User talk:Criticize

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Criticize! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Pbritti (talk) 23:18, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reversal of my edit on Denis Ten page

[edit]

Hi, I was wondering why my recent edit was reverted in the programs section of the Denis Ten page? That section has the 2010-2011 section focused on two pieces by Franz Liszt in the free skating section, and I knew that if there were two or more works by the same composer, I would erase the first 'by Franz Liszt' and make it look like those works were by the same composer? I was surprised when I went to the contributions section of Wikipedia to find that my edit was reverted. Could you help to restore it? I was just doing that to improve, not to harm, the article. Sincerely, Meaghan Brown 108.26.172.49 (talk) 00:55, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert this edit?

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jonas_Kersken&diff=prev&oldid=1296449430 176.108.139.1 (talk) 02:32, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That was a mistake. I have corrected it back to yours Criticize (talk) 02:37, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Explanations

[edit]

Why did you revert my edit here? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=24-hour_clock&oldid=1296444264

I know there is a source, but the full meaning of "wee hours" would be "wee hours of the morning". And the period between 00:00 and 06:00 is postmidnight, and is not morning. 168.232.221.4 (talk) 04:49, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

Why did you revert vandalism to my user subpage then restore it? --pro-anti-air (talk) 20:36, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, can you try to leave warnings on the talk pages when reverting edits? --pro-anti-air (talk) 20:38, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Bengali queer literature, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:24, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Criticize (talk) 08:39, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]

Hello Criticize. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Referentis (talk) 22:37, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Advice kindly received. Criticize (talk) 22:45, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My Mistake

[edit]

Sorry Citicize, I didn't see the box to put the explanation. 2600:1000:A022:570F:B0F7:6F7E:3314:3830 (talk) 17:26, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oops :)

[edit]

Hi Criticize, thanks for the revert at Tom Fernandez – if possible, remember to check if there might have been other vandalism in the revision reverted to. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:28, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

why remove Ian Wright controversy?

[edit]

I would argue this needs to be included as it's totally relevant to what she represents in 2025 with her deflective comments 92.25.249.186 (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your reversion on Reservation in India. This is because I think VikingV1's edit is constructive. While I feel that the specific wording can be improved, I think saying that the student 'committed suicide' is clearer and more encyclopedic than a 'tragic incident'. If you disagree, I think the best thing to do is discuss the section on the article's talk page. Best regards, QwertyForest (talk) 17:42, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Paapa Essiedu

[edit]

Why do they erase that he is going to be severe Sanape? Do you take it off because you don't like it? 2806:250:414:C55B:E9B7:3D2E:B89E:A61D (talk) 02:51, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're A Manual Revert Legend!!!!

[edit]

Hey Criticize!

I believe you don't have that crummy rollback thing yet, but how on earth are you fighting vandalism so quickly using manual revert???

I only read articles here, but I have never seen anyone on Wiki undo edits so quickly with the manual revert tag attached to them.

You're incredible!!

You must be some tech wizard or something, but i can't thankyou enough for working hard to keep my most admired articles safe from stubborn IPs just in time.

So just thought I could leave this here to give your page some respect! I truly appreciate your online activity and your vandal awareness skills.

Keep up the good work! Best Regards. Xpad (talk) 10:20, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly received with gratitude. May you prevail in all that you do. Criticize (talk) 12:34, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick action here Earlier yesterday.
Maybe one day you should consider running for Admin if you keep this up.
My Warrior đŸ’Ș Xpad (talk) 21:49, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bloordale Beach

[edit]

Hey Criticize,

I noticed you helped revert an edit to the page on Bloordale Beach by someone who deleted a bunch of significant info from that page. Thanks. There's someone falsely trying to take credit for creating the "Beach", and presumably they are the person making those deletions. Your help reverting it is appreciated. If you'd like more information, you could contact the person who created the beach at the email address on the "statement from the person who created the beach" document that's linked on the Bloordale Beach page. They'd be happy to tell you the story and answer any questions... The deletion of this information (which amounts to reporting the existence of and summarizing the contents of a statement from the creator of the beach, and adding photographs of the beach) is vandalism with an agenda, which is frustrating. Perhaps you can help prevent further deletions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.65.22.120 (talk) 01:48, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ma'am/Sir, your message is kindly considered. Honestly, i have never emailed anyone before. So i'm not familiar with doing this.
However, i am willing to watch out for that page if you require me to do so.
No problem at all.
I wish you the best wherever you are in the world. Criticize (talk) 12:33, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FAST channel with OTA feed

[edit]

Ion Television should not be included as it converted to a FAST channel in 2021 , which effectively eliminates the need for an OTA feed for the network anyways since its launch in 1998 as PAX TV. In fact, why not let Ion Television shut down it's broadcast television feed as it converts to an internet-only channel, just like its sister network Ion Plus? 72.134.38.53 (talk) 03:08, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pernia Qureshi

[edit]

I noticed you reverted the edits of some information I removed on Pernia Qureshi, I removed it because the supporting articles were going outdated and irrelevant and I also updated some relevant and new information so I hope I can make that update again as I edited it. 122.161.48.60 (talk) 10:58, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial University of Dorpat

[edit]

Imperial University of Dorpat - why did you undo my insertion of a link to that institution in the article Alfred Wilhelm Volkmann? 89.12.205.245 (talk) 11:54, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Monitoring the Mentalism page

[edit]

Hey!

Just wanted to say thanks for monitoring the mentalism page. I've had talks with the person trying to shove their work on the page. He claims he's trying to include the information to ensure the public knows that Mentalism isn't "real" per se. This of course is already visible on the page and rather easy to see. Thanks for the help, Xobr Xobr21037 (talk) 13:47, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Criticize! Thank you for your guidance. I just tried to organize the informations about Mr. Ripoli's family! Is it posible or not? TerĂȘncio60 (talk) 20:32, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User talk page reversions

[edit]

Just a courtesy reminder to you that talk page reversions are generally allowed in most circumstances. See WP:NOTWALLOFSHAME. đŸȘ· nahida 22:22, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]