User talk:BodhiHarp

Speedy deletion nomination of Dotted I with curve at bottom

[edit]

Hello BodhiHarp,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dotted I with curve at bottom for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Dotted I with curve at bottom to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

C F A 02:30, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I created the article because the Dotted I with curve at bottom links to Dotted I with curve at bottom which doesn't exist instead Draft:Dotted I curve at bottom exists I don't know how to rename so anyone can easily view it from any Cyrillic page on the right side BodhiHarp (talk) 02:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ra (Cyrillic) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Ra (Cyrillic). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 07:04, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ra (Cyrillic) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ra (Cyrillic) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ra (Cyrillic) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Remsense ‥  19:38, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Ra (Cyrillic), is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Remsense ‥  19:48, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Remsense ‥  21:06, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

[edit]

You have been unblocked. Apologies for the confusion. Happy editing, voorts (talk/contributions) 19:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Small capital reversed R (March 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Flat Out (talk) 05:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How much references do I need to show that the subject may qualify for a dedicated Wikipedia article? BodhiHarp (talk) 20:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voiceless linguolabial nasal moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Voiceless linguolabial nasal. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Please provide sources for the information in the article as per WP:VERIFY.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 TT me 12:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of drafts

[edit]

I see that you are working on multiple related drafts, including Draft:Small capital reversed R, that have obstacles to becoming articles. Several sources there appear to be WP:User generated, and others may be insufficient for showing general notability. Some of the other drafts have not started referencing at all. Magazines, newspapers, and books are often useful. WeyerStudentOfAgrippa (talk) 20:29, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Ca was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I'm sorry, but a sound used in zero languages is not an encyclopedic topic.
Ca talk to me! 12:45, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, BodhiHarp! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ca talk to me! 12:45, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @BodhiHarp, I saw your post on the AfC help desk. I rejected your article since I believed it had little potential to be expanded beyond its current state. As of writing, the draft only details the diacritics symbols used in its notation and contains virtually no information about the sound itself. If you can find coverage on reliable sources specifically discussing this sound in disordered speech, I will be happy to un-reject your draft. Ca talk to me! 03:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see that the upper-pharyngeal plosive articles are sounds also not found in any real-world languages. While I argue that they have more substantial coverage than the voiceless linguolabial nasal, I will un-reject your draft for the sake of fairness. Ca talk to me! 03:45, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 06:46, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]