User talk:Chidgk1

Guild of Copy Editors Requests

Hello, Chidgk1. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Diesel Exhaust at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! TNM101 (chat) 06:31, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CO2-Plume Geothermal has been accepted

CO2-Plume Geothermal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

qcne (talk) 13:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COI

I'm curious as to why you would create an article with the edit summary "I don't have a conflict of interest"; is there a reason someone would think you would? 331dot (talk) 12:17, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I don’t think so Chidgk1 (talk) 12:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

Why are references getting put after commas and periods and not before? As most wikis have it after. Laffuble (talk) 01:46, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean before. Laffuble (talk) 01:47, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LaffubleSorry I don’t know why Wikipedia has that standard Chidgk1 (talk) 12:15, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.

Thanks.Laffuble (talk) Laffuble (talk) 12:48, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Chidgk1. Thank you for your work on Samsun-Sivas Regional. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:13, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings of the season

~ ~ ~ Greetings of the season ~ ~ ~

Hello Chidgk1: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Spread the love; use {{subst:User:Dustfreeworld/Xmas3}} to send this message.

--Dustfreeworld (talk) 13:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Toprakkale–İskendurun railway

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Toprakkale–İskendurun railway, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Afşin-Elbistan power stations

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Afşin-Elbistan power stations you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BigChrisKenney -- BigChrisKenney (talk) 05:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are making a high number of AfD nominations in Wikipedia:WikiProject Turkey

Hello Chidgk1. I recently started watching Wikipedia:WikiProject Turkey/Article alerts. You seem to be making a high number of AfDs. Most recent AfDs seem to be from you actually.

Given the Eurocentric bias in English-language Wikipedia (also see: Signpost Are Wikipedia articles representative of Western or world knowledge? ), I am concerned that you are contributing to that.

There are very few Turkish speakers on English-language Wikipedia, and you are much more active than most of them. I'd recommend more time to be given for sources to be found. You also don't seem to try to find sources yourself, for example: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Orduspor_(women's_basketball). If you are very interested in AfDs in Turkey-related topics, but you don't speak Turkish, you can also try google translate? Bogazicili (talk) 12:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Bogazicili I am glad you are watching those alerts.

Most of the articles I nominated had been tagged years ago for having no sources. So I think there has been plenty of time for sources to be found.

And as I have also created and improved several articles about Turkey I don’t think I have increased any Eurocentric bias. Chidgk1 (talk) 16:08, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok thanks. I just wanted to draw your attention to that signpost issue and Wikipedia:Systemic bias.

I might be also in a suspicious Wiki mood lately given the large number of socks in a topic area I'm involved in. I hope you don't take this personally :) Bogazicili (talk) 16:19, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. I am very rarely in Istanbul (maybe once or twice a year) but if you live there we could perhaps meet up some time. Or indeed if you are ever in Samsun Chidgk1 (talk) 16:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bogazicili: just a note that your first linked article appears to code Turkey as European (see for example Turkish appearing in the chart of European languages)... So the "euro" in Eurocentric bias includes Turkey. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Horse Eye's Back I was a bit peeved with https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/jan/06/london-is-europes-most-congested-city-with-drivers-sat-in-traffic-an-average-101-hours-last-year when I looked at the survey and they had classified Istanbul as in Asia. @Bogazicili would know better than me but I suspect most of the Istanbul congestion is on the European side or on the bridges. Chidgk1 (talk) 16:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Horse Eye's Back: I had just read the "Main findings summary" on page 6. Bogazicili (talk) 16:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Afşin-Elbistan power stations

The article Afşin-Elbistan power stations you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Afşin-Elbistan power stations for comments about the article, and Talk:Afşin-Elbistan power stations/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BigChrisKenney -- BigChrisKenney (talk) 00:21, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Busy

I have been busy, I have not touched it in weeks. And I thought we were done with the Wikipedia. Laffuble (talk) 19:15, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Forests in Turkey

