User talk:Theleekycauldron

abcdefgh
8
a8 black rook
b8 black knight
c8 black bishop
d8 black queen
e8 black king
f8 black bishop
g8 black knight
h8 black rook
a7 black pawn
b7 black pawn
c7 black pawn
e7 black pawn
f7 black pawn
g7 black pawn
h7 black pawn
e4 black pawn
f3 white knight
a2 white pawn
b2 white pawn
c2 white pawn
d2 white pawn
f2 white pawn
g2 white pawn
h2 white pawn
a1 white rook
b1 white knight
c1 white bishop
d1 white queen
e1 white king
f1 white bishop
h1 white rook
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
White to move, so it's leeky's turn – check back later! (last mover: CopperyMarrow15)



Inbox

[edit]

Sometimes messages slip through the cracks. Sorry about that! I keep this list to let me know what I still need to respond to – feel free to add your own name and message here if you're still looking for a response from me.

  1. 05:04, 17 February 2025 (UTC) fill out your thing at WP:REFLECTIONS – HouseBlaster (talk • he/they)
  2. 02:17, 15 May 2025 (UTC) Make a chess move – HouseBlaster (talk • he/they)
  3. 02:51, 15 May 2025 (UTC) ban houseblaster from my talk page for messing with the inbox format theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 02:52, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The last date that GalliumBot seems to have updated it is 29/08/2025. Is the bot down? TarnishedPathtalk 01:58, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

gah, probably. I'll get into it tomorrow. thanks for letting me know! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 02:25, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ping TarnishedPathtalk 15:19, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 16:52, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ugh, at least, i thought i did... theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 17:18, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it looks like it did something. TarnishedPathtalk 21:47, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
oh yay, there we go! guess it took a few tries to get started back up. wack! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 21:49, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think it may not be doing anything again. It updated twice yesterday and then nothing since. TarnishedPathtalk 16:16, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@TarnishedPath: things are usually slow on the weekends and the preps are pretty full, are you sure there just haven't been any promotions in the last 18 hours? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 16:49, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It seemed to move a few times yesterday. So perhaps all good. TarnishedPathtalk 01:05, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DYKSTATS didn't update this morning and there are some nominations at T:TDYK that haven't drifted to Approved. Is GalliumBot down?--Launchballer 20:34, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

gahhh! what on earth... theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 20:35, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
bot was signed out, I signed it back in, should be good now :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 20:43, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is, thanks. Also, could you amend the edit summary PSHAW gives when rejecting noms? I've had a couple of people complain about me saying "rejected by reviewer" when I've timed them out (see (User talk:AirshipJungleman29#Template:Did you know nominations/Murder of Charlotte Dymond and Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Should nominators be allowed to unilaterally re-open closed nominations without a discussion or appeal?). Just removing 'by reviewer' would work, though I wonder if it's worth adding 'timed out' to the dropdown.--Launchballer 14:21, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
yup, that's just a template, should be good now :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 14:39, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GalliumBot is not updating Wikipedia:Did you know/DYK hook count

[edit]

Theleekycauldron, GalliumBot's last update to Wikipedia:Did you know/DYK hook count, and thus to the table, was over 48 hours ago. Please take a look and see what needs to be done to get this feature back online. Many thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 14:32, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

wuh-oh. ummmm theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 17:58, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
looks like some malformed {{DYK talk}} templates, should be fixed now? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 18:12, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was reading your userpage when I suddenly saw the title of this message. I have started a draft at User:Earth605/Sandbox. Just letting you know the article will be created. Soon? Dunno. Probably not. Earth605 (talk) 17:47, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Earth605! Sounds good, but beeeee careful. I don't actually trust previous me's judgment as to whether that particular article can survive NEVENT/NOPAGE/BLP challenges. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 17:58, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'll reevaluate later, then... Earth605 (talk) 18:01, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for discussion of Module:Automatic case citation

[edit]

Module:Automatic case citation has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:04, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for discussion of Template:Automatic case citation

[edit]

Template:Automatic case citation has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:05, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support!

[edit]
Thank you for your support!
A year has passed since you helped me pass my RFA! The whole process was definitely less than ideal, but I made it. Better yet, I've not had many complaints. I'm certainly still in the toddler phase of adminship, but I'm happy to be here. Thank you so much for your support a year ago, as well as the ongoing support you've provided as I move from "newbie" admin to "intermediate" admin. I really appreciate it. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:14, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]