User talk:Crystal Drawers

April 2025

Hello, I'm WhiteTailedEagle. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pilot (Arrested Development), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 🦅White-tailed eagle^{Talk to the eagle}Stalking eagle 22:58, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I believe you’ve made a mistake. I expanded the article and I don’t think any information was unsourced. I even added 3 new sources. I undid your reverts, as it seems you’re just reverting new information for no real reason. Also, it seems you have a history of doing stuff like this according to your talk page Crystal Drawers (talk) 23:01, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pilot (Arrested Development)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pilot (Arrested Development) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:02, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pilot (Arrested Development)

The article Pilot (Arrested Development) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pilot (Arrested Development) and Talk:Pilot (Arrested Development)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:41, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bad News (How I Met Your Mother)

The article Bad News (How I Met Your Mother) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bad News (How I Met Your Mother) and Talk:Bad News (How I Met Your Mother)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:42, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Crystal Drawers! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! TzarN64 (talk) 01:40, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Crystal Drawers (talk) 10:44, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pilot (Arrested Development)

The article Pilot (Arrested Development) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pilot (Arrested Development) for comments about the article, and Talk:Pilot (Arrested Development)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:21, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bad News (How I Met Your Mother)

The article Bad News (How I Met Your Mother) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bad News (How I Met Your Mother) for comments about the article, and Talk:Bad News (How I Met Your Mother)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:42, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

When you move a draft to mainspace

Please examine the result, remove any AFC artefacts, and add cats and inbound links 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 14:45, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I was planning on doing it but had to leave for a second and so didn’t do it yet. Thanks for the reminder, though :) Crystal Drawers (talk) 15:03, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Top Banana (Arrested Development)

The article Top Banana (Arrested Development) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Top Banana (Arrested Development) and Talk:Top Banana (Arrested Development)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Top Banana (Arrested Development)

The article Top Banana (Arrested Development) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Top Banana (Arrested Development) for comments about the article, and Talk:Top Banana (Arrested Development)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 03:05, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE copy edit of BoJack Hates the Troops

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for BoJack Hates the Troops at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! — TheOnlyZac (talk) 23:07, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of BoJack Horseman season 5

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article BoJack Horseman season 5 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 10:07, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Flight of the Phoenix (Arrested Development) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Flight of the Phoenix (Arrested Development) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 14:08, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Flight of the Phoenix (Arrested Development) has failed

Your good article nomination of the article Flight of the Phoenix (Arrested Development) has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 20:43, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of BoJack Horseman season 5 has passed

Your good article nomination of the article BoJack Horseman season 5 has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 15:22, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BoJack Horseman season 5 peer review

Thank you for the ping for the BoJack Horseman season 5 peer review. I will see if I can get to the peer review in the future, but apologies for not being able to get to it sooner. It may be helpful to reach out to other editors who have work on television topics in the FAC/FA space, and make sure that all of my outstanding comments from the FAC are addressed, like the issues with the book sources. Best of luck with the peer review! Aoba47 (talk) 20:33, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Good luck with your new FAC :) Crystal Drawers (talk) 22:39, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 00:51, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, how are you doing? I’m just letting you know that all your last FAC comments have been resolved, in case you wanted to leave some comments at the peer review. No pressure, though! Good luck again with your FAC :) Crystal Drawers (talk) 19:02, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pilot (Franklin & Bash) (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

No need for separate article. Some of the content can be merged to List of Franklin & Bash episodes.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pilot (Franklin & Bash) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 21:47, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Fish Out of Water (BoJack Horseman) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Fish Out of Water (BoJack Horseman) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Plifal -- Plifal (talk) 14:43, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Philbert.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Philbert.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of The One Where Michael Leaves is under review

Your good article nomination of the article The One Where Michael Leaves is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 00:26, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of The One Where Michael Leaves has passed

Your good article nomination of the article The One Where Michael Leaves has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 04:52, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lucille's Double Wink.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lucille's Double Wink.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Creek (fandom)

On 27 September 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Creek (fandom), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that fan-art of a romantic pairing between two South Park characters later appeared in the show itself? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Creek (fandom). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Creek (fandom)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Z1720 (talk) 12:02, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Special Barnstar
		Thank you for improving the Arrested Development episode articles (and promoting some to GAs!) Appreciate it :D Mjks28 (talk) 23:30, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thank you so much! I've always appreciated your creation of the articles, it's been great fun expanding them! Thank you again for leaving this, it’s very nice of you :) Crystal Drawers (talk) 00:31, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Fish Out of Water (BoJack Horseman) has failed

Your good article nomination of the article Fish Out of Water (BoJack Horseman) has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Plifal -- Plifal (talk) 13:21, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Good Grief.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Good Grief.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hank's Unmentionable Problem

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hank's Unmentionable Problem, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:10, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of A Allan Adventure for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Allan Adventure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Allan Adventure until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Go D. Usopp (talk) 11:27, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Sad Sack (Arrested Development) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Sad Sack (Arrested Development) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Olliefant -- Olliefant (talk) 00:04, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Sad Sack (Arrested Development) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Sad Sack (Arrested Development) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Olliefant -- Olliefant (talk) 19:43, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Curb Your Enthusiasm MAGA.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Curb Your Enthusiasm MAGA.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 01:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Larry vs. Michael J. Fox has been accepted

Larry vs. Michael J. Fox, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Somepinkdude (talk) 22:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Larry vs. Michael J. Fox is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Larry vs. Michael J. Fox is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Olliefant -- Olliefant (talk) 08:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Larry vs. Michael J. Fox has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Larry vs. Michael J. Fox has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Olliefant -- Olliefant (talk) 17:45, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Afternoon Delight (Arrested Development) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Afternoon Delight (Arrested Development) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Olliefant -- Olliefant (talk) 18:22, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Afternoon Delight (Arrested Development) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Afternoon Delight (Arrested Development) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Olliefant -- Olliefant (talk) 16:46, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]