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Forests in Turkey you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit -- Reconrabbit (talk) 19:44, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Forests in Turkey

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Forests in Turkey, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

High number of AfD for Turkish train articles

Hi,

Over the past several months I have noticed you consistently nominate many Turkish railway articles for deletion. It seems your rationale is that they are unsourced, therefore I believe it would be more productive if instead you would bring them the attention of the community instead of nominating them for deletion right away. May I ask why you are doing this? Cheers. (Central Data Bank (talk) 18:18, 22 January 2025 (UTC))[reply]

@Central Data Bank Not specifically rail articles but completely unsourced articles at https://bambots.brucemyers.com/cwb/bycat/Turkey.html#Cites%20no%20sources

Wikiproject Turkey is not very active but I brought them to the attention of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains/Archive: 2024#Turkey

Reasons:

1) A little bit of relaxation after trying to get GA for other articles.

2) If the number of completely unsourced articles tagged with the Turkey Wikiproject are reduced then PERHAPS articles in the project generally will be considered more reliable when AI hoovers up info from Wikipedia. So it MIGHT benefit the project as a whole. Chidgk1 (talk) 06:36, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Chidgk1 thanks for clarifying. Unfortunately railway articles on Turkey are not high priority for most so only a handful of users (myself included) take time to edit them, which becomes quite difficult with life getting in the way. Looking through the IZBAN articles, I can see that updates are required for them, as they were created over a decade ago. I have been slowly working on improving them over the past few months, but like I said, I can't promise a timeline. Your most recent tags will be the next articles I source and expand upon. Cheers. Central Data Bank (talk) 10:30, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Climate change in Turkey

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Climate change in Turkey, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:49, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of Ramsar sites in Turkey

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Ramsar sites in Turkey, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:49, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Forests in Turkey

The article Forests in Turkey you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Forests in Turkey for comments about the article, and Talk:Forests in Turkey/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit -- Reconrabbit (talk) 15:23, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Responding to alt text question

Hi! I just wanted to respond about your Help desk question, which got archived off the desk. If I'm understanding things correctly from reading over the Phabricator discussions, you can save default alt text for a media file on Commons (which is what you did), but, Mediawiki (the software behind Wikipedia and all its sister projects) doesn't do anything with it currently. The software has yet to be extended to pull alt text from an "external" source such as Commons.

Unfortunately, at present you'll have to copy-and-paste the alt text over onto English Wikipedia. This could be semi-automated with a userscript, though I'm not aware of one existing; you could dig into it or ask at the tech village pump if interested. I hope that helps clarify things. Thank you for contributing to the projects, and if you have any other questions ask away, or feel free to drop by my talk page in the future! --Slowking Man (talk) 22:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for explaining Chidgk1 (talk) 06:02, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

About Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egekent 2 railway station

The ping seems to have failed, I've seen it once I checked whether the discussion was closed. İzmir–Afyon railway is a main line, thus fullfills the third point on WP:RAILOUTCOMES. But there isn't really a well-established guideline about the stations. I personally do consider any stations on the major suburban networks or metro systems as inherently notable, but really hard to get past behind trivial coverage on the Net, especially on a non-English speaking country. There are few written books on such topics as well, so articles have to rely on non-secondary sources such as forums, blogs, wikis. It still fulfills the WP:GNG and avoiding article creep IMHO.

I felt like I'd write all that down because I've seen other noms, and didn't want to bother with answering these too; yet my reply on Egekent 2 was also vague as well, at least when I read it now&then. I have expected others to take part, but well. Maybe taking a third opinion on the subject would be nice. Regards & have a nice day,

Edit: There also might be some non-trivial but hard-to-cite or omitted stuff on the subject. I was reminded of that after looking at Ayrılık Çeşmesi railway station—I know the station gets frequent coverage as people prefer the station for suicide owing to its name. However the news about suicides are often censored, and thus I don't see a way for citing without original research/self-publishing a primary source, which would violate impartiality and unethical as well. ahmetlii ^✉ _{(Please ping me on a reply!)} 22:59, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I have copied this to the article talk page for the benefit of future editors Chidgk1 (talk) 06:35, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Flora of Turkey

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Flora of Turkey, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:51, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Afşin-Elbistan power stations

On 5 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Afşin-Elbistan power stations, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Turkey approved the expansion of a coal-fired power station while also bidding to host the 2026 United Nations Climate Change Conference? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Afşin-Elbistan power stations. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Afşin-Elbistan power stations), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Really great writing and research - thank you No Swan So Fine (talk) 23:14, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious

Four years!

Thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:47, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ensete perrieri

On 17 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ensete perrieri, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that botanists at Kew Gardens suggested in 2018 that there were only three Madagascar banana trees left? You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ensete perrieri), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:04, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hey there, I'd say you deserve one of these! BTW I'm one of those programmer dorks who just loves wading through all that lovely markup syntax, so you're welcome to bug me for assistance with that template stuff anytime. Happy editing! Slowking Man (talk) 16:23, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing at Talk:Russian invasion of Ukraine#Requested move 24 February 2025

Hi. Thanks for contributing to this discussion. Since more than one move has been proposed (Russia-Ukraine war and Russo-Ukrainian war among them) it might be helpful to the closer to indicate which name you favour moving to. Additionally, if you also favour moving the existing Russo-Ukrainian war article (written from a POV that the present war began in 2014), for example to Russo-Ukrainian conflict, you may also wish to indicate this.

I hope you don't mind me responding here to avoid making the discussion there overly-long. Thanks again for your contribution. FOARP (talk) 09:38, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@FOARP Sorry maybe I misunderstood the question. I have now removed my vote because the discussion is too long and complicated for me to spend time trying to understand Chidgk1 (talk) 12:33, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. FOARP (talk) 13:02, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2024 United Nations Biodiversity Conference

On 4 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 United Nations Biodiversity Conference, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 18:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:46, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:45, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:57, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:08, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:24, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:06, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:58, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:49, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:37, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:07, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:11, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:51, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:33, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:04, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:04, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:37, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:22, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Kızılırmak Delta

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-024-01843-2, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:36, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - I was about to change it - should have done so in my sandbox Chidgk1 (talk) 12:31, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just for future reference, copying copyrighted text to a sandbox would also not be allowed. The best way is to take notes while reading, and then writing immediately in your own words. The second-best solution is to copy offline to Word and then paraphrase. Hope that helps :). —Femke 🐦 (talk) 09:39, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Completed copyedit!

I've finally completed my copyedit of Kızılırmak Delta. I definitely went beyond the typical definition of "copyedit" in a few places almost everywhere, but I do think the prose is now clear and concise enough that it shouldn't be a serious barrier to the article's promotion to GA. I've added more comments at Talk:Kızılırmak Delta#Post-copyedit comments. PrinceTortoise (he/him • poke) 07:50, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great thanks - I hope to take a look tomorrow Chidgk1 (talk) 12:22, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting tip

Morning. I was just looking at our article on net-zero emissions and noticed that you changed to first sentence to be quite complicated [1]. The construction you've used there is called WP:PLUSING, or a noun + ing structure. This can be an ambiguous structure, but here the problem lies in the fact that the relevant verb takes a while to materialise. By the point people read 'being', you may have lost them already. I believe I've seen you do this before, so wanted to make you aware of the copyediting exercises linked in WP:PLUSING :). —Femke 🐦 (talk) 09:44, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah OK thanks I had not realised that - my feeble excuse is that my writing has been corrupted by hearing Turkish where the verb is the last word in the sentence. Chidgk1 (talk) 07:37, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kızılırmak Delta

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kızılırmak Delta, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:22, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The World Destubathon

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to help you buy books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for articles which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well done

