User talk:Spworld2
Welcome!
[edit]| Welcome, Spworld2! | |
|---|---|
|
Disambiguation link notification for August 16
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tanur Assembly constituency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tanur. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Nava Kerala Sadas has a new comment
[edit]
Recent edit reversion
[edit]In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.
I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
List of most-viewed Instagram reels moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to List of most-viewed Instagram reels. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is unclear if any source establishes these as the absolute Top 5, one of the sources just discussed "some of the most-viewed" [1] rather than absolute Top 5. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. MarioGom (talk) 10:13, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- noted , This list includes name and video of most viewed Instagram Reels with its reference along with its direct video link. This reduces the possibility of changing it to draft and wants to change it in the main space Like YouTube Video Lists and Instagram Post Likes and Followers List currently Article Available category includes this, which is going to move to main space Spworld2 10:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of List of most-viewed Instagram reels for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-viewed Instagram reels until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.MarioGom (talk) 13:57, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Politics of Kerala
[edit]After deletion of the "meme trolls in Kerala" thing, there appears to be at least two-editor support Freiland and me) for adding a section called something like "Social media" at Politics of Kerala that uses the better-quality ones of the sources you provided at AfD, to concisely and narrowly focus on use of social media (including but not overly dwelling on memes and trolling) by politicians and their supporters in Kerala. If you try to WP:COATRACK it into a "memes in Kerala are magically special" or "there's a unique trolling community in Kerala" story, you can expect it to be reverted. But if it sticks to just reporting the salient facts without elaboration and original research that paints and exaggeratory picture, then it would probably be useful. Some stuff to focus on: Kerala being somewhat behind-the-times until recently in this department, then over a fairly short span becoming very social-media active, especially in regards to citizen activism, and politicians themselves and their boosters using the Internet for campaigning, in lieu of street-corner rallies and paper leaflets. Plus two instances of governmental crack-down on socio-political trollers. That sort of stuff. Keep it on-topic and it will work well. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 00:59, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see article creation as a warning sound, I think Wikipedia can be a source for the world to know the truth about social media special in Kerala. I would like to include a part Kerala Social Media Politics in "Politics in Kerala" which has a clear source in this world, Hope more wikipedia professors like you to follow and post mortem on the slightest doubt, thank you for your great well wish. --Owner of magical cat 🐈 (talk) 11:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Spworld2. Thank you for your work on Lotus Lake Wetland Thirunavaya Malappuram. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ayisha Abdul Basith
[edit]Hello Spworld2,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ayisha Abdul Basith for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 10:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of The Real Kerala Story for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Real Kerala Story until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.— Callitropsis🌲[talk · contribs] 05:20, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Spworld2, thank you for your work on 2024 United Arab Emirates floods. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of our new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Spworld2. Thank you for your work on Tahsin Mohammed Jamshid. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Real Kerala Story (June 17)
[edit]
|
Hello, Spworld2!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Callitropsis🌲[talk · contribs] 00:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
|
Keren Jadhav moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Keren Jadhav. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Moreover, If you're connected with the subject, please disclose the COI 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 15:50, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Coordinates of 2024 Uttar Pradesh stampede
[edit]In these edits you removed the correct coordinates for the crowd crush, and replaced them with coordinates that pointed 10 kilometres away from the site of the tragedy. I am always curious as to the genesis of such errors, how did you come to insert these incorrect coordinates into the article? Abductive (reasoning) 08:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- The village coordinates where the incident took place is recorded on the basis of news reference, if there is any mistake in this, it can be corrected Spworld2 (talk) 08:59, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Going forward please refrain from placing incorrect information in Wikipedia articles. If you don't know how to do a particular type of edit, don't do that kind of edit, or ask for assistance. Abductive (reasoning) 09:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Spworld2. Thank you for your work on Dalit League. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 01:43, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
ITN recognition for 2024 Wayanad landslides
[edit]
