User talk:AluminiumWithAnI

Feel free to add conversations below if needed; response may take between a few hours and several days because of time zone (UTC+9) and IRL stuff.

Welcome!

Hi AluminiumWithAnI! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones

Welcome to the tropical cyclone WikiProject! I'm a longtime editor, and I like reaching out to new users, in case they need any help. What aspect of tropical cyclones are you most interested in? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I've had a long-time interest in the topic since around 2013, when I began watching typhoon warnings in the news as a 6 year old. I'm fascinated with the display of the forces of nature (and nature in general, really), as well as our ability to predict/forecast them. Recently my focus has been on subtropical cyclones (or any oddball/in-between weather systems), since despite them forming frequently in my region (Western Pacific, near Japan), there isn't much research done about them in my country, meaning there's much more for us to learn. I track tropical cyclones almost daily (whenever there are any) as a hobby, and I'm glad to join a community with similar interests! AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 12:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for adding those old storms to the list of Pacific typhoons! I was wondering how old is the oldest known event. I came across the late 900s event in Japan, and I’m glad thanks to your efforts that it’s gone back a few more centuries! Keep it up. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 12:22, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've been digging up old Japanese records that are pretty much inaccessible to the outside world (due to language barriers, as well as their obscurity), and I am honored to be of some help to the community! AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 13:15, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Omg you don’t even realize how important it is to overcome these language barriers! By adding to the English Wikipedia, that’s going to end up in Google searches and future research papers, because that once inaccessible info is now freely available to all. Keep it up! Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 13:59, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm planning to add dozens more typhoons from the 9th to 19th centuries in the short term. I might leave for a few months between autumn 2024 to spring 2025 so as to study for my entrance exams for university, but I'm more than willing to contribute whenever I can. AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 00:50, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, that's a great attitude toward Wikipedia. Do what you can, when you can, and when you can't, no worries, it'll still be here! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited WASP-178, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Photometry. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchism

Hi AluminiumWithAnI,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

We also have a live cleanup drive, if you'd like to participate, and a mailing list if you'd like to be notified of upcoming edit drives.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 12:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as HD 11343. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:48, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for the reminder. I'm in the process of figuring out the types of licenses and what you can and can't do with them, so I appreciate your help. Regarding this, I have one question: Is there an easy way to see the licensing/rights of an academic journal/article (e.g., if the images used can be used in Wikimedia projects)? That would be helpful for future contributions, especially for a beginner like me. AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 23:05, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good question. A lot of journal articles are compatibly licensed nowadays, and if they are, it will say so somewhere on the document. For this particular article, I could not locate the license anywhere on the webpage you used in your citation. However, if you click on the link to look at the pdf, you will see the license information at the bottom of the first page. (That's a typical place it will be found.) I did not have to download the pdf for this one, but occasionally I do.

For a chart that shows compatible licenses, see Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright#Can I add something to Wikipedia that I got from somewhere else? — Diannaa (talk) 00:15, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for the useful information. I'll look through the pages you've linked. AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 02:06, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi AluminiumWithAnI. Thank you for your work on HD 107969. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

this star needs to be mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824:

I now added the mention of the central star's HD designation (HD 107969), as the star already has a dedicated section on the article (which is why I created the redirect in the first place). If this is insufficient or any improvements should be made, please let me know. Thanks, AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 08:27, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on "List of Pacific typhoons before 1850

(I apologize for my limited English proficiency. Therefore, the content above was translated with the assistance of AI tools. If any phrasing seems unclear or requires adjustment, please let me know so I can clarify further.)

First, thank you for your contributions to the article *[List of Pacific typhoons before 1850](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Pacific_typhoons_before_1850)*, especially the hundreds of entries related to China and Japan. However, I noticed that **dates in the Chinese historical records section often lack day-level precision**. Many typhoon events in China can indeed be traced to specific days (not just years or months), and there are **significant gaps in the list** where numerous typhoons remain unrecorded. 广袤的天空 (talk) 16:12, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to offer assistance to improve this section by:  

1. **Converting dates** from traditional Chinese lunar/imperial calendars to the Gregorian calendar with scholarly references.  

2. **Adding missing typhoons** based on Chinese historical archives (e.g., local gazetteers, imperial records).  

