User talk:Worldhisotrylover20

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

September 2025

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Purple People Bridge have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:03, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flag of Georgia (U.S. state). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Flag of Georgia (U.S. state) was changed by Worldhisotrylover20 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.93544 on 2025-09-19T02:29:33+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:29, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Too many pages to list. You are edit warring (WP:3RR) to force in either WP:OR or blatantly unsourced WP:RS and telling people to read other articles instead. Most of your edits are uncited or without edit summaries, or falsely marked as minor WP:RS WP:EDITSUMMARY WP:MINOR. Also you have cast WP:ASPERSIONS about other editors' motives regarding racism and hate. — Smuckola(talk) 00:16, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nation of Islam

[edit]

It is extraordinary that you would think that not describing NoI as "Islamic" in the opening sentence is "whitewashing". I can only assume that you think that there is something inherently negative about Islam. Most old world muslims and scholars of Islam regard NoI as completely heretical as it has its own novel, idiosyncratic and (from their point of view) blasphemous interpretation of Islam (eg believing in a succession of gods, whereas the central tenet of Islam is 'one god'). Most NoI members probably see it as a legitimate form of Islam. From WP's PoV, the (tenuous) relationship between NoI and Islam is recorded later in the lead. Pincrete (talk) 04:07, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 23:44, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Haroon Rashid Aswat have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:46, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was changed by Worldhisotrylover20 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.947096 on 2025-09-25T18:51:42+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:51, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm ArachnidInner. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fourth Reich, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. (Arachnid's userpage | what did I do now) 20:41, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hi Worldhisotrylover20! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Pierre Laval and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. and many other edits Doug Weller talk 07:40, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He was put to death for Nazi collaboration, thats a fact. Why are we defending objectively questionable peoples actions? Worldhisotrylover20 (talk) 16:18, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your reply is a non sequitur. Doug Weller talk 17:46, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This one is even worse.[1] In fact I’m spoiled for choice. Doug Weller talk 17:50, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I swear that one was na accident. The other one wasn’t though, because it already states he was a Nazi collaborator, and was put to death for that, hence why I added that. Worldhisotrylover20 (talk) 21:39, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to OS X Mavericks. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Criticize (talk) 01:39, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to OS X Mavericks, you may be blocked from editing. Criticize (talk) 01:43, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not vandalism, ars technical review mentions it Worldhisotrylover20 (talk) 01:45, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.[2] --Hipal (talk) 15:38, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.Trade (talk) 13:50, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Yamla (talk) 11:39, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]