User talk:Fin.Seaman

Welcome

Hello, Fin.Seaman, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

Finding your way around

• Table of contents
• Directories and indexes
• Department directory

Editing articles

• How to develop an article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help

• Frequently asked questions
• Cheatsheet
• Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
• The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
• Help pages
• Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

• Community Portal
• Join a WikiProject
• Follow Wikipedia etiquette
• Practice civility
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Nomination of Draft:Hartley Boats Supernova National Championship 2023 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Draft:Hartley Boats Supernova National Championship 2023 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draft:Hartley Boats Supernova National Championship 2023 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Angiemcc2023 (talk) 17:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Catatau Elstrodt (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Catatau Elstrodt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:03, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fin.Seaman! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:03, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ian Barrows (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ian Barrows and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:48, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hartley Boats Supernova National Championship 2023 (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hartley Boats Supernova National Championship 2023 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:37, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thomas Monarch

The article Thomas Monarch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, mainly listed in statistics, fora, fansites, ... but not much reliable, significant stuff.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 18:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram Despite competing in the highest class of motorsport, the lack of common information could be put down to the period that he competed. Despite that I don't beleive that the article should be deleted as it holds an unuiqe place in the history of F1. Any help or advice to keep the article up would be appreciated, Thanks Fin.Seaman (talk) 18:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But he hasn't competed in the F1, he didn't even drive in the qualifications. It's more of an urban legend than anything else. Are there any books about F1 (r motorsport in general) which devote a paragraph or more to him? Fram (talk) 20:12, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bunafreva Lake moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bunafreva Lake, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 19:19, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas Monarch

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thomas Monarch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Monarch. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:49, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Catatau Elstrodt

Hello, Fin.Seaman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Catatau Elstrodt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hartley Boats Supernova National Championship 2023

Hello, Fin.Seaman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hartley Boats Supernova National Championship 2023, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Barrows moved to draftspace

Ian Barrows, a draft you started, has been moved back to draft space. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:58, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Uladzislau Pramau

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Uladzislau Pramau requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uladzislau Pramau. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Killarnee (talk) 20:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bunafreva Lake

Hello, Fin.Seaman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bunafreva Lake, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ian Barrows

Hello, Fin.Seaman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ian Barrows, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Southport 24 Hour Race 2024 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Southport 24 Hour Race 2024. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:00, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ian Barrows

Hello, Fin.Seaman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ian Barrows".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ren Tomida moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ren Tomida. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and does not currently appear to meet WP:SPORTBASIC. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bunafreva Lake

Hello, Fin.Seaman. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bunafreva Lake".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:29, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southport 24 Hour Race 2024 (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Southport 24 Hour Race 2024 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 15:46, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Oreo Coca-Cola has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Oreo Coca-Cola. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:55, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oreo Coca-Cola has been accepted

Oreo Coca-Cola, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:55, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2025 Austrian Grand Prix (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chippla360 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2025 Austrian Grand Prix and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 13:38, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ren Tomida

Hello, Fin.Seaman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ren Tomida, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southport 24 Hour Race 2024 (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Southport 24 Hour Race 2024 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 20:56, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:List of Southport 24 Hour Dinghy Race winners has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of Southport 24 Hour Dinghy Race winners. Thanks! Astra Travasso (talk) 16:49, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Southport 24 Hour Dinghy Race winners (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Southport 24 Hour Dinghy Race winners and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 12:47, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Southport 24 Hour Races has been nominated for renaming

Category:Southport 24 Hour Races has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 12:25, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ren Tomida

Hello, Fin.Seaman. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ren Tomida".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 19:27, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2018 29er Worlds Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2018 29er Worlds Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. –HirowoWiki (📝) ^w^ 12:39, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please activate your private message (email) feature

@Fin.Seaman Hi dear Fin.Seaman! I am a Polish/Albanian Wikipedian and I have a request. Please can you activate your private message (email) feature to let you know about my request? Thanks PDoro (talk) 00:26, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i think i have done PDoro, shoot me a message :) Fin.Seaman (talk) 16:45, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 49erFX for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 49erFX is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/49erFX until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kaffet i halsen (talk) 09:18, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Waszp Games 8.2m medallists has been accepted

Template:Waszp Games 8.2m medallists, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Agent 007 (talk) 19:44, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Omer Vered Vilenchik moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Omer Vered Vilenchik. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 07:07, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why has this been done? The article ios clearly labled as a stub. It cannot be said that the article lacks significance as other rticles such as Aly Badawy and Ha Jee-min have similar article length, and both have very few sources sited. These articles have been listed since 2021 and 2012 respectivley with no trouble. It cannot be said that Omer Vered Vilenchik lacks significance as all other Olympians excluding a small handfull of obscure ones have articles on wikepedia. The article for Khairulnizam Afendy has only one source and yet that article is allowed to stand. Please enlighten me on what makes the article for Omer Vered Vilenchik any different to any ofthe rest of the articles I have mentioned. Thanks Fin.Seaman (talk) 08:33, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As also written in the declined submission below, the article does not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people) – instead the sources used are one result list and one database entry. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 16:47, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Omer Vered Vilenchik (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Omer Vered Vilenchik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:34, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ILCA Class association logo new.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ILCA Class association logo new.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 22:38, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 09:22, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ILCA Class association logo new.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ILCA Class association logo new.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]