User talk:Bollardant

This is Bollardant's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kandara Airport has been accepted

Kandara Airport, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jamiebuba (talk) 12:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Bollardant! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Paul_012 (talk) 19:30, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A few pointers

Hello, and thank you for your contributions. I've noticed that you've been using bare URLs in your referencing. This should be avoided, and citations should include more identifying information to avoid breakage when links go offline. You'll find more information at WP:Bare URLs.

Also, it seems you used some sort of translation tool to generate the Thai name for Bhumibol Dam Airport, which was gibberish. Machine translation tools should never be used this way, as they are wholly unable to identify the correct terms and spellings for proper nouns. If you don't know the language, please leave the native name empty.

Finally, while having Wikipedia articles for obscure airports is nice, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a directory. Topics need to satisfy the WP:notability guidelines to warrant an article. If no in-depth information apart from basic technical facts from directory listings is available, that's usually a sign that the subject might not warrant a Wikipedia article. --Paul_012 (talk) 19:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will take this in account for my next contributions to Wikipedia. Bollardant (talk) 00:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. Thank you for your recent contributions to Loei Airport. I noticed that you added an image to the article's infobox as a thumbnail. In future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox, as this is against the Manual of Style. When adding an image, supply only the filename to the |image= parameter and the caption to the |caption= parameter instead. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using; please consult the Template page for the infobox being used on that page for proper instructions and documentation. Thanks! - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 04:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:RAF Kasfareet

Hello, Bollardant. You have new messages at Talk:RAF Kasfareet.
Message added 20:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Gavbadger (talk) 20:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sorry, I had forgotten to put a citation about the aircraft. The information was from citation 3 (Middle Eastern Airfield Report Volume 2 on Page 149). Bollardant (talk) 11:36, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this amazing article Bollardant!! Which was the source about Egyptian Air Force use of aircraft there, including F-100s? Can you link it? Many thanks Buckshot06 (talk) 11:12, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for doing all that digging. But I believe you have misunderstood. The EAF never flew F-100Cs or F-100Ds. What that listing is is a USAF assessment of what USAF aircraft could operate from the airfield in an emergency, I believe!! Buckshot06 (talk) 20:01, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I did not think about that. That was a good pointer, so I will try to do more digging, thanks! Bollardant (talk) 09:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very impressive work you have done! Big thanks for doing such great research and also adding all of these squadrons. Bollardant (talk) 15:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sargodha Satellite Fields moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sargodha Satellite Fields. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 18:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for moving it into the draft, I now have fixed the issue by verifiying every segment with the source I got it off from. Bollardant (talk) 21:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But the article leans on some unreliable sources. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 18:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see, I will do more digging focused on books and published sources, hopefully to replace the unreliable sources! Thanks again. Bollardant (talk) 07:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, re Sargodha Satellite Fields, what was the name of Sargodha (Main) when it was used by the Royal Air Force? I can't find any mention of it within the map section of my RAF squadron books, or the name of the airfield in my RAF unit book. Did it have paved runways during WW2? What kind of aircraft operated from there during WW2? Fighters, bombers, or observation planes? Gavbadger (talk) 20:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it was only mentioned a few times that it was apparently used by the RAF, and then abandoned after WW2. The only relevant map I could find while the complex was still active, is a PAF Wartime sectional chart, which shows all four airfields.

[1]https://sameerjoshi73.medium.com/a-knights-tale-da8235ab7272 Bollardant (talk) 21:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aérodrome communal de Rodez-Onet-le-Château (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aérodrome communal de Rodez-Onet-le-Château and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 06:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bollardant! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 06:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aérodrome communal de Rodez-Onet-le-Château (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Memer15151 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

One source is about a sporting complex, one doesn’t appear to constitute WP:SIGCOV. The last source doesn’t show where it got any of its information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aérodrome communal de Rodez-Onet-le-Château and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UserMemer (chat) Tribs 14:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Serre-Chevalier Airfield moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Serre-Chevalier Airfield. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mount Lykaion Hippodrome (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mount Lykaion Hippodrome and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kline • talk • contribs 02:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Bollardant! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Published article hasn’t been reviewed, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 05:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chernobyl Reactors 5 and 6 has been accepted

Chernobyl Reactors 5 and 6, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

LR.127 (talk) 01:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Chernobyl Reactors 5 and 6 at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corsica Airfield Complex (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tesleemah was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Most part of the article is unsourced, kindly remove sections you can't find sources for.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Corsica Airfield Complex and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tesleemah (talk) 06:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lannion Airfield/Lannion–Côte de Granit Airport

Hello,

Why did you create Lannion Airfield instead of just copying your content into Lannion–Côte de Granit Airport. The airport article is tiny, has no historical information and has plenty of room for expansion.

