User talk:Pencilceaser123

This user likes to be pinged.

This user likes specific examples of what they have done wrong and how to improve, and can't understand otherwise.

This autistic user may correct things that don't need to be corrected. They are not trying to argue.

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome!(We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Pencilceaser123, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Help desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Aquabluetesla (talk) 01:30, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Numbaa has been accepted

Numbaa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GMH Melbourne (talk) 07:25, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I was worried when it said it could take 3+ months! Pencilceaser123 (talk) 08:20, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hi Pencilceaser123! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Lapstone Oval and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 21:15, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I think that was a missclick I meant to add to talkpage Pencilceaser123 (talk) 21:45, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

watchlist not talkpage Pencilceaser123 (talk) 06:23, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arthur J. Hand has been accepted

Arthur J. Hand, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chetsford (talk) 06:32, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Comerong Island has been accepted

Comerong Island, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:42, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Pencilceaser123 (talk) 05:46, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

do you know Pindi Saidpur more than me?? I'm citizens of Pindi Saidpur Unknown (talk) 09:33, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No I dont know. Im just trying to make sure its up with wiki standards and help new users. I am appreciative for you expanding the page for your town Pencilceaser123 (talk) 09:36, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Awesome effort and great work :) tony 02:20, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

oh nice, I just get bored and check the recent changes page sometimes. Thank you! You do great work too Pencilceaser123 (talk) 02:21, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	For your role in getting rid of the Alrashed Sahoubah hoax. gidonb (talk) 02:12, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

oh nice thank you! Pencilceaser123 (talk) 02:21, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose someone should add it to the list of hoaxes Pencilceaser123 (talk) 02:27, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:16, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dealing with a very experienced editors

When dealing with experienced users, it is generally more effective to write them a short personal message than to apply a standardized template..... Just the basic courtesy. Moxy🍁 02:19, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will do that next time, however I was just trying to save time. It is also fairly standard to not delete messages from other peoples talk pages unless its a clear violation of wikipedia policy.

Also see both the final paragraph of Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars and User:DESiegel/Template the regulars. The last paragraph of dont template the regulars doesnt entirely apply to you as it is for the recipient of a template. However I believe it still somewhat applies to you as you seemed to act as the recipient. Next time please dont remove a message from another persons talk page you disagree with but add a message to my talk page. Thank you for being kind and trying to improve wikipedia. Pencilceaser123 (talk) 02:24, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I saw what you said on my page and the Aethiopia one.

I removed it because I added the full quote to the top since it related to Colchis, which was referred to as Asiatic Ethiopia or Second Ethiopia, and this section of herodotus' work on the cultural similarities between Aethiopia and Egypt mentioned Colchis as also having practiced circumcision. I feel with my edits I've added a lot of missing info and I didn't remove that quote, just moved it because there were two on the page. I'm new so i didnt realise sorry. 2601:280:CE82:7070:5866:F563:D3D4:8265 (talk) 01:37, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Thank you for joining wikipedia. I have no problem with the change you made, its just without an edit summary explaining why you made the change I felt the need to revert it. Again, thanks for your work. Pencilceaser123 (talk) 01:41, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Calito Soul

Thanks for adding the warning - I'd drafted something but yours is better. I set up the archive so the warning will be more prominent (will take 12-24 hours before it runs) Oblivy (talk) 03:45, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah thanks Pencilceaser123 (talk) 03:47, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit suggestions

Hi! Noticed your recent edits on Park Bo-gum's page and want to say thanks! I hope you can maintain its quality if it’s not a bother. There are also lots of updating needed. Attached some articles on these updates:

(1) The North Face Ambassador https://sports.donga.com/ent/article/all/20250916/132395932/1#

(2) Incheon Airport Honorary Ambassador https://www.incheonilbo.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=1303295

(3) New variety show https://sports.donga.com/ent/article/all/20250916/132395932/1#

(4) New film's English name http://www.megaboxplusm.co.kr/board/detail?uid=30&keyword=&pg=1&num=19/

THANKS SO MUCH! 111.90.230.12 (talk) 02:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On WP: Deny

