Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for building this list, a continuation of List of USA satellites (1-500), with an arbitrary but reasonable split at 500. More than one source for list would be helpful. I also think that readers shohuld be better served by consolidating these tables to display duplicated information once, rather than repeating them.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 16:38, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The reason is that 500 satellites are good amount of satellites and as many information is very old so making list extremely long will make editing full page very hard. So, I had spilit it into two parts. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:48, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of star systems within 75–80 light-years, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cygnus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jammu Tawi–Srinagar Vande Bharat Express

Hello, Abdullah1099,

Thank you for creating Jammu Tawi–Srinagar Vande Bharat Express.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please provide appropriate sources and references directly relevant to the article and its topic. Most of the references currently cited pertain to related but distinct subjects. They do not substantiate the specific content of this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|QEnigma}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

QEnigma (talk) 06:50, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern and correct it very soon like before 15 June. Abdullah1099 (talk) 06:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of passenger trains of Indian Railway with Proper Name for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of passenger trains of Indian Railway with Proper Name is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of passenger trains of Indian Railway with Proper Name until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wareon (talk) 10:47, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jammu Tawi – Srinagar VB Express Route

Template:Jammu Tawi – Srinagar VB Express Route has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:46, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pratham Swatantrata Sangram Express moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pratham Swatantrata Sangram Express, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 08:05, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the information to Pratham Swatrantata Sangram Express article as it really belongs to that article. Abdullah1099 (talk) 08:38, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of New Glenn boosters

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of New Glenn boosters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Add ref and fixings things

Hi,can you help me adding ref and fixings things in the NGC 4626 please,thank you QuanChanUwU (talk) 04:54, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will definitely help you. Abdullah1099 (talk) 04:56, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much,I just join Wikipedia like 1 week so im not good at editing,that it’s my first page that I created too QuanChanUwU (talk) 04:59, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's normal infact you are better than me in the early day timeline. My Wikipedia early days was terrible. Like you do many things in one to two months i had known all that after 6 months or more, half reson my education related thing half i have less time and want to do more.

But, I want to know that what about the list of star above 500 ly. As you have already seen my works already taken down. This is why i am also telling the warning on that day. Abdullah1099 (talk) 05:05, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am start tried created it too but i kinda lost it so many time,just like my browser got crash and it lost all,but now im still tried created it,I think in the next week it will complete QuanChanUwU (talk) 05:12, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I mean the list of star from 500ly to 550ly by the way QuanChanUwU (talk) 05:13, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I give you a suggestion upload information in small sections and upload one by one rather than in one whole edit. Abdullah1099 (talk) 05:20, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then maybe 2 days more and I will upload it QuanChanUwU (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, No Problem but you had find out how to make it notable and how to make it follow all Wikipedia laws and don't violate any laws. Abdullah1099 (talk) 05:19, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I khow it actually,by the way thank you By mentioned it QuanChanUwU (talk) 05:21, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, No Problem Abdullah1099 (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have been add 15 star in the list of star within 500-550 now QuanChanUwU (talk) 04:17, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Abdullah1099 (talk) 04:19, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe i will fix some bugs,add some info and upload it QuanChanUwU (talk) 04:27, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Good Abdullah1099 (talk) 04:28, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I try my best to do it but it’s so bad sorry about that QuanChanUwU (talk) 04:54, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i will suggest to use SIMBAD for reference Abdullah1099 (talk) 04:58, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok QuanChanUwU (talk) 05:01, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of star systems within 500-550 light years QuanChanUwU (talk) 04:52, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, The list is infact very good. Abdullah1099 (talk) 04:58, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much QuanChanUwU (talk) 04:59, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You not used my works. Abdullah1099 (talk) 05:01, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My only fear is that Fram at the end come and put this list into AfD. Abdullah1099 (talk) 05:00, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Me too actually,hope not QuanChanUwU (talk) 05:01, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He has already done my work into AfD, The same list. That is the reason i am not adding anything for now to your list even i want. Because i had fear that if i had added then he can directly delete the article. Abdullah1099 (talk) 05:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh,no problem QuanChanUwU (talk) 05:11, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Fear, I will send you details of stars in this. Abdullah1099 (talk) 05:13, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,by the way thank you very very much,I will be there again after 8 hours QuanChanUwU (talk) 05:18, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, Problem bro i also learn. So, you can also see me inactive for sometime especially evening time in IST. Sorry if i can sometime not reply. Abdullah1099 (talk) 05:23, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

maybe my list will be taken down now,checking in my talk page QuanChanUwU (talk) 06:35, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think you also should take part in the talk page and tell the reason why you think Wikipedia need the page Abdullah1099 (talk) 07:36, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nah I think i will just delete it by myself,it dint a page that i have too have much times on it,just a bit of luck and sorry them for bother him QuanChanUwU (talk) 07:53, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then Ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 08:00, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Next time I will create a better page QuanChanUwU (talk) 07:54, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Idea, but the pages should have to follow all guidelines. I will also start making a new page in next month. The List name will be List of Hypergiant Stars Abdullah1099 (talk) 08:02, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh,ok QuanChanUwU (talk) 09:38, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Abdullah1099 (talk) 04:59, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By the way can you help me add ref and more star please,I need to study right now,maybe 8 hours more and I can add more star,info,.. sorry about that QuanChanUwU (talk) 05:05, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 05:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First use Category:Bayer objects then Category:Flamsteed objects Abdullah1099 (talk) 05:19, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stars i find