On 31 July 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Wayanad landslides, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 12:05, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Spworld2. Thank you for your work on Hamda Taryam Al Shamsi. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 14:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of 2024 Kolkata doctor rape and murder case for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Kolkata doctor rape and murder case until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Aydoh8[contribs] 06:49, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Your contributed article, 2024 Kolkata doctor rape and murder case
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2024 Kolkata doctor rape and murder case. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2024 Kolkata rape and murder incident. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2024 Kolkata rape and murder incident. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ZimZalaBim talk 16:23, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Chelari Airport for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chelari Airport until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Fram (talk) 10:28, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
ITN recognition for 2024 Kolkata rape and murder incident
[edit]On 21 August 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Kolkata rape and murder incident, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 09:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Do not add album covers to BLP articles without a valid non-free use rationale. Most images fail to meet WP:NFCCP#1 because the subject is still alive, meaning a free equivalent could be created that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Spworld2. Thank you for your work on Mundakkai, Wayanad. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
please add the latest population figure from the official indian census site
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
-MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Neutralhappy (talk) 22:30, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, listening to the discussion,
- Listening to your arguments, a bit busy, give a friendly discussion description Spworld2 (talk) 16:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Sitaram Yechury
[edit]On 16 September 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Sitaram Yechury, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 09:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Majlis Al-Noor for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majlis Al-Noor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.scope_creepTalk 16:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Ratan Tata
[edit]On 11 October 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ratan Tata, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 18:03, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Ayisha Abdul Basith for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayisha Abdul Basith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.TheWikiholic (talk) 13:46, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
AFDs
[edit]Hello, Spworld2,
If you are participating in AFD discussions and arguing to Keep an article, please do not simply say that reliable sources exist. That is not sufficient. Instead, say, specifically, which sources in the article or references that you have since found, help establish notability (GNG) and provide significant coverage. That will be more persuasive to your fellow participants and the closer of the discussion. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 23:44, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Mufeeda Thesni for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mufeeda Thesni until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.TheWikiholic (talk) 16:40, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Support
[edit]Hi! How are you doin' --Delphilore
Concern regarding Draft:List of most-viewed Instagram reels
[edit]
Hello, Spworld2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of most-viewed Instagram reels, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:08, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
When creating articles
[edit]When creating articles about crashes, please try to avoid the use of the word 'accident' as it violates WP:NPOV. We don't know if https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Almora_bus_accident was, in fact, an 'accident'. Better to use 'crash' or 'collision' or some other word that doesn't remove culpability around the event. Cheers -- Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 22:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Your advice is noted, thanks Spworld2 (talk) 12:59, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Keren Jadhav
[edit] Hello, Spworld2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Keren Jadhav, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:09, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Samaira Hullur moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Samaira Hullur. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and WP:ONEEVENT; the degree of significance of the event itself and of the individual's role within it should both be considered. The general rule is to cover the event, not the person. WP:TOOSOON. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Charlie (talk) 15:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
The Real Kerala Story (article expansion)
[edit]Hello,
I hope you're doing well. I noticed that you’ve been working on the article titled "Draft:The Real Kerala Story." It has been moved out of the main space due to concerns about its encyclopedic value and importance.
The article currently seems more aligned with a focus on religious issues, but it may be more fitting to expand its scope and title to something like "Criticism of Kerala" or a similar approach that covers a broader context. As it stands, the article reads more like a personal essay, which is often a reason for rejection when requesting to move content to the main space.
You might find useful references in articles like Criticism of the United States government, Criticism of Israel, Anti-Indian sentiment, Anti-Filipino sentiment or more, which explore similar themes in a more balanced and comprehensive way.