Apologies on improperly using this. I've read it and seen edits by other users on the same page citing it despite the previous edits being legitemate and not blocked / banned users. Like this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Park_Bo-gum&diff=prev&oldid=1311250955. The previous editor was even a bot and there were no errors on it. If it's not much of a bother, can you make me understand when to use it and when no to. Thank you. XxwvwxX (talk) 03:03, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh you were fine cause it actually was a vandal. My understanding of it is it's kinda like "don't feed the trolls" don't give them too much attention. Just revert, warn/report and move on. Pencilceaser123 (talk) 03:10, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. Thanks! XxwvwxX (talk) 03:32, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Katsuo_Watanabe

I noticed you deleted notable student from the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Katsuo_Watanabe, including two that are notable enough to have their own Wikipedia entries. Any Judoka that places in the Olympics or in a national tournament, or holds a high office in a Judo administrative body would be considered "notable". Nytomiki (talk) 20:27, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

well they should be red links then Pencilceaser123 (talk) 20:38, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 02:05:31, 27 October 2025 for assistance on AfC submission by Zackandquack

Zackandquack (talk · contribs)
- Anew (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Draft:Anew (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

My creation request for the album Anew was recently denied with the cited reason of "No more notability shown than last submission." I don't think this is in any way accurate, and believe the draft fulfills Wikipedia's notability requirements for music-related pages. Between the prior submission and this most recent one that was denied, I added a section noting the album reaching No. 1 on the Japanese Billboard chart as well as reaching No. 1 on the Oricon JP chart. This album is notable, was released by a notable band, and has been covered by multiple media sources that have been cited in the article. I don't understand what this draft is missing; it includes far more cited information than many of the band's other records.

Zackandquack (talk) 02:05, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

my apologies, I have looked at it again and on a second look I should have accepted it. If you submit it again I will accept it. Pencilceaser123 (talk) 02:10, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

👍 Thank u for the prompt response Zackandquack (talk) 03:59, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Pencilceaser123 (talk) 04:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anew (Album) has been accepted

Anew (Album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Pencilceaser123 (talk) 02:14, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lmao. I resubmitted an article I rejected cause I realised I was wrong Pencilceaser123 (talk) 02:18, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you do this the best way is to just revert your review edit and the decline on the user talk page. Also if you do have reason to submit for another user the AFCH tool allows you to submit unsubmitted drafts as the page creator or someone else. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 09:45, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah thanks Pencilceaser123 (talk) 20:04, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agender has been accepted

Agender, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have completed the page swap with some intervention by another editor. I will not try to explain what was done. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:12, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Siege of al-Fashir

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Siege of al-Fashir, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:05, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

oh damn, referncing has been weird for me Pencilceaser123 (talk) 03:07, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Al-Fasher Genocide from Satiliate.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Al-Fasher Genocide from Satiliate.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:54, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Pencilceaser123! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2025 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

Cielquiparle (talk) 07:23, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Al-Fasher Massacere perpatrator with victims.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Al-Fasher Massacere perpatrator with victims.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:02, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Normandy landings

You have been warned about bludgeoning the process at Talk:Normandy landings#Requested move 28 October 2025. The editor who warned you pointed you at Wikipedia:Don't bludgeon the process. In Wikipedia terms, bludgeoning is where someone attempts to force their point of view through a very high number of comments, such as contradicting every viewpoint that is different from their own. Typically, this means making the same argument over and over and to different people in the same discussion or across related discussions. This can happen on a talk page, deletion discussion, or... realistically, in any discussion on Wikipedia. This behaviour and conduct is undesirable, considered a form of disruptive editing, and is usually seen and reported as such when observed by other editors who are involved in the same discussion. So far, you have made 13 posts in a discussion involving 16 editors!

Do you know about WP:ANI? If you carry on bludgeoning the process, you may get taken there. It is not fun.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:57, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What? I dont see how I am bludgenoeing the process? Ill stop making so many posts alright but I was just making points, I never meant to upset anyone or anything? I am genuinely confused? Pencilceaser123 (talk) 09:08, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I never meant to upset anyone or anything yes, I know. That is why editors try to explain the problem to you. The purpose of the move discussion is see what other editors think, and why they think it. You do not need to answer nearly all of them. You made your point clear when you made your proposal. Most of your comments are just saying the same thing, over and over and over again in slightly different ways. -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:23, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright and thats all you had to say, your comment came off as implying bad faith. Ill make less comments, but the one you replied to specicly and said I was bludgenoing discussion confuses me. Because that one was a question, so of all of the talk page comments that one makes the most sense to reply to? Besides, that answer was saying different things to other replys. Anyway thank you. I wasnt aware making a lot of comments in a discussion was considered rude and disruptive, so thanks for pointing that out. Pencilceaser123 (talk) 21:55, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bludgeoning

