User talk:Van1985

This is Van1985's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: Annie Minogue Band (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProClasher97 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Annie Minogue Band and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 06:01, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OhMega Creative! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 06:01, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Annie Minogue Band (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Do not use blogs as sources. iMDB is an unreliable source. Too much of the article is unsourced, specifically towards the start. From how I'm reading the article, I'm not quite sure how this band is notable aside from the fact they released music.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Annie Minogue Band and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rambley (talk) 14:13, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Annie Minogue Band (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MediaKyle was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Annie Minogue Band and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MediaKyle (talk) 11:22, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Annie Minogue Band (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HilssaMansen19 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Greetings, Thank you for your work. For now, the draft is not being accepted. The subject may be notable but the style is not per general WP criterias and reliable citations after every paragraph are needed. Before submitting it again - Please check WP:STYLE and WP:TONE.Reliable secondary and independent sources that provide significant coverage with more non-primary ones are also needed. If you have any doubt, check Teahouse or leave a message on my talk page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Annie Minogue Band and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HilssaMansen19Irien1291S • spreading wiki love ~ Message here; no calls 02:39, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Annie Minogue Band for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Annie Minogue Band is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annie Minogue Band until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 16:20, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Van1985. Thank you for your work on Babanango Game Reserve. Another editor, 11wallisb, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hello. This article has multiple issues which need immediate attention. Firstly, there are multiple citation errors visible in the references relating to author names. Secondly, at least one of the references is a bare URL which needs to be converted into proper citation style. Finally, a third of this article has been detected as being generated by an LLM, this is not acceptable on Wikipedia. Please edit the article so these issues are resolved as soon as possible. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|11wallisb}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

11WB (talk) 21:53, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @11wallisb

I hope you are well. Please could I ask you to review my article changes, if it is acceptable as is, or best to leave for a bit while others make further edits?

Please advise. Still a newby editor here, so trying to learn the ropes! Van1985 (talk) 07:47, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I have only just come online today, but I will make sure to take a look at this in the next few hours and will get back to you! (Replying now so that you know I've seen your reply!) 11WB (talk) 11:41, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Van1985, sorry for the delayed response. I can see the bare URLs are no longer an issue and the citation errors are fixed. Just make sure the article isn't written using generated LLM text. I have marked the article as reviewed. Thanks! 11WB (talk) 17:40, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Claim of changing llm content

It is best not to remove the tag about llm content yourself. Instead, ask the editor who placed the tag if they are satisfied with your fixes. Abductive (reasoning) 07:31, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Abductive

Ok thank-you for your response - I misunderstood the guidelines here on this then. I will reply to the reviewer and ask them to review my fixes.

Thank-you! Van1985 (talk) 07:42, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, don't worry too much. Leave it for a few days, people may come along and improve the article. Then look at your wording with fresh eyes. Abductive (reasoning) 07:44, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Annie Minogue moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Annie Minogue. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:46, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Dclemens1971

Thanks for your review and feedback. Would you be able to guide me as to what parts of the article you view as promotional? And would it better to remove those parts completely, and just keep the article simple, with introduction, early life and education, and maybe parts of her career? And take out the rest for now? Van1985 (talk) 06:30, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some examples of promotional language:

• The band has been described as combining rock attitude with pop sensibility and blues undertones. Without a source here, this sounds like marketing language.
• In 2023, Minogue released NOW!, an album centered on themes of resilience, social responsibility, and personal truth. What does this even mean?
• She has been profiled in Who’s Who of Professional Women, Passion Vista, and WomLead Magazine, which highlighted her longevity in the music industry and her emphasis on authenticity. (Who's Who is a pay-to-play directory and WomLead is I'm guessing the same since there's no byline there and the article is a puff piece.)

But you could still take those sentences out and the article would still have an overall promotional tone due to its reliance on non-independent sources like WomLead. I would focus on rewriting in straightforward language with every statement sourced to an independent, reliable, secondary source. The WP:TEAHOUSE is a great place to ask for help as well! Dclemens1971 (talk) 10:46, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for your feedback @Dclemens1971, I really appreciate it.

I will work on the article more and then ask for further assistance at The Teahouse. Van1985 (talk) 13:00, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Thank you, Van1985, for your query on the Women in Red talk page. I think it would be useful for you to become a member of the project: see New registrations on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. In connection with the biography you are writing, you'll find some useful tips in our Ten Simple Rules. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:28, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for signing up and welcome to the project. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties.-Ipigott (talk) 11:54, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Ipigott

Appreciate your input here! Van1985 (talk) 12:55, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Annie Minogue has been accepted

Annie Minogue, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

João^hola 07:47, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Josedimaria

Thanks so much for approving my article for creation. Much appreciated! Van1985 (talk) 18:33, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Renishaw Hills moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Renishaw Hills. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Aesurias (talk) 08:14, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Aesurias

Thanks for your review of my article Renishaw Hills.

I have made some edits to the parts of content that I thought may be seen as machine-generated text - it should be good now.

I am usually able to see the button "Submit the draft for review" at the top of the article, but I don't see that option now - please could you take a look and let me know if I have missed it?

Thanks! Van1985 (talk) 19:06, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The entire article is AI-generated using an LLM - the giveaway is the unnecessary capitalization in section titles. Aesurias (talk) 20:32, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Have you run this article through any AI content detectors to back your claim?

You can use any tools likes https://quillbot.com/ai-content-detector or https://www.grammarly.com/ai-detector, which I have just done and it has confirmed for me that none of the text is LLM content, so please tell me how you got to your conclusion? Van1985 (talk) 05:55, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Renishaw Hills for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Renishaw Hills is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renishaw Hills until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 14:02, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - November 2025

Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 11, Nos. 326, 327, 353, 354 Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes. Online events: New: Alphabet run: U, V, W | Asian women Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: Women in Red's Asian women event is part of the global Wikipedia Asian Month 2025 campaign. You are welcome to add your contributions to both event pages. Tip of the Month: Verifiability is increasingly important as AI evolves. You should ensure that every statement made is adequately sourced. There should be no less than three independent reliable sources for each biography, including at least one source for each paragraph. Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 20,473 articles created in the past year. 21 Oct 2024, 19.963% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,030,245 biographies; 405,305 women) 28 Oct 2025: 20.23% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,094,677 biographies; 423,778 women) Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help wanted! Want to apply your skills or learn new ones? Help us plan monthly events, design event logos, come up with a tip-of-the-month, and/or provide any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:08, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Van1985! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Request for help with Renishaw Hills article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:11, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]