Gavbadger (talk) 18:04, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think that it should be separate because it was demolished in 1944, and that there was not much information about it’s post-war re-development afterwards. There could be a main article re-direct link on the civil based article on the top of the page, or in a history summary. Also, there is a pretty big list of operational units on Lannion Airfield. Bollardant (talk) 03:23, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yilan Airfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yilan County. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bribie Island Bridge has been accepted

Bribie Island Bridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 23:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bollardant. Thank you for your work on Naval Outlying Landing Field Waldron. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article! Have a blessed and wonderful days ahead!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: No worries, and thank you for swiftly reviewing my article. Bollardant (talk) 10:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bollardant. Thank you for your work on Sinmak Airfield (K-20). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day ahead.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:10, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Chernobyl Reactors 5 and 6

Hello! Your submission of Chernobyl Reactors 5 and 6 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:56, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have added the correct source with the hook information. I am unable to reply there unfortunately. Bollardant (talk) 04:43, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected the article and passed the nomination. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:17, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bollardant. Thank you for your work on Yilan Airfield. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:44, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mount Lykaion Hippodrome has been accepted

Mount Lykaion Hippodrome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Samoht27 (talk) 15:55, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lanna International Airport (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources aren't sufficient to establish notability per WP:GNG. Also: WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lanna International Airport and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:45, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Bollardant! Your additions to Draft:Lanna International Airport have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 15:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lanna International Airport (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

Per last reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lanna International Airport and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:57, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Bollardant. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by TNM101 (chat) 06:52, 27 December 2024 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

DYK for Chernobyl Reactors 5 and 6

On 29 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chernobyl Reactors 5 and 6, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that nearly 300 construction workers showed up at 8 am to continue building Chernobyl Reactors 5 and 6, unaware of the Chernobyl disaster earlier that day? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chernobyl Reactors 5 and 6. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chernobyl Reactors 5 and 6), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:04, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Bollardant! The thread you created at the Teahouse, No in-depth sources., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:16, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bollardant. Thank you for your work on Chiang Klang Airport. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia! May you and your family have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Bollardant (talk) 09:05, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cooranbong Airport moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Cooranbong Airport. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corsica Airfield Complex has been accepted

Corsica Airfield Complex, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:13, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nucleopedia moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Nucleopedia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 11:55, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miranshah Airfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page No. 9 Squadron.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bollardant. Thank you for your work on RAF Chengtu. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating the page. Improvements might be to add a more specific location (that is, which one of the US airfields did it grow from), an a little more clarity over how it shifted from US to Royal Air Force control.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 12:09, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Airports disestablished in 1966

A tag has been placed on Category:Airports disestablished in 1966 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:22, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: K-500-65/3000 steam turbine has been accepted

K-500-65/3000 steam turbine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WeWake (talk) 04:32, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Airfield Complex has been nominated for deletion

Category:Airfield Complex has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 11:39, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Delfzijl (1813–1814)

Hello, Bollardant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Delfzijl (1813–1814), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:09, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Delfzijl (1813–1814) (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CSMention269 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Only lines passed with no links given. Atleast a few are expected.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siege of Delfzijl (1813–1814) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 04:34, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Delfzijl (1813–1814) (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lijil was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

It looks as though this siege is probably notable, but the references still need work. For instance, ref 2-4 are all a sentence in French that just claim that Napoleon said something with no reference to an actual source for the claim. I would also recommend looking at how an article about a siege or battle is typically structured as the structure is a bit confusing now. The mention of "unlike this other siege" is not helpful for readers who haven't heard of the other siege - it's more important to clarify who was attacking, who was besieged, what war it was part of etc. See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Content_guide#Battles. The infobox is helpful. Hope you continue to work on this as it'll be a useful article when the references and organisation are improved!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siege of Delfzijl (1813–1814) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lijil (talk) 19:44, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gustav-Oskar Winter Klingele

Hello, Bollardant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gustav-Oskar Winter Klingele, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:09, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Airports disestablished 1976

A tag has been placed on Category:Airports disestablished 1976 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:09, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nucleopedia

Hello, Bollardant. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nucleopedia".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:26, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wude Airport

Hello, Bollardant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wude Airport, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Your edit to Kai Tak Airport has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:59, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gustav-Oskar Winter Klingele (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Primary sources do not establish notability per WP:GNG.

Besides which, many of the citations are to sources too close to the subject.

That book (ref #3) may (or may not) be okay, but it alone isn't enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gustav-Oskar Winter Klingele and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:52, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Whale Sanctuary Project

Hello, Bollardant,

Thank you for creating Whale Sanctuary Project.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Orphan: Please link to this page from other Wikipedia articles.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:34, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]