If you are interested, I can provide detailed methodologies, sources, and cross-verification steps. Please let me know how I can collaborate with you to enhance the article’s accuracy and completeness.   广袤的天空 (talk) 16:13, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reaching out! Your English is totally understandable. I neither speak Chinese nor know how to access Chinese archives, and the sources I could find online often only listed a handful of storms with brief descriptions, so I appreciate any help with pinning down the dates as well as adding new storms. If you have difficulties adding the content in English yourself, I can offer to proofread your translated text to make it flow better (since if I recall correctly it is discouraged to add AI-generated text straight to articles).

Having recently started university I have a tight schedule, so I apologize in advance if my work or responses are a bit slow. I'm looking forward to a collaboration to make the article more complete. Cheers, AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 06:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to clarify that while I use AI tools to translate my messages (like this one) due to my limited English skills, I have never edited Wikipedia articles with AI-generated content. My goal is only to share historical Chinese records for the typhoon list. As a middle school student in China currently preparing for my high school entrance exams (until late June 2025), I can’t dedicate time to research until July or August 2025. Starting then, I can provide verified data if you could handle adding them to the article in English. Thank you for your understanding! 广袤的天空 (talk) 14:49, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Examples of materials I can provide:  

The Compilation of Historical Materials on Natural Disasters in Shanghai Area (from 751 AD to 1949 AD).上海地区自然灾害史料汇编（公元751~1949年）

Time：唐大历十年七月二十八日  （ September 1st, 755 ）

Original records七月己未夜杭州大风，海水翻潮，飘荡州廓五千余家，船千余只，全家陷溺者

有百余户，死者四百余人。苏、湖、越等州亦然。【《旧唐书》卷37，

卷11]

七月杭州海溢。[《新唐书》卷36]

Translation into English

On the night of September 1, 775  a catastrophic typhoon struck Hangzhou. Storm surges inundated the city, destroying over 5,000 households and  1,000+ boats. Entire families were swept away , resulting in over 400 deaths. Similar devastation occurred in Suzhou(modern Suzhou), Huzhou（modern Huzhou）, and Yuezhou (modern Shaoxing).

In July 775, storm surges flooded Hangzhou."   广袤的天空 (talk) 14:57, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear about the AI thing, I was just pointing out what not to do, rather than that you did anything wrong, so sorry if I sounded accusatory. Anyhow, those resources would be very useful for expanding the article. One thing I would like to ask you is to provide information on the source material, such as the name, author/publisher, and the year of publishing, so that I can add well-sourced information. I really appreciate your help! You can add information to my user page linked below:

User:AluminiumWithAnI/Typhoons AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 11:56, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since I'm on vacation recently, I have plenty of time to organize these documents and add them to the sandbox page. I will maintain a certain frequency of updates for now, and I hope you can add them to the List of Pacific typhoons before 1850 page. 广袤的天空 (talk) 12:47, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, I am currently studying for finals so I will be doing the bulk of the work in August-September, when I have my vacation. I might be able to start adding some content sooner if I find the time. AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 13:05, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, I've encountered an issue regarding dates. Since most of these records are only precise to the month, with only a small number specifying the exact day, when converting to the Gregorian calendar, these month-only records end up spanning parts of two months. In such cases, should I keep the original dates or convert them to the Gregorian calendar? 广袤的天空 (talk) 04:57, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK, here's an idea: in plain text form, I think listing both dates with one of them in parentheses would be fine, like this (using the 392 typhoon you've researched as an example):

In the sixth lunar month of 392 (between July 6 and August 4), a typhoon struck...

When creating a table, something like this might be cleaner (please note that the details of the table may be changed in the actual article):

Year	Date	Area(s) affected	Damage/notes
392	between July 6 and August 4 (converted date)	Yongjia Commandery	The tide surged, and many people in the four coastal counties drowned.

Please feel free to make any further suggestions/questions. Thanks, AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 14:15, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, may I begin removing the original Chinese text from the parts that are already translated? I'm planning on turning the Typhoons page into the actual draft for the List of China typhoons (pre-1500) article (because of ease and authorship/attribution stuff), and the final article should probably contain just the translated text. AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 13:40, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Those translated parts can be deleted. However, I have some other questions and suggestions:  

1. If categorized by region, there's a special case in 1650: a typhoon struck Japan but left tidal disaster records in Shanghai and Zhejiang, China, and flood records in Seoul, Korea. How should this be regionally categorized?  