Good job restoring and responding to a indef-blocked sockpuppet! 173.79.19.248 (talk) 22:56, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I don’t understand what you mean. The deletion on the talk page did not have any change description to say that the user had been blocked. If I had known it was a sockpuppet of course I would not have restored the content or wasted my time responding to them. Who are you anyway? Chidgk1 (talk) 05:56, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you had spent two seconds investigating, or asked, I would have been happy to explain it to you. Who are you, anyway? 173.79.19.248 (talk) 11:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lol now you've done it a second time; hilarious, excellent work. 173.79.19.248 (talk) 22:51, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Codru (forest)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Codru (forest), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:35, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Panama Party

Hello, I haven't been able to find any truly credible sources for this article. Socialist Workers Front (Marxist–Leninist) I don't know if there was an AFD. 201.225.6.229 (talk) 12:06, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you think it should be deleted you can propose deletion yourself I think Chidgk1 (talk) 17:40, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PROMOTION

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Block_of_Wikipedia_in_Turkey&diff=prev&oldid=892560284

VPNs can be used for every browser not special to Opera browser, this edit just sounds like COI/paid edit. Throat0390 (talk) 03:56, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Throat0390I have never had any connection with Opera Chidgk1 (talk) 06:38, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs for exonym lists

Hey Chidgk1,

I'm kinda new to AfDs, so I don't say this with any sort of authority on the subject, but with all the exonym articles you are nominating for deletion, it might make more sense to do a group nomination so that they can receive adequate attention from a larger group of editors. It seems like some might be slipping through the cracks and not generating much discussion.

I only say this as someone who spends a lot of time working on lists and articles for surnames, it would be really distressing to have to defend all of them separately, so I image this could be really meaningful to someone who does the same sort of thing for exonyms. Obviously, it is completely your call, but I wanted to make the suggestion.

Sincerely,

Ike Lek (talk) 05:41, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ike Lek Good idea but someone else already did that and it was rejected because some are worth keeping Chidgk1 (talk) 06:38, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bördübet

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bördübet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sweetabena (talk) 08:47, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

removal of active aircraft number of russian air force page

why did you remove the number of aircraft? 103.244.143.171 (talk) 16:37, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List of active Russian military aircraft#Remove the numbers columns as unreliable? Chidgk1 (talk) 17:43, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Safahat

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Safahat, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:52, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PROD

When you add a PROD template, your message should only give your reason and reference notability or deletion policy. Given your areas of interest, the most relevant ones to you are probably WP:ORG and WP:NPOL. Do not ask rhetorical questions or leave snarky comments addressed to nobody or editors at large. Other editors are less likely to back up your proposals if they think you are not doing things seriously. Yue🌙 07:10, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Yue I just do the prod and afd to relax after doing difficult serious stuff like recreating Coal-fired power station. If anyone wanted to start prods and afds seriously I guess they would try and automate them further. Chidgk1 (talk) 07:35, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Chidgk1: You can still relax and do AfDs and PRODs properly. I assumed in good faith that you understand deletion policy and how to do WP:BEFORE, which is why I merely insisted you have a clear, policy-based PROD message. However, your suggestion that someone who would want to do PRODs and AfDs "seriously ... would try and automate them further" leads me to believe you do not understand WP:BEFORE.

An article lacking sources presently is not immediate grounds for deletion; you are supposed to conduct a search yourself and conclude that no reliable, in-depth coverage exists. However, a lot of the reasons you give in your PRODs and AfDs amounts to asking for someone else out there to prove notability or just stating that there are no sources.

Here are two examples of your proposed deletions being undone by different editors because you did not give a proper rationale (by Liz and by Kvng). Starting an improper PROD is wasting the time and effort of two editors, albeit very little; starting an improper AfD is wasting a lot of time and effort for everyone. Yue🌙 18:46, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chidgk1, I take your response as an indication that you don't promise to leave a well thought-out policy-based deletion rationale behind for PRODs and AFDs. This is not an appropriate response to a fellow editor's valid concern. If you are tired at the end of the day, you should not be tagging articles for deletion or doing them carelessly. I just saw a PROD you tagged with the comment "I doubt this is notable". That's not a good reason to delete an article because one editor doesn't think, for the 5 seconds they spent on it, that a subject is notable. BEFOREs are not required for PROD'd articles but you should still have a good, policy-based reason for deletion that is based on more than your doubts.

