User talk:Luxtaythe2nd

This is Luxtaythe2nd's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

I used to archive stuff here. Now I don't, but the archives are: User talk:Luxtaythe2nd/Archives/2021/September, User talk:Luxtaythe2nd/Archives/2021/October, User talk:Luxtaythe2nd/Archives/2021/November, and User talk:Luxtaythe2nd/Archives/2021/December.

Subsidies in Iran needs update to remain good

Subsidies in Iran has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:00, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you got the wrong person, sir. Luxtay the IInd (^{talke to mee}) 17:21, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alberto Caballero (astronomer)

I recently emailed ExoQuest about a reward board offer on the draft mentioned in the title. They stated that you are also working on it. I started a draft at Draft:Alberto Caballero (astronomer) with just the basics - that he's an astronomer. Do you want to work on it? He gave me some text to begin the draft, which I will add to the draft shortly. --interstate five 16:37, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image change

Why did you change the image on Elizabeth II? I don't see a reason why you would change it, the old one was perfectly fine. RteeeeKed 💬📖 18:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The old image represents the end of her reign more than its overall duration, as the peak of the concerns of her reign came about in the mid-1980s and early 1990s, and the 1986 image is way better at representing that. Luxtay the IInd (^{talketh to me}) 18:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why change the image on Queen Elizabeth?

Not very important to me but I'm interested in your reasoning on changing the image AltoStev (talk) 18:07, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's mostly because of the fact that the 2015 image was made during the later years and I think the 1986 one represents her better (the peak of her reign could be argued to have come about in the 80s and 90s). Luxtay the IInd (^{talketh to me}) 18:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"IIIRP" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect IIIRP and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 6#IIIRP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 08:31, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For improving articles especially the short description areas... You deserve one of these. Volten001 ^☎ 14:18, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hamilton portrait

I want to change it back again, so I am asking why, etc etc, on your talk page, but I am not sure how long I can be patient Shoreranger (talk) 19:27, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry! I am here. I changed the Hamilton potrait because the posthumous potrait by John Trumbull embedded on the original article is not actually a good representation of Hamilton, considering that there were authentic and high-quality Hamilton portraits. Since Trumbull also made a portrait of Alexander Hamilton back in 1792, when he was actually Secretary of the Treasury, I think it would be better to have this authentic portrait by the same artist than a posthumous one. tl;dr Authentic, same artist and high quality. Luxtay the IInd (^{talketh to me}) 19:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

since when has art had to be contemporary? i understand the decision, but a lot of art is posthumous and honestly i just prefer the previous one. they clearly represent hamilton in different tones and perhaps even time periods. considering the political relevancy, im willing to put it up to a democratic vote. i, for one, vote for posthumous fancy handsome hamilton from presumably his prime. shoeranger seems to agree. thank you for reading. sorry if i sound tense or upset, im not good with conveying tone. Baguetteboing (talk) 21:07, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why not put it up to a democratic vote? Luxtay the IInd (^{talketh to me}) 06:07, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gdańsk

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gdańsk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 16:03, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gdańsk

The article Gdańsk you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Gdańsk for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 16:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Radio Złote Przeboje logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Radio Złote Przeboje logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Radio Złote Przeboje logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Radio Złote Przeboje logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Radio Złote Przeboje logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Radio Złote Przeboje logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Marie Thérèse Louise of Savoy, Princesse de Lamballe/GA1