Best of luck with your edits, and I appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia!--— MimsMENTOR talk 16:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Zakir Hussain (musician)
[edit]On 22 December 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Zakir Hussain (musician), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:10, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Spworld2. Thank you for your work on Kerala Nuclear Power Station. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day ahead!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:44, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Keren Jadhav
[edit]Hello, Spworld2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Keren Jadhav".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:05, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
December 2024
[edit] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 13:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Your nom of Ágnes Keleti
[edit]Earlier an ip nominated this, but a user keeps removing it without explanation. I restored it just before you added yours. I combined the two. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 08:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Richard-of-Earth Okay, I saw it, both at the same time, no problem, you can give me 'update' credit if you want. Spworld2 (talk) 08:46, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I added credit. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 09:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Aria (Indian singer) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aria (Indian singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.— Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:00, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Spworld2. Thank you for your work on Puthanathani Bypass. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Warm salutations! Thank you for creating the article! May you and your family have a blessed day today!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Copyright violation
[edit]I reverted your recent edit to Thajuddin because you introduced text copied verbatim from a source. This is a copyright violation. Please don't do it again. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:19, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Your message was noted, it was a typing mistake. Spworld2 (talk) 06:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Democratic Movement of Kerala for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democratic Movement of Kerala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.TheWikiholic (talk) 14:02, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi! Here and Here. As per the sources you provided, the film was amongst the films that made it to the list of 207 eligible films for Best Picture. It has nothing to do with the Best International Film. Sid95Q (talk) 08:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Death of Mihir Ahammed for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Mihir Ahammed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.BusterD (talk) 22:27, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of 2025 Thiruvananthapuram mass murder for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Thiruvananthapuram mass murder until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 08:48, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
"Aria (Indian singer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Aria_(Indian_singer) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 8 § Aria (Indian singer) until a consensus is reached. 112.207.123.170 Talk to me! 01:47, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:The Real Kerala Story
[edit] Hello, Spworld2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Real Kerala Story, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:11, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Can you please check this request Help request for The Real Kerala Story article Spworld2 (talk) 04:48, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of 2025 Kenya bus crash for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Kenya bus crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.XYZ1233212 (talk) 13:07, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
"Air India Flight 787-8" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Air India Flight 787-8 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 12 § Air India Flight 787-8 until a consensus is reached. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:37, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:07, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
ITN/C
[edit]Hello Spworld2. Many thanks for adding sources to WP:ITN/C candidates as you did here. But please note that the "Updater" field in the nomination template is intended to be for editors who update the target article. Regards. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:25, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- And if starting an ITN/C nomination, please don't just add random people as article creators like you did at Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates#Telangana chemical factory explosion. I imagine this was a copy/paste error, but please be more careful in future. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:28, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Ok,noted, thanks for inform Spworld2 (talk) 15:06, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
Suburbs of Sharjarh
[edit]Hiya. You added Sajaa and Wadi Helo to the category 'Suburbs of Sharjah'. Sajaa is actually not a suburb of Sharjah but a settlement in its own right (although Sharjah's steady eastward march does mean it will one day be subsumed the way things are going!) and Wadi Helo is most definitely nowhere near Sharjah (although is a settlement of the Emirate). I thought I'd mention it rather than reverting! Muwaileh, you're bang on the money! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:46, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of P.K. Shifana for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P.K. Shifana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Thilsebatti (talk) 02:37, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Mansoor bin Mohammed Al Maktoum moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Mansoor bin Mohammed Al Maktoum. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 02:38, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
LLM?
[edit]Hey, did you use an LLM for this edit? Apologies if you did not. Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 02:32, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
- No! Never! , Spworld2 (talk) 04:58, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Unauthorised RFA
[edit]Hi. I noticed that you have created a Request for Adminship (RfA) page for me without my knowledge or consent. I want to make it explicitly clear that I did not authorize or request this nomination, nor do I have any intention of standing for adminship at this time. Per long-standing community expectations and RfA norms, no user should be nominated for adminship without their explicit consent (see: WP:RFA#Nomination).