89 Aquarii,Chi Aquarii,36 Aquilae,Pi Aquilae,Tau1 Arietis Abdullah1099 (talk) 05:40, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also English is not my main language so maybe i got something wrong in it QuanChanUwU (talk) 05:12, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then what your main language Abdullah1099 (talk) 05:21, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnamese QuanChanUwU (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, It is also a very good language Abdullah1099 (talk) 05:23, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,also don’t use google translate to translate to Vietnamese,it’s very very bad QuanChanUwU (talk) 05:25, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Your edit to Arktika-M has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The4lines |||| (talk) 16:03, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thanks for informing me Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:08, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So, Is there a way to add some of that data into the article. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:26, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sir i can remove that tag now as i already solved the problem. Abdullah1099 (talk) 02:54, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for discussion of Template:Samastipur–Jaynagar line

Template:Samastipur–Jaynagar line has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:43, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for discussion of Template:Samastipur–Jaynagar section

Template:Samastipur–Jaynagar section has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:43, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help about NGC 1777

Can you help me add more info and fix some bugs in my new page NGC 1777 please thanks you QuanChanUwU (talk) 07:32, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is my Sandbox Abdullah1099 (talk) 08:44, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for discussion of Template:Darbhanga Jaynagar line

Template:Darbhanga Jaynagar line has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:30, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of New Glenn boosters (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MediaKyle was:

It's not clear why this should be a standalone article from List of New Glenn launches. You may wish to merge your content there.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of New Glenn boosters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MediaKyle (talk) 14:03, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I made the list to be inline with what Falcon 9 and even Electron and in future every reusable rocket needs. Yes, Blue Origin development is not as fast as SpaceX do. That's why very less number of booster. If i want i can easily add 5 booster Booster 1 to 5, one used on NG-1, 2 on NG-2,...,5 - NG-5 and all in manufacturing but i think doing that would be too fast for Wikipedia. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:07, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Abdullah1099. Thank you for your work on Navigation Technology Satellite. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for taking the time to create this article! Have a beautiful and blessed weekend!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 00:56, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I am glad atleast some of my creations are useful for the community Abdullah1099 (talk) 02:33, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of spaceflight launches in October–December 2025, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boilerplate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Hello, I'm Tankishguy. I noticed that you recently removed content from COSMO-SkyMed without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tankishguy :)(: (talk) 03:30, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tankishguy bro not removed only move that CSG section from below to near the first Generation of Satellites to make easy to understand it. That's a very minor update. Thanks for informing me Abdullah1099 (talk) 03:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of FTV and OPS satellites

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of FTV and OPS satellites requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 03:49, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@45dogs It not my first bro i only moved it to draft space for complete and modification after all that completed, I will re-upload the article when it's completed it's now in my Sandbox. I put it there to gave some focus to that article. Abdullah1099 (talk) 03:54, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the A3 nomination; that was because the redirect wasn't there, twinkle didn't let it be nominated for WP:CSD#R2, which is usually what needs to be done when moving to draft space. Though, at this point I think that page has to be deleted, since I don't think the article could be moved back via normal means. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 03:57, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are you not able to just use Template:In use while the major edit goes on in main space though? 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 03:58, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that exist in Wikipedia. I would be happy to do that. Can you help me bro Abdullah1099 (talk) 04:02, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

At this point List of FTV and OPS satellites needs to be deleted in order to make way for a move back to article space from the draft. Theoretically, a page mover could do so, but I don't have those rights, so it would likely be easier to simply wait for an admin to delete the page, then move it. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 04:06, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I mean after that does i can re-upload it after completing everything. Abdullah1099 (talk) 04:08, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since it was just deleted, I am going to move it back to article space if that is fine. Its less disruptive for the readers of the project if that page is in main space. You should place the template at the top (WP:TWINKLE makes this easy), and then edit. Hopefully, no edit conflicts should occur, since no one else should edit the page while the template is up, though it doesn't stop them from doing so. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 04:12, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing all that, I would be happy if all those features would be helpful to me Abdullah1099 (talk) 04:38, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Abdullah1099! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Uploading NASA image, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Abdullah1099 (talk) 03:14, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for your cool new article NGC 1358! I always love to see more astronomy articles being created Shocksingularity (talk) 02:12, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I am glad my astronomy article is useful. But what this tag is called Abdullah1099 (talk) 03:45, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Abdullah1099. Thank you for your work on Sentinel-1D. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this article about satellites! Have a blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 02:07, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Abdullah1099 (talk) 02:08, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk

Hey @AluminiumWithAnI, I had started work on completing your started drafts Draft:VFTS 16 as it fell interesting to me and also working on your idea Draft:V861 Scorpii. Do you have any problem bro. Abdullah1099 (talk) 03:03, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And completed works on VFTS 16 and will start completing works on M10-VLA1. Abdullah1099 (talk) 04:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me, you have permission to edit the draft. It's one of those projects I haven't had the time to finish, so collaborations are welcome. AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 04:56, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I see that you've turned it into an article, thanks for your help AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 04:57, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, I seen it as a interesting object. I found two more that are interesting one is the MACHO one and other is M10-VLA1. So, I will try to complete Abdullah1099 (talk) 05:45, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@AluminiumWithAnI bro Completed M10-VLA1, but sorry as it has very less references. So, Can you add some more Abdullah1099 (talk) 09:31, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I could find this brief mention, but am struggling to find anything else. I'm a bit worried that the topic may have been premature to have its own article, but it might barely get past notability requirements. AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 11:09, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I also think same but it's atleast have some meaning and i already put that article into Star-stub. So, I think no problem will come Abdullah1099 (talk) 13:00, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]