Hi, Luxtay. I noticed your review of Talk:Marie Thérèse Louise of Savoy, Princesse de Lamballe/GA1. Usually, if there are some issues with a GA candidate, but none of the quickfail criteria are met, an article is placed on hold for up to a week to allow the nominator to smooth out any wrinkles (see e.g. my interaction with Vami IV at Talk:Sarah Ashton-Cirillo/GA1). Is there a reason why you failed this directly, or should it be placed on hold instead? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 17:40, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did indeed fail to mention the third quickfail criteria as my reason for the denial—a banner like {{POV}} or {{cleanup}} would certainly be needed in such an article, not only because of its biases that I mentioned in the review, but also of the constant inconsistent spelling and overly-long paragraphs within the article, which I also mentioned in the review—and these issues pile up. Luxtay the IInd (^{talketh to me}) 17:48, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing any overwhelming bias there. If you're going to quickfail this, I would suggest spelling out at the GAN page, in detail, which parts of the article you see as quickfailably biased and why. Focusing on negative acts committed by a group of people is not inherently biased, as long as that focus is due based on what's in reliable sources; is it that you think there is undue focus, or that you think the tone used is non-neutral? (Inconsistent spelling and overly-long paragraphs are the sort of thing that should be handled at the GAN.) -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 18:12, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Assassination of Paweł Adamowicz

On 31 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Assassination of Paweł Adamowicz, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that after a stabbing attack on Paweł Adamowicz (pictured), the mayor of Gdańsk, at least 41 blood packets were used in an unsuccessful attempt to save him? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Assassination of Paweł Adamowicz. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Assassination of Paweł Adamowicz), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 41,206 views (1,716.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gdańsk

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gdańsk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 22:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gdańsk

The article Gdańsk you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Gdańsk for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 12:03, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Luxtaythe2nd. Thank you for your work on EN80. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thank you very much! Translating it all from plwiki was a bit of a challenge, so it's nice to have my work appreciated. God bless! Luxtay the IInd (^{talketh to me}) 09:22, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Luxtaythe2nd. Thank you for your work on Wojciech Olszański. Another editor, BastianMAT, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BastianMAT}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BastianMAT (talk) 17:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BastianMAT: Thanks for the compliment! I worked on it for a few days. Luxtaythe2nd (_{Talk to me...}) 17:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

The World Destubathon

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:53, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Luxtaythe2nd. Thank you for your work on 1995 Gdańsk gas explosion. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 03:47, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

DYK for 1995 Gdańsk gas explosion

On 6 August 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1995 Gdańsk gas explosion, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after a building in Poland was wrecked by one explosion then demolished by a second, a cat was found alive among the rubble? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1995 Gdańsk gas explosion. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1995 Gdańsk gas explosion), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar of European Merit

		The Barnstar of European Merit
		For participation in the European 20,000 Challenge.
		_{this WikiAward was given to Luxtaythe2nd by Grimes2 16:35, 6 August 2025 (UTC)}[reply]

I am honoured, thank you. Luxtaythe2nd (_{Talk to me...}) 17:56, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from pl:Tunel pod Martwą Wisłą to Martwa Wisła Tunnel. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:33, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Luxtaythe2nd. Thank you for your work on Great Armoury. Another editor, Junbeesh, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Junbeesh}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Junbeesh (talk) 10:47, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Ferber House

Hello! Your submission of Ferber House at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk) 19:08, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ustrzyki Górne

On 23 August 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ustrzyki Górne, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that, after Ustrzyki Górne was burnt down and depopulated following World War II, a students' club from Warsaw played the most important role in its reconstruction? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ustrzyki Górne. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ustrzyki Górne), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Gdańsk is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Gdańsk is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 08:43, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Gdańsk has failed

Your good article nomination of the article Gdańsk has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 22:43, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Old Town Hall, Gdańsk

On 3 September 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Old Town Hall, Gdańsk, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the basement of the Old Town Hall in Gdańsk was rented by a famous astronomer to store his beers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Old Town Hall, Gdańsk. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Old Town Hall, Gdańsk), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abit of help

Hey, saw your keep reply on the Gunther AfD. I have been sent a bunch of news articles by Gunther himself that mentions him... and that was from 2023 and before. He knows my email because I was the one asking if he approves that one of his photo's is able to be licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0.

Theres alot of stuff, and since you may way more experience than I got, I need some assistance in combing through them all.

Are you interested in that? If so, I can send all the links over.

