User talk:TheUltimateGrass

This is TheUltimateGrass's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kohoutek 4-55 (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sophisticatedevening was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kohoutek 4-55 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 17:35, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheUltimateGrass! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 17:35, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UKS 2323-326 (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sophisticatedevening was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UKS 2323-326 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 19:33, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: LEDA 1313424 has been accepted

LEDA 1313424, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 01:21, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UKS 2323-326 has been accepted

UKS 2323-326, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 01:27, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Congrats on your articles! It was a pleasure to accept them. CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 17:15, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello TheUltimateGrass! Your additions to Draft:Stellar encounter have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. AstrooKai (Talk) 05:12, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HH 30 distance

Hi TheUltimateGrass, I came across your edit to the HH 30 article where you added the distance of 146.4 parsecs. I’ve been trying to find a source that gives this exact value, but most published references I’ve found list a broader range for the Taurus Molecular Cloud (around 130–160 pc). Could you let me know where that specific measurement came from? I’d appreciate any source or reference you used. Thank you. Desmondhwong (talk) 14:09, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I got the number from the infobox of the HH 30 page. There is a citation next to it which is here —> https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.07523 TheUltimateGrass (talk) 14:14, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, TheUltimateGrass, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia) The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

TheUltimateGrass, good luck, and have fun. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:28, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TheUltimateGrass. Thank you for your work on Eos cloud. Another editor, Noleander, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Source "Sci.News: Breaking Science News" has a problem with the "first" tag. Suggest review that source in the raw article text & correct the tag.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Noleander (talk) 01:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stellar encounter has been accepted

Stellar encounter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 04:35, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kohoutek 4-55 (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tarlby was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The subject must be proven to be notable before it can be published.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kohoutek 4-55 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 20:31, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of UGC 10310 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UGC 10310 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UGC 10310 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~ A412 ^talk! 18:04, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Absorptiometer moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Absorptiometer. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:21, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hi TheUltimateGrass! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:47, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Air pollution chemistry moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Air pollution chemistry. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and there are already extensive pages on air pollution and atmospheric chemistry. I do not see this page as adding more information, both of those are extensive. For this to exist it would need to describe something that is not already well covered. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:16, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Air pollution chemistry has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Air pollution chemistry. Thanks! Ldm1954 (talk) 12:17, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: VIK J2348-3054 (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CF-501 Falcon was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I would ask for more sources, at least two to three more.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:VIK J2348-3054 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 01:17, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Solar System uppercased per Wikipedia style

Hello, and I've edited one of your articles (thanks for the page!). Please be aware that 'Solar System' is a proper name and capitalized on Wikipedia (as are Sun, Moon, Earth, etc.). Thanks! Randy Kryn (talk) 22:53, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: VIK J2348-3054 (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Decent article, but this draft should cite better sources than pop-sci websites and preprints, which are not peer-reviewed. It looks like there are some hits on Google Scholar.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:VIK J2348-3054 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 00:50, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anton Petrov (science communicator) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anton Petrov (science communicator) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Petrov (science communicator) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:10, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve NLTT 12758

Hello, TheUltimateGrass,

Thank you for creating NLTT 12758.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

No inline citations at all in the starbox despite making strong claims

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lithopsian}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lithopsian (talk) 16:06, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve NLTT 12758

Hello, TheUltimateGrass,

Thank you for creating NLTT 12758.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

See WP:NASTRO

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lithopsian}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lithopsian (talk) 16:09, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Poa abbreviata subsp. pattersoni

It seems that GBIF has this as a synonym of Poa abbreviata, and POWO has Poa pattersonii listed as accepted as a full species. At WikiProject Plants the consensus is to follow POWO. Do you want me to move it, or do you know how? Abductive (reasoning) 03:32, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure you can go ahead and move it, I am not good with the technical side of Wikipedia. :( TheUltimateGrass (talk) 03:39, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moved and cleaned up. If you have created any other articles on flowering plants that aren't accepted by POWO, please fix them. Abductive (reasoning) 06:32, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions

You recently edited the short description of List of ring galaxies to "List of ring galaxies". A short description that matches the article title is not helpful; in cases where the title is sufficiently descriptive on its own, the thing to do is use "none" as the short description. For further guidelines, see WP:SDESC. — LucasBrown 22:18, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TheUltimateGrass. Thank you for your work on Aquarius II. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 02:01, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation in titles

An article title only needs to include a disambiguator like "(dwarf galaxy)" if there are other topics with the same name. Tucana IV, Grus II and Cetus III are unambiguous, so I've moved them. SevenSpheres (talk) 16:58, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TheUltimateGrass. Thank you for your work on Butler Mons. Another editor, Northernhenge, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this article. It will be interesting to see how it develops.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Northernhenge}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Northernhenge (talk) 23:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

I'm a new page reviewer and thought your article on GM Aurigae was really cool :D Shocksingularity (talk) 22:56, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TheUltimateGrass. Thank you for your work on Avilés Canyon. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 09:22, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kohoutek 4-55

Hello, TheUltimateGrass. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kohoutek 4-55, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: VIK J2348-3054 has been accepted

VIK J2348-3054, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Patre23 (talk) 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on WASP-28

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page WASP-28, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic title error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:39, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Absorptiometer

Hello, TheUltimateGrass. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Absorptiometer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Air pollution chemistry

Hello, TheUltimateGrass. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Air pollution chemistry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]