User talk:Van1985

This is Van1985's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Annie Minogue Band (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProClasher97 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Annie Minogue Band and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 06:01, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OhMega Creative! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 06:01, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Annie Minogue Band (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Do not use blogs as sources. iMDB is an unreliable source. Too much of the article is unsourced, specifically towards the start. From how I'm reading the article, I'm not quite sure how this band is notable aside from the fact they released music.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Annie Minogue Band and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rambley (talk) 14:13, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Annie Minogue Band (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MediaKyle was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Annie Minogue Band and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MediaKyle (talk) 11:22, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Annie Minogue Band (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HilssaMansen19 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Greetings, Thank you for your work. For now, the draft is not being accepted. The subject may be notable but the style is not per general WP criterias and reliable citations after every paragraph are needed. Before submitting it again - Please check WP:STYLE and WP:TONE.Reliable secondary and independent sources that provide significant coverage with more non-primary ones are also needed. If you have any doubt, check Teahouse or leave a message on my talk page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Annie Minogue Band and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HilssaMansen19Irien1291S • spreading wiki love ~ Message here; no calls 02:39, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Annie Minogue Band for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Annie Minogue Band is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annie Minogue Band until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 16:20, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Van1985. Thank you for your work on Babanango Game Reserve. Another editor, 11wallisb, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hello. This article has multiple issues which need immediate attention. Firstly, there are multiple citation errors visible in the references relating to author names. Secondly, at least one of the references is a bare URL which needs to be converted into proper citation style. Finally, a third of this article has been detected as being generated by an LLM, this is not acceptable on Wikipedia. Please edit the article so these issues are resolved as soon as possible. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|11wallisb}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

11WB (talk) 21:53, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @11wallisb

I hope you are well. Please could I ask you to review my article changes, if it is acceptable as is, or best to leave for a bit while others make further edits?

Please advise. Still a newby editor here, so trying to learn the ropes! Van1985 (talk) 07:47, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I have only just come online today, but I will make sure to take a look at this in the next few hours and will get back to you! (Replying now so that you know I've seen your reply!) 11WB (talk) 11:41, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Claim of changing llm content

It is best not to remove the tag about llm content yourself. Instead, ask the editor who placed the tag if they are satisfied with your fixes. Abductive (reasoning) 07:31, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Abductive

Ok thank-you for your response - I misunderstood the guidelines here on this then. I will reply to the reviewer and ask them to review my fixes.

Thank-you! Van1985 (talk) 07:42, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, don't worry too much. Leave it for a few days, people may come along and improve the article. Then look at your wording with fresh eyes. Abductive (reasoning) 07:44, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]