With best regards JonasJorgensen4 (talk) JonasJorgensen4 (talk) 18:49, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I've been a little busy lately though. Would be eager to help regardless. Luxtaythe2nd (_{Talk to me...}) 19:00, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heres a BIG list INBOUND

From September 2023 to January 2023 in no specific order where media reported about me or quoted me mainly in Serbia, Brazil, Armenia, Russia and Kosovo

https://mondediplo.com/2023/09/07austrian

https://belsat.eu/en/news/15-09-2023-armenia-s-anti-russian-turnaround

https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/news/fehlinger-wants-kosovo-in-eu-in-2029-calls-for-isolation-of-serbia/

https://exxpress.at/oesterreichischer-lobbyist-fordert-jetzt-wieder-nato-bomben-auf-belgrad/

https://news.am/eng/news/778670.html

https://caucasuswatch.de/en/news/nato-refutes-rumors-about-armenias-acceptance-to-alliance.html

https://news.am/eng/news/780448.html

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/russia-voices-concern-over-armenias-announcement-of-joint-military-drill-with-us/2985094

https://tass.com/politics/1670829

https://www.kosmo.at/oesterreicher-lockt-serbien-mit-u-bahn-system-in-eu/

https://www.kosmo.at/oesterreicher-will-serbisches-denkmal-fuer-nato-opfer-entfernen/

https://sinjali.com/fehlinger-perendimi-spo-e-trajton-kosoven-me-dinjitet-serbia-po-provokon-vazhdimisht/

https://concordia.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Pressekonferenz-Wien-4.April-NATO-Enlargement-Austria-Kosovo-Serbia-and-mutal-recognition-SRB-RKS.pdf

https://www.botasot.info/politika-lajme/1988299/kercenimet-e-vuciqit-per-veriun-eksperti-austriak-reagon-ashper-ndaj-be-se-ndash-tregon-kushtin-qe-duhet-vendosur-nga-kurti/

https://www.botasot.info/politika-lajme/2044940/eksperti-austriak-vjen-me-nje-parashikim-te-fuqishem-pas-perplasjes-se-kurtit-me-brnabiqin-fundi-i-vuciqit-me-afer-se-kurre/

https://www.botasot.info/politika-lajme/1953096/vjen-nje-parashikim-i-keq-per-vuciqin-eksperti-austriak-do-te-humbase-perballe-kurtit-ndash-keshtu-kosova-do-arrije-fitoren-e-madhe/

https://www.botasot.info/politika-lajme/1887297/befason-eksperti-austriak-ne-keto-vite-do-te-anetaresohet-kosova-ne-nato-dhe-be-ndash-jep-parashikimin-e-keq-per-serbine/

https://www.azerbaycan24.com/en/nato-cheerleader-advocates-breaking-up-brazil/

https://ordinary-times.com/2023/06/14/how-far-is-too-far-in-supporting-ukraine/

https://www.b92.net/eng/comments.php?nav_id=116543

https://tkp.at/2023/05/23/ruf-nach-maidan-in-serbien/

https://www.sd.rs/vesti/info/vreme-je-za-revoluciju-u-srbiji-da-bude-evropska-albanski-lobista-i-srbomrzac-pruzio-podrsku-2023-05-20

https://tv6.md/ru/2023/09/05/glava-evropejskogo-komiteta-po-razvitiju-nato-prizval-moldovu-vstupit-v-aljans/

https://www.novosti.rs/vesti/politika/1240210/nato-kosovski-lobista-zeli-padne-srpska-krv-porucuje-vreme-revoluciju-srbiji

https://srpskiportal.rs/politika/mrzitelj-srba-i-zagovornik-protesta-porucuje-vreme-je-za-srbomajdan-a-do-tada-izolujte-srbiju-video/78469/

https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20230828075007-4-466551/bukan-rusia-ekonom-nato-serukan-pecah-negara-ini-jadi-5

https://360noticias.cl/otan-amenaza-desmantelar-brasil-por-apoyo-a-brics/

https://es.causaoperaria.org.br/2023/08/29/brasil-deberia-exigir-explicaciones-a-la-otan/