2. For local categorization, Chinese typhoon records could start new entries from 1400 onward because records become extremely frequent after this date (nearly annual). Would compiling them into a single entry be too extensive?  

3. I found numerous records in 日本気象史料,  日本気象史料 追補 1, 日本気象史料 追補 2, and the 室戸台風調査報告. The first three are downloadable at the National Diet Library (mainly in storm sections). The last report was inaccessible, but I located it here:  

https://pan.huang1111.cn/s/QzqkbUm  

These can supplement Japanese typhoon records, though determining how to identify typhoon records in 日本気象史料 requires further discussion 广袤的天空 (talk) 14:44, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, I think a year-by-year list would be better. 广袤的天空 (talk) 15:06, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the questions/suggestions, I'll answer each of them below:

1. I think that storm can be included in each of the regional articles, while mentioning that the storm affected other areas. In the China article, for instance, you could say something like: "In 1650, storm surges from a typhoon affected Shanghai and Zhejiang. This storm also struck Japan and produced flooding in Seoul." In the List of Pacific typhoons before 1850 article, listing all the affected regions and brief summaries of the effects should be fine.

2. In that case, the article should probably be split by century (List of China typhoons (1400-1499), for example), which is how the Atlantic hurricane season articles are organized before 1800.

3. Thanks for the new sources! I will be looking into them soon.

As for your final suggestion, yeah, the articles can be organized by having subsections for each year (e.g., 1496 season, 1497 season,...) from the 1400s and after (maybe earlier if there are enough storm records). AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 14:34, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@广袤的天空 whilst I work on the formatting of the pre-1400 typhoons page, I have prepared a new page for compiling information about typhoons in or after 1400 here: User:AluminiumWithAnI/Typhoons2. If you'd like to add material for these storms you can freely use this page. AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 13:46, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand. (I might reply a bit late since my vacation is over, and high school only gives me six hours off a week QAQ, so I won't be adding new information for now. Also, thanks for your help.) 广袤的天空 (talk) 05:44, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. No need to hurry, edit at your own pace :) AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 05:46, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Thinking of creating astronomy articles from your Sandbox list.

Hey, I had seen that you had over 1000 Astronomical objects in your sandbox. I am thinking of making some articles on those topic. Really want to know which of them are notable and which are non-notable. I would be very thankful. Abdullah1099 (talk) 03:39, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, while this was initially meant to be a personal list, sure, you can create articles from there. As for notability, you can ignore the entries with the comment "marginal" since they are less likely to be notable. The "maybe," "tedious" and "painstaking" entries are likely notable, as I've found multiple independently published papers via SIMBAD (the comments simply detail the amount of reading I'd have to do to create an article, so the "tedious" and "painstaking" entries usually have more abundant coverage in research papers than the "maybe" entries). If you have any other questions about the list, please contact me in the replies to this message, as I'm happy to be of some help. Thanks, AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 08:06, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks bro for giving me permissions. I will start making article probably just after uploading two stars, that i planned to add one of them is very interesting to me FR Scuti. Abdullah1099 (talk) 08:32, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! I'm glad that my list is useful for the community. Happy editing! AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 09:07, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Abdullah1099 (talk) 09:08, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think i will start with object 1RXS J170849.0−400910 for the first article. Waiting for your suggestions bro. Abdullah1099 (talk) 14:10, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the late reply, here are some ideas for new astronomical object articles depending on your interests.

Neutron stars: PSR B0628−28 (aka PSR J0630−2834; not in the list but notable), PSR B0355+54, PSR B1929+10, PSR J0751+1807, PSR J1641+8049

Black holes and/or white dwarfs: 47 Tuc X9

Variable binary/multiple stars: V523 Cassiopeiae, V861 Scorpii, V502 Ophiuchi, V453 Cygni, TY Boötis, RX Cassiopeiae

If you'd like any more suggestions or have more specific requests please let me know. Cheers, AluminiumWithAnI (talk) 03:21, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Ok i will start work right now first on these topics Abdullah1099 (talk) 05:38, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]