User talk:Chippla360
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| I admire your dedication..keep the flame burning! The project thrives because of passionate editors like you. Keep going strong! |
- Thank you so much, tho my usertalk page might archive anytime soon, do you mind placing it on my Userpage ? Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 10:33, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- You can do it manually...always feel free to manage your talkpage and userpage however you like. Chronos.Zx (talk) 14:06, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Rollback granted
[edit]
Hi Chippla360. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
- Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
- Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 14:51, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Swayvee - 2025
[edit]@Chippla360: I am here to inform you that I made some changes on Swayvee. I upgraded the article and added some sources to improve it's notability. Thank you for creating; I am here to assist you. Best regards 💬 2RDD (talk) 10:07, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hello @2RDD, I saw your Good works on the article and I want to appreciate you for your time and efforts, I noticed this artist, seeing his massive growth over the period, and it’s a pleasure. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 18:34, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Cool 💬 2RDD (talk) 05:28, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Why Love has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 05:28, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Hi
[edit]Article i submitted for creation (Draft:Rukiye Bala Hodo) has been declined, what do i do now with it? Will it be automatically deleted? Imai akirah (talk) 19:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Look for more source, add it to the article and remove generally unreliable sources, then add incline citation at the end of each long text paragraph. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 20:43, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Rollback on Ben Verellen page
[edit]Hi - The page on Ben Verellen is pretty far out of date at this point; I updated it recently, only to have it all rolled back. Can you tell me why it was rolled back? I can think of possibly one phrase that may have been out of sync, but by and large it was all accurate and I provided citations. If I can tweak something and get my updates reinstated, that'd be great, lmk what I need to do. Thanks. 207.225.245.175 (talk) 01:47, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi IP: About My rollback on Ben Verellen, I noticed some of the content added where promotional and some where not really constructive, Also you added a citation to "linkedin" secondly some of your citation weren’t constructive enough, some where just additions of links and not all where able to offer verification. You are free to make a neural and constructive edits and it will be fine. As a rollbacker, I won’t be able to rollback just 1 revision of an edits if serval edits where made in a roll, I gave my reason on your talk page, please go check it, thanks. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 09:18, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- I saw your note briefly on my Talk page, which is why I followed up...
- - OK, didn't realize can't link to LinkedIn.
- - No content was intended to be promotional (I have no interest in the business), just describing what the new product does and its purpose. I can try to revise that, though.
- - What is "a neural and constructive edits"?
- - I'll review requirements and add citations. I assumed those were generated automatically when linking to a source.
- I'll update it again when I have a chance, thanks. 207.225.245.175 (talk) 16:21, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Add only facts and been neural, secondly cite your references instead of just adding links, don’t add unreliable source, even if your edits are fine and you added your citation properly, unreliable source will be reverted. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 16:24, 6 June 2025 (UTC)