https://vigilantlinks.com/2023/04/nato-official-unveils-plan-to-break-up-russia-into-41-new-countries/

https://www.eldebate.com/internacional/20230828/presidente-comite-europeo-ampliacion-otan-desmembrar-brics_136163.html

https://www.terra.com.br/noticias/checamos/e-falso-que-representante-da-otan-fez-ameaca-ao-brasil-apos-cupula-dos-brics,18d594628d340055cd14c55c9eabf2a0x9ee2du4.html

https://www.defesaaereanaval.com.br/internacional/ex-brasil-presidente-do-comite-austriaco-para-a-otan-faz-ameaca-separatista-ao-brasil

https://www.naiz.eus/en/iritzia/articulos/una-protesta-virtual-como-reaccion-logica-a-la-hegemonia-occidental

https://caliber.az/en/post/188376/

https://www.dailysabah.com/opinion/columns/armenias-axis-shift-will-it-spark-a-new-us-russia-showdown

https://www.eurasiantimes.com/after-ukraine-west-invites-armenia-to-join-nato-russia-concerned/

https://en.vestikavkaza.ru/news/Europe-wants-Armenia-to-join-NATO.html

https://derstatus.at/politik/nato-lobbyist-mit-oevp-naehe-fordert-welt-freimaurertum-auf-748.html

https://www.easternherald.com/2023/03/17/austria-calls-for-removal-of-monument-to-child-victims-of-nato-bombing-in-belgrade/

https://www.kurir.rs/vesti/politika/4133544/ginter-felinger-trazi-da-se-skloni-spomenik-milici-rakic

https://vecernjenovosti.ba/161736/nekategorizovano/sramno-nato-lobista-trazi-uklanjanje-spomenika-milici-rakic-foto/

https://redportal.rs/sta-je-biiilo/66409/srbomrzac-gunter-felinger-trazio-uklanjanje-spomenika-milici-rakic-%F0%9F%98%A5

https://rt.rs/srbija-i-balkan/22793-austrijski-ekonomista-spomenik-milici-rakic/

DYK for Gdańsk Crane

On 14 September 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gdańsk Crane, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the medieval Gdańsk Crane was primarily being used by the late 19th century to lift ships for propeller repairs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gdańsk Crane. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gdańsk Crane), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:03, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Luxtaythe2nd. Thank you for your work on Radunia Canal. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 00:46, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Luxtaythe2nd. Thank you for your work on Great Mill, Gdańsk. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 00:50, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit late here but

thanks for joining WikiProject Tuvalu FinkyOfNalanja (talk) 04:25, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Luxtaythe2nd, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:53, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Luxtaythe2nd (_{Talk to me...}) 17:54, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Great Armoury

On 30 September 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Great Armoury, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1919 a restaurant with vending machines was opened in the 17th-century Great Armoury (pictured) in Gdańsk? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Great Armoury. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Great Armoury), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Laun chba ller 00:02, 30 September 2025 (UTC) [reply]

Thank you for this and other Gdansk topics! It's also featured on Portal:Germany. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:53, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! That's very fun! Luxtaythe2nd (_{Talk to me...}) 13:54, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am so pleased about your articles because I just visited Gdansk, and am pleasantly reminded - click on places and search for Gdansk ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:08, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ferber House

On 2 October 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ferber House, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Ferber House (pictured) was rumoured to be haunted after the family who owned it went extinct? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ferber House. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ferber House), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Laun chba ller 00:02, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Gdansk

Thank you for quality articles around Gdansk such as Ferber House, Gdańsk Crane, Great Armoury and Old Town Hall, Gdańsk, for your ambition to make the city a GA, for quality reviewing and tireless contributions, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2994 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:19, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am honoured. Luxtaythe2nd (_{Talk to me...}) 14:18, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of 1995 Gdańsk gas explosion is under review

Your good article nomination of the article 1995 Gdańsk gas explosion is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grumpylawnchair -- Grumpylawnchair (talk) 02:46, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]