Please be mindful not to WP:BLUDGEON discussions, such as at ITN recently. I see @Toddy1 has already told you about this and you should really stop making so many comments in discussions. Thanks, Chorchapu (talk | edits) 00:57, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I seriously don't understand how this is an issue, I've tried to make less comments without replying to things that don't need replies. But I have only been making comments were I feel it is necessary, such as clarifying my position, answering questions, or stating my opinion on various proposals. It's kinda hard for me to defend myself bcz it's not clear which discussions you are referring too. I appreciate what you're saying but I don't believe I am bludgeoning discussion as my replies vary in what they say, I don't repeat the same thing over and over now. Could you refer to some specific replies I should not have made? Pencilceaser123 (talk) 01:03, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Pencilceaser123 (talk) 01:03, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[1] for a start. And in the ongoing Al-Fashir discussion you have made 10 comments in a discussion with 14 people. Before you make a comment, stop and think if it's really necessary. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 01:16, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I also noticed you changed the Al-Fashir ongoing proposal to a blurb. Please don't do this as it can mislead other editors as to what the nominator was actually suggesting (I was among those confused). Chorchapu (talk | edits) 01:28, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry this was a mistake. I am new to ITN and was confused. Apologies. Pencilceaser123 (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! Chorchapu (talk | edits) 01:35, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry you can revert that, I was just trying to suggest a possible blurb if it did have a blurb but was confused, I didnt realise it was ongoing. Pencilceaser123 (talk) 01:36, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. However I dont understand what the reason behind why the first one is bad, they made an accusation they should not have made. I do think most of my comments are neccesary. Also of those 10 comments, 2 are replies to my own post (bcz sometimes replying is quicker than editing it) , 1 is an accidental duplicate of another one, and of the others 5 are justifying my blurb, which I didnt want people to misinterpret. Its true the ones about the blurb are largely duplicates but I felt people were misinterpreting the reason behind my blurb I chose and just needed context. I wasn’t sure how else to do it.

Question: one of the replies I got to a reply is saying there is no evidence mass killing is continuing, I disagree and sources generally consider it continuing (the statement "over a day or so" is especially wrong as the main stuff happened over a few days) so should I reply to that reply providing a reason for how its continuing? Or should I not? Pencilceaser123 (talk) 01:36, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My rule for myself is that, in general, if someone is either sorely mistaken, has misinterpreted something you said, or is asking you a question. Of course there are very broad guidelines with many caveats but it's a good place to start. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 01:40, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But what do I do regarding the above specific question? I guess you made you italitics bcz your explaining why I was wrong for the American reply thing, but I feel its fine to intervene if someone does something they shouldnt do (or maybe I should use that persons talk page for that?). What if someone isnt extremely mistaken but is saying something misleading. Pencilceaser123 (talk) 01:43, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For more niche cases it is best to use your own judgement. Take care, Chorchapu (talk | edits) 01:58, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you sorry Pencilceaser123 (talk) 02:10, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LLM generated sources

Hello, I noticed you used Selina Wamucii as a source to edit Trichilia ulei. It is an unreliable source due to being generated by a Large Language Model so I reverted the edit. The other two sites I'm aware of like this for plants are Botanikks and botanicalrealm.com If you have any questions WP:PING me here or ask on my talk page. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 04:29, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh damn huh sorry didn't know that. I'll avoid that in future Pencilceaser123 (talk) 05:50, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not a big deal. I know they are at the top of the web results for a lot of little know plants.

For something like Trichilia ulei the first place I look for a source is archive.org in their collection of books. There are a few sources there, some even in English. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 14:12, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help

hello, can you help me? another editor is denying my notes on the talk page saying that it is denied. I am not trolling, i am not blocked and i’m also not a sock. I just don’t have an account and have a dynamic IP. (i am all the user replying in the section below) can you look into it? they also archived my discussion unceremoniously. :( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Park_Bo-gum/Archive_1#Notes ~2025-32089-01 (talk) 10:40, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Satellite image of Alsen village, west of el-Fasher, showing a bern constructed through the village.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Satellite image of Alsen village, west of el-Fasher, showing a bern constructed through the village.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of El Fasher massacre has failed

Your good article nomination of the article El Fasher massacre has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 10:45, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Agender

On 20 November 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Agender, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some people identify with no gender? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Agender. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Agender), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:04, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]