Please refrain from creating or re-opening any such nomination unless I personally request it. I would also request that the current RfA be withdrawn or tagged for deletion immediately. Thilsebatti (talk) 10:23, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
- I suggested your name after seeing the experience. I don't know much about the withdrawal format in this. Please help if you can. Otherwise, I will have to ask other admins for help. Is there any problem with the nomination? Spworld2 (talk) 10:43, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
- You can add {{db-g7}} to the top of the page. And no, you should never create an RfA for someone without their prior agreement. Fram (talk) 10:49, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
- ok, thanks! Spworld2 (talk) 10:56, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
- You can add {{db-g7}} to the top of the page. And no, you should never create an RfA for someone without their prior agreement. Fram (talk) 10:49, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Firos (politician) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firos (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Thilsebatti (talk) 06:30, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:University of Calicut Students' Union
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:University of Calicut Students' Union indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:10, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of 2025 National Highway 66 collapse at Kooriyad, Malappuram for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 National Highway 66 collapse at Kooriyad, Malappuram until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.XYZ1233212 (talk) 17:40, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
August 2025
[edit] | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Izno (talk) 20:31, 17 August 2025 (UTC) |
- @Izno Noted, thanks! I have added my appeal request below section Spworld2 (talk) 06:31, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Dubai Mallathon moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Dubai Mallathon. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:57, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
Unblock request
[edit]
Spworld2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Unblock Request - Account 'Spworld2' Hello admins,
I am writing to appeal the block on my account, Spworld2. I understand the block was placed due to concerns about my editing behavior, specifically regarding alleged sockpuppetry. I would like to address the allegations and explain the situation from my perspective.
I sincerely apologize for the issues my edits have caused and any confusion that arose. I was not fully aware of all the policies, and this was an error of inexperience, not intent.
Here are the specific points I wish to clarify:
Editing in the Same Area as a Blocked Account: I understand that a previous blocked user (a "sock puppet") also edited articles in the Malabar region of Kerala India. It is true that my edits focus on similar topics, such as politics, people, political parties, and places in this region. However, this is due to my genuine interest in my home area, not a connection to any other account. I have no affiliation with any past accounts. The editing patterns and gaps in years between the edits of the other account and my own also support this.
Username Similarity: An allegation was made that my username Spworld2 is similar to a previous user with SP in their name. This is a misunderstanding. I chose my username without any knowledge of or intent to copy any other account. There is no connection between my account and any other account on Wikipedia.
Recreating a Previously Deleted Page: This was a significant misunderstanding on my part due to my lack of experience. I created a page that a sock puppet account had previously created and that was subsequently deleted. My standard editing practice is to search for a topic. If a page doesn't exist, I create it. In this case, I followed my usual method. I did see a deletion tag on the page, but I did not understand its full implications. Due to my inexperience with Wikipedia's policies, I did not know that recreating a previously deleted page, especially one deleted for policy violations, is against the rules. I thought that by finding a new, more notable title for the article, I could address the issue. I now understand this was a serious mistake.
I fully admit that my actions were in violation of Wikipedia's policies, specifically [mention specific policies like WP:SOCK, WP:GNG, or others if you know them. If not, just say "Wikipedia's policies"]. I have since spent a significant amount of time studying the core policies, including WP:Sockpuppetry, WP:No Original Research, and WP:Verifiability. I now understand the importance of following these guidelines to ensure the integrity of the encyclopedia.
If my account is unblocked, I promise to strictly adhere to all policies and guidelines. I am ready to cooperate with any and all investigations and am confident that my innocence will be proven. I simply want to contribute constructively to articles about my home region and improve Wikipedia.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely, Spworld2 Spworld2 (talk) 06:24, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
We don't consider AI-generated appeals (100% likelihood per GPTZero). You are blocked, not AI, therefore you need to tell us why you think you should be unblocked. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:49, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Spworld2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Sorry, above request was prepared using AI for formatting purposes. I used AI to create this request, and I admit my mistake.
I would like to state my reason for being unblocked here.
The first allegation against my 'Spworld2' account is that it is a sock puppet account.
