User talk:Pandachini bananini

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:05, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pandachini bananini (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

because i dont know what i did wrong by asking climater67 cappuccino assassino and panam2014 plus im sorry ); please also please write down what i did wrong

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:29, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pandachini bananini (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand I wont do any damage to wikipedia if its unnecessary what i have wrote i will delete it please warn me next time i am about to get blocked please i promise i wont do any thing bad to Wikipedia's pages. I vow and swear to god i wont do any damage im cathalic by the way just please warn me next time. Thank you for your time. :)

Decline reason:

From your unblock request, it isn't clear if you are denying being Cupaccino Assassino. WP:CIR appears to apply here. I am declining your unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 12:49, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pandachini bananini (talk) 05:47, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pandachini bananini (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for posting disruptive comments on Wikipedia by being cappuccino assassino i understand what ive done. thank you for your time :)

Decline reason:

The socking is one part of the problem (I note for the record that there was also Android Shadow (talk · contribs)). The other part is that your contributions don't demonstrate that you're willing to contribute constructively, and this unblock request does little to change that. --Blablubbs (talk) 10:32, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pandachini bananini (talk) 10:37, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

please

help Pandachini bananini (talk) 06:02, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Administrators are volunteers, and there is a long queue of unblock requests, so your request may take time to be reviewed. There is no set order or time promised for when unblock requests are reviewed, so you need to wait until it has been done. This could be several days or even weeks, depending on the backlog of requests. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:36, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pandachini bananini, please list all of the accounts you have created/used on Wikipedia. Thank you. -- asilvering (talk) 05:46, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since your previous unblock request has now been declined, I'll state that I might be willing to unblock you, but I'd need to hear the answer to this question first before even considering it. -- asilvering (talk) 12:05, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you Pandachini bananini (talk) 10:49, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pandachini bananini (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wont do sock puppetry ever again and, i've had a long time to think about it then i realised what i have done is frustrating for administration and annoying for the people who read the information i edited. Its also foul to myself. I am sorry and i will try my very best to not do anything wrong. (especially sockpuppetry)

Decline reason:

In lieu of the open one below which answers @Asilvering:'s query Star Mississippi 13:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pandachini bananini (talk) 10:59, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pandachini bananini, asilvering has shown a willingness to consider unblocking you, but asked you to list all the accounts you've used on Wikipedia. I strongly suggest you take that seriously; being responsive to such a question is far more likely to be helpful than just a simple apology. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 15:16, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I would go so far as to say that no administrator will consider an unblock until you do. -- asilvering (talk) 19:52, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pandachini bananini (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My sockpuppetry acounts are: Android Shadow Cappuccino Assassino. And if there are any more please write them down because those are all I remember. Never again will I do trolling/sockpuppetry on Wikipedia ever again I am sorry.

          Kind regards,
            
                                                         Pandachini bananini.

Decline reason:

Please do not simultaneously request to be unblocked on multiple accounts. To reviewing admins: User:Isma4l also requested to be unblocked, naming User:Android Shadow and User:Cupaccino Assassino as alt accounts. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:45, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pandachini bananini (talk) 06:28, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And tralalelo tralala/tralalero tralala i think this is one of my users that were sockpuppetry i might be wrong. Pandachini bananini (talk) 06:53, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pandachini bananini, what kinds of edits are you interested in making on wikipedia? Obviously, you signed up to vandalize and now regret it. But do you intend to start contributing constructively to Wikipedia articles? (If not, that's okay too.) -- asilvering (talk) 13:35, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yes, check on "these are the edits i would like to do" section. (look below) Pandachini bananini (talk) 11:36, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it'll be a long time before you'd be able to convince the community that you're ready to be an admin. Usually that takes at least two years of really high-quality editing, and you're kind of starting from zero over here.

@Ponyo, how's this: I'll convert this to a p-block from mainspace that expires in two years. If they manage to convince me or some other admin that their edits are well-considered enough to be allowed into mainspace directly, we can lift the block. If they vandalize again we'll just reblock for the rest of the two years (and maybe TPA revoke). I think the reason for the timing should be pretty obvious but if not, email me. -- asilvering (talk) 21:18, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering thank you,

one of the reasons i would like to be unblocked is because those acounts are my first times using Wikipedia and when i was using it i had no idea there were blocks or bans and don't you think that people should get one more chance to prove themselves?

Also Wikipedia has information nothing else has, which is great and ever since i realised how bad Wikipedia is getting vandalised and i would like to stop Wikipedia from going useless, unhelpful and only used for tomfoolery because there are many people in the world who will destroy Wikipedia and i cant watch that happen so i would like to ban (or block if i get to) those people to stop them from breaking our community, Wikipedia.

So if i could get a second chance it would be a pleasure and thank you @Asilvering and @Ponyo for helping me realise that.

So please could you unblock me.

Thank you Pandachini bananini (talk) 21:56, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

asilvering and Ponyo: This editor has also requested to be unblocked at User talk:Isma4l, naming the same two alternate accounts. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:47, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful. @Pandachini bananini, I'll be revoking talk page access from all of your accounts. You cannot continue to use multiple accounts while requesting an unblock. -- asilvering (talk) 07:03, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

these are the edits I would like to do

yes I would now like to fix Wikipedia's pages probably punctuation, uneeded information and I would like to be admin do protect Wikipedia because ever since I realized what i have done i would like to prevent that from happening again. Pandachini bananini (talk) 20:58, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

and if i get adminship i will never use it as an advantage over people or as revenge Pandachini bananini (talk) 11:43, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. asilvering (talk) 07:10, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]