User talk:TzarN64

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TzarN64 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Let it be clear I do not want to get unblocked. I do feel like I deserve the ANI and some sort of punishment. I just want an check user to come in and prove I don’t own those fake sock puppet accounts I didn’t even know about these accounts existed until @Tarlby emailed me. And then I’m like what the hell? I logged out of Wikipedia before the ANI was made. These accounts are very obviously not mine because they’re made like hours between eachother and only exist to start chaos at my own ANI. I believe someone created these accounts to frame me as a sock puppeteer. If I was really going to sock puppet, I’m not going to my own ANI to start up chaos, that’s stupid. Second. I’ve noticed it was odd that @Freedoxm was the first to replace my user page with my block message and saying that “justice was served”. I don’t understand why would anyone would do this as I recognized my mistakes before and I wanted to take a break from Wikipedia before returning. Please, please actually take this message seriously and bring in a checkuser, im begging you. I never did any of these sock puppet accounts or anything like that. Please. Thank you.TzarN64 (talk) 05:00, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser has returned inconclusive verdict on the owner of the multiple socks.

Since this request explicitly states that TzarN64 does not wish to be unblocked, I am closing this procedurally as decline.

(That seems to deal with the entire substance of this request.) DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:20, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TzarN64 (talk) 05:00, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a reminder, while most things can be removed from a talk page, declined unblock requests are one of the exceptions, and must remain while the related block is active, per WP:KEEPDECLINEDUNBLOCK. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 22:05, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]