The accusation is that my 'Spworld2 account and the alleged sock account have mutually edited a few articles. I mainly edit articles on politics, political parties, NGO organizations, political leaders, crime cases, events, transport, landmarks, and geography in Kerala, India, especially in the Malabar region. There are tens of thousands of Wiki editors in Kerala. In such a situation, where so many people are in the same zone, there will be articles that need to be re-edited, re-updated, or linked that someone else has already edited. Similarly, there will be people in the Kerala zone who are interested in the topics I have chosen (especially related to politics). This might be why the accusation of mutual editing has been made against me. However, when I checked, there is a gap of several years between the edit counts and the time of editing for my account and the alleged sock account.
Another allegation is that I re-created one or two pages that this sock account had previously created, but with a different title. I don't blame the editors who made this allegation, as it might seem suspicious to anyone.
However, the reality is that this is a continuation of the previous allegation and is also related to being in the same zone. My editing method is to first search if a policy-compliant, notable page exists on Wikipedia. If not, I edit it using the "create a new page" tag that appears below the search box. For the specific pages mentioned in this suspicious allegation, which were created and then deleted by the sock account years ago, I searched for the title as per my usual method. The pages didn't exist, but I did see a tag indicating that someone had created and deleted them before. Since I was unaware of the details, I found a suitable alternative title and created the pages to avoid taking a time-risk. This was a mistake due to my lack of knowledge, and I have already explained this error in the previous admin discussion.
Another accusation is the similarity in names: the two letters SP from the sock account's name are present in my account name, 'Spworld2'. This is an unfounded accusation.
I have no connection to this sock account whatsoever. It is not my account; these are all just allegations. Some of the allegations are a result of misunderstandings due to editing in the same geographic zone.
I have explained the maximum number of reasons for my unblock request here.
I am ready for any further investigation.
I believe the admins will consider my unblock request.
I thank the admins for giving me the opportunity to present my arguments.
Decline reason:
No. Absolutely not. Not to mention that any unblock request we could possibly accept would have to address the concerns brought up at WP:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1196#RFA without my consent. The standard offer is open to you. asilvering (talk) 00:21, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Spworld2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My apologies, I forgot to mention the WP:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1196#RFA without my consent that the admin brought up above.
I kindly request that the admins who are checking this unblock request once again note the other reasons (my arguments and the allegations made against me) mentioned above.
Regarding the WP:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1196#RFA without my consent, honestly, it happened because of my lack of knowledge. I have seen the editor I mentioned in the RFA in many AFD discussions. I believe they have shown good quality checking and page reviewing skills. I also thought they had the editing excellence to be nominated to an admin panel. This is where the issue began. I was not aware that I needed to ask for the editor's consent before nominating them. Immediately after the incident, the editor brought it up in the admin discussion RFA, and I presented my mistake in that discussion and also gave my explanation to the other admins who participated. That is where more allegations were raised against me. I repeat, it was due to my lack of knowledge.
I am also ready to accept The "standard offer" you have proposed. Furthermore, I am ready for any investigation to prove my innocence. The allegations made against me were due to a misunderstanding and my lack of knowledge. I do not wish to blame anyone.
I am ready to accept The Standard offer that you are offering.
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to present my case and for providing the 'Standard Offer' option
Spworld2 04:31, 3 September 2025 (UTC) 12:02, 4 September 2025 (UTC) (timestamp corrected by DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:10, 4 September 2025 (UTC))
Decline reason:
Declining to start the standard offer: do not edit the English Wikipedia at all for at least six months -- no other accounts, no logged out editing. After at least six months, you can return and request an unblock. In the meantime, you are free to edit other Wikipedias, such as the Simple Wikipedia. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:00, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- If you're taking the standard offer, you don't need to lodge an appeal, just take it and stop editing on en.wiki for a minimum of six months. Each time you edit, the countdown clock re-starts. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:12, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Religious Harmony in Kerala
[edit] Hello, Spworld2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Religious Harmony in Kerala, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 23 October 2025 (UTC)