And the answer here is not to use more automation but for the tagger (YOU) to be more conscientious when you are considering tagging an article for deletion. You can easily receive a topic ban from deletion tagging if the effort is too much to ask of you. If you don't have the time or attention, then don't tag an article or file for deletion, it's as simple as that. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:51, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz@Yue You may be interested in discussions I have started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Unreferenced articles#Roughly what proportion of unreferenced articles have no active projects? and Wikipedia_talk:Proposed_deletion#I_suggest_making_this_easier_for_the_proposer Chidgk1 (talk) 07:10, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to start de-PRODding articles that don't have a valid, policy-based deletion rationale provided. "Not much is known about it" is not a valid policy-based deletion rationale. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:30, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure - if there is any doubt just deprod and don’t waste time thinking about it Chidgk1 (talk) 04:37, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Social cost of carbon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Social cost of carbon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social cost of carbon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Iljhgtn (talk) 08:27, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Kızılırmak Delta is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Kızılırmak Delta is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alpha Beta Delta Lambda -- Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 11:44, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Kızılırmak Delta is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Kızılırmak Delta has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alpha Beta Delta Lambda -- Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 13:44, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ever-growing Wheat

Dear Chidgk 1, you'll be aware I'm trying to keep the Wheat from growing even larger. It is already a long article, and people are capable of raising a GA Review on the grounds of excessive length. Continual additions obviously make the risk of this steadily worse. I spent a good deal of time yesterday, not for the first time, working on reducing the article's length, so it is dispiriting to have yet another length increase this morning. "Worth mentioning" is how one talks when one is trying to build up an article; alternately, we could ask "is this really necessary?" when trying to prevent something from getting ever more seriously overweight. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:57, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiswick Chap Firstly sorry for temporarily making the GA worse, but I could not see any other way of getting rid of the rubbish that was in the peak wheat article as deleting such articles is very difficult. I think that our changes together have now strengthened Wikipedias coverage of wheat as a whole. Chidgk1 (talk) 07:18, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Let's hope so. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:27, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kızılırmak Delta

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kızılırmak Delta, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:04, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review suggested on Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change

Good morning, I am writing to follow up on our request to edit the page Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change, which is available on the talk page Talk:Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change. Thank you in advance for your feedback, User:Aglauda 09:44, 20 August 2025 (CEST)

Hi! I finalized our last comments on the page Talk:Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change, would you mind checking out the Updating 'Mission' section and Citations paragraphs? Thank you! User:Aglauda 12:36, 5 September 2025 (CEST)

AfDs

My point about PRODs about a month ago is even more important for AfDs. PRODs and AfDs are not processes used to cleanup articles lacking citations. The first consideration when coming upon an unsourced article is adding citations yourself and then proposing deletion after you've checked for sources yourself.

You should not be tagging articles with PRODs that merely state "Not notable" or something similar and then escalating to an AfD with the same non-policy-based reason. You have to explain in detail how you determined something is not notable to show you've done WP:BEFORE. PRODs and AfDs aren't something you do half-heartedly, which you kind of implied in the previous discussion. Your response to another editor at your AfD nomination of Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (Manitoba) reminds me of your attitude in our previous discussion, which is quite dismissive, and it seems you didn't really take what I said about the onus being on you, not other editors, to do WP:BEFORE before nominating articles for deletion. You can make mistakes – I've made a few with AfDs – but you can't then turn that on other editors with comments like "If the provincial branch was as famous as you say then it should be quick and easy for you to cite". Yue🌙 04:08, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I came here, @Yue because @Chidgk1 is ignoring their own AFD at CCF MB. Possible the most unnecessary AFD I've ever seen. I hadn't realised this was an ongoing problem - but reading a bit, I see that this has been an ongoing issue for months, if not longer. I can understand a mistake, which is then withdrawn quickly. But for not providing a proper nomination reason and not doing any BEFORE, and refusing to listen to those pointing out how extremely poor an AFD, and skipping the discussion?This seems to be a systemic issue. Is it time for a request at ANI for a topic ban from PROD and AFD? Nfitz (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Nfitz: Without prejudice to Chidgk1's intentions (i.e. I assume they're not intentionally trying to be disruptive), I think the discussions here and at their failed proposal to turn PRODs into a form of fast-track cleanup by eliminating the requirement of WP:BEFORE, which they were specifically criticised for, should have made it clear to them that the deletion process is not some minor form of article cleanup, and nobody but themself has a desire to change that.

To be blunt, I don't think lazily flooding the PROD and AfD system with unjustified nominations as a past-time is helpful to the project because they waste the time of other editors, particularly responding administrators. It's also quite audacious to then respond to critiques by others editors by asking them to do the work for you. If Chidgk1 doesn't want to take the deletion process seriously because they just want to engage with it as a form of relaxation as they have said, then they shouldn't be engaging with it at all. Yue🌙 18:37, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. And digging into their history, I'm pleased to see some excellent editing work. I am troubled though that they find pissing off people by ignoring policy and creating work for otherse is a form of relaxation! Hopefully they can think about the bigger picture of their actions. 02:16, 4 September 2025 (UTC) Nfitz (talk) 02:16, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Analog sampled filter
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crawl ratio
• Delay box (prod)
• Underseal (prod)

What's an appropriate sanction here? Because this ongoing process of "pissing off people by ignoring policy and creating work for others" has gone on long enough. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:21, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Andy Dingley@Nfitz@Yue OK I have removed twinkle from my gadgets. As far as I can remember I have never done a manual AfD and I never intend to go through such a fiddle.

As for PROD after doing one or two manually I would be fed up with such typing and would stop for the day.

I don’t know if it is possible to technically block me from using twinkle, but if so you could do so and have me make some kind of formal request to get it back. I think that would be better as now I can just tick a box to get it back. And if you can technically block me from AfD that would be great. Chidgk1 (talk) 09:18, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I'm not particularly versed in these topic areas. I'm surprised that they are completely unreferenced. But "underseal", really - how is something that is so well known going to pass any BEFORE? But also - why not just fix the articles (and why do these just languish)? The crawl ratio article is certainly an interesting read. Should the nomination for most of these AFDs be to merge, and not to delete? Anyhow, this is appears to be over ... so I guess we just move on. Nfitz (talk) 18:45, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aragua State Anthem

The Spanish article has potentially sources. Bearian (talk) 10:38, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your copy edit request for Panthera pardus tulliana

Hello, Chidgk1. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Panthera pardus tulliana at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! 🫎 moose 💬 10:36, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Kızılırmak Delta has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Kızılırmak Delta has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alpha Beta Delta Lambda -- Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 18:06, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ottoman Defters

Hi,

Do you know if the Ottoman defter tax records are available somewhere online?

Thanks 130.215.219.71 (talk) 15:42, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your additions on the draftpage Humus form

Thanks a lot for your fruitful contribution to improving this page. Now I will await some time before adding more text and references. I created a page in French (my own language) on the same subject. Do not hesitate to make addtions (and deletions) from your side. Thanks also for the illustration. Great! Jfponge 15:02, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Solar power, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kızılırmak Delta

On 25 October 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kızılırmak Delta, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that three-quarters of Turkey's bird species live in the Kızılırmak Delta? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kızılırmak Delta. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kızılırmak Delta), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Plural wikilinks

Please see MOS:LINK for the correct way to insert plural wikilinks. Use [[lagoon]]s instead of [[Lagoon|lagoons]]. I notice you frequently format this incorrectly. Best wishes. Flibirigit (talk) 13:46, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Humus form

On 30 October 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Humus form, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that mull, mor and modor are humus forms? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Humus